seminar ‘social impact...

KULIAH 5 SIA CASE STUDIES & EXPERIENCES

SIA????

Oleh :

TPr HERLINA AB AZIZ(LPBM A0302, MSIA 0013, DOE Reg SS0683)

Presiden MSIA

SEMINAR

‘SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT’Praktis Penyediaan SIA dan Amalan

Terbaik

PERTUBUHAN PENILAIAN IMPAK SOSIAL

MALAYSIA @ MALAYSIAN ASSOCIATION OF

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESMENT

7 Oktober 2019

Dewan Utama Majlis Perbandaran Dungun

Contohnya

………

KANDUNGAN KERTAS PEMBENTANGAN

1. SIA DAN MANUSIA

2. LATAR BELAKANG PRAKTIS SIA DI MALAYSIA

3. PERTUBUHAN MSIA DAN PRAKTIS SIA

4. CONTOH-CONTOH PENYEDIAAN SIA UNTUK PELBAGAI KATEGORI PROJEK

4. WAY

FORWARD

PRAKTIS

PENYEDIAAN

SIA

MANUSIA…Ar-Rahman (55:7-9)

“Dan langit telah ditinggikanNya dan di ciptakan keseimbangan, agar kamu jangan

merusak keseimbangan itu, dan tegakkanlah keseimbangan itu dengan adil dan

janganlah kamu mengurangi keseimbangan itu”

LINGKUNGAN PENGARUH SOSIALDALAM KEHIDUPAN MANUSIA

1

2

3

45

6

7Keluarga &

Masyarakat

Interaksi Antara Pelbagai Pemboleh ubah sosial

Individu & Keperluan Diri

Persekitaran

Pekerjaan & Sosio-

ekonomi

Persekitaran

Tempat Tinggal Hidupan flora

dan fauna

Kemudahan dan

Infrastruktur, Trafik Rekreasi dan

Libur

TEORI HIERARKI KEPERLUAN MANUSIAOLEH MASLOW (1943)

Nota : Pemarkahan (Need Scoring) Hierarki Maslow ; 1 – keutamaan paling kurang,

5 – keutamaan paling tinggi

Sumber : Olahan dari

https://commons.m.Wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maslow_hierarchy_of_needs.jpeg.

wifiiphone

Plug point

..data top up

2019

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maslow_hierarchy

SIA DI MALAYSIA

SIA peruntukan

subseksyen

22(2A), Akta 172

Sustainability

Assessment

(SA) dalam RT

SIA dalam LCP

(TCPA 1972)

SIA sebagai

komponen Kajian

Kemungkinan

Pengenalan

SIA sebagai

komponen EIA

Pengenalan

SIA dalam RT

(awal 2000)

Social Impact Assessment (SIA) was formally discussed in Malaysia as a tool in social and landuse planning in the mid 1990s.

MALAYSIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESMENT (MSIA) @ PERTUBUHAN PENILAIAN IMPAK SOSIAL MALAYSIA

1. To promote the practice of social impactassessment in the formulation andimplementation of development and policyproposals at the national and internationallevels.

2. To promote participation in identifying socialimpacts of policies and projects andmeasures required in addressing them.

3. To promote the research and developmentof social impact assessment theory,methods and practices relevant toMalaysian society.

4. To promote and encourage a high standardof practice amongst members of thePertubuhan and others using social impactassessment methods, in accordance withthe Code of Ethics.

7

5. To undertake or encourage initiatives,consistent with the other objects, powersand resources of the Pertubuhan, topromote or advance the protection of thesocial environment.

6. To create a resource network for socialimpact assessment.

7. To facilitate the improvement of the qualityand standard of professionalism ofpractitioners.

8. To provide a platform/forum forinterdisciplinary integration of social impactassessment practitioners.

9. To professionalise social impactassessment.

Objective of MSIA

Incorporated in 2005

KULIAH 5 SIA CASE STUDIES & EXPERIENCES 2

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SIA)

STUDY for :

CASE

STUDY

ACTIVITIES

1 Airport – SIA For Purpose of EIA

2 Housing – Kebenaran Merancang (Below 100ha)

Before Manual

3 Drainage And Irrigation – Semenanjung

Malaysia

4 Drainage And Irrigation – Sabah

5 Housing – Category 2 As Per Manual SIA

6 Highway – Category 1 As Per Manual SIA


AIRPORT :SIA Study for LCCT & Associated Facilities,

KLIA


Key Issues in

the Social

Impact

Assessment of

Airport

Development :

1. Aircraft Over

flight Noise and

Impact on Property Values

2. Safety Issues

ZOI Determining Factors:

• Distance from project site.

• Flight path (risks and noise zone).

• Direct and indirectly impacted group.

• Physical barrier.


DISTRICT MUKIMNOISE ZONE 60 dBA AREA (ha.)

Kuala

Langat

Tg. Dua

Belas II 301.18

Sepang Sepang 497.18

Labu 433.31

TOTAL 1,231.67

Area Affected With Aircraft

Noise Zone


Area Affected With Public Safety

Zone (Outer and Inner PSZ).

DISTRICT MUKIM

PUBLIC SAFETY

ZONE AREA

(ha.)Kuala

Langat

Tg. Dua

Belas II 6.80

Sepang Sepang 172.97

Labu 80.9

TOTAL 260.67


0

Positive Impacts from KLIA as Perceived By The Study Area Communities.CATEGORY OF IMPACT

TYPE OF IMPACT

LOCATION(DISTRICT)

MAGNITUDE OF POSITIVE IMPACTS

EVALUATION / COMMENT

Housing, Public Services, Amenities, Transport And Accessibility

Better access to urban areas due to better road networks within their

vicinity

Sepang Low

• Though located in close vicinity to KLIA, the main KLIA gateways and job locations are more accessible from Kuala Langat.

• No direct access currently available from the southern and western side of KLIA (Mukim Sepang) to KLIA.

• Most KLIA gateways are more accessible from

Kuala Langat District. This indirectly contributes to higher accessibility of the study area.

Kuala Langat

High

Better air transport -budget-traveling facility offered by LCCT.

Sepang High• The said benefits do not confined to only the

surrounding areas, but spread through the whole state, region and nation. Kuala

LangatHigh

Socio-Physiolo-gical Conditions

Increase in kampongs’ population (transient and permanent) from the immigration of KLIA workforce.

Sepang Medium

• In migration population are mainly to areas where planned housing are provided.

• Increase in stronger purchasing power population indirectly gives positive impact to commercial activities within Sepang and Sg. Pelek towns.

• Taman Langat Murni and Kota Warisan are among the favourite choice for living by KLIA airport workforce and airlines crew on temporary/short term basis.

Kuala Langat

High


Negative Impacts from KLIA as Perceived By The Study Area Communities.

CATEGORY OF IMPACT

DETAILS OF SOCIAL IMPACT

LOCATION(DISTRICT)

MAGNITUDE OF NEGATIVE

IMPACTSEVALUATION / COMMENT

ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, INCOME AND EMPLOYMENT

Land value within ZOI

Airport land use and activity controls and impact on economic opportunities and property values

Sepang Medium

• Decrease of land value due to airportconstraint on future developmentimposed on their land by the LocalAuthorities.

• Despite the land use control, there areseveral committed developmentsproposed within the impacted villages inKuala Langat.

• The development pressure has resulted toLocal Authorities being concern of theneed to review the guidelines which isbeing imposed based on the 1993 noiseand fatality risks zone.

Kuala Langat

Medium

1

1

Kampongs natural expansion

Being the airport buffer zones, most villages are only zoned for agriculture.

Sepang Medium

• Due to the land use zoning, mostkampongs are left with no futuredevelopment areas allocated for theirfuture generations.

• Their concern of unjust for being leftbehind and unable to grow in tandemwith the surroundings due todevelopment limitation enforced.

Kuala Langat

Medium


Managing Social Impacts During LCCT Development And Operation.

ISSUES STAGE RECOMMENDED MITIGATING MEASURE

1Low awareness level -

fear of uncertainties

may lead to rejection

and resistance.

Planning

Operation

• Series of public relation work to disseminate

proper information and negative impact

mitigating measures to be carried out.

1

2

2Public awareness of

risks - lack certain

information about risks

and hazards.

Planning

Operation

• Need programs and fixed venues to disburse

information on nature of flight in the vicinity of

KLIA; airport operational requirement, major

cause of accidents, its location and emergency

evacuation procedures.

3Restriction and

constraints to landuse

within risk zones

Planning

Operation

• Proper advise to stakeholders on the guidelines

rational for safe and efficient operation of KLIA

• Amendment to Local Plan to accommodate new

guideline based on the new contour of noise and

risks

4Water, noise and dust

from construction

activities

Construc-

tion

• Developer to take all environmental monitoring

measures during construction-noise, mud flood,

safety treat and dust from traffics using kampongs

roads.


ISSUES STAGE RECOMMENDED MITIGATING MEASURE

5Influx of foreign workers

- Increase of crime,

conflicts on cultural

values sensitivities

Construction

&

Operation

• To enhance security level, provide workers housing

(construction and KLIA contract workers) and to

monitor their activities at all time. Proper briefing to

foreign workers on local values and sensitivities.

1

3

6Most jobs and business

opportunities not

offered to locals and

local companies.

Construction

&

Operation

• Priorities to competent local companies in

construction jobs related to LCCT, priorities to local

components and materials and job opportunities to

local workers with specific required skills and

background.

7

Changes to income

from economic loss –-

decrease in plantation

productivity, limitation

to swiftlet birdnest

industry, open burning

Operation

• Related studies/ research on agriculture to verify

the claims of the locals (were also being raised

within the SIA KLIA 2003)

8

Increase in population -

pressure to existing

public facilities,

amenities,

infrastructures. Locals

need for kampung

natural growth

expansion areas

Operation

• Assessment of demand and supply need to be

prepared in the Action Plan Study (RKK).

• Kampong expansion to cater the need for natural

growth of living quarters within the acceptable

density, infra, amenities/ support sectors to ensure

high quality of life within the constraint area.


Amalan Terbaik

• Projek digerakkan oleh Kerajaan Negeri

• Penglibatan masyarakat dari awal

• Simulasi dan teknologi digunakan dalam

penentuan kawasan impak di peringkat

awal

• Sebagai tool dalam penentuan strategi

negeri dan kawalan pembangunan PBT di

sekitar lapangan terbang


Housing

SS 15, 16, 17, 19, 12, 18,14

Commercial

Subang Parade, Subang Jaya Carrefour, Wisma

Consplant 1 & 2, Antah Holdings, Mesiniaga,

Subang Jaya Medical Centre

Hotel

Sheraton Subang Hotel and Holiday Villa Hotel

Industrial Area

Temasya Industrial Area

Educational Facilities

Primary and Secondary School of SS 17 and /

SMA

Institutional Buildings / Transportation

KTMB Commuter, Community Facilities

Complex, Petaling District Office Complex

Recreational Areas :

Subang Ria Recreational Park and Kelab Golf

Negara Subang

HOUSING :SIA Study For Mixed Use Development


GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT :

Project located in Subang Jaya– proposed MIXED DEVELOPMENT.

➢ Offices, shopping centres

➢ Integrated Transportation Terminal

➢ A 205-unit service apartment.

➢ Circulation system and pedestrianfacilities.

Since traffic impact is

projected as one of the main

impact of the development

to its surroundings, a Traffic

Impact Assessment Study is

also prepared

1

5


QUESTIONNAIRES SURVEY DESIGNS & ANALYSIS METHODS :

One-to-one interviews are carried out in a questionnaire survey to stake holders/surroundingcommunities of project Zone of Impact (ZOI) within Bandar Subang Jaya, with priorities given to

residents and users of 500 meter from site, and to cover development within 1.5 kilometer

radius.

Distribution of samples

was done by giving

higher percentage of

samples to the most

directly affected

target group based

on ZOI coverage. The

highest percentages

of samples are given

to the residents target

group followed with

KTM Commuter and

commercial users,given due to their

close vicinity to the

proposed site.

Content of Questionnaires Survey :

Section A : Respondent Background Information

Section B : Respondent’s Level Of Understanding Of The Project

Section C : Existing Problems At The Vicinity Of The Proposed Project

Section D: Perception and Level Of Acceptance On The Proposed Project

Analysis Methods :

▪ Scenarios analysis

▪ Fitted empirical-similar

past

▪ Record of previous

experiences

▪ Expert knowledge/

judgement

▪ Field research ; interviews

1

6


Shophouses –2 Samples


SS15 -19 Samples

SS15 -19 Samples

SS17-19 Samples

SS17-19 Samples

SS16 -20 Samples

SS16 -20 Samples

Subang Parade –10 Samples

Subang Parade –10 Samples

Carrefour -10 SamplesCarrefour -

10 Samples

Tapak Cadangan

Pembangunan

Tapak Cadangan

Pembangunan

SS16Commuter Station -

50 samples

SS16Commuter Station -

50 samples

SS19 -10 Samples

SS19 -10 Samples

Shophouses-2 Samples

Pejabat Tanah dan Daerah Petaling –

18 Samples

Pejabat Tanah dan Daerah Petaling –

18 Samples

Mesiniaga –4 samples

Mesiniaga –4 samples

Shophouses -2 Samples



OVERALL QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY SAMPLES

DISTRIBUTION


IMPACTS EXPECTED BASED ON OTHER SIMILAR EXPERIENCES :

POSSIBLE POSITIVE IMPACTS

Increase job opportunities and more active

business opportunities.

Enhance the attractions of Town Centre toshoppers

Offers more variety on shopping choices andmore facilities for the shoppers.

Increase rental value of business lots and the

value of surrounding lands.

Offers easy access to residency / workplace /business premise / with the availability of the

Integrated Public Transportation

Increase the level of public transportation withthe provision of Integrated Transportation

Terminal (Commuter, Bus, Taxi).

Offers more parking spaces to shoppers,commuter users and users of other public

transportation.

1

8

POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS

Noise pollution from construction activities andincrease of heavy vehicles traffic movement

Air pollution from construction activities andincrease of heavy vehicles traffic movement

Water pollution from construction workersdomestic waste which silt into the township

drainage system.

Road are dirtied from soil and construction

material which spilled from constructions lorries

Traffic congestion due to the disturbancescaused by construction activities on the town

traffic flow including those cause by movement

of heavy vehicles.

Diversion of traffic due to road closure andproblems with loading and unloading of goods

Degrading of surrounding land values / thedecrease of business rental rate


OVERALL FINDINGS OF SOCIAL SURVEY :

Level Of Acceptance Of The Project After

Receiving A Project's Brief.

INITIAL LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE OVERALL %(-1) No Comment 7 3.52(0) Disagree 18 9.05(1) Agree Slightly 21 10.55

(2) Agree Moderately 33 16.58(3) Agree 67 33.67(4) Strongly Agree 41 20.60(5) Extremely Agree 12 6.03

Total 199 100.00

The Possibility Of Acceptance To The Project

Development If The Developer Takes All

Measures To Reduce The Negative Effect

ACCEPTANCE AFTER MEASURES TAKEN OVERALL %(-1) No Comment 5 2.53

(0) Disagree 20 10.10(1) Agree Slightly 16 8.08

(2) Agree Moderately & With Condition 40 20.20

(3) Agree 54 27.27(4) Strongly Agree 47 23.74(5) Extremely Agree 16 8.08Total 199 100.00

Residents

Negative impacts perceived by

residents during construction aremainly traffic congestions, diversion of

traffic, threat to users’ safety, air

pollution and dirt on existing road by

the construction activities.

More negative impacts are expected

after completion, i.e. :▪ Increase of traffic volume and the

problem of traffic congestion

▪ Lack of parking space

▪ Increase of noise pollution

▪ Increase of crime rates and social

problems

1

9


OVERALL FINDINGS OF SOCIAL SURVEY (cont.) :

Commercial Users

Main concern during construction :

▪ Traffic congestions

▪ Existing dirty road

▪ Threat to users’ safety

▪ Diversion of traffic

▪ Increase of business competition

Main concern after completion :

▪ Increase of heat on surrounding areas.

▪ Increase of crime rates and social problems

▪ Increase of traffic volume and the problem of traffic

congestion

KTM Commuter Users

Main concern are:

▪ Traffic congestion

▪ Difficulties to use commuter services dueto lack of parking spaces

▪ Air pollution

▪ The increase number of commuter userwhich would cause discomfort to many.

▪ Threat to safety of the commuter users

▪ Difficulties to use commuter services dueto the closure of pedestrian walkway.

Office Users

During construction, the respondents are expecting

some negative impacts such as air and noise pollution,

while during operation, increase in traffic volume and

lack of parking spaces are some of the issues they fear

of.

2

0


IMPACT EVALUATION :Positive Impacts

Public Transportation

• Traveling using railway transportation

will be faster, more comfortable and

convenient as KTM commuter will be

directly connected to bus/taxi and

LRT services.

• The new development will offer more

variety on shopping choices and

more convenient facilities for the

shoppers.

Urban Economics

• Increase in job and business

opportunities

• Variety of comfortable, accessible

and interesting shopping choices

• Provision of more parking spaces to

resolve current limited supply issues

Adverse Impacts

TYPE OF ADVERSE IMPACTS TIME OF

OCCURANCE

Traffic congestion due to the

disturbances caused by

construction activities on the town

traffic flow including traffic

diversions.

During

construction

Difficulties to use commuter

services due to lack of parking

spaces.

Pollution generated from

construction activities

The increase number of commuter

user which would cause discomfort

to many.

Increase of business competition

After

completion

and during

operation

Increase of heat on surrounding

areas.

Increase of crime rates and social

problems

Increase of traffic volume and the

problem of traffic congestion

2

1


ADVERSE IMPACTS AND ITS MITIGATING MEASURES :TYPE OF ADVERSE IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES

Low awareness level among

public on project

Public needs to be addressed by project proponent, since fear of

uncertainties may miss-lead publics to greater rejection and

resistance. Series of public relation work can be initiated to

address public concerns and to uplift company’s image and to

disseminate proper information and measures on mitigating

adverse impact to public.

2

2

Increase of heat on surrounding

areas.

Increase in heat need to be mitigated with various ways, through

design, material used and soft treatments such as increase in open

spaces and greens, either in the form of ground level or roof top

open spaces. Such need have to be accommodated in the

design


services due to lack of parking

spaces.

To provide ample car parks, both for the need of development

and for the purpose of ‘park and ride’.

The increase number of

commuter user which would

cause discomfort to many.

Increase on number of commuter users may cause discomfort if

the current facilities are being used. In this case, a new integrated

transport terminal will be constructed and planned together within the public transport network.


services due to the closure of

pedestrian walkway.

Construction site planning should be prepared to include the need

of pedestrian passage to the existing KTM Commuter station.


Amalan Terbaik

• Projek digerakkan oleh PBT

• Penglibatan masyarakat dari pelbagai

strata

• Pendekatan mengumpul feedback

masyarakat bandar

• Sebagai tool dalam perancangan tapak

kebenaran merancang yang kompleks

termasuk pertimbangan isu setempat


THAILANDFelda Mata Air

MARA Institute of Workmanship

Bkt ManekForest Reserve

Rehabilitations Centers(PUSPEN)

Kg. Batu 9

TerinaiKg. Guar Jentik

Padang Besar

Kg.Tasoh

Kg. Bukit Manik

Kg. Pelarit

Kg. Masjid

Department ofAgriculture

Felda Rimba Mas

To ArauTo Ulu Pauh

Jalan Guar Jentik

To Satun / Wang Kelian

Malaysia Universityof Perlis (UniMap)`

Felda Lubok SirehQuarters

Jala

nK

aki B

ukit

Kg. Sahabat

Kg. LembauBiak

Kg. Kubang Tiga

Kg. Wang Mu

Kg. Chantek

Kg. Ayer Timbul

Kg. Medang Gatal

Kg. Darat

Kg. Nyatoh

Kg. Padang Malau

Kg. Baharu

Kg. Belukar

Timah Tasoh Dam

To Hatyai

Kaki Bukit

Bukit Air

Timah TasohResort

And Retreat

TasohPLKN Camp

1 km

2.5 km

5 km

Kg. Aman

Kg. Bkt. Chabang

500 m250 m

Housing

Agriculture

Industrial

Water Body

Sport and Recreational

Forest

Vacant Land

Road

Railway

LEGEND

Public Facilities

Zone Of Impact 250m-5km

Settlements

LIST OF VILLAGES WITHIN THE ZONE OF IMPACT (ZOI) AREA

SETTLEMENTDISTANCE FROM DAM

< 1 km 1 - 2 km 3 - 5 km

Kg. Tasoh /

Kg. Bkt Chabang /

Kg. Sahabat /

Kg. Guar Jentik /

Kg. Lembau Biak /

Kg. Wang Mu /

Kg. Pelarit /

Kg. Aman /

Kg. Masjid /

Kg. Chantek /

Kg. Nyatoh /

Kg. Baharu /

Kg. Kubang Tiga /

Kg. Belukar /

Kg. Ayer Timbul /

Kg. Darat /

Location of Affected Users to Project Site.

DRAINAGE & IRRIGATION :SIA Study for Timah Tasoh Dam, Perlis


Scale Of Impact VillagesNo. of Houses

(Unit)Population

(Person)Surveyed (person)

Directly Impact

Kg. Tasoh 130 650 66

Kg. Sahabat 15 75 22

Kg. Bkt Chabang 13 65 10

Sub-Total 158* 790 98

Indirect Impact

Kg. Guar Jentik

543 2,714**

6

Kg. Bukit Manek 3

Beseri Jaya 3

Kg. Aman 6

Kg. Padang Rati 1

Bukit Keteri 1

Kg. Semadang 1

Taman Melati Indah 1

Kaki Bukit 16

Kg. Belukar 2

Seri Berangan 1

Simpang Empat 1

Kg. Darat 1

Kg. Alor Kangar 8

Sub-Total 543 2,714 51

Grand Total 701 3,504 149

Note:

* Based on house counting on site

** Assumed number based on Mukim

population figures and data from

Penghulu Mukim.

Zone of Impact (ZOI):

• Directly impacted zone :

Inundated areas; 0 – 1 km

circumference.

➢ Approx.158 households @

790 population.

➢ Sample size = 80% / 126

➢ Surveyed = 77.8% / 98

respondents.

• Indirectly impacted zone :

Areas within 5 km-

circumference from the site.

➢ Approx. 543 households @

2,714 population.

➢ Sample size = 6% / 32

respondents

➢ Surveyed = 51 respondents.


INUNDATED AREA IMPACTED GROUP RESPONDENTS PROFILE :

▪ On home and land ownerships, almost 95% of the directly impacted group owned their

house and land.

▪ A total of 40 farmers in the direct impacted group - 80% of them owned their farmland,

which are mainly located within their village compound.

PUBLIC DIALOGUES :

Among the matters arising are :

▪ Fears of getting unfair / unexpected

compensation.

▪ Fears of threat to residents’ safety from heavy

vehicular traffic, since there was a similar fatal

accident recorded within the vicinity.

▪ Fears of forgoing the 46 years old leased land

(no land title) near the dam without

compensation is highlighted.

FEEDBACKS FROM PLKN CAMP

AND TASOH LAKE RESORT AND

RETREAT :

▪ PLKN: the rising of the dam will affect

the whole camp and its operation -

deepen the dam.

▪ TLR: only some current temporary

structure built next the water edge

will be affected - adverse impact will

be minimal, and welcomed the

project.

2

5


POSSIBLE IMPACTS -

DURING CONSTRUCTION (Directly Impacted Group @ 0 – 1km circumference)

POSSIBLE POSITIVE

IMPACTSPOSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS

Moderate Effect:

✓Increase land value and

surrounding image.

✓Road upgrading.

Moderate Effect:

×Effect to health/hygiene from water pollution.

A Lot of Effect:

✓Decrease of flood

occurrence.

✓Increased job

opportunities.

A Lot of Effect:

×Land acquisition/ house/ orchard as dam area.

×Water pollution from construction activities.

×Decreased land value.

Extreme Effect:

×Resettlement of local population and communities.

×Threat to daily activities.

×Noise and air pollution from construction activities and heavy

vehicles traffic movement.

×Threat to residents safety such as the presence of foreign workers,

and the increase of heavy vehicles on road.

×Effect to health/hygiene with presence of foreign workers or from

dust/surrounding.

×Safety risks to the locals should the dam collapsed.


RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES –

DURING CONSTRUCTION

ADVERSE

IMPACTMITIGATING MEASURES PROPOSED

Health and Safety

• Safety risks -

dam

collapsed.

✓ impacted group need to be well informed on the

probable occurence of dam collapse incidence and

measures to take, if the incidence do occur.

• Foreign

workers -

residents

safety and

effect to

health/

hygiene.

✓ managed properly the foreign workers.

✓ housed them within the workers’ housing.

✓ provided facilities within their temporary housing

area.

✓ supervised and controlled their activities 24 hours.

• Increase of

traffic

movement

• Raising of

public road

diversion/

closure

✓ manage construction activities to avoid any

complications with public.

✓ dedicated construction routes are to be provided to

avoid conflicts.

✓ public announcements.

✓ clear signages.

• Water

pollution.

✓ provide silt trap on water discharging points into

public drains.

✓ provide proper system for wastes water from

construction workers’ dwelling facilities.



DURING CONSTRUCTION

ADVERSE

IMPACTMITIGATING MEASURES PROPOSED

Socio-Economic Implication

• Decrease

land value

✓ series of public engagement, awareness and CSR

programs to be conducted by DID.

✓ project coverage, phasing and other details – display

for viewing by stakeholders.

• Social

acceptability

✓ follow-up social surveys.

✓ a complaints register - provide in the site office.

• Economic

opportunities

✓ consider to employing local labour/ workforce in the

project/ giving contract to local contractors.

• Land

acquisition

and

resettlement

of local

population

and

communities

✓ resettlement – is vital before the water raise to the

critical level.

✓ any options on the relocation program need to be

clearly discussed and information to be disseminated

clearly.

✓ options for voicing out opinions and complaints need to

be provided, and the process/ compensation amount to

be transparent and documented.

✓ project phasing – to minimise conflicts on local

population.

✓ acquisition details are also to be agreed by both

parties.

Awareness Program – to the surrounding communities.


POSSIBLE IMPACTS -

DURING OPERATION (Directly Impacted Group @ 0 – 1km circumference)

POSSIBLE POSITIVE IMPACTS POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS

Moderate Effect:

✓Improve the quality and level of clean water supply

system.

✓Decreased of flooding area.

✓Increased job opportunities.

✓Increased surrounding image.

✓Improved and developed tourism and recreational

activities at dam area.

✓Road upgrading.

✓Increase crop productivities by sufficient drainage.

Moderate Effect:

×Decreased catch of fresh water

fishes from the river system.

×Decreased water quantity and

quality for daily use.

×Decreased land value.

×Exposure to the flood risk.

Extreme Effect:

✓Improved quality of life at resettlement area.

A Lot of Effect:

×Threat to daily activities from

project development (and land use

control).

×Safety risks to the locals should

the dam collapsed.



DURING OPERATION

Small scale aquaculture activities.

Release water from dam into river system – to

maintain its current level.

ADVERSE

IMPACT MITIGATING MEASURES PROPOSED

Health and Safety

• Safety risks to

the locals

✓ impacted group need to be well informed

on the probable occurrence of flood

incidence, safety of dyke and measures

to take, if the incidence do occur

(Emergency Action Plan).

• Expose to the

flood risk by

amount of

water

discharge

✓ consider the impact of water released into

Sg. Korok.

✓ proposed a diversion channel as

additional withdrawal outlet of the Timah

Tasoh Dam.

Socio-Economic Implication

• Threat to daily

activities

✓ low impact activities = eco-tourism and

small scale aquaculture / fishing to be

allowed to minimise social impact.

• Decreased

catch of fresh

water fish,

water quantity

and quality.

✓ ensuring water level in the rivers

downstream are maintained at its current

level.


RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES

RESETTLEMENT

▪ As FINAL OPTION to mitigate impact resulted from the project. The project proponent

should also consider the option since safety and security of the impacted community

cannot be denied and sacrificed.

▪ If the project proponent decided not to resettle the directly impacted population, they

should assure ample actions and mitigating measures be taken to avoid safety

risks which may resulted to severe loss of life.

▪ Resettlement on best possible site selected will cater for minimum negative

impacts on land use and social needs.

▪ On land acquisition, compensation must

reflect market rates, while resettlement must

take into account equivalent “quality of life”

values as well as land and building equivalents.

▪ Lands and settlements adjacent to the dam

periphery will have to be protected or

acquired, if the levels of their locations are the

same as or below the new normal pool water

level of the dam.

3

1


Amalan Terbaik

• Projek digerakkan oleh Jabatan /

Agensi

• Pertimbangan mitigasi fizikal atau

kemanusiaan?

• Kesiapsiagaan bencana melalui

simulasi kejuruteraan

• Pertimbangan perpindahan penduduk


1

Figure 1.0

Legend :

Zone of Impact (ZOI)

- within 1kilometer to 10 kilometers radius

from proposed dam site.

Location Map

D07

D11

D10

D13

Kilometers

Stamping

Radius Distance From Site

Directly Impacted Area

Indirectly Impacted Area

5-10km0-5km

DRAINAGE &

IRRIGATION :SIA Study for Kota Marudu Dam Development


Figure 2.0

Legend :

Zone of Impact – D07 (Torintidon)






5-10km0-5km

D07

Gontoi`

Pampang Poring

Lambada

Rugading Baru`

Pandawar

Nangko / Tabaliung

KM

Stamping


4

Dam Overview Findings / Projected Impact

D07

i. Two villages found within 2-4 kilometerfrom the D7 project dam site that is Kg.Torintidon and Kg. Stamping.

ii. The areas populate by approximately 150peoples residing in not more that 30houses.

iii. Most of the houses within the area are ofraised floor semi-permanent andtemporary type (made of rumbia andnipah leaves place on a wooden frame).

iv. Population in D7 is mainly of Kadusethnic.

v. Although sited very close to the site, thevillage are located at higher altitude, andmost possible not be affected by the daminundation if the dam is to be sited at thislocation.

vi. The village is only accessible via dirttrack.

i. No population expected on proposed dam site ofD7:Torintidon.

ii. Prefered site based on social implication compared to D13 :Marak-Parak and D11: Kotud.

iii. Impacts need to be evaluated among others will be :

▪ Agriculture land acquisition may be required for daminundation.

▪ Impact on the downstreams such as Kg. Lambada, Kg.Rugading, Kg. Sorosop and other surrounding areas need tobe assess particularly on the possible change tosurroundings resulted implication of dams to volume ofwater in Sg. Bandau.

▪ Impact on Tagal System implemented on Sg. Bandau.

▪ Implication of dams construction to ground water and soilstability of the surrounding villages in particular thoseresiding the hillslopes such as Kg. Stumping and Kg.Torintidon.

▪ Impact to the down stream villages in the instance of dambreak occurrence.

▪ Impact on the accessibility of Kg. Guntoi and Kg. PampangPoring at the upstreams which currently rely on the Kg.Torintidon dirt track.


Figure 5.0

Legend :

Zone of Impact – D13 (Marak Parak)



Location Map

`

Pangapuyan Baru

Tangkol

Bambangan/Kulangi

KiasMalangkap

Laut`

Tandahawon

Malangkap Tengah

Surun Surun

D13

KM




5-10km0-5km


6

Dam Overview Findings / Projected Impact

D13

i. Kg. Sorinsim located on D13 housesapproximately 40 houses while Kg. MarakParak sited less than 5 kilometers from sitereside larger population and more than 100houses.

ii. Major ethnic group within the 5 kilometer isof Kadus.

iii. Economic activities within the areas areagriculture, fisheries and services.

iv. Tertiary economic activity such as retailexpected within the area as the area hassignificant population size.

v. Both Kg. Sorinsim and Marak Parak areaccess via Kota Marudu – Kinabalu Park Roadwhich traverse within the study area andbeing the main access to the area from KotaMarudu town.

vi. Most houses in this area are permanenthouses. There are also many communityfacilities provided within the area such ashalls, rural clinics and churches.

i. Approximately 131 people will be affected with theinundation of dam, therefore direct impact will be critical.

ii. Settlement, houses and agriculture land acquisition maybe required for dam inundation.

iii. High adverse direct impact expected on existingpopulation due to the current settlement profile.

iv. The least preferred site based on social implication

v. Impacts to be evaluated among others will be :

▪ Affect of the downstreams such as Kg. PangapuyanBaru, Tangkoi, Pompodon, Sonsui and other lowercatchments need to be assessed in particularly due toimplication of dams to volume of water in Sg. Sorinsim.

▪ Implication of dams construction to ground water andsoil stability of the surrounding villages such as Kg.Marak Parak, Kg. Kias and Kg. Malangkap.

▪ Impact to the down stream villages in the instance ofdam break occurrence.

▪ Impact on the accessibility of hinterland such as Kg.Malagkap Laut, Malangkap Tengah and KinabaluNational Park


Amalan Terbaik

• Projek digerakkan oleh Jabatan / Agensi

• Di gerakkan di peringkat kajian

kemungkinan untuk memilih tapak

terbaik sebelum perancangan tapak

terperinci

• Pertimbangan sosial diganding bersama

pertimbangan kejuruteraan dan

kewangan dalam penentuan opsyen

terpilih


• PENILAIAN IMPAK SOSIAL

• PERMOHONAN KEBENARAN MERANCANG BAGI PEMBANGUNAN BERCAMPUR SELUAS 619.00 HEKTAR

(1,529.58 EKAR), MUKIM TANJUNG DUA BELAS, DAERAH KUALA LANGAT,

SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN.

13 April 2017

MESYUARAT PANEL INTERIM PENILAIAN

IMPAK SOSIAL


KAJIAN SIA

Kajian SIA dimulakan pada Julai 2015 hingga Dec 2015 (6 bulan)

Kajian SIA dibuat pada dua (2) peringkat iaitu :

KAJIAN SIA MAKLUMAT PERMOHONAN STATUS

Peringkat 1:

SIA sebagai sebahagian

penyediaan Laporan DEIA,

di bawah Section 34A EQA

1974.

Tarikh Permohonan Dibuat : Dec 2015

Di teliti dan diulas oleh Panel SIA

Jabatan Alam Sekitar, Prof Datin Dr.

Asmah Ahmad

Lulus 10.2.2016

Peringkat 2:

SIA sebagai keperluan

Permohonan Kebenaran

Merancang

Tarikh Permohonan Dibuat : 17.2.2016

Telah dibentang kepada Jawatan

Kuasa Perancang Negeri

Pembentangan SIA

kepada Mesyuarat Panel

Interim Penilaian Impak

Sosial pada

13 April 2017. Lulus

dengan pindaan.

Penyediaan SIA Peringkat 2 menurut :

Manual Penilaian Impak Sosial Bagi Projek

Pembangunan Edisi Pertama, 2012


Amalan Terbaik1. Masyarakat Orang Asli memerlukan fokus yang berasingan daripada

komuniti lain.

2. Pemahaman yang jelas tentang kronologi dan perundangan perlu untuk

mempunyai perspektif yang tidak berat sebelah.

3. Isu-isu terdahulu yang membabitkan komuniti, yang belum selesai, boleh

mempengaruhi persepsi penduduk terhadap cadangan pembangunan

baru.

4. Penglibatan ketua-ketua masyarakat adalah penting untuk memastikan

pemahaman dan penerimaan penduduk tentang projek, terutamanya

selepas penglibatan awam diadakan.

5. Peri pentingnya penyimpanan rekod dan dokumentasi dengan rapi dan

baik. Contohnya, ketiadaan rekod telah menyukarkan pengenalpastian

lokasi kubur.

CASE STUDY 6….

CADANGAN JAJARAN PROJEK LEBUHRAYA PERSISIRAN

PANTAI BARAT (WCE) TAIPING-BANTING BAGI SEKSYEN 7

(ASSAM JAWA-TANJONG KARANG)

UntukLEMBAGA LEBUHRAYA MALAYSIA

Merujuk kepada “Manual Penilaian Impak Sosial Bagi Projek Pembangunan

(Edisi Ke-2), 2017”, kajian SIA bagi cadangan projek pembangunan Lebuh Raya

LPB adalah merupakan Kategori SIA 1

Kategori Jenis Pembangunan Ciri-Ciri Pembangunan

Infrastruktur Utama Negara

Lebuh raya ▪ Lebuh raya ekspres

(expressway)

▪ Lebuh raya (highway)

▪ Expressway dan highway adalah seperti yang mana klasifikasi oleh JKR dan

LLM – tidak termasuk jalan persekutuan dan jalan negeri yang menggunakan

nama “lebuh raya”

▪ Jalan hendaklah merentasi 2 negeri atau lebih

▪ Termasuk projek menaiktaraf yang melibatkan pengambilan balik tanah

CADANGAN LEBUH RAYA PESISIRAN PANTAI BARAT (LPB)

Maklumat Cadangan

Projek LPB

▪ Banting - Changkat

Jering/Taiping

▪ 233 kilometer

▪ 21 persimpangan

▪ Mula Ogos 2014

▪ Dijangka siap Ogos

2019

▪ Kawasan kajian SIA

10km dari Assam Jawa

- Tg. Karang Fasa dan Seksyen

Pelaksanaan Projek

Lebuh Raya Persisiran

Pantai Barat

Fasa Seksyen

1 3, 4, 5, 8 dan 9

2 1, 2, 6 dan 7

3 10 dan 11

4 12

52

PERIHAL TAPAK PROJEK Opsyen 1: Cadangan pembangunan jajaran

Lebuh Raya LPB asal yang bermula dari

Kampung Parit Serong hingga ke Persimpangan

Tanjong Karang; Kampung Dato’ Ahmad Razali.

Opsyen 2: Cadangan penaiktarafan jajaran

Jalan Persekutuan 5 yang berdekatan

dengan tapak Hospital Tanjong Karang

baru dengan struktur jejambat melalui

Pekan Tanjong Karang hingga ke

Persimpangan Tanjong Karang

PERIHAL DAN PERINCIAN CADANGAN JAJARAN OPSYEN 1

OPSYEN 1

Jajaran asal Seksyen 7 (dari

Persimpangan Bertingkat Assam

Jawa ke Persimpangan

Bertingkat Tg. Karang

Penyediaan sistem

jalan baru dan

“frontage road” bagi

mengekalkan sistem

jalan-jalan hubungan

Jalan - jalan utama masih

dikekalkan. Enam (6) buah

lintasan bagi mengekalkan

sistem jalan asal

Kerja menaiktaraf

jalan FR5 oleh JKR

Persimpangan bertingkat

Tg. Karang.

Kenderaan boleh masuk

keluar lebuhraya /FR5

Susur keluar/masuk Jln Kilang

Padi. Kenderaan dari Selatan

boleh keluar ke Pekan Tg.

Karang dan kenderaan dari Tg.

Karang boleh masuk lebuhraya

menuju Selatan.

17

PEMBAHAGIAN ZON PENGARUH JAJARAN OPSYEN 1

Zon Pengaruh Sekunder 2

Responden =1,271

Peratus Pencapaian =81.3%

Zon Pengaruh Sekunder 1

Responden = 307

Peratus Pencapaian =

65.0%

Zon Pengaruh Primer

Responden = 204

Peratus Pencapaian = 98.0%

Sumber: Kajian SIA Bagi Seksyen 7, Projek Lebuh Raya Persisiran Pantai Barat (2017).

KAEDAH PENILAIAN OPSYEN4

Penilaian impak positif makro dan

setempat

Penilaian Impak Negatif

Secara Pemarkahan

(Scoring)

Pandangan Pakar dan

Amalan Pengurusan

terbaik

Penilaian Impak

Kumulatif

1 32 4

IMPAK POSITIF MAKRO BERKEPENTINGAN NEGERI DAN NEGARA11

6Pengangkutan berat dan barangan yang

selamat antara pelabuhan

5Meningkatkan pembangunan Bandar Kuala

Selangor dan Tanjong Karang apabila

kemudahsampaiannya dapat dipertingkatkan

dengan rangkaian perhubungan terus yang

baik

8Pembangunan pelancongan di Daerah

Kuala Selangor akan terus berkembang

dengan connectivity terus ke Lapangan

Terbang Kuala Lumpur (KLIA) dan dari

pusat-pusat pelancongan seluruh negara

9Pembangunan hiliran pertanian dapat

diperkukuhkan dengan kemudahan

penghantaran keluar hasil Daerah

Agropolitan dan Jelapang Padi Negara

10Kepentingan awam mengatasi kepentingan

peribadi

11Pembangunan lebuhraya secara konsesi

yang mengurangkan beban kerajaan

1Perkhidmatan jarak jauh yang pantas dan

selamat antara konurbasi perbandaran negara

bagi pengguna-penguna rentas negeri iaitu

dari Koridor Lembah Klang/Selangor ke

Greater Kamunting Conurbation/utara Perak

iaitu Taiping

2Mengurangkan pergantungan kepada Jalan

Persekutuan 5 supaya ia dapat memberi

perkhidmatan kepada trafik dalaman secara

lebih efisien

4Merancakkan limpahan pembangunan dari

Wilayah Lembah Klang ke Daerah Kuala

Selangor dengan pembentukan koridor

pembangunan baru

7Mengurangkan kadar migrasi keluar

penduduk dari daerah-daerah luar bandar

dengan perjalanan yang lebih singkat ke

pusat-pusat ekonomi utama Lembah Klang

seterusnya meningkatkan taraf kualiti hidup

penduduk dan perkembangan ekonomi

setempat

3Pengagihan trafik jarak jauh dari Lebuhraya

Utara-Selatan khususnya di musim perayaan

untuk meningkatkan kelancaran trafik dan

mengurangkan masa perjalanan

RUMUSAN PENILAIAN IMPAK NEGATIF KESELURUHAN

KAEDAH PENENTUAN KEKETARAAN IMPAK DAN TAHAP RISIKO IMPAK PROJEK

1. Keketaraan Impak Keketaraan = Keterukan (S) x Keberangkalian (P)

Significance = Severity x Probability

Tahap Keterukan (S) Ciri-ciri

1 Impak Sosial

Kecil

1. Terhad di kawasan setempat, jangka masa yang pendek dengan impak yang tidak

ketara ke atas komuniti

2. Bilangan yang terjejas dalam komuniti adalah kecil

3. Tempoh impak dijangka berlaku untuk sekitar 3 bulan

2 Impak Sosial

Sederhana

1. Terhad di kawasan setempat, jangka masa yang pendek/panjang dengan impak

yang ketara ke atas komuniti

2. Menjejas komuniti dalam zon-zon primer dan sekunder hingga menyebabkan

ketegangan

3. Tempoh impak dijangka berlaku untuk sekitar 1 tahun

3 Impak Sosial

Tinggi

1. Kerosakan yang hebat, impak bagi tempoh masa sederhana dan panjang

2. Berkemungkinan tidak mematuhi perundangan

3. Menjejaskan komuniti tahap wilayah di luar zon sekunder

4. Tempoh masa impak dijangka berlaku untuk sehingga 2 tahun

4 Impak Sosial

Amat Tinggi

1. Kerosakan jangka panjang / memberi kesan kepada komuniti keseluruhannya

2. Mengakibatkan campur tangan perundangan

3. Memberi kesan kepada komuniti tahap wilayah luar zon sekunder

4. Tempoh masa impak dijangka berlaku melebihi 2 tahun dan menjadi sebahagian

impak kumulatif atau bertambah ganda

Tahap Keberangkalian (Probability)

1 Amat jarang berlaku

2 Jarang berlaku

3 Seringkali berlaku

4 Berlaku secara berterusan

Sumber : Olahan Manual Penilaian Impak Sosial Bagi

Projek Pembangunan (Edisi ke-2), JPBD Semenanjung

Malaysia 2017.

KAEDAH PENENTUAN KEKETARAAN IMPAK DAN TAHAP RISIKO IMPAK PROJEK

3. Tahap Risiko Impak dan Tindakan Untuk Impak Negatif

Rujuk m/s 5-7 di dalam laporan.

Penentu Tahap Risiko Impak Dan Tindakan

Kod warna Hijau Kuning Oren Merah Jambu Merah

Skor 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-59 60-80

Risko

Impak

Kurang ketara Ketara (prioriti

rendah)

Ketara (prioriti

sederhana)

Ketara (prioriti

tinggi)

Ketara (prioriti

sangat tinggi)

Tindakan

Untuk

Impak

Negatif

Mitigasi secara

pentadbiran

dan sokongan

Penambahbaik

an berterusan

atau langkah-

langkah

mitigasi dan

kawalan

Langkah-

langkah

pencegahan

dan mitigasi

Langkah-

langkah segera

pencegahan,

mitigasi dan

direkabentuk

semula

Tapak projek

dipindahkan

lokasi atau

direkabentuk

semula

Sumber : Olahan semula dan Manual Penilaian Impak Sosial Bagi Projek Pembangunan (Edisi ke-2), JPBD Semenanjung Malaysia 2017

Sumber : Manual Penilaian Impak Sosial Bagi Projek

Pembangunan (Edisi ke-2), JPBD Semenanjung

Malaysia 2017

64


A. Pemarkahan Mengikut Peringkat Projek

Fasa

Impak

/ Jenis

Impak

Semasa

Pembinaan

Semasa

Operasi

Opsye

n 1

Opsye

n 2

Opsye

n 1

Opsye

n 2

Positif 50% 20% 72% 33%

Negatif 50% 80% 28% 67%

Rumusan :

Jajaran di Opsyen 1 adalah jauh lebih baik

berbanding jajaran di Opsyen 2

berdasarkan impak positif yang

dimaksimakan dan impak negatif yang

diminimakan.

Purata Tahap Risiko Impak Setiap Opsyen

Mengikut Peringkat

Sumber: Kajian SIA Bagi Seksyen 7, Projek Lebuh Raya

Persisiran Pantai Barat (2017).

Opsyen 1Opsyen 2

Opsyen 1Opsyen 2

Rujuk m/s 5-7 di dalam laporan. Perincian seperti di m/s 5-8 hingga 5-11.


Opsyen

Keterukan

(Severity)

A

Keberangkalia

n (Probability)

B

Keketaraan

(Significance)

C = AXB

Hierarki

Maslow

Keutamaan

(Skor)

D

Risiko

Impak

(Risk

Rating)

E= CXD

Opsyen 1 34 54 99 64 352

Opsyen 2 46 60 155 69 596

Pemarkahan (Scoring) Risiko Impak Negatif Bagi Opsyen 1 dan Opsyen 2.

Rumusan :

1. Risiko impak bagi Opsyen 2 adalah sangat kritikal dan memerlukan cadangan

projek di jajaran ini di pindahkan ke lokasi lain.

2. Opsyen 2 merupakan opsyen yang TIDAK BOLEH DITERUSKAN (No-Go)

3. Opsyen 1 adalah opsyen yang lebih baik berbanding Opsyen 2, namun begitu

memerlukan langkah-langkah mitigasi bagi mengurangkan kesan negatif dari projek.

B. Pemarkahan Keseluruhan Projek Mengikut Option

Sumber: Kajian SIA Bagi Seksyen 7, Projek Lebuh Raya Persisiran Pantai Barat (2017).

66PANDANGAN PAKAR DAN AMALAN PENGURUSAN TERBAIK

Rujuk m/s 5-17 di dalam laporan

Penempatan semula

secara tidak rela

(involuntary

resettlement) mesti

dielakkan sebaik

mungkin.

Opsyen 1 melibatkan

penempatan penduduk kira-

kira 23 keluarga dan ini jauh

lebih rendah dari Opsyen 2 (69

keluarga)

Opsyen 2 melibatkan pihak

terjejas sangat ramai (sekurang-

kurangnya 510 hartanah)

berbanding hanya 164

hartanah di Opsyen 1. Ia juga

melibatkan kepentingan awam

seperti kemudahan

masyarakat, kawasan

perniagaan, pusat bandar dan

utiliti.

Bila mana

perpindahan keluar

penduduk terpaksa,

impak perlu

dikurangkan dengan

mengkaji pelbagai

alternatif/ pilihan lain

yang ada

Jajaran Opsyen 1 mempunyai

impak negatif kerana

melibatkan perpindahan keluar

penduduk namun berbanding

Opsyen 2, tahap keterukannya

boleh diterima.

Memindahkan jajaran

lebuhraya ke Opsyen 2 dari

Opsyen 1 sebagai alternatif

adalah tidak sesuai kerana

jumlah pihak terjejas akan

menjadi lebih ramai dan tahap

keterukan adalah jauh lebih

tinggi.

Amalan Terbaik OPSYEN 1 OPSYEN 2

Amalan Terbaik berasaskankepada Handbook on

Resettlement, A Guide to A good Practice, Asian

Development Bank

71RUMUSAN PIHAK TERJEJAS DENGAN PENGAMBILAN BALIK/GANGGUAN PENGGUNAAN MENGIKUT OPSYEN

Jadual A : Hartanah yang terlibat Dengan Pengambilan Balik

OPSYEN 1 OPSYEN 2

BilanganAnggaran Jumlah Yang

Terkesan

139 695 orang pekerja

pertanian

0 -

23 104 orang penduduk

0 -

2 30 orang pekerja

0 -

0 -

164

(24.3%)829 orang

Kategori Hartanah Terjejas

Tanah Pertanian

Kediaman Terancang

Kediaman Kampung

Perniagaan Terancang

(termasuk strata)

Perniagaan/Industri Tidak

Terancang

Stesyen minyak

Kemudahan Masyarakat

Jumlah

BilanganAnggaran Jumlah Yang

Terkesan


pertanian



260 1,300 orang pekerja


5 25 orang pekerja

21 Rujuk Jadual B

510

(75.7%)7,908 orang

829 orang 7,908 orangvs

RUMUSAN PIHAK TERJEJAS DENGAN PENGAMBILAN BALIK/GANGGUAN PENGGUNAAN MENGIKUT OPSYEN

Jenis KemudahanOpsyen 2

Bilangan Anggaran Jumlah Yang Terkesan

Sekolah 42,512 orang tenaga pengajar dan

pelajar

Hospital 1 234,521 jumlah penduduk daerah

Masjid / Surau 3 2,150 ahli kariah

Perkuburan Islam 1 1 kawasan perkuburan

Balai Polis 1 70 orang anggota

Institusi kewangan 6 60 orang pekerja

Pencawang telekomunikasi / PE 2 0

Agensi Kerajaan 3 30 orang kakitangan

Jumlah 21 (100%)4,822 orang terkesan langsung dan

234,521 terkesan secara tidak langsung

Jadual B : Kemudahan Masyarakat terlibat Dengan Pengambilan Balik Hartatanah

IMPAK KOS PAMPASAN HARTANAH MENGIKUT OPSYEN

Anggaran Nilai (RM)

6,100,000

2,400,000

3,250,000

870,000

12,620,000

OPSYEN 1

Nota

Nilai hartanah

berdasarkan harga kaki

persegi:

▪ Pertanian; RM5

▪ Kediaman; RM15

▪ Perdagangan; RM25

▪ Industri; RM15

▪ Institusi; RM5

40% daripada kos tanah

Kos ini melibatkan;

▪ Pampasan Bangunan

▪ Kerosakan Harta

▪ Perpindahan

▪ Sewa Sementara

▪ Lain-lain

Kos ini Melibatkan;

▪ Yuran Penilai

▪ Yuran Kehadiran

Perundingan

▪ Yuran Lain-lain

-

Anggaran Nilai (RM)

15,100,000

6,100,000

70,260,000

1,940,000

93,400,000

Jenis Kos

Tanah

Kesan Mudarat

Pampasan

Proses

Pengambilan

Balik Tanah

Jumlah

OPSYEN 2

PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK SOSIAL (SIMP)

PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK SOSIAL

Pelan Pengurusan Impak Sosial (SIMP) disediakan untuk opsyen terpilih, iaitu

Opsyen 1 yang melibatkan cadangan pembinaan LPB di jajaran baru untuk

menilai kejayaan pelaksanaan langkah mitigasi projek, tahap keterukan, outcome

yang dikehendaki, key performance indicator (KPI) dan kekerapan pemantauan

diperincikan berserta dengan agensi-agensi yang terlibat.

ImpakSosial Yang

Dikenalpasti

TahapRisiko Impak

Outcome Yang

Dikehendaki

LangkahPencegahanMitigasi dan

Adaptasi

KPI

PihakPelaksanaLangkahMitigasi

Langkah danTempoh

Pemantauan

PihakPemantau

TINDAKAN UTAMA PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK

SOSIAL

12

Mengukuhkan inklusi sosial

dengan memastikan golongan

terjejas dimasukkan kedalam arus

keuntungan (benefit stream) dan

mempunyai kesampaian kepada

peluang oleh projek.

4 RANGKA KERJA INKLUSI

SOSIAL

Memberi kekuatan kepada pemegang

taruh melalui penyertaan mereka dalam

rekabentuk dan pelaksanaan projek serta

akses kepada maklumat.

4 RANGKA KERJA PENYERTAAN

Mengukuhkan keselamatan dengan

meminima dan mengurus kesan risiko

sosial dan meningkatkan daya tahan pihak

berkepentingan dan orang perseorangan

yang terjejas kepada renjatan sosio-

ekonomi (socio-economic shock).

4 RANGKA KERJA PENGURUSAN

RISIKO

Membentuk Pasukan Khas

menangani isu pengambilalihan

tanah secara telus dan sesegera

mungkin

Tindakan : UPEN Negeri / JKPTG

dan diurusetia oleh Pejabat Tanah

dan Daerah Kuala Selangor

1

Mengadakan satu pejabat tapak

(dilengkapi dengan pameran dan

pegawai) untuk orang ramai

mendapatkan maklumat tepat.

Tindakan : Pemaju projek

2

Membentuk pasukan peguam

untuk membela nasib pihak terjejas

dengan kosnya ditanggung

bersama oleh pemaju projek dan

kerajaan negeri.

Tindakan : Jabatan Bantuan

Guaman Negeri Selangor

3

Menguruskan pekerja asing untuk

mencegah konflik yang mungkin

berlaku dengan masyarakat

setempat.


4

TINDAKAN UTAMA PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK

SOSIALRANGKAKERJA PENYERTAAN

4

Menyedia Pelan-pelan Pengurusan

Impak dan pematuhan syarat-

syarat termaktub

▪ Pelan Pengurusan Trafik

▪ Kajian Penilaian Impak Alam

Sekitar

▪ Pelan Pengurusan Alam Sekitar

▪ Pelan Kawalan Hakisan dan

Sedimen


1

Pemaju menyediakan 2 susur

keluar tambahan dari LPB di Jalan

Kilang Padi dan satu lagi susur

keluar ke Jalan Persekutuan 5

sebelum Pekan Tanjong Karang

untuk mengekalkan vitality Pusat

Bandar Tanjung Karang


2

Pemaju memastikan kelancaran

perjalanan penduduk dengan

membina jejantas-jejantas

merentasi LPB dari kawasan

perkampungan segera sebelum

pembinaan LPB dan menaiktaraf

jalan-jalan sambungan antara LPB

dan jalan persekutuan/negeri


3

Mengawal kesan pencemaran

bunyi dari LPB ke kawasan

persekitaran kampung yang tinggi

penduduk dengan meletakkan

penghadang bunyi.


4

TINDAKAN UTAMA PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK SOSIALRANGKAKERJA PENGURUSAN MIKRO

4

TINDAKAN UTAMA PELAN PENGURUSAN IMPAK SOSIAL

RANGKAKERJA INKLUSI SOSIAL

4

Pemberian pampasan setimpal

kepada pihak terjejas oleh pemaju

untuk semua bentuk kerugian

mengikut harga pasaran termasuk

kerugian potensi tanah masa

depan untuk menyegera

livelihood restoration

Tindakan : JKPTG

1

Kerajaan memberi peluang

kepada pihak terjejas dengan

pengambilan tanah memiliki

rumah sendiri dalam projek-projek

hartanah mampu milik seperti

projek Rumah Selangorku atau

Skim Myhome oleh Jabatan

Perumahan Negara.

Tindakan : PBN dan KPKT

2

PBT menzonkan sebahagian tanah

pertanian di antara bandar dan

LPB kepada zon pembangunan

masa depan untuk membolehkan

pemilik menukar syarat tanah

kepada tanah bangunan secara

teratur

Tindakan : MDKS

3

Pemaju menjalankan CSR untuk

membantu pihak terjejas

mendapat peluang pekerjaan /

perniagaan baru di kawasan

niaga/ RnR untuk disewa pada

harga berpatutan.


4


Amalan Terbaik1. Beberapa opsyen di sediakan untuk penilaian yang lebih lengkap

2. Tekanan politik dan pemimpin masyarakat mungkin mempengaruhi pemikiran dan

pembuatan keputusan, malah boleh memburukkan keadaan.

3. Kepentingan negara, negeri dan orang awam (orang ramai) mengatasi

kepentingan satu-satu kelompok masyarakat apatah lagi individu.

4. Isu / kebimbangan responden yang diketengahkan perlu di skorkan mengikut

keutamaan (Maslow) untuk meminimakan impact

5. Urban communities sering tidak mengambil bahagian aktif di dalam proses

penglibatan masyarakat namun tidak boleh diketepikan. - Kepentingan pandangan

pakar untuk menyeimbangkan kepentingan-kepentingan semua kelompok

stakeholders.

6. Pembuatan keputusan tidak boleh dilengahkan sehingga menggusarkan

penduduk dan memburukkan keadaan.

1. Penerimaan SIA sebagai tool perancangan yang berkesan danbukannya hanya sebuah dokumenwajib

2. Penglibatan lebih ramai TPr danprofessional dalam penyediaan SIA

3. Pengetahuan yang lebih mendalam dankomprehensif tentang pendekatan danmetodologi penyediaan SIA yang baik

4. Professionalisme dalam SIA

WAY FORWARD PRAKTIS PENYEDIAAN SIA

• Keep your self connected……MSIA

• Typing……..

Herlina 0178146005

[email protected]

SEKIAN. TERIMA KASIH.

seminar ‘social impact...

Documents