Laporan KPKw ULBS BI SPM

LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA

FORMAT PELAPORAN ULBSBAHASA INGGERIS SPM

2016

LAPORAN KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

BIL.

NAMA SEKOLAH NO. PUSAT BILANGAN CALON

1 SMK XYZ SN999 179

NAMA KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH: BOBBY FLAY

1. PRESTASI KESELURUHAN CALON BERDASARKAN SKOR

NO. OF CANDIDATES

AT EACH CENTRE

LEVELTOTALEXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY WEAK VERY WEAK

26 – 30 21 – 25 16 – 20 11 – 15 5 – 101 179 3 21 73 58 24 179234GRAND TOTAL 3 21 73 58 24 179

1

Laporan KPKw ULBS BI SPM

2. KOMEN TENTANG PENTAKSIRAN

2.1 Model: Models used by the candidates are suitable with the students needs and ability. Suitability of the models for candidates are appropriate and useful in real life communication.

2.2 Konstruk: At the end of the third assessment, students were more confident. They were able to present their scripts with at least satisfactory performance. They were more sure of the content of their presentation. Some students still failed to give eye contact and appropriate non-verbal communication. The students also make unnecessary occasional pauses during their presentation that defected their performance. Some students were too shy. Therefore, hindered their ability to present their points/ideas effectively.

Good candidates were able to present with appropriate tone and intonation.The weaker candidates tended to present with monotonous ton(reading intonation). Some still have problem with pronunciation of consonant cluster and fricatives. Fluency in pronunciation was affected/influenced by their mother tongue. The good candidates were able to use wide range of vocabulary while weak candidates have limited range of vocabulary. Most words used were of elementary level.

Only a small number of candidates were able to respond critically to questions asked. Most of the candidates' response were on a superficial level. Students failed to provide answers that should reflected critical and creative thinking. Limited general knowledge has made it harder for students to give opinion. This problem might arises because the students memorizes their text. They were conscious and tried to avoid making mistakes, thus, limit their ability to think beyond the required scope.

2.3 Kriteria Penskoran: The descriptors are too complicated for each score. Should revise the criteria for assesssment or replace with banding.

3. SARANAN KEPADA CALONStudents should be given enough time and preparation for oral test.

4. SARANAN KEPADA GURUThe teachers have to juggle between finishing the syllabus and to evaluate students according to the time limit. Thus, teachers should be given an isolate period for ULBS assessment.

5. ISU DAN SARANAN PENAMBAHBAIKAN ULBSSuggestions a list of themes and topics should be provided/given by the teachers

2

Laporan KPKw ULBS BI SPM

6. HAL-HAL LAIN In general the assessment methods and models are appropriate and cater to the students' needs. Students have more freedom in choosing what they want to present and familiar with. Thus they would be able to present effectively.

Laporan disediakan oleh :

_____________________(BOBBY FLAY)Ketua Pentaksir SekolahSMK XYZ

Tarikh : 15 APRIL 2016

3