community living environment in public housing malaysia - study visit report

8/12/2019 Community Living Environment in Public Housing Malaysia - Study Visit Report

1/24

SCHOOL OF ART & DESIGN/AIC 2 /ESTHER CHAN YUEN YIN/A3505/IAD YEAR 2

1 | P a g e

ARCHITECTURE IN CONTEXT 2: STUDY VISIT REPORT

COMMUNITY LIVING ENVIRONMENT IN PUBLIC

HOUSING MALAYSIA

PPR LAKSAMANA JALAN PEEL & PPR COCHRANE JALAN

NAKHODA YUSOF, WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR

ESTHER CHAN YUEN YIN

A3505

MR. MUHAMAD RAZIF NASRUDDIN


2/24


2 | P a g e

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

1.2 Aim and Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 3

1.3 Research Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 4

2. CHAPTER 1: How Exterior and Surrounding Environment Affecting Resident Living Condition in Public Housing? . 5

2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Amenities and Maintenance................................................................................................................................. 6

2.3 External Environment and Safety ........................................................................................................................ 8

2.4 Building Materials, Structure Defect and Workmanship Quality. ........................................................................ 10

3. CHAPTER 2: How Indoor Environment Affecting Resident Living Condition in Public Housing? ............................. 13

3.1 Internal Layout, Space Usage and Indoor Environment .................................................................................... 13

4. Recommendations and Suggestions. ....................................................................................................................... 16

4.1 Survey Data Collection from Residents in Public Housing ................................................................................. 17

5. Conclusion. .............................................................................................................................................................. 18

REFERENCE LIST ...................................................................................................................................................... 19

ILLUSTRATION LIST ................................................................................................................................................... 21

APPENDIX A................................................................................................................................................................ 22


3/24


3 | P a g e

1. INTRODUCTION1.1 Introduction

According to the UNDP 1997 Human Development Report and 2004 United Nations Human

Development (UNHDP) report, Malaysia has the highest income disparity between the rich and poor

in Southeast Asia, greater than that of Philippines, Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam and Indonesia. The

UNHDP Report shows that the richest 10% in Malaysia control 38.4% of the economic income as

compared to the poorest 10% who control only 1.7%. Eventually it contribute to housing or property

inequality, Kuala Lumpur as the capital of Malaysia has an increasing number of squatters, shanty

towns and slums. It is also seeing an increase in criminal acts such as snatch theft, robberies and

rape. (Income Disparity in Malaysia, Wikipedia, 2013)

Further to the economic recession in the late 1997, Peoples Housing Project(Program Perumahan

Rakyat or PPR) schemes in cities and major towns for the resettlement of squatters has been

implemented in order to ensure its citizen, particularly lower income groups, to enjoy the benefits of

adequate, affordable and quality housing. This programs aimed to create a balance between physical

and environmental development, and human development based on noble universal rules as stated

in the Total Planning Development Guidelines. (Government of Malaysia, 2001)

1.2 Aim and ObjectivesThe aim and objectives of this paper is to examine and analyze the relationship between public

housing and community living environment in Malaysia. In between architecture and social matter, I

personally think that architecture should not set a boundary between the rich and poor society, it


4/24


4 | P a g e

should provide the best for all classes of community. Not a single man should be deprived from a

decent and safe living environment, a place where it is not merely for basic shelter but a foundation of

creating a happy healthy family, an environment where it is capable of fostering the spirit of

neighborliness as well as encouraging interaction among all levels of society despite which social

class one belongs to.

A quality communal living environment contributes towards good society which practices noble values.

It is within the communal living environment that interaction takes place, families are nurtured, noble

values are developed and services are shared. Therefore, this is an architectural issue that should be

analyze and improve because a large percentage of community with low income and poor families will

have to rely on living in public housing to survive especially owing a house made it difficult these days.

(Government of Malaysia, 2001).

1.3 Research MethodologyThe research is based on both visit from primary and secondary data. Primary data on the problem of

community living environment in public housing were gathered through personal site analysis and

case study on government public housing located at PPR Laksamana, Jalan Peel and PPR Cochrane

Perkasa, Jalan Nakhoda Yusof. Through personal survey with 100 residents at their houses during

weekdays and weekends. Site visits were made through observations and photographs were taken to

confirm the physical environment and amenities provided for the residents. Secondary data on

government housing development were gathered from Malaysian official documents.


5/24


5 | P a g e

2. CHAPTER 1: How Exterior and Surrounding Environment Affecting Resident LivingCondition in Public Housing?

In 2003, Human Rights Commission of Malaya criticized that the Malaysian government only carried

out official planning and implementation of the low-cost housing schemes for the poor society but failed

to address the issues related to habitability, suitability, defects and shoddy workmanship, lack of

maintenance and physical safety of the residents. (Suhakams Observations, Recommendations and

Conclusions: Human Right Commission of Malaysia, 2003). This first part of the paper is to discuss

about the finding of exterior and surrounding environment in selected public housing and how it is

affecting the residents.

2.1 LocationThe National Housing Department is working closely with state governments to ensure that these

houses are built in suitable locations. (Government of Malaysia: 2005). Both selected public housing

is located in the city, near to school, mall, religious center, government building and accessible to

public transportation such as buses and light rail transit (LRT). However, these houses are located

near to major route and highways causing a huge threat as we understand how vehicular pollution

affects the heath of people living close to the highways despite the constant noise nuisance. Growing

numbers of studies have shown that smaller particulates emitted by trucks and cars barreling down

our nations highways can promote heart disease, strokes and immune systems. Try to imagine how

notorious these living condition can affect families with senior citizen and children in their homes

whether or not they are not on the street and even a young healthy man can be poorly affected living

in a polluted condition in the long term. It is suggested that sound barrier to be erected and lined with

trees as a natural barrier that can eliminate up to 80% of ultrafines. (Big Road Blues, Tuft Now, 2012)


6/24


6 | P a g e

2.2 Amenities and MaintenanceThe provision of infrastructure and social facilities aimed at promoting social well-being for all and

ensure equitable and communal living environment. These public housing are equipped with vehicle

parking area, motorcycles bay, playground, park, basketball field, badminton court, mosque,

convenient shops, clinic, business center, and management office.

Upon observation on the site visit, it is found that most of the amenities and facilities are poorly

maintained, the paint from the badminton court wall is peeling off due to the weather, pebbles are

everywhere on the park especially children playground area where it can be very dangerous, the

footpaths on the park for disabled are cracked and inappropriately installed. Most of the time the

parking for vehicle is insufficient even parking for the disabled has been taken, people would double

park their car and leave the hand break off. A better planning on the usage of parking spaces should

Figure 1, 2 & 3: The physical condition at the basketball field, playground and park.


7/24


7 | P a g e

be introduce such as providing at least one parking lot for each house and design angled parking to

maximize the usage of parking area.

Apart from that, there is no proper motorcycles bay that equipped with metal bars for locking the

motorcycles, cracked tile and floor are not been replaced all over the buildings, therefore causes

uneven ground to collect water and wet grounds that is not suitable for elderly and childrens. On the

side of sanitation matters, the maintenance services for collection of waste are inadequate. Not merely

that it causes odour nuisance to the surrounding areas, there is basically no clean water to clean this

area after the waste collection is complete, this can give impact to the resident and subject to many

other diseases.

Figure 4, 5 & 6: Even during the day, car parking spaces is insufficient even people have gone out for work.

Figure 7: People parked the

motorcycle at the elevator lobby and

cracked tile are not been replaced.

Figure 8: The water doesnt

flow down to the drain

because of uneven ground

Figure 9: Garbage dumping area


8/24


8 | P a g e

Ignorance of clearing the undergrowth and debris found in the drains to ensure water flows out cause

stagnant water that it would be potential outbreak of mosquito-related diseases. Other damages that

needed instant maintenance are the replacement of wrecked metal grill, damaged cables, leakage,

unlit street lamp post at the parking area and walkways, frequent break down of the elevator system,

rodents and vandalism elimination.

2.3 External Environment and SafetyThese public houses are in the developing city, thus there is always a constant noise disturbance, air

pollutions and disruption to traffic from the construction site nearby. The current project near these two

sites are the mixed development The Velocity by Sunway Group, Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and other

various highway constructions.

Although it is accessible to public transportation such as buses and light rail transit (LRT), however

residents will still have to walk 30 minutes to the nearest train station and 20 minutes to the bus

circulation route, plus the bus circulation route and travelling frequency in this area is not efficient.

Figure 10 & 11: Metal grill for drainage is not been replaced. Figure 12: Stagnant water can cause

mosquitos to breed


9/24


9 | P a g e

Therefore, for working class community they would prefer traveling on their own transport. As for the

student and elderly they will have to walk a distance to travel to school and market which is not safe

in the early morning without the illumination of street lights. It has been reported that these area have

high robbery rate. Meanwhile for the internal traffic on these houses, because as previously mentioned

that there is lack of availability of parking spaces, people are parking everywhere and this caused

unsystematic flow of internal traffic. There is no footpath or pedestrians for the children or disabled to

be completely safe traveling to the playground or garden, children will walk on vehicle driveway in

order to go to the playground. Fire extinguisher are generally found in the lobby area only.

Does it really creates safe and caring living environment for all levels of society including the children,

elderly, handicapped and disabled? It is also identified that there is lack of consideration for the elderly

and disabled, more ramps for wheelchair access should built especially at the circulation area from

parking area to elevator lobby and garden. The walkway at the elevator lobby usually have varies of

levelling and steps which makes it difficult for disabled who travelled alone. Every elevator must meet

the intent regulations for the accessibility of a wheelchair but here it does not provided a wider elevator

opening for a better concern.

Figure 13: Varies levelling and steps Figure 14: Opening of the

elevator


10/24


10 | P a g e

2.4 Building Materials Structure Defect and Workmanship Quality.Kuala Lumpur City Council (DBKL) Housing Maintenance Division highlighted that complaints

frequently reported are water pipe burst, water seepage through wall and ceiling, rain water entering

the house through window, and manhole clogged.

The most frequent complaints were rain water entered house through window. There are two main

reasons to the problem. Firstly, the faulty detailing where a concrete copping is placed at the bottom

of the window opening. When rain water hits the concrete copping at the bottom of the window, rain

water then bounces into the interior space of the unit through gaps between the glass panes. Secondly,

the quality of workmanship where gaps between wall openings and window frames is not water tight,

water seepage occurred at gaps between window and wall. Water proofing problem especially at toilet

and bath is very crucial. Good site supervision and workmanship is critically important to resolve the

problem. Otherwise, it is very costly and troublesome if to carry out any remedial work after completion.

(GOH, AI TEE, AHMAD, 2012)

Table 1: Shows the compilation of complaints received by

DBKL Housing Maintenance Division for PPR Cochrane Perkasa 1 site.

Figure 15: Water splattering due to the

copping at the bottom of the window


11/24


11 | P a g e

For security reason, a better quality door and lockset should be used for the unit main entrance door.

Otherwise metal grilles sliding door should be installed in front of unit main entrance for security reason

as well as to improve ventilation of the unit. The adjustable louvered windows are better for air

movement compared with casement or top hung windows, however it has carried the risk of glass

panes falling from the higher floor if the catches are not function properly. (GOH, AI TEE, AHMAD,

2012)

Figure 16: Common lockset,

metal grilles and door provided

by government.

Figure 17: Louvered windows glass falling out due to poor workmanship.

Figure 18 & 19: Algae grow and water seepage on the

wall

Figure 20 & 21: Paint peeling off and ceiling leakage


12/24


12 | P a g e

Other structure defects and poor workmanship quality is visible on the ceiling leakage, floor and ceiling

not level, water seepage, plastering thickness, expose of plumbing pipes, tiling are not even, painting

is peeling off and poor electrical work.


13/24


13 | P a g e

3. CHAPTER 2: How Indoor Environment Affecting Resident Living Condition in PublicHousing?3.1 Internal Layout Space Usage and Indoor Environment

Ministry of Housing and Local Government and the National Housing Department set the minimum

standards of public housing and provide each unit with living room and dining area attached, kitchen,

toilet, bathroom, and three bedrooms. It is found that the layout of space is ineffective because firstly

the toilet is too close to kitchen, although there is an extended wall as a segregation of spaces however

the toilet window is facing at the kitchen, caused an unpleasant odor in the unit itself. Secondly,

strangers who walking passed the corridor can have a direct visual access to the living area and dining

Plan 1: Typical Unit Furniture Layout Plan


14/24


14 | P a g e

area, unless the main entrance door are always closed at most of the residents. While the ineffective

layout planning also affected the resident that cooking area should have been separated from the dry

kitchen to prevent smoke to enter the entire house. Thirdly, the third bedroom as labelled in Plan 1 are

neared to the corridor as the opening of the windows is facing to the corridor. These high trafficking

corridor would give the feeling of insecure and unease even the resident is in their own bedroom,

fearing that their privacy would be violated. Lastly, there is basically no places for laundry and residents

will have to dry out their clothes at the corridor, ground floor near the convenient shops or near to their

own windows, on the fencing near TNB substation and hanging them out from their bedroom windows.

Due to this, my observation continue to lead me into the finding of natural sun lighting that illuminate

on the internal spaces of the buildings. Although the layout of the buildings are designed to hold a

Figure 22, 23, 24, 25, 26: Clothes are hung everywhere to dry.


15/24


15 | P a g e

center opening courtyard all the way up to the top floor but most of the time during the day the internal

spaces of the building are low in light illumination. Children would play at the center courtyard because

it is not as sunny as playing at the garden.

While the children are playing at the ground floor, the noises are vivid even on the top floor due to the

reflection of sound echo thus the application of noise insulation materials should be considered. It is

found that due to all these inconvenient caused, resident are likely to be closed off from community.

Figure 27, 28, 29: Light illumination are low at the center courtyard and corridor.


16/24


16 | P a g e

4. Recommendations and Suggestions.Good internal and external planning of the public housing scheme, improved residential facilities,

better consideration on design element and security as well as reliable building management team will

further enhance the quality of living in PPR flats. Instead of pointing finger only to the building

management team, let us not forget also the responsibility of residents. To integrate the power of

engaging peoples for the same purpose and promising living environment, like how the American

Institute of Architects New York Chapter (AIANY) had considered to address the communitys health

issues, provide a mix of rental and homeownership opportunities for people at a range of income levels

to create a truly mixed-income community with a series of green rooftop vegetable garden, space for

outdoor activity and an indoor fitness facility. (ULI Case Studies: Via Verde the Green Way, Urban

Land Institute, 2014)

Figure 30, 31, 32: Via Verde originated in a design competition held by the city of New York and the local

chapter of the American Institute of Architects. A series of green roofs is the organizing elements of the design.


17/24


17 | P a g e

4.1 Survey Data Collection from Residents in Public Housing

8

30

23

18

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Aspect of Improvement

Survey Data Collection in Public Housing

Location

Amenities & Maintenance

External Environment & Safety

Building Materials, Structure Defect & Workmanship Quality

Internal Layout, Space Usage & Indoor Environment

7

5

4

8

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Survey Data Collection in Public Housing

Playground & Garden Car Parking Area Motorcycle Bay

Garbage Dumping Area Drainage Wet Floors & Leakage

Chart 1: This chart shows that higher percentage of respondents that concerned on amenities &

maintenance in their PPR flats.

Chart 2: This chart shows that in the 30% of Amenities & Maintenance, higher percentage of

respondents are concerned about garbage dumping area and its health impacts.


18/24


18 | P a g e

5. Conclusion.From the survey done with residents we can be surely to see that people are more concern with the

health-related problems and various impacts that has been mentioned earlier. Meanwhile, today many

developers and public officials are interested in health-related aspects of development such as urban

farming and walkability. Building management team should consider development on the opportunities

for more active living, yet are accessible to the disabled and safe, through a combination of

encouragement of exercise and improved air quality, low or zero VOC materials, natural ventilation

that improves indoor air quality. Through prioritizing community-engaged activities, integration of

different types of community, we are pushing away segregation of social hierarchy and architecture

inequality, we cultivate understanding between community, a true architecture do not merely provide

spaces to the people but bringing people together for a purpose, to engage people for reflection,

meditation and experience the connection between of architecture, life and inspiration.


19/24


19 | P a g e

REFERENCE LISTWebsite:

Income Disparity in Malaysia: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 2013 [viewed 10 February 2014].

Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_disparity_in_Malaysia

Suhakams Observations, Recommendations and Conclusions: Human Right Commission of Malaysia,

2003 [viewed 12 February 2014]. Available from: http://www.suhakam.org.my/docs/

documents.resource/housing_Part 1_observation.pdf

Accessibility to Basic Needs: A report of Suhakams Seminar on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights:

Human Right Commission of Malaysia, 2003 [viewed 12 February 2014]. Available from:

http://www.suhakam.org.my

Big Road Blues: Tufts Now, 2012 [viewed 15 February 2014]. Available from: http://now.tufts.edu/

articles/big-road-blues-pollution-highways

ULI Case Studies: Via Verdethe Green Way: Urban Land Institute, 2014 [viewed 20 February 2014].

Available from: http://uli.org/case-study/uli-case-studies-via-verde/

Via Verde The Green Way: Viaverdenyc, 2013 [viewed 20 February 2014]. Available from:

http://viaverdenyc.com/

Theses:

GOH,AI TEE and AHMAD YAHAYA. Public Low Cost Housing in Malaysia: Case Studies on PPR

Low-Cost Flats in Kuala Lumpur. 2012 [viewed 12 February 2014]. Available from: http://e-

journal.um.edu.my/public/article-view.php?id=2654


20/24


20 | P a g e

Printed Material - Books:

GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA. Total Planning and Development Guidelines. Department of Town

and Country Planning, Peninsular Malaysia, Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 2001.

GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA. Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006-2010. The Government Press, Kuala

Lumpur, 2005.

GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA. Eighth Malaysia Plan 20012005. The Government Press, Kuala

Lumpur, 2000.

ADB. MUTALIB B. JELANI. Urban Planning, Housing and Sustaninable Development in Malaysia.

First APNHR Conference on Housing and Urban Development, Kuala Lumpur, 2003.

NATIONAL HOUSING DEPARTMENT. JPN Standard Plan 2000. 2006


21/24


22/24


22 | P a g e

APPENDIX AThis appendix is about the survey done in PPR Laksamana and PPR Cochrane and here is the

example of survey forms.

Public Housing Survey QuestionsResident Information

Age:

Gender:

Race:

Student Research Survey

Issues of ImprovementWhat would your priority be? Location


External Environment & Safety

Building Materials, Structure Defects & Workmanship Qua Internal Layout, Space Usage & Indoor Environment

LocationWhich is your main concern? Check one box to indicate the priority level. Sound insulation

Air quality


23/24


23 | P a g e

Amenities MaintenanceWhich area do you need better improvement? Check one box to indicate the priority level. Playground & Garden

Car Parking Area

Motorcycle Bay

Garbage Dumping Area Drainage Wet Floors & Leakage

External Environment SafetyWhich aspect do you need better improvement? Check one box to indicate the priority level. Easy access external traffic

Systematic internal traffic

Street lights

Footpath & ramps for disabled Fire protection system & equipment

Building Materials, Structure Defect Workmanship QualityWhich defects do you need better improvement? Check one box to indicate the priority level. Water piping

Window design

Manhole

Lockset & metal grille Water seepage on wall Painting peeling off Tiling uneven Ceiling leakage


24/24


24 | P a g e

Internal Layout, Space Usage Indoor EnvironmentWhich area do you need better improvement? Check one box to indicate the priority level. Ineffective unit layout design

Privacy indoor environment

Place for laundry

Lighting illumination Noise insulation

community living environment in public housing malaysia - study visit report

Documents