sample report muet......rosni.doc

MAJLIS PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA

CONFIDENTIAL

MPM/P16.1E


PEPERIKSAAN STPM/MUET SESI MARCHTAHUN 2014

REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK AND QUESTION PAPER

Note:1.If there is not enough space, please write on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this report.

2. Please type or write in black ink.

Examiners DetailsName of Examiner/Team Leader/Group Leader/

Co-chief Examiner/Chief Examiner:

ROSNI BINTI HASHIMExaminers Code:109

Details of Paper

Name of Paper:WRITINGCode of Paper:800/4

Codes of Centres Examined

MD0718

1. Data

1.1

Number of scripts examined1801.4

Lowest mark7

1.2Full mark1001.5Mean **37.8258

1.3Highest mark 561.6

Total number of scripts written in English ***180

2. Comments on Question Paper

Quality of questions in general

There are 2 questions to attempt. The questions are not difficult for the candidates provided, they knew what are required of them*Delete whichever is not relevant.

**Please refer to the method of calculating the mean as given in Lampiran 3, Panduan Kepada Pemeriksa (MPM/P12.3).

***For Mathematics, Computing, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology only.

[Turn over

CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL

Problems in question paper (if any)Question 1The number of words asked hampered the students capability to write.

Question 2

Candidates misinterpreted the word healthy. Level of difficulty of question paper in general

Average. for both questionsQuestions presented are not difficult. In question 1, candidates are required to interprete a chart and a table about youth visiting the dentist and reasons for visits. They need to analyse and linked the information found in the two visuals given. Candidates should be able to answer this question. They were also required to write within the limited given words ( 150-200 words) and they are advised to spend about 40 minutes on this questionQuestion 2

Candidates are required to write on the topic given and whether they agree or disagree with the statement given. CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIALUse of language and terms All the candidates wrote in english. They could not write proper language of comparison such as the highest, the lowest, the most popular.etc3. Comments on Candidates Answers in General

Quality of answers including planning and presentation

Strengths and weaknesses (please provide examples)

Other comments related to candidates performance (including candidates use of English)Question 1The introduction and overview of all the candidates look as if memorized. Either they have been told about the questions earlier or they memorized them. Candidates did not plan well

StrengthThe candidates attempted the questions. They compare and use all the information given in the 2 visualsWeaknesses

Msinterpreted the firs viauLAt . Sometimes linkers were not used and reasons were not given. Language of comparison was also missing from their writings. They tried to analyse the information but it was not very effective . Reasons and data were also not properly presented or reasons were not mention at all. Many assumptions were given. They did not use high frequency words. Mostly simple vocabularyQuestion 2

Strength

Candidates attempted the question given regardless of understanding the meanings of the questions

weaknesses

Misunderstood the word healthyTurn overCONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL4. Comments on Specific Questions

Task

Expected answers

Strengths and weaknesses in candidates answers

Answers to quantitative questions Question1In question 1, candidates are required to interprete a chart and a table about pet ownership. They need to analyse the results of the survey and linked the information found in the two visuals given. Candidates should be able to answer this question. They were also required to write within the limited given words ( 150-200 words) and they are advised to spend about 40 minutes on this question

Question 2

Candidates are required to agree or disagree with the statement given. They must also justify their stand giving relevant example. Actually, word count is not required but because they were not told (have never attempted this type of question in school before), majority of them wrote about three paragraphs and then leave one paragraph empty to write their conclusions at the last paragraph. Just imagine 2 written paragraphs, I empty area and then suddenluy there is a conclusion!.

Signature: .....................................

Name of examiner: ROSNI BT HASHIMDate:


MPM/P16.1E


PEPERIKSAAN STPM/MUET SESI MARCH

TAHUN 2014

REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK AND QUESTION PAPER

Note:1.If there is not enough space, please write on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this report.

3. Please type or write in black ink.

Examiners DetailsName of Examiner/Team Leader/Group Leader/

Co-chief Examiner/Chief Examiner:

ROSNI BINTI HASHIM

Examiners Code:109

Details of Paper

Name of Paper:LISTENINGCode of Paper800/1

Codes of Centres Examined

MD0718

3. Data

1.1

Number of scripts examined1801.4

Lowest mark3

1.2Full mark1.5Mean **8.0988

1.3Highest mark 151.6

Total number of scripts written in English ***180

4. Comments on Question Paper

Quality of questions in general

This is a listening test paper. The candidates need to listen very carefully to the tape and answer the questions on the paper given. In general the questions presented were easy for the candidates if they are able to hear the tape played clearly

*Delete whichever is not relevant.

**Please refer to the method of calculating the mean as given in Lampiran 3, Panduan Kepada Pemeriksa (MPM/P12.3).

***For Mathematics, Computing, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology only.

[Turn over


Problems in question paper (if any)

Part 1

There are 8 questions. Many candidates did not attempt the questions or wrongly answered the questions This may be due to lack of time or they could not hear the questions at all.

Part II

There are 6 questions. All the candidates in this centre answered the questions

Part III

There are 6 questions. Candidates are advised to write not more than five words. Yet many of them wrote more than that

Level of difficulty of question paper in general

Overall, for these students, they should find the questions quite easy to attempt.


Use of language and terms English was the medium of writing.

Turn over


5. Comments on Candidates Answers in General

Quality of answers including planning and presentation

Strengths and weaknesses (please provide examples)

Other comments related to candidates performance (including candidates use of English)Part 1

All candidates attempted the questions given.

STRENGTH Attempting all the questions given

WEAKNESS

Writing more than the required words

Part 2

All candidates attempted the questions given

STRENGTH

Attempting the questions

WEAKNESS

Writing the answers in a sentence form instead of just circling or writing the alphabets

Part 3

STRENGTH

Candidates attempted all the questions given

WEAKNESS

The students wrote more than the required words.

CONFIDENTITurn overCONFIDENTIAL6. Comments on Specific Questions

Task

Expected answers

Strengths and weaknesses in candidates answers

Answers to quantitative questions The test consists of three parts. Each part comprises a recording. Candidates are told to listen to each recording. They are required to circle or write the answers given on the question paper. Answers which they gave with more than the specified number of words will be marked as incorrect.

Signature: .....................................

Name of examiner: ROSNI BT HASHIMDate:

CONFIDENTIALEMBED Unknown

EMBED Unknown

PAGE 2

_377326021.unknown

sample report muet......rosni.doc

Documents