the collective dream home (housing)

2o 3o

TOTAl PLOT AREA 2.4 acres/ 9712.5 m2

THE COLLECTIVEDREAM HOMELOCATION: 3°7’52”N 101°43’33”E

Jalan Cochrane55100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur

SMK Cochrane

PPRT FLats

Proposed MRT station

Jalan Cochrane

Kuala Lumpur- Putrajaya HWY

4o 5o

380DENSITIES NOS DWELLINGS USES

LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

Index 001

the Collective Dream (Home) 001

Page NO. Contents

The Collective Dream (Home)

7o

8o, 9o, 10o, 11o

12o, 13o

15o

16o, 17o

18o, 19o

21o, 22o

23o

24o

CreditsResearchMasterplanPrima BriefDataCalculationsHypothesisStrategiesConceptSite ImagesSite Location

25o

26o, 27o

28o, 29o

30o, 31o

32o-43o

44o-49o

50o

51o-55o

Home MapMassing modelsModelsSketchesMassing Development!SectionsDiagramsStructural

56o-57o

58o

59o-60o

62o-63o

64o

65o-69o

Environmental AnalysisSite PlanParkingTypical Floors

70o-76o

77o-83o

Unit VariationsPrecedent Studies

the Collective Dream (Home)Housing research unit for PRIMA

THA

T’S A

HOU

SE

FOR

ME!

6o 7o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

002CREDITS

analysis

housing unitantifolio

PRIMA HOUSING UNIT

Second Edition 2012All rights reserved

Thanks to all the Lecturers who made this happen.

Muhammad Shamin Sahrum2009360311FSPU, UITM,Shah Alam

www.shaminsahrum.co.uk

“I could not think of anything more noble

than making a beautiful house.”

Frank Llyod Wright

tCD(H)

8o 9o

003RESEARCH

direction analysis


tCD(H)

10o 11o

& PROGRAM

An abstract device had been developed to act as the generator of an architectural scheme.

CONCEPT-FORM

Programmatic strategy turned to conceptHad to assume the configuration of a form-concept form- in order to exist

There can be no architecture without programs

Bernard Tschumi

Concept and its form are always a function of one or several program characteristics.

Suspended Garden

The LoopThe Grid

& PROGRAM

An abstract device had been developed to act as the generator of an architectural scheme.

CONCEPT-FORM

Programmatic strategy turned to conceptHad to assume the configuration of a form-concept form- in order to exist

There can be no architecture without programs

Bernard Tschumi

Concept and its form are always a function of one or several program characteristics.

Suspended Garden

The LoopThe Grid

12o 13o

3

25

1

1. Entrance to housing area

2. Sports Centre/ Recreational

3. Pedestrian Boulevard

4. Perimeter Vehicular Access

5. Commercial Area

Legend

4


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

004MASTERPLAN

analysis



tCD(H)

14o 15o

the M50 is us Malaysiansearning between rm2500to rm7500 a month!


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

005PRIMA BRIEF

analysis


PRIMA

HOUSING

NOW!TARGETED

FOR THEM50!

PRIMA

The theme for the development of high density living will be that emphasize on social interaction for the formula-tion of social cohesion with a sense of place and sense of belonging. A place where the tenant knows most of their neighbours, where neighbours

help each other in time of neeed and where children can grow up and play in safe and conducive environment. The physical facilities are well provided by the tenants and the social environments are safe and friendly for the com-munity or users.


tCD(H)

16o 17o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

Existing Building Outdoor Exposed Parking

Main access road Pedestrian

SetbackService Route Privacy

Green Link Pedestrian LinkIngress & Egress

006DATA

analysis


“Neighbourhood living and com-munity environment quality are both the influencing elements to the house purchasing decision.

This is because Malaysian house-holds prefer to stay longer in the

neighbourhood.”

Vegetation


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

tCD(H)

18o 19o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

Common Spaces

community centre =

shops =

religious place =

public square = common terrace =

laundry place =

250 m2 =

35 (7) m2 =

140 m2 =

300 m2 + 480 =

1000 m2 =

100 (2) =

250 m2

245 m2

150 m2

300 m2

1000 m2

200 m2

Total

2625 m2

{250 m2

245 m2

150 m2

300 m2

1000 m2

200 m2

ToTT tal

2625 m2

Circulation = 10 %= 870 m2Circulation = 10 % = 870 m2

Housing units / 60 % =380 units total

5250 m2

single =

2+1 =

3+1 =

Studio = Soho =

45.60 m2

75.00 m2

99.25 m2

43.20 m2

70 ~90 m2

70 units =

140 units =

60 units =

30 units =

80 units =

Housing units / 60 %


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

entrance =

room 1 =

kitchen =

living room =

W.C =

Single Units

4.00 m2

11.40 m2

3.90 m2

25.00 m2

1.30 m2

(45.60) m2

entrance =

room1 =

kitchen =

living room =

W.C WW =

Single Units

4.00 m2

11.40 m2

3.90 m2

25.00 m2

1.30 m2

(45.60) m2

entrance =

kitchen =

living room+bedroom =

W.C =

Studio Units

5.00 m2

3.90 m2

30.00 m2

4.30 m2

(43.20) m2

entrance =

kitchen =

living room+bedroom =

W.C WW =

Studio Units

5.00 m2

3.90 m2

30.00 m2

4.30 m2

(43.20) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

room 3 =

kitchen+WC =

living room =

=

SOHO Units

8.00 m2

15.00 m2

15.00 m2

5.25 m2

14.70 m2

25.00 m2

20.00 m2

(102.95) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

room 3 =

kitchen+WC =

living room =

=

SOHO Units

8.00 m2

15.00 m2

15.00 m2

5.25 m2

14.70 m2

25.00 m2

20.00 m2

(102.95) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

kitchen =

living room =

W.C =

2+1 Units

9.00 m2

10.50 m2

10.50 m2

14.70 m2

25.00 m2

1.30 m2

(75.00) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

kitchen =

living room =

W.C WW =

2+1 Units

9.00 m2

10.50 m2

10.50 m2

14.70 m2

25.00 m2

1.30 m2

(75.00) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

kitchen =

living room =

room 3 =

room 4 =

3+1 Units

9.00 m2

16.00 m2

16.00 m2

14.70 m2

28.00 m2

10.80 m2

5.25 m2

(99.25) m2

entrance =

room 1 =

room 2 =

kitchen =

living room =

room 3 =

room 4 =

3+1 Units

9.00 m2

16.00 m2

16.00 m2

14.70 m2

28.00 m2

10.80 m2

5.25 m2

(99.25) m2

007CALCULATIONS

analysis


007CALCULATIONS

analysis


tCD(H) tCD(H)

20o 21o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

Due to this mobility, the interpretation of ‘home’ is chang-ing: we do not live in one place anymore like our grandpar-ents. We adapt ourselves while moving around. Thus our notion of what constitutes a ‘home’ needs to change too. Can we cre-ate a city that absorbs changes easily? Should temporal ways of creating homes become more apparent?

Our notion of home no longer involves a monotonous, singular event dwelling, but home is now made out of series of events. In this ever mobile society our home is made up of a collec-tive of events that sum up what home is. Why don’t these se-ries of events be closer to where we live? Within a 5 minute radius say?

With the fast pace change in society it is important that we hold on to certain beliefs and culture. Thus it is within the urban environment should the collective home be more important than ever. The Collective Dream (Home) requires the partici-pation from it’s residents in order for it to happen. A more active role to living in a neighbourhood. The ‘collective’ en-courages sharing, reduces waste and fosters relationships.

“Instead of multiplying individual dreams,

can we build a collective one?”

Winy Maas, Visionary Cities,The Why Factory

Dwelling courtyard typology studies

008HYPOTHESIS

analysis



tCD(H)

22o 23o

“5 minutes of physical activities in the presence of nature led to demonstrable benefits in both mental and physical health.”

Doctor Frances Kuo, director of the Landscape and Human Health Laboratory at the University of IllinoisEnvironmental Science & Technology

Walking, cycling, fishing, horseback riding, farming, and even gardening all constitute “physical activity.”

Five minutes was determined as the most efficient number. Longer times were still beneficial, but lead to diminishing returns

Common courtyard

The Five Minute City

Re-envisioning the Linear Block

Ecological Responsibility

Layering of Zones

Residents meet up at a common space with differ-

ent functions

Vertical planting throughout the building, blurring boundaries.

Nurturing is home. Thus planting areas as well as communal gardens provided

1-4 minutes of walking to get to any point of

interest within building.

Connection with MRT line makes travelling to the city within minutes.

Maximum efficiency through walking and

cycling.

Creating ground street level conditions and

meeting areas vertically.

Performative design for facade design reduces waste while optimizing efficiency

Prefabricated building con-struction for future flex-ibility and cost effective

Low energy use by adapt-ing passive cooling and

heating.

Energy harvesting by means of environmentally

responsive design.

Encourage recycling by providing the infrastruc-ture to minimize waste.

3D matrix planning.Planning both vertically

and horizontally.

Water preserving through reusing of grey water for watering plants saves costs

Streets within streetsLayering of private,

semi-private, public and semi-ublic zones.

Neighbourhood and environment quality is not only a vital component for personal network; consumers are psychologically secured when trustworthy neighbours are around

Shyue Chuan, Chong, Bik Kai, Sia, Wah Wan, Cheong , Soo Sung, Hng : House Purchasing Decisions: A Case Study ofResidents of Klang Valley, Malaysia

009STRATEGIES

analysis


Shyue Chuan, Chong, Bik Kai, Sia, Wah Wan, Cheong , Soo Sung, Hng : House Purchasing Decisions: A Case Study of

Residents of Klang Valley, Malaysia


tCD(H)

24o 25o

01

02

03

04

Extracting from the idea of chinese shophouse courtyards, and stacking + connecting them at a vertical level.


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres 011

SITE IMAGESanalysis


010CONCEPT

analysis


tCD(H)

tCD(H)

26o 27o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

012LOCATION

analysis



tCD(H)

28o 29o

30o 31o

011LOCATION

analysis


013MASSING MODELS

analysis


tCD(H)

32o 33o

014MODELSanalysis


014MODELSanalysis


tCD(H)

tCD(H)

34o 35o

015FINAL MASSING

analysis



LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

015FINAL MASSING

analysis


tCD(H)

tCD(H)

36o 37o

015 LOCATION MODELS

analysis


tCD(H)

38o 39o

015FINAL MASSING

analysis


40o 41o

015MODELSanalysis


“Home is the making of

an interior in which a variety of confronted societies gain simueltaneity”

-Andre Jaques-

tCD(H)

42o 43o

012MODELSanalysis


44o 45o

016SKECTHES

analysis



tCD(H)

46o 47o

012SKECTHES

analysis


tCD(H)

48o 49o

012SKECTHES

analysis


tCD(H)

50o 51o

PERIMETER

BLOCK!

ACCESS!

ELEVATE!

PUBLIC

AREA

PUNCH THROUGH!

PEDESTRIA

N

MOVEM

ENT!

DENT!FOR E

NCLOSURE

+ ENTRANCE

PULL UP!

INCREASE

DENSITY!

CUT OUT!

PROVIDE

VIEW

S! EXTRACT!

VIEW

S +

GARDENS

FINIT

E!

018MASSING!

analysis


tCD(H)

Sectional drawing showing the Vertical Street gardens and how activities are performed within them. The dotted red line serves as movement trajectories for the residents as they move about in the building.

Scale > 1:50

Legend

1. Vertical Street Gardens overlooking 4 Floors of neighbourhood streets. Becoming a vital point of circulation and interaction for the residents.2. Communal Planting plot for residents. To have a home is to nurture, and planting helps foster interaction among residents.3. Ribbon staircases that connect alongside the facade.4. Vertical connectivity through a skybridge, increases connectivity and interactivity.5. Lift and services core running from sub-basement all through other floors.

017SECTION

analysis


tCD(H)

52o 53o

THAT'S AHOUSEFOR ME!

54o 55o

KEY1.Vertical Street Gardens2.Services Core3.Communal Spaces4.Ribbon Staircase

1312

Longitudinal Section 1:500Showing Communal Programmes

Gymnasium

Eateries

Laundry

Kindergraden

Community Hall/Shops

019LONG SECTION

analysis


tCD(H)

56o 57o

Programme Diagram

KEY1.Vertical Street Gardens2.Services Core3.Communal Spaces4.Ribbon Staircase

1

12

3

4

ParkingParking

Parking/115 spaces1150 m2

Retail/245 m2

Community/1200 m2

StudioHousing/51 units

SingleHousing/40 units

Mid FamilyHousing/37 units

Family Housing/77 units

Public Space/400 m2

020DIAGRAMS

analysis


Unit Distribution

Programmatic DistributiontCD(H)

58o 59o

IBS Structural Elements

Columns on 8.1m x 8.1m

Grid

Pre Fab slabs resting on columns

(RED) indicates the structural lift/service

cores

Wall units and other parts are assembled into a unit and slot-ted within the width of the

columns

021STRUCTURAL

analysis


Above: Local weather analysis

Below: Shadow Path analysis of Massing showing areas shaded during the span of a day.

Above + Below: Thermal Comfort analysis of Vertical Street Gar-dens, cut at both the Vertical and Horizontal Axis.


tCD(H)

60o 61o

The Blue areas indicate the more thermally comfortable regions, while gradually in-creassing to Yellow, indicat-ing areas of the most thermal exposure..

022ENVIRNMTNAL

analysis



“Architecture is about the under-

standing of the world and turning it into a more meaningful

and humane place.”

Juhani Pallasmaa

tCD(H)

62o 63o

1

9

10

2

4

5

7

8

3

6

11

12

Ground PlanScale 1:200

1.Lobby2.Community Centre/Hall3.Vehicular Drop Off4.Ramp to underground parking5.Pedestrian Boulevard6.Guard House7.Services drop8.Refuse Chamber9.TNB Substation10.Mail Room11.Admin office12.Childrens Playground

Key

019SITE PLAN

analysis


tCD(H)

64o 65o

Floor 5-6 Floor 7

Floor 8 Floor 9

Floor 10 Floor 11

Precedent Studies

023PARKING

analysis


tCD(H)

66o 67o

Floor 12 Floor 13

Floor 14

Internal Alleyways


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres

024TYPICAL FLOOR

analysis


025UNIT/Corridor

analysis


tCD(H)

tCD(H)

68o 69o

Communal Spaces

1st Floor : Surau2nd Floor : Nursery3rd Floor : Laundry4th Floor : Eateries5th Floor : Gymnasium

Communal Spaces

1st Floor : Surau2nd Floor : Nursery3rd Floor : Laundry5th Floor : Gymnasium

Corridors, internal alleys

Corridors, internal alleys

026TYPICAL FLOOR

Lvl 1 to 4


tCD(H)

70o 71o

Studio Unit / 43.2 m2

TYPE L

Single Room Unit / 51.2 m2

TYPE P

SOHO Unit / 63 m2

3 Room Unit / 105.3 m2

TYPE S

2 Room Unit / 79.2 m2

TYPE B

Unit variation of dwellings, adapting to the needs of differ-ent residents that would want a specific environment for their living needs.

027UNITVARIATION

analysis


tCD(H)

72o 73o

Example 3 Room Unit

KEY

a.Vestibuleb.Dining Areac.Room 1d.Room 2e.Room 3f.Living Areag.Toilet h.Kitcheni.Verandahj .Yard

a

b

c

e d f

g

gh

i

j

Section A-A’3 Room Unit

A

A’

028DETAILS

analysis


Source:WOHA Architects

tCD(H)

74o 75o

029ENVRNMNTAL

analysis


Daylight analysis of Studio Unit and the amount of light re-ceived in the unit. Also the shadow cast affects of the over-hangs on its surround-ings during the day.


tCD(H)

76o 77o


LIVING60%

COMMON SPACES30%

CIRCULATION10%

2.4acres


78o 79o

030PRECEDENT

analysis

housing unitantifolio VANKE,

STEVEN HOLLtCD(H)

80o 81o

GIFU,SEJIMA

82o 83o

MOULMEIN RISE,WOHA

BIG,8 HOUSE

84o 85o

TEAM

Xthe Collective Dream (Home)PRIMA housing unit 2012

“I could not think of anything more noble

than making a beautiful house.”

Frank Llyod Wright

PRIMA HOUSING UNIT

Second Edition 2012All rights reserved

Thanks to all the Lecturers who made this happen.And to the guys at Quixotic Studio for all the blood sweat and tears together.

Muhammad Shamin Sahrum2009360311FSPU, UITM,Shah Alam

www.shaminsahrum.co.uk

the collective dream home (housing)

Documents