riteria eam xcellence kajian kes 10 oktober 2018 - mpc.gov.my · pemilihan projek & definisi/...

Transformation Innovation Partnership 1

BENGKEL PEMURNIAN TEAM

EXCELLENCE –

PERINGKAT KEBANGSAAN 2018

KriteriaTeam Excellence

& Kajian Kes

Pembentang:

Zainudin Elias

Perbadanan Produktiviti Malaysia

10 Oktober 2018


Objektif

•Meningkatkan tahap kefahaman

terhadap kriteria APIC 2018

•Membantu persediaan kumpulan di

dalam menyediakan laporan projek

bagi menyertai APIC 2018.


Mukadimah….1.Tahniah kerana terpilih ke APIC 2018

2.Teruskan usaha untuk buat yg terbaik

• Lain platform, berbeza sistem penilaian,

berbeza pendekatan

• Tingkatkan kemahiran, potensi diri

3.Betulkan nawaitu…

• Sumbangan kita..

• Meraikan pencapaian..

Transformation Innovation Partnership

Garispanduan Persembahan

Mini & Wilayah

Persembahan Projek

Sesi Q & A

5mins.

20mins.

Persiapan

5mins.

APIC

Persembahan Projek

15mins.

Persiapan

5mins.

MASA

4

Catatan:

Strategi buat

demo projek

tanpa jejaskan

masa.


Pengenalan Kriteria APIC

KriteriaMar-

kah

1. Introduction of Problem

Pengenalan Masalah

100

2. Creative & Innovative Final

Solutions/ Penyelesaian Akhir

Kreatif & Inovatif

250

3. Result & Impact of the Project

Hasil & Impak Projek

280

4. Validation/ Pengesahan 90

5. Result & Sustainability

Hasil & Kemapanan

130

6. Lesson Learned & Presentation

Pembelajaran & persembahan

150

Total Score: 1000

5


Perbandingan Kriteria Penilaian

No MINI & WILAYAH Mar-

kahNATIONAL CONVENTION

Mar-

kah

1. Pengenalan/ Introduction 50 1. Introduction of Problem 100

2. Pemilihan projek & definisi/ Project

Selection & Definition

150 2. Creative & Innovative Final

Solutions

250

3. Analisis Peluang Penambahbaikan/

Improvement Opportunities Analysis

250 3. Result & Impact of the

Project

280

4. Penyelesaian dan pelaksanaan kreatif

& inovatif / Creative & Innovative

Solutions/ Implementation

200 4. Validation 90

5. Pemantauan & penyeragaman

Monitoring and Standardisation

100 5. Result & Sustainability 130

6. Achievement & Value Creation

Pencapaian & penciptaan nilai

200 6. Lesson Learned &

Presentation

150

7. Persembahan/ Presentation 50

Jumlah 1000 Total Score: 1000

6


Skala Pemarkahan

•Tiada langsung(laporan/persembahan)

•Memenuhi kriteria secukupnya

•Setakat disentuh & kurang jelas

•Maklumat & pendekatan tidak

memadai; terhad •Pendekatan melebihi dari yg

ditetapkan.•Laporan/penerangan thdp

analisis, tindakan & kesimpulan

menjangkau

•Integrasi dgn subkriteria

berkaitan

•Tahap ketepatan maklumat

Not Covered: 0 Point

Unclear : 1 Point

Meets Criteria: 2 Points

Bagi sesetengah kriteria merujuk

kpd:

• Kaedah/teknik/alat

• Analisis

• Hubungkait/ link

Exceeds Expectation: 3 Points


Beberapa aspek kriteria APIC:

Slide 8

1. Keseluruhannya 6 kriteria dgn. 16 subkriteria

2. Turutan tidak harmoni dgn. PDCA & kriteria TE mini/ wilayah.

3. Terma baru digunapakai yg tiada dalam kriteria TE mini/ wilayah.

Contoh: stakeholder (I.3), sustainability (V.12)

4. Fenomena hubungkait diantara subkriteria tertentu; isu integrasi

Contoh: Kriteria I.2 – III.7 & Kriteria I.3 - III.10 - VI.14

5. Wajaran tertinggi adalah bagi kriteria III Result & Impact of the

Project (280/1000 = 28%).


Latihan 1 – Kenalpasti

hubungkait kriteria

1. Kriteria I.2 – III.7

2. Kriteria I.3 - III.10 - VI.14

3. Kriteria II.5 – III.10

4. Kriteria II.6 – III.8 – III.9

5. Kriteria II.6 – IV.11

Arahan:

Menggunakan salinan kriteria yang dibekalkan, hubungkan kriteria-kriteria

berikut:


APIC CRITERIA - 2018

10

I. INTRODUCTION OF PROBLEM (100) Max.

Marks

1. Describe what, why & how the project was selected. 50

2. Explain how the project supports/aligns with the

organization's goals, performance measures, and/or

strategies.

(Link to III.7)

30

Identify the potential stakeholders (who may be impacted by

the project) and explain how they may be impacted by the

project.

(Link to VI.14)

20

Penjelasan :

Pemilihan masalah

Definisi masalah

Latar belakang masalah

Sasaran projek & justifikasi

Kenapa masalah dipilih

□Pelanggan □Organisasi □Stakeholder

Strategi/matlamat organisasi yg

terkesan; jenis impak

Siapa stakeholder; jenis (impak

berpotensi);


II. CREATIVE AND INNOVATIVE FINAL SOLUTIONS (250) Max.Marks

4. Explain how final solution was determined. 100

5. Describe the expected benefits by implementing the

solution(s) / improvement action(s). (Link to III.10)

80

Describe the uniqueness of the solution. (Link to III.8

& III.9)70

11

Penjelasan :

Rajah Ishikawa 1

Varifikasi dan Validasi

Rajah Isikawa 2

Cadangan penyelesaian & prosesnya

Carta perbatuan pelaksanaan cadangan

Pelaksanaan cadangan, kelulusan pelaksanaan, ujicuba

Jangkaan faedah – ketara & tidak

Keunikan cadangan

Semakan pencapaian sasaran

PUNCA MUNGKIN

Dilapor; hanya disentuh dlm

persembahan


III. RESULT AND IMPACT OF THE PROJECT (280) Max.Marks

7. Explain how the project has contributed to the organisation and has helped to impact its strategic or operational performance.(Link to I.2)

120

8. Explain how the results of the project have created spin-off for other opportunities and/or display continual improvement.

80

Identify the opportunity or prospect of the project to be commercialized and /or recognised.

50

The impacts and value creation of the project to the environment and stakeholders.(Link to I.3 and II.5)

30

Penjelasan :

Impak projek kepada prestasi organisasi

Pelanggan

Organisasi

Persekitaran

Spin off projek – pelbagai kegunaan

Peluang projek dikomersialkan/ diiktiraf (validation)

Impak projek kepada persekitaran & stakeholder


IV. VALIDATION (90) Max.Marks

11. Describe the final solution (s)/ improvement action (s) and explain how the team validated the final solutions (s)/ improvement action (s).(Link to II.6)

90

13

Penjelasan :

Semua surat penghargaan dan pengiktirafan yang diterima samada:

Dari dalam Organisasi

Pihak ketiga (luar organisasi)

KRITERIA IV


V. RESULT AND SUSTAINABILITY (130) Max.Marks

12. Describe the procedure, system, or other changes that were made to implement the solution(s)/ improvement action(s) and to sustain the results.

130

Penjelasan :

Pemantauan terhadap pencapaian projek vs sasaran projek

Penyeragaman - pembentukan SOP baru atau perubahan kepada SOP

sedia ada

SOP disebarkan dan diterangkan melalui sesi latihan, perkongsian

Pengekalan hasil/ prestasi projek (terkini)

KRITERIA V


VI. LESSON LEARNED AND PRESENTATION (150) Max.Marks

Describe how lesson learned were identified and addressed. 30

Describe how the results were shared with stakeholders.(Link to I.3)

40

15. Well organized presentation with logical sequence that conforms to stipulated time.

40

16. Clear presentation, effective usage of visual aids and good public speaking.

40

Penjelasan :

Pembelajaran, halangan dan cara mengatasi

Penilaian kumpulan (carta Radar)

Penerangan bagaimana projek dikongsikan dengan

stakeholders

15

KRITERIA VI


TERIMA

KASIH

riteria eam xcellence kajian kes 10 oktober 2018 - mpc.gov.my · pemilihan projek & definisi/...

Documents