TAJUK : MENINGKATKAN KEMAHIRAN MENOLAK DAN MENAHAN BOLA HOKI MELALUI KAEDAH LATIH TUBI DALAM KALANGAN MURID TAHUN 4.NAMA PENYELIDIK : AHMAD ZULHELMI BIN RAMLANNAMA PENYELIA : CIK AZIZAH BINTI MD AMIN

ABSTRAKKajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sejauh mana kaedah latih tubi dapat meningkatkan kemahiran menolak dan kemahiran menahan bola hoki.Subjek kajian adalah seramai lapan orang yang terdiri dalam kalangan murid-murid Tahun 4 di salah sebuah sekolah daerah Banting, Selangor.Pemilihan sasaran kajian adalah berdasarkan skor lemah mengikut rubrik daripada Program Mengenal pasti Bakat Sukan (TID) Hoki Bahagian Sukan, Seni dan Kokurikulum Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2010).Data dikumpulkan melalui ujian awal dan ujian akhir serta pemerhatian berstruktur menggunakan senarai semak bagi mendapatkan perbezaan peningkatan kemahiran menahan dan kemahiran menolak bola hoki setelah menjalani kaedah latih tubi yang diadaptasikan daripada Modul Latihan Sukan Untuk Guru Penasihat Kelab Sukan Hoki Sekolah Rendah, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2011).Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa semua subjek mempamerkan peningkatan kemahiran menolak dan kemahiran menahan bola hoki setelah menjalani kaedah latih tubi.Keputusan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kaedah latih tubi berupaya meningkatkan kemahiran menolak dan kemahiran menahan bola hoki serta amalan pengajaran guru.Dapatan kajian memberi implikasi bahawa program latihan yang bersesuaian dan sistematik penting dalam meningkatkan prestasi lakuan motor murid-murid di sekolah rendah.

Title:The effects of the use of light-weight pucks on skill performance in women's hockeyAuthor:Leiter, Jeffrey Robert Scott,Publication title:ProQuest Dissertations and ThesesPages:193 p.Number of pages:193Publication year:2001

The goal of the CanadianHockeyAssociation is to increase the velocity of the shots of female players and make it easier to raise the puck off the ice. The present study investigated the effects of the use of light weight pucks on women'shockeyusing four pucks of different weights (4.5 oz, 5.0 oz, 5.5 oz, and the regulation 6.0 oz puck). The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of light weight pucks on the biomechanics of the wrist shot, as well as, the puck velocity and accuracy of the wrist shot among elite femalehockeyplayers. A subproblem was to determine if any difference exists in the stickhandling,passingand goaltendingskillsof elite developmental female players when using a lighter puck. An additional subproblem was to gather pre and post attitudinal data of elite female players to see if there is a difference in opinion on adopting a lighter puck between age groups and if the players supported its adoption. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Title:Basic skills the most important for any hockey playerAuthor:Harris, Paul,Publication title:Hockey WeeklyIssue:11Pages:S1,S7Number of pages:2Publication date:Jan 26, 2005Year:2005

Basicskillsthe most important for anyhockeyplayer

Harris, Paul.Hockey Weekly(Jan 26, 2005).

The last 10 years or so has seen a shift in emphasis inhockey. Beginning with the New Jersey Devils' 1995 Stanley Cup sweep over the Red Wings, the game went from being dominated by creative offense to a mighty defensive struggle.The key to the change was the increased importance of systems.Whether it was the Devils' neutral-zone trap, the Red Wings' left-wing lock or one-two-two passive forechecking systems, limiting opponents' scoring chances became the focus instead of theskillof the players.That emphasis began in the NHL, but trickled steadily downward. To the minor leagues, to the Major Junior and College ranks, to Tier II Junior and, finally, to the amateur and youth ranks.Before Mite Travel was dropped by the Michigan AmateurHockeyAssociation last season, there were even Mite A and AA teams which regularly played some kind of stifling defensive system that didn't allow 7-and 8-year-olds to develop theirskillsproperly.That means that many young players haven't had the proper instruction and practice time on the four basicskillsofhockey: Skating, stickhandling,passingand shooting.When the Red Wing coaching staff talked to a group of area coaches in November, associate coach Barry Smith said that over half of each youth practice should be devoted toskilldevelopment.And the key to all of theskillsis skating."There's no sense in doing breakouts and systems," said Smith. 'They're useless if the kid stumbles before he even gets the puck."He said that the proper skating technique, knees bent with the weight evenly distributed over each blade, is essential in developing otherskills."Can they move their stick back-and-forth across their bodies and not lose any balance?" asked Smith.If they can't, then it's going to be awfully difficult for them to stickhandle.And once a youngster learns the proper, basic techniques of skating, he or she should then focus on carrying the puck."When you give a player the puck who can skate real well, but not handle the puck," said Real Turcotte of the Turcotte Stickhandling School. "His speed is cut in half."Mastering both skating and stick handling can lead to a lifetime of enjoyment from playinghockey."If you want to have fun, you have to have both of those things," said Turcotte. "Once those twoskillshave been mastered, it is then easier to become a better passer."That's askillthat one notable area youth coach thinks is lacking among young players."I don't think people stress it enough,passing," said former Red Wing Doug Brown. "Giving andreceiving passes. If you bobble it (the puck) at all, you slow down. You don't seepassingthat's as strong as it could be."But generally speaking, the good passers can also skate and handle the puck."The better stickhandler a player becomes, the better passer he is," said Turcotte. "Because he doesn't have to look at the puck, so he's always looking up."So a youngster who can skate properly and well, and can handle the puck and always has his or her head up looking for apass, also has a better chance to develop a good shot.Balance and flexibility are the keys to shooting the puck. You need balance to have a power base and to shift your weight. And you need flexibility to be able to accurately execute a wrist shot, slap shot or even a backhand shot.While we haven't seen him in action for a while due to the NHL lockout, Colorado Avalanche center Joe Sakic is a prime example of how skating and stick handling fundamentals can lead to a great shot. That's particularly the case with Sakic's wrist shot, which he unloads most effectively while in full stride.It's one thing for a player with strong wrists and forearms to be able to snap the puck off with just a flick of his wrists. Those shots are usually accurate but don't have too much steam behind them. But it is quite another thing the way Sakic does it. When he gets his shot off in full stride, he gets his legs and torso into the shot to give it the power necessary to regularly beat NHL goaltenders.And that's not possible on the move without good. skating fundamentals.If you want more proof as to the importance of skating, look no farther than teen phenom. Sidney Crosby The Rimouski Oceanic center, who has torn up the Quebec Major JuniorHockeyLeague the past season-and-a-half, will be the No. 1 pick of the next NHL Draft (whenever that happens - everything is on hold because of the lockout). He has done a lot of work on his skating over the years with Robbie Glantz International Powerskating."Here's a guy that's going to be the No. 1 pick overall," said Glantz. "And he's the most intense about skating."Glantz has also worked with Dan Pritsche, who has played in the NHL with the Columbus Blue Jackets and has been a standout on the last two United States World Junior championship teams, and defenseman Jack Johnson of the United States Under-18 Team. Johnson will play at Michigan next season and is ranked by NHL Central Scouting as the fifth best North American skater available for the draft.Brown was another example of a player benefiting tremendously because of the basicskills.Though never considered by many a frontline player during much of his 15-season career with the New Jersey Devils, Pittsburgh Penguins and Red Wings, Brown managed to stay in the league and then become an important cog in two Red Wing Stanley Cup winning teams because of his versatility.That versatility was made possible because of his foundation of -basicskills.Generously listed at 5-11 and 185 pounds throughout his career, Brown was a good enough skater to skate backwards quite well and that allowed him to be a good defensive player. And hispassingand shootingskillsallowed him to be a dangerous offensive player when on the ice with other talented offensive players.Because of hisskills, Brown could play fiveon-five (on either an offensive of defensive line), four-on-four, kill penalties (he and Sergei Fedorov often played together in four-on-four and penalty-killing situations) and play on the power play.Not too many people remember that late in the 1995 season - before the team acquired Igor Larionov - Brown skated on a unit with Fedorov, Slava Kozlov, Vladimir Konstantinov and Slava Fetisov.You couldn't play with that group without outstanding basic fundamentalskills.Players will always be able to learn systems when they get to the higher levels of the sport where strategy is important because everyone has a great amount of talent.But if a player is to have any chance of reaching that level or even really improving as a player, he or she first must master the basicskillsof skating, stick handling,passingand shooting.

This easily-assembled, low cost, versatile apparatus for evaluating the hockey skills of individual players, particularly their shooting, passing and stick handling abilities, comprises a self-supporting, multi-sectioned upstanding wall structure defining, on a substantially flat surface, at least first, second and third adjacent substantially-rectilinear compartments. Two of the compartments have puck target means at one end and are open at the other end so as to provide a shooting position for the contestant, the puck target means comprising a vertically-disposed wall having a plurality of puck receiving apertures therethrough, the size and location of the apertures differing in the respective compartments. The third, substantially-larger compartment has a plurality of upstanding separator devices positionable on the flat surface therein and in spaced relation from each other and from the wall structure so as to define a continuous serpentine path for the contestant to follow. In addition to testing ice, roller and field hockey skills, the apparatus may be used for hockey practice and as a competitive game.Holleran, T., & Green, F. (1973).U.S. Patent No. 3,709,489. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

INTRODUCTION: The primary non-skating skills employed in ice hockey all involve use of a hockey stick to some degree. The importance of the stick is obvious in offensive skills such as shooting and passing. It is less obvious but equally important in defensive skills such as checking and face-offs. The selection and use of a stick depends on several factors which vary according to the level of hockey an individual is playing and on the skill level of the player. Cost, appearance, feel, performance, and durability are all areas that might be considered by various players. However, for those performing at elite levels feel and performance are likely the most significant factors. The stick must feel right in the hands before a player will consider using it and it must perform up to required standards in skills such as shooting and passing. The variables contributing to how a hockey stick feels and performs include primarily: weight, centre of mass location, shaft flex, resistance to twist, and breaking force. Together, these factors will determine the success of a manufacturer in promoting and selling a particular model.At present, there are three primary types of ice hockey stick. The traditional stick is made of wood with a wooden blade being glued to a wooden shaft. Variants include fibreglass wraps that cover the blade or perhaps layers of laminated wood and fibre glass pressed into the shaft. A second type of stick incorporates a hollow aluminum tube (perhaps filled with foam to dampen vibrations) into which a wooden or composite blade is inserted at one end and a wooden plug at the other end. When the blade breaks it is replaced by another without the necessity of discarding the shaft. The third type of hockey stick is similar to the aluminum tube except that it consists of a hollow tube comprised of composite materials such as graphite and kevlar. These materials are combined with resins and fibreglass to form a shaft into which a blade and a plug are inserted. At amateur levels of play all types of sticks are in common use. At the professional level, aluminum sticks have been phased out over the past two years and with the rare exception all players use either wooden or composite graphite sticks. The differences between the three types of sticks that might contribute to performance and Afeel have been a topic of concern for manufacturers of hockey sticks for the past several years.Baseline information on stick and shaft characteristics is important to future design and modifications of hockey sticks. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to evaluate characteristics of various types of hockey stick shafts that contribute to the feel and performance capacity of the stick.Professional hockey players and highly skilled amateurs select sticks intuitively on the basis of Afeel. In this study, large samples of wood (N = 40), aluminum (N = 32), and composite (N = 55) hockey sticks were evaluated for the following characteristics: weight, centre of mass, flex strength, torsional resistance, and breaking force. Although the sticks were sampled from several manufacturers, the test protocol followed a standard procedure used by Louisville Hockey to test for performance characteristics and quality control.Marino, W. G. (1998). Biomechanical investigations of performance characteristics of various types of ice hockey sticks. InISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive(Vol. 1, No. 1).

To determine the relationship between multidimensional performance characteristics and level of performance in talented youth field hockey players, elite youth players (n=38, mean age 13.2 years,s=1.26) were compared with sub-elite youth players (n=88, mean age 14.2 years,s=1.26) on anthropometric, physiological, technical, tactical and psychological characteristics. Multivariate analyses with performance level and gender as factors, and age as the covariate, showed that the elite youth players scored better than the sub-elite youth players on technical (dribble performance in a peak and repeated shuttle run), tactical (general tactics; tactics for possession and non-possession of the ball) and psychological variables (motivation) (P