JURNALPSIKOLOGI DANKAUNSELINGJOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELLING

Tahun 2015 Brlanqan 6 ISSN 1985 - 3602

Sidang Pengarang ii

Pengenalan Ringkas iii

Dari Meja Editor ivKAMARUL MD SHAH, PhDSALLEH AMAT, PhDStrategi Meningkatkan Kecekapan Kaunseling PelbagaiBudaya Mengikut Amalan Guru Kaunseling

NORDIANA ABD. RAHIMKajian Impak Program Pasca Akrab Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 17

NORISHAM HJ ABD GHANI PhDKemarahan Dalam Kalangan Warga Kerja Jabatan Pendidikan NegeriKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 31

JAMALUDIN HJ. AHMAD PhDMAIZATULAKMAM HJ. YAHYAFaktor Penyebab Masalah Hidu Gam DalamKalangan Pelajar Pelbagai Kaum Di Malaysia 47

NUR L1YANA MOHO IBRAHIMMOHAMMAD AZIZ SHAH MOHAMED ARIP PhDMOHAMMAD NASIR BISTAMAM PhDKesahan Dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Kerjaya BerasaskanPendekatan Teori Kognitif Pemprosesan Maklumat 63

RADZIAH HASSANJAMALUDDIN AHMAD PhDKeberkesanan Modul Bimbingan Kelompok Terhadap MotivasiPencapaian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah 79

NORDIANA ABD. RAHIMHubungan Gaya Asuhan Ibu Bapa Dengan TahapKemarahan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah 91

HAMIDAH MAHMUDPenilaian Tahap Profesionalisme Guru Bimbingan DanKaunseling Sekolah Rendah Di Malaysia 103

LEE JUN CHOI PhDLOH SAU CHEONG PhDSchool Counsellors' Self-efficacy In Dealing WithBullying Among Secondary School Students 117

NORMADIYANA ABDULLAHHubungan Caragaya Pengurusan Konflik Dengan KepuasanKerja Dalam Kalangan Guru Bimbingan Dan KaunselingSekolah Menengah Negeri Selangor 139

MOHAMMAD AZIZ SHAH MOHAMED ARIP. PhDMARNY SYAZANNA MAZLANNURUL IZYAN MOHO SOBRIPembinaan, Kesahan Dan Kebolehpercayaan InventoriKesedaran Diri (Mindfulness)(IKD) 153

SALAMIAH HASANKajian Impak Jelajah Psikososial, Bahagian Psikologi Dan Kaunseling,Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 171

Biodata Penulis 191

School Counsellor's Self-Efficacy In Dealing WithBullying Among Secondary School Students

school Counsellors' Self-Efficacy In Dealing With BullyingAmong Secondary School Students

Lee Jun Choi PhD.Loh Sau Cheong PhD.

Universiti Utara MalaysiaUniversiti Malaya

jyijzhi@hotmail.com

Abstract

Although there are now quite a lot of literatures on how or what schools can do indealing with cases of bullying, curiously enough there is little information availableabout what school counsellors actually feel, think, and do when bullying is going onat their schools. Scant attention has been paid to school counsellors' self-efficacyregarding bullying and what actually are their ability when they deal with this type ofproblem, particularly in Malaysia. There also relatively little is known about sourcesthat have an impact on school counsellors self-efficacy regarding dealing withbullying in school, in the local context or probably in the international arena. Thepurpose of this study was to identify the overall source of influence that contributes toschool counsellors' self-efficacy and what are the levels of their self-efficacy in termsof dealing with bullying in secondary schools. The measurement for sources ofinfluence on school counsellors self-efficacy scale and their self-efficacy level whendealing with bullying in secondary school are validated through self-constructedquestionnaire. Based on the finding of this study, the level of school counsellors' self-efficacy in terms of dealing with bullying in secondary school among in-serviceteachers was moderately high (M = 3.83, SD= 0.79). This implies that majority ofthe in-service school counsellors were somewhat confident of themselves in havingthe ability to successfolly perform their duty or responsibility in dealing with bullyingamong students in secondary school. The findings of this study showed that masteryexperience is a crucial source of influence on school counsellors self-efficacy indealing with bullying among students.

I 117

JURNAL PSIKOLOGI DAN KAUNSELING

Rigby, K. (2012) Bullying in Schools: Addressing Desires,Behaviours. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 339-348.

Not

Schuster, B. (1996). Rejection, exclusion, and harassment at work and in school· aintegration of result from research on mobbing, bullying and peer rejec;io nEuropean Psychologist, 1(1),293-317. n,

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Self-regulated learning and acaderniachievement: Theory, research and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag. Schunk,DCH. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. EducQtionaiPsychologist,25( I), 71-86.

Skiba, R., & Fontanini, A. (2000). Fast facts: Bullying prevention. Bloomington, IN:Phi Delta Kappa International. Retrieved August, 18, 2007, fromhttp://www.pdkintl.org/whatis/ffi2bully.htm

Shakoor, S., Jaffee, S. R., Bowes, L., Quellet-Morin, I., Andreou, P., Happe, F.,Moffitt, T., & Arseneault, L. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children'stheory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. Journal of Child Psychologyand Psychiatry, 53(3),254-261

Smith, P. K., & Thompson, D. (1991). Practical Approaches to Bullying. London:David Fulton.

Smokowski, P.R., & Kopasz, K.H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types,effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools,27(2),101-10.

Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can bedone about school bullying?: Linking research to educational practice.Educational Researcher, 39,38-47.

Trentham, L., Silvern, S., & Brogdon, R., (1985). Teacher efficacy and teachercompetency ratings. Psychology in the Schools, 22(3), 343-352.

Whitted, K.S., & Dupper, D.R. (2005). Best practices for preventing or reducingbullying in schools. Children & Schools, 27(1), 167-173.

Williams, K., & Kennedy, J. H. (2012) Bullying behaviours and attachment styles.North American Journal of Psychology, 14(2),321-338.

Winters, D. L. (1997). levels of violence in Pennsylvania public schools and efforts ;~control and prevent violence (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 199 'Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 2020A.

andWoolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacY

their beliefs about managing students. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6, 137- 148.

Only

School Counsellor's Self-Efficacy In Dealing WithBullyingAmong Secondary School Students

Z"[11I11erman,B. 1. (1995). Measuring and mis-measuring academic self-efficacy:I Dimensions, problems and misconceptions. Symposium presented at the Annual

Meeting of the America Educational Research Association, New York.

Zimmerman, B. 1. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptualframework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational implications, (pp. 3- 21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Zimmerman, B. 1., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Students differences in self-regulatedlearning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82( I), 51-59.

136 I 1137