modeling as a tool - belia

19
Modeling as a tool for energy analysis and optimization E. BELIA, PRIMODAL US INC. 2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management” East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Upload: mars3002

Post on 08-Jul-2016

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Modeling as a tool for energy

analysis and optimization

E. BELIA, PRIMODAL US INC.

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility

Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Overview

• Modeling basics

• Overview of tools

• Examples:

– DO vs. ammonia control for energy reduction

– N removal vs. increased gas production

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

What Is Modelling?

• What is a model? – System representation that can predict some system behavior

• Essential elements of models – Series of process equations

– Parameter values (allow the model to be calibrated)

– Initial (starting point) & boundary conditions

– Dynamics (time-varying performance vs. steady-state)

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

SIMBA#

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Models for Energy Optimization

• Impact of dynamics

• Energy tariff implications

• Control design and testing

• Balancing multiple objectives

• Energy balance

• Equipment selection (e.g. blowers)

• ……..

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Example 1:

DO vs. Ammonia/DO cascade

feedback control

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Objectives

• Evaluate two control strategies

• Balance energy usage and cost

• Meet effluent ammonia consent

• Variable tariff

• Fixed air distribution

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Plant Layout

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

M

DO

Controller

Manipulated

variable Pressurized air

Reference variable (setpoint)

Measured variable (Actual value)

O2

NH4 controller

DO f(NH4)

NH4

Aeration Control Strategies

Mixed

Liquor

Primary

Influent

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Influent COD Load and

Electricity Tariff

$0.00

$0.02

$0.04

$0.06

$0.08

$0.10

$0.12

$0.14

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM

Ele

ctri

city

co

st

CO

D lo

ad (

t/d

)

Time

COD load

Electricity tariff

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Cost Comparison of the two

Control Strategies

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Aera

tio

n C

ost

($)

Air

Flo

w (

Nm

3/d

)

Time (d)

Airflow - DO setpoint Airflow - Ammonia/DO Aeration Cost - DO setpoint Aeration Cost - Ammonia/DO

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Example 2: Balancing COD

Flow

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Objectives

• Existing small primary tank (30% TSS

removal)

• Site constraints

• CEPT evaluation

• Balancing:

– Aeration cost

– Digester gas production

– Nitrogen removal

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Plant Layout

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Low Primary Tank Removal

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Simulating Chemically

Enhanced Primary Treatment

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Scenario Comparison

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2

% T

SS

rem

oval

Primary Tank Removal

Curren CEPT

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Current CEPT

Air

flo

w (

Nm

3/d

)

Blower

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4

Efflu

ent N

Ox-N

(m

g/L

)

Bio

gas (

m3/d

)

Biogas vs. Nitrate

Digester Gas

Effluent NOx-N

Current CEPT

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Summary of Model Potential

• Wastewater “flight” simulator

• Dynamic interactions between influent,

control, energy and cost

• Balancing costs and risks

2014 Energy Workshop: “A Water and Wastewater Utility Guide to More Sustainable Energy Management”

East Lansing, Michigan, October 16, 2014

Presenter contact information

Evangelina Belia Ph.D., ing.

Primodal Inc.

US & Canada

[email protected]

www.primodal.com