report masjid sri gombak.pptx

8/14/2019 REPORT MASJID SRI GOMBAK.pptx

1/30

ACCESS AUDIT IN THE BUILT

ENVIRONMENT 2013

ASSIGMENT REPORT 2013

Exercise Venue : Masjid Khairiyah, Taman Sri Gombak, Batu

Caves, Selangor

Audited Venue : Ground Floor, Main prayer area

Group No : 2


2/30

MEMBERS INVOLVED

NO. NAME MATRIC NO

1.

MUHAMMAD FARID BIN IBRAHIM BLIND PERSON2. MOHD RAZIEMI BIN RUSLAN CRUCHES PERSON

3. NUR DIANA BINTI KHAIRUDDIN PERSON WITH WHEEL

CHAIR, BLIND

4. TAHIRAH ZAHIRAH BINTI AZMAN PHOTOGRAPHER,

ANALYZER5. PHOO PWINT THU AUNG PHOTOGRAPHER,

ANALYZER

6. SHAH AMIR EZHAM BIN ISMAIL PERSON WITH WHEEL

CHAIR, CRUCHES PERSON


3/30

MASJID KHAIRIYAH


4/30

Masjid Khairiyah Sri Gombak is located at Taman Sri Gombak,Batu Caves, Selangor

Access audit exercise has been done starting from the entrance

up to the main prayer area which at the ground floor level

The spaces involved are incuding the entrance, ablution area,toilet and main prayer hall

INTRODUCTION


5/30

SITE LOCATION

LOCATION OF MASJID KHAIRIYAH SRI GOMBAK

FROM GOOGLE MAP


6/30

SITE PLAN (n.t.s)


7/30


8/30

NO AREA

1 ENTRANCE

2 FOYER

3 ABLUTION AREA

4 SECONDARY PRAYINGAREA

5 MAIN PRAYER HALL

6 STAIRCASE

NO CONNECTIVITY

a PARKING AREA

b DROP OFF AREA

14

3

2

ACCESS AUDIT SIMULATION

5

6

NO ACCESS

X NEAREST ASSEMBLY

POINT

Y NEAREST GUARD

HOUSE

a

b


9/30

DATA COLLECTION


10/30


11/30


12/30

The first consideration when designing spaces for children

should be safety. Secondly emphasizes the children's scale

Finally, furniture and facilities should choose to complywith safety standards, use toxic, blunt and soft material.

SPACE FOR CHILDREN


13/30

The spatial characteristics of the Mosque of Prophetin Medinawhich reveals a prayer hall in a hypostylemodel, one concludes that this scheme provides asuitable ambience for praying, through the sense of

neutrality, non-procession, repose, and equilibrium itreveals, allowing every point in the space to be acenter of equal significance.

Universal design comes in how accessible the mosqueis as a synergic space Multiuse of space We must approach the mosque not as a building for a

single set of ritual worship but more of a kind of socialcenter.

UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR

MOSQUE


14/30


15/30

EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT

NO ELEMENT ANALYSIS PROPOSALParking

1. No accessible parking

provided for OKU

2. No international symbol

of access, imprinted on

parking ground

1. Provide OKU parking MS 1331:2003

(Figure 18-m/s-24)

2. Provide OKU parking signage MS

1331:2003(Figure 17-m/s 24)

PARKING AREA AND PATHWAY


16/30



NO ELEMENT ANALYSIS PROPOSAL

Pathways at Main

Entrance1. No tactile guiding blocks

provided at the main

entrance and pathway

surrounding as references

for the vision impaired

persons along the way to

enter the mosque.

2. No warning blocks

provided at the crucial area

to indicate the obstruction.

eg: Fencing and drop at main

entrance, riser at theexternal ablution area

3. No manholes placed

outside the pedestrian path

of travel

1. Provide tactile guarding block ,

installed along the line of travel

2. Provide warning blocks around any

obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer to figure

10 a)/ms-14


17/30



Pathways1. The pathway surrounding

is clear of steps and

obstruction.

2. No guiding blocks installed

along the line of travel.

3. The surface level is

smooth and non-slippery

1. Provide tactile guarding block ,installed along the line of travel



10 a)/ms-14



18/30



Pathways towards the

external ablution

1. The surface level is

smooth but the material of

tile used was slippery

2. No guiding blocks installed

along the line of traveltowards the external

ablution.

3. No warning blocks

provided to indicate the

ablution area.

1. Provide tactile guarding block ,

installed along the line of travel



10 a)/ms-14

3. Place suitable non-slip tile for the

safety precaution.



19/30


RAMP @ENTRANCE1. Ramp gradient 1:6 at the

first ramp width 1.4 m

2. No landing after ramp

3. No guiding block

4.Ramp gradient 1:10 after

the first ramp width 2m

5. Both ramp Material used

not suitable (slippery)

1. Ramp should be 1:12, follow MS 1184 :

2002, refer to item 5.2.

2. Should allow for at least 1200mm

length landing. Refer to MS 1184:2002,item 5.2.

3. Should allow for guiding block for blind

sight user.

4. Should be slightly gentle or allow for

step ramp, MS 1184:2002, refer to item

7.1. Material should be non-slip.

RAMPS



20/30


RAMP @TOILET1. Ramp gradient 1:10

2. No tactile or warning

block

3. Door too heavy for

wheelchair to open.

4. No guiding block

5. Drop tile too steep &

material used not suitable

1. Ramp should be 1:12, follow MS 1184 :

2002, refer to item 5.2.

2. Should allow for at least 1200mm

length landing. Refer to MS 1184:2002,item 5.2.

3. Should provide slide/automatic door.

4. Should allow for guiding block for blind

sight user.

5. Should be slightly gentle or allow for

step ramp, MS 1184:2002, refer to item

7.1. Material should be non-slip.

RAMPS



21/30


RAILINGS1. No railing 1. Provide railing along the RAMP follow

MS 1331:2003 (Figure 7a-m/s 11)

RAILINGS



22/30


STAIR1.No handrail on right side

2.No warning tiles

3.Too steep

1. Provide handrail follow MS

1331:2003 (Figure 7b-m/s 11)

2. Put warning tiles

STAIRS



23/30


ABLUTION AREA1. No Signage and braille

text for blind user

2. No Railing surrounding

the ablution area and

towards it for support and

guiding

1. Should provide signage for guidance.

Pictogram with emboss signage typeand braille text. Font size should be

bigger for blind sight people. (Manual

Audit-ms 076)

2. Provide railing at ablution area and

towards it for elderly, ambulatory andblind user

INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT


24/30


ABLUTION AREA3. No guiding block towards

ablution area and warning

block as to different level of

the ablution area

3. Provide guiding block , installed along the

line of travel towards the ablution area

for blind sight user and

provide warning blocks around any

obstruction MS 1331:2003, refer tofigure 10 a)/ms-14



25/30


26/30

ELEMENT ANALYSIS PROPOSAL

5. Not accessible to

wheelchair

6. Obstruction along

path

5. Provide area that accessible towheelchair user such as wall

mounted ablution area or

designed modular wudu station,

accommodating a combination of

standing, seated and, if required,

wheelchair-based users.

6. Provide clear width for

wheelchair user



27/30


5 TOILET

1.Door provided is too narrow for thetoenter.

Door Width : 0.8 m

2.Toilet provided not suitable to be used by

the disable people because:

no grab bar for disable

there is big drop in the toilet

the door is open inside to the toilet

Drop height : 0.1 m

3.Sink too high for the OKU wheelchair users

to use and there is no lower sink for

wheelchair and children users

Sink height : 0.9 mwheelchair

4.No OKU signage for disabled person

1. Provide OKU toilet follow the Malaysia Standard (Manual

audit akses 1 malaysia-m/s 92)

2. to avoid having the drop in toilet as the drop will makes

the disabled person more difficult in accessing the toilet

3. Reduce the sinks height (Manual audit akses 1 malaysia-

m/s 92)

4. Provide OKU with braille signage

TOILET



28/30

CONCLUSION


29/30

In conclusion, the design of Masjid Khairiyah doesconsider the disable person in certain areas, but most of

the provision do not meet the standard requiredaccording to Malaysian Standard

Some of the area does not consider the disable person atall

However there are still rooms for improvement andmeasures can be taken to ensure the accessibility for the

disable people

Finally, this case study should be a good lesson to learnfor every architects and future designers.

CONCLUSION


30/30

THANK YOU

report masjid sri gombak.pptx

Documents