garis panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja … filepelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja kursus dan clo/plo...

GARIS PANDUAN PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN KERJA KURSUS DAN CLO/PLO [EE601 PROJEK 2] JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK POLITEKNIK, KEMENTERIAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI

EDISI PERTAMA DISEMBER 2012

i

PRAKATA

Dokumen ini disediakan sebagai panduan kepada semua pensyarah di Jabatan Kejuruteraan

Elektrik mengenai kaedah pentaksiran bagi kursus EE601 Projek 2. Garis panduan ini boleh

digunapakai dalam proses pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja kursus yang akan mengukur hasil

pembelajaran pelajar dalam aspek pengetahuan, kemahiran praktikal dan kemahiran insaniah.

Garis panduan ini diharap dapat:

emberi kefahaman kepada pensyarah mengenai kriteria pentaksiran kerja kursus M

projek;

embantu pensyarah dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran kerja kursus projek dan M

embantu pensyarah menyediakan dokumen dan rekod proses pentaksiran kerja M

kursus projek

Nota: Garis panduan ini menjelaskan keperluan yang minimum bagi pentaksiran kursus projek

yang mesti dipenuhi oleh para pelajar. Sehubungan dengan itu, pihak Jabatan

Kejuruteraan Elektrik boleh menambah elemen yang bersesuaian agar ia selari dengan

keperluan semasa.

ii

PENGHARGAAN

Assalamualaikum w.b.t dan Salam Sejahtera agi pihak Seksyen Pembangunan dan Penilaian Kurikulum, saya ingin merakamkan setinggi-tinggi penghargaan dan ucapan tahniah dengan penyediaan Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus dan CLO/PLO (EE601 Projek 2) yang

merupakan satu bahan rujukan kepada para pensyarah Jabatan Kejuruteraan Elektrik di politeknik.

Usaha mengeluarkan garis panduan ini wajar mendapat pujian memandangkan ianya dapat membantu meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kefahaman para pensyarah seterusnya dapat mewujudkan keseragaman dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran kursus ini di politeknik masing-masing. Oleh itu, diharapkan garis panduan ini juga akan digunakan untuk memantau pencapaian projek pelajar sepanjang semester dan seterusnya menjana pemberian gred secara sistematik.

Akhir sekali, saya mengucapkan tahniah dan selamat maju jaya kepada Pn. Noorfozila binti Bahari, Pensyarah Utama di Politeknik Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (POLISAS) yang telah menyumbangkan ilmu pengetahuan dan kepakaran beliau untuk menyediakan garis panduan ini.

Sekian, terima kasih.

HJ. ZULKEPLY BIN ABDUL SAMAD

Timbalan Pengarah

Seksyen Pembangunan dan Penilaian Kurikulum

Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik

B

EE601 PROJECT 2

1

GUIDELINES TO COURSEWORK AND CLO/PLO ASSESSMENT There are TWO (2) types of assessment for EE601 Project 2 which are the Coursework Assessment and the CLO/PLO Assessment. The assessments are done as follows. 1. CLO/PLO Assessment

The EE601 Project 2 CLO/PLO Assessment is divided into the following FOUR (4) parts.

A. To determine the relationship between the Assessment Tasks marks and the CLO marks,

please refer to the following mapping of CLO verses Coursework Distribution given below.

B. The Life-Long Learning assessment (CLO4) will use the provided rubric and rubric marks form.

C. The Project Psychomotor Skill assessment (CLO1) will use the EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill Rubric provided along with the assessment form for the following:

i. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Hardware project ii. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Software project

iii. Psychomotor skill assessment form and rubric for Interfacing Project

D. The overall EE601 Project 2 CLO/PLO assessment will be using the following form: i. Coursework CLO and PLO Assessment Form (MQA purposes)

2. Coursework Assessment For EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment, the following are provided:

ii. Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes), iii. Coursework Assessment Marking Schemes for Hardware, Software and Interfacing

Projects The Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes) is an overall coursework assessment for Project 2. The Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme is to aid the assessment of some of the assessment tasks for Project 2. It will ONLY have the marking scheme for the following assessment tasks for Project 2; Attendance, Involvement, Logbook (Format), Presentation, Final Report and Model/System. The assessment task for Logbook (Progress) however, will use the Psychomotor Skill Rubric in Part C above.

EE601 PROJECT 2

2

1. CLO/PLO Assessment

1.

2.

3.

4.

Coursework

CLOCLO Attendance Involvement Logbook Presentation Final Proposal Model / System

* √ - P

√ - C √ - C

√ - C √ - C

√ - A √ - A **√ - A

Legend:

C - Cognitive ; ; A - Affective

Note:

1.

2. CLO2 (Cognitive) mark will come from Logbook and Model / System.

3.

4. CLO4 (Affective) will be assessed using the provided Life-long Learning Rubric for Project 2.

The rubric will include the Attendance, Involvement and Logbook(**) assessments.

} Marks from

Coursework

demonstrate continuous learning and information management skill while engaging in independent

acquisition of new knowledge and skill to develop the project. (A3, PLO6)

Course Learning Outcomes:

Part A. CLO VS COURSEWORK MARKS DISTRIBUTION

P - Psychomotor

Portfolio Product

design project prototype (hardware project) with suitable and attractive casing or system programme

(software project) with user interface. (C5, PLO1)

CLO1 (Psychomotor) mark will come from Logbook(*) assessment and uses the provided EE601 Project 2

Psychomotor Skill rubric.

conduct circuit testing, troubleshooting and repair based on electrical circuit fault finding and operation theory

(hardware project) or test run, debug and execute system programme (software project). (P4, PLO2)

prepare an oral presentation of the project, in group or individually, inclusive of a final report written in a

standard format with the necessary technical data referred to during project implementation. (C3, PLO1)

The rubric mark is 100% and IS NOT PART of the coursework mark.

CLO1

CLO2

CLO3

CLO4

CLO3 (Cognitive) mark will comes from Presentation and Final Proposal assessments.

The mark for CLO1 comes from the Course Progress mark (20%) and IS CONVERTED to 100%.

EE601 PROJECT 2

3

A B C D E F

Acq

uir

e

Info

rma

tio

n

Ma

na

ge

Info

rma

tio

n

Sha

re I

de

as

Le

arn

Ind

ep

en

de

ntl

y

Att

en

da

nce

Invo

lve

me

nt

5 5 5 5 5 5 100%

1 2345678 4 4 4 4 4 4 80

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

Prepared by :

Date :

Note:

1. Assessment of affective skill must be based on the 'Life-long Learning Rubric' provided.

2. Total mark for Life-long Learning skill is to be converted to 100% and IS NOT PART of the coursework mark

Part B. Life-long Learning Rubric Form (CLO4, PLO6)

Ali bin Abu

Total No. Student ID

Aspects

Student Name

( Course Lecturer Name )

EE601 PROJECT 2

4

Very

GoodFair

4 2

A. Acquire Information:

Able to acquire relevant information

from various sources.

B. Manage Information:

Able to manage acquired

information.

C. Share Ideas:

Ready /will ing to share new ideas.

D. Learn Independently: Able to learn

independently.

E. Attendance

Attendance during project sessions

F. Involvement

Involvement in project activities

Skills / Aspects

Learning Domain

(LD) / Programme

Learning Outcome

(PLO)

Involve in more than 90% of the

project activities

Involve in 60 - 70% of the project

activities

LIFE-LONG LEARNING SKILL RUBRIC FOR EE601 PROJECT 2

Demonstrate the ability to learn

independently with minimum

supervision.

Demonstrate the ability to learn

independently with some supervision.

LD6 / PLO6

Life Long

Learning/

Information

Management

Skills and

Continuous

Learning

Retrieve relevant information from

several sources.

Retrieve relevant information from

only one source.

Hardly analyze and integrate acquired

information with own ideas.

Sometimes analyze and integrate

acquired information with own ideas.

Frequently share ideas and

resources.

3

Sometimes share ideas and resources.

Unsatisfactory

1

Attend more than 90% of the

project sessions

Attend 60 - 79% of the project sessions Attend less than 40% of the project

sessions

80 - 90%

Retrieve relevant information

from various sources.

Always analyze and integrate

acquired information with own

ideas.

Excellent

5

Good

Involve in less than 20% of the project

activities

80 - 90% 30 - 50%

Hardly share ideas and resources.

Hardly able to learn independently

and need consistent supervision.

40 - 59%

EE601 PROJECT 2

5

A B C D E F G H

sim

ulat

ion

PCB

layo

ut

Sold

erin

g

Phot

olito

grap

hy

Etch

ing

Com

pone

nt

test

ing

Circ

uit t

estin

g

Mod

el

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100%

1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 79

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

Prepared by :

Date :

Note:

1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill' rubric given below.

2. Total 1 - marks for Project Course Progress (ISO mark - 20%)

3. Total 2 - marks for Psychomotor Skill (CLO1,PLO2 - 100% each)

4.

No. Student ID

Course Lecturer Name

0

0

0

0

0

Part C(i). Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Hardware Project)

Total 2

(Psycho

motor)

0

0

0

0

20%

16

Total 1

(Project

Course

Progress)

Student Name

Aspects

The number of aspects in the rubric form is determined by the number of aspects used in the project

psychomotor skill rubric for hardware project.

EE601 PROJECT 2

6

A B C D E

Initi

al D

evel

opm

ent

of P

rogr

am

Mai

n Pr

ogra

m a

nd

Subr

outin

e

Test

ing

and

debu

ggin

g

Exec

ute

Prog

ram

Des

ign

Syst

em

Soft

war

e

10 10 10 10 10 100%

1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 902 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

Prepared by :

Date :

Note:

1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'Project Psychomotor Skill' rubric given below.




Total 2

(Psycho

motor)

Part C(ii) Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Software Project)

No. Student ID Student Name

Total 1

(Project Course

Progress)

Aspects

20%

180

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

EE601 PROJECT 2

7

A B C D E F G

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100%

1 2345678 Ali bin Abu 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 90

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

Prepared by :

Date :

Note:

1. Assessment of psychotor skill must be based on the 'Project Psychomotor Skill - Interfacing Project' rubric given.



4. The number of aspects in the rubric form is determined by the number of aspects used in the project psychomotor skill rubric.

0

0

0

Part C(iii) Psychomotor Skill Assessment / Project Progress Assessment (CLO1, PLO2 - Interfacing Project)

Aspects

Te

stin

g /

de

bu

gg

ing

/ si

mu

lati

on

soft

wa

re-h

ard

wa

re

inte

rfa

cin

g

Total 1

(Project

Course

Progress)

Total 2

(Psychomotor)

0

0

0


Cir

cuit

sim

ula

tio

n

an

d P

CB

lay

ou

t

Ph

oto

lito

gra

ph

y

an

d E

tch

ing

Co

mp

on

en

t a

nd

Cir

cuit

te

stin

g

So

lde

rin

g a

nd

Mo

de

l

Ma

in p

rog

ram

an

d

Su

bro

uti

ne

No. Student ID Student Name

0

0

20%

18

0

EE601 PROJECT 2

8

2 - 3 7 - 8

A. Circuit simulation

- simulation techniques

- simulation results

B. PCB layout using CAD

- track size and distance

C.

- use of soldering tools

- soldering quality

D. Photolitography

E.

- steps in etching process

- PCB quality (after etching)

F. Component testing

- use of correct components

- use of correct testing tools and technique

G.

H.

- produce good casing and wiring finishes

Note: The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.

- pad size

- footprint selection and placement

- layout size

Aspects

Able to use correct simulation techniques and produce

correct simulation results / displays for parts of the project

circuit.

Score Descriptions

Excellent

9 - 10

Inability to use proper simulation techniques and produce

correct simulation results / displays for most part of the

project circuit.

Poor

Able to use correct simulation techniques and produce correct

simulation results / displays successfully.

Acceptable handling of the UV exposure unit and correct

exposure duration used.

Use correct tools and techniques for testing ALL different

components.

Able to use and handle correctly the UV exposure unit and

correct exposure duration used.

Observe the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the

etching steps, PCB tracks produced are well-defined and shiny

with no oxide layer on the tracks.

- use of photolithography tools (UV exposure

unit)

- exposure duration

Etching

Not able to use and handle the UV exposure unit in a proper

manner and over setting the exposure duration.

Does not observe the safety procedures of handling the

etchant in the etching steps, PCB tracks produced are jagged

and corroded tracks with oxide layer.

Incorrect component used, incorrect use of tools and

techniques for testing the components.

Incorrect use of tools and techniques to trace the input and

output and testing of the project circuit. Circuits fail to

function.

Soldering

Perfect track size, track distance, pad size, footprint selection

and placement and PCB layout size.

Correct handling of the soldering and desoldering tools. Solder

is shiny and of proper size.

Use correct tools and techniques for testing some of the

components.

Use correct components, use correct tools and techniques to

trace the input and output and testing of ALL parts of the

project circuit. Circuits are fully functional.

0 - 1

- use of correct circuit testing technique

- use of correct testing tools

Breadboard Circuit testing

Improper track size, track distance, pad size, footprint

selection and placement and PCB layout size.

Improper handling of the soldering and desoldering tools.

Produce many cold-joints and bulky solder.

Observe the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the

etching steps, produced some well-defined shiny PCB tracks

and and some oxidated tracks.

Use correct component, use correct tools and techniques to

trace the input and output and testing of SOME parts of the

circuit. Circuits are partly functional.

Moderate

4 - 6

Proper and acceptable track size, track distance, pad size,

footprint selection and placement and PCB layout size.

Correct handling of the soldering and desoldering tools.

Produce a few cold-joint or bulky solder.

Part C(i) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (HARDWARE PROJECT)

Model Model design is not acceptable, poor wiring finishes and uses

unacceptable quality materials.

Model is well-designed with very good casing and wiring

finishes and uses good quality material.- produce model /casing (hardware) or a

complete system (software)

Model design is acceptable with proper wiring finishes and

uses good quality materials.

EE601 PROJECT 2

9

2 - 3 7 - 8

A. Initial Development of Program

- flow chart

- algorithm

B. Writing Main program and Subroutine

- main program and subroutine links

C. Testing and debugging

- syntax / logical error

D.

E.

- attractive program layout display

Note:The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.

Excellent design of system software wih very good user

interactive elements. The program is visually

stimulating through active animation, color, and

graphics.

Did not select suitable software to perform the task

of the project. Was not able to execute the program.

Design System Software Poor design of system software with no user

interactive elements and too simple and

unattractive layout display.

Acceptable design of system software with user

interactive elements but visually not so stimulating

layout display.

- produce a complete system with user

interface

Flow chart or algorithm is logical but the sequence is

hard to follow, the main program is linked to the

subroutine.

Flow chart or algorithm is logical and easy to follow and

in sequence, the main program is linked to the

subroutine.

The main program and the subroutine does not

linked. Input / output declaration and program not

according to standard programming format.

The main program and the subroutine is linked. Input /

output declaration and program not according to

standard programming format.

The main program and the subroutine is well written

and linked. Input / output declaration and program are


Select appropriate software to perform the task of the

project. Able to make the program partly work, loads in

acceptable time duration, and quite easy to navigate

through.

Select the precise and best software to perform the task

of the project. Able to make the program works well,

loads quickly, and easy to navigate through.

-selection of software

-performance

- programming format

- main and subroutine interaction

Execute Program

Test and debugging of program is unsuccessful, with

many logical and syntax error. Main program and

subroutine did not interact and no passing of data.

Able to test and debug parts of the program with still few

logical and syntax error. Main program and subroutine

seems to interact and data is partly passed correctly.

Able to test and debug program successfully with no

logical and syntax error. Main program and subroutine

interacts and data is passed correctly.

Part C(ii) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (SOFTWARE PROJECT)

Aspects

Score Descriptions

Poor Moderate Excellent

0 - 1 4 - 6 9 - 10

Flow chart or algorithm is not logical and the

sequence is confusing, no links between the main

program to the subroutine.

EE601 PROJECT 2

10

2 - 3 7 - 8

A. Circuit simulation and PCB layout using CAD

- simulation results

- track size and distance

B. Photolitography and Etching

- safety steps in etching process

- PCB quality (after etching)

C. Component and Breadboard Circuit testing

- use of correct components

D.

- produce good casing and wiring finishes

E. Writing Main program and Subroutine

- flow chart / algorithm

- main program and subroutine links

F. Testing / debugging / simulation

- syntax / logical error

G.

Note:The aspects of the project psychomotor skill can be added or removed as required.

Moderate Excellent

0 - 1 4 - 6 9 - 10

Not able to use and handle the UV exposure unit and

over setting the exposure duration. Does not observe

the safety procedures of handling the etchant in the

etching steps, PCB tracks produced are jagged and

corroded tracks with oxide layer.

Incorrect component used, incorrect use of tools and

techniques for testing the components. Incorrect use of

tools and techniques to trace the input and output and

testing of the project circuit. Circuits fail to function.

Use correct tools and techniques for testing some of the

components. Use correct component, use correct tools

and techniques to trace the input and output and testing

of SOME parts of the circuit. Circuits are partly

Use correct tools and techniques for testing ALL different

components. Use correct components, use correct tools and

techniques to trace the input and output and testing of ALL

parts of the project circuit. Circuits are fully functional.

Part C(iii) EE601 PROJECT 2 PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL RUBRIC (INTERFACING PROJECT)

Aspects

Score DescriptionsPoor

- footprint selection and placement

- layout size

Able to produce correct simulation results / displays

successfully. Perfect track size, track distance, pad size,

footprint selection and placement and PCB layout size.

- programming format

Test and debugging of program is unsuccessful, with

many logical and syntax error. Main program and

subroutine did not interact and no passing of data.

Able to test and debug parts of the program with still

few logical and syntax error. Main program and

subroutine seems to interact and data is partly passed

correctly.

Able to test and debug program successfully with no logical

and syntax error. Main program and subroutine interacts

and data is passed correctly.- main and subroutine interaction

- use of photolithography tools

- exposure duration

Model design is acceptable with quite attractive layout

and display and uses good quality materials, proper

wiring finishes with a few cold-joint or bulky solder.

Model is well-designed with attractive layout and display,

very good casing and uses good quality material, and wiring

finishes with ALL solders are shiny and of proper size.

Soldering and Model Model design is not acceptable and uses unacceptable

quality materials., produce poor wiring finishes with

many cold-joints and bulky solder - soldering quality

- produce model /casing

Able to handle the UV exposure unit and correct

exposure duration used. Observe the safety procedures

of handling the etchant in the etching steps, produced

some well-defined shiny PCB tracks and and some

oxidated tracks.

Able to use and handle correctly the UV exposure unit and

correct exposure duration used. Observe the safety

procedures of handling the etchant in the etching steps,

PCB tracks produced are well-defined and shiny with no

oxide layer on the tracks.

Fail to download and execute the program. Input and

output devices do not function at all.

Able to download and execute the program. The

software and hardware partly interfaced correctly with

only SOME of the input and output devices operates

according to design.

Flow chart or algorithm is not logical and the sequence

is confusing, no links between the main program to the

subroutine. Input / output declaration and program not


Flow chart or algorithm is logical but the sequence is

hard to follow, the main program is linked to the

subroutine. Input / output declaration and program not


Flow chart or algorithm is logical and easy to follow and in

sequence, the main program is linked to the subroutine and

are well writte. Input / output declaration and program are


Download and execute program successfully, Complete and

excellent interface between the harware and the software.

The input and output devices operates fully and according

to design.

Program downloading and software-

hardware interfacing

- produce a complete system with user

interface

Inability to produce correct simulation results / displays

for most part of the project circuit. Improper track size,

track distance, pad size, footprint selection and

placement and PCB layout size.

Able to produce correct simulation results / displays for

parts of the project circuit. Proper and acceptable track

size, track distance, pad size, footprint selection and

placement and PCB layout size.

- use of correct component and circuit

testing technique

EE601 PROJECT 2

11

CLO4 PLO2 PLO6

Logb

ook

TOTAL

Logb

ook

Mod

el /

Sys

tem

TOTAL

Pres

enta

tion

Fina

l Rep

ort

TOTAL

Life

-long

Lea

rnin

g

Rubr

ic CLO2

+

CLO3

TOTAL CLO1 CLO4

20 100 10 20 100 20 20 100 100 200 100 100 100

1. 12345678 Ali bin Abu 15 75 8 16 80 17 18 88 80 168 84 75 80

2. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 8 9 8 8 8

(Course Lecturer Name)

Note:

1. Logbook is used to assess CLO1 (psychomotor skill), CLO2 and CLO4 (life-long learning skill)

2. To assess CLO1, use the provided rubric for EE601 Project 2 Psychomotor Skill assessment.

3.

PLO1

Student NameStudent ID#No.

CLO3CLO1 CLO2

To assess CLO4, use the Life-long Learning rubric provided. Mark for CLO4 is 100% and IS NOT PART of

the coursework mark.

Prepared by :

Date:

Group Attainment Average

Part D(i) - COURSEWORK CLO and PLO ASSESSMENT FOR EE601 PROJECT 2

EE601 PROJECT 2

12

2. Coursework Assessment The EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment uses Coursework Grading Assessment Form (for ISO purposes) below, with the aid of the Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme provided in section 2(ii).

5% 5% 20% 20% 20% 100%

1. 2345678 Ali bin Abu 4 4 19 19 19 91 A

2. 0

3. 0

4. 0

5. 0

6. 0

7. 0

8. 0

9. 0

10. 0

(Course Lecturer Name)

(format)

10%

8

Atte

ndan

ce

Invo

lvem

ent

(progress)

20%

18

Pres

enta

tion

Date:

No. Student ID# Student Name

2(i) COURSEWORK GRADING ASSESSMENT - EE601 PROJECT 2

GRADE

Prepared by :

Fina

l

Prop

osal

TOTAL

ProductPortfolio

Mod

el /

Syst

emLogbook

EE601 PROJECT 2

13

1-2

(Poor)

3-4

(Moderate)

5

(Excellent)

1 Attendance / 5 / 5

2 Involvement / 5 / 5

3 / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 10

4 Presentation / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 20

5 Final report / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 30 / 20

6 Model :

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 50 / 20

Content and

Concept

Casing and

Layout

2(ii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Hardware Project)

Verification by project supervisor every 2 weeks

Continuous improvement based on feedback by

project supervisor

Project Activity Plan / Gantt chart

Weekly notes on project activities

Student is involved in 90% of project activities

Scaling

ItemTotal

Marks

The model size is appropriate.

Attractive control panel layout and labelling.

Logbook format mark :

Presentation mark :

Functional

Clear explanation / description of the contents

Include costing / bill of materials

Abstract / introduction / acknowledgement

Include graphics / tables / diagrams

ScoreAspects

Student unattendance is < 10%

Keypoints

Logbook

format

Use of visual aids

Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework

assessment)

Final Report mark :

Model mark :

Use good quality material

Neat wiring layout and finishes

The project works well.

Good safety elements and procedure

Clear operating instruction manual.

Content related to implemented project

Conclusion / Project further work

The project offers a solution to a problem.

The project sources are cited, reliable and replicable.

The project aligns with the curriculum & standards.

Excellent communication skill

Team work spirit

Follow standard format (table of contents)

EE601 PROJECT 2

14

1-2

(Poor)

3-4

(Moderate)

5

(Excellent)



3 / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 10

4 Presentation / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 20

5 Final report / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 30 / 20

6 System software :

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 80 / 20

2(ii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Software Project)

Item Aspects KeypointsScaling

ScoreTotal

Marks



Logbook

format







Use of visual aids


Team work spirit

Presentation mark :



Include graphics / tables / diagrams

Clear explanation / description of the contents



Final Report mark :

Content

The content is educational.

The content is valid & reliable.

The content is accurate & factual.

The content is clear.

The content sources are cited and reliable.

The content aligns with the curriculum & standards.

The content is free from bias.

Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework

assessment)

System Software mark :

Ease of Use

The directions are clear and easy to follow.

The program is interactive.

The program is easy to navigate through.

The students can exit the program at any time.

Program

execution

The installation and setup are easy.

The program loads quickly & is error-free.

The program works well.

The audio (sound) is clear.

The program is visually stimulating through active

EE601 PROJECT 2

15

1-2

(Poor)

3-4

(Moderate)

5

(Excellent)



3 / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 10

4 Presentation / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 20 / 20

5 Final report / 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 30 / 20

6 Model and System Software :

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 5

/ 80 / 20

Ease of Use



Use of visual aids


Team work spirit



Logbook

format




project supervisor


2(iii) EE601 Project 2 Coursework Assessment Marking Scheme (Interfacing Project)

Item Aspects Keypoints

Scaling

ScoreTotal

Marks

Note: The aspects can be added or deleted as required. Total marks should be converted to 20% (for EE601 Project 2 coursework assessment)

Operation of input and output devices

Casing and

Layout

The model size is appropriate.

Attractive control panel layout and labelling.

Use good quality material

Neat wiring layout and finishes

Functional

The project downloads and works well.

Good safety elements and procedure

Clear operating instruction manual.

Model & System Software mark :

Execution

and

Interfacing

The installation and setup are easy.

Iinterfacing between the software and the hardware

The program is interactive.

The program is easy to navigate through.

The program can be exited at any time.



Final Report mark :

Content and

Concept

The project offers a correct solution to a problem.

The project sources are cited, reliable and replicable.

The project aligns with the curriculum & standards.

Presentation mark :



Include graphics / tables / diagrams and the sources

Correct explanation / description of the contents

Diselaraskan oleh:

UNIT KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK SEKSYEN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENILAIAN KURIKULUM JABATAN PENGAJIAN POLITEKNIK

garis panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja … filepelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja kursus dan clo/plo...

Documents