jkr-shah alam[1].ppt

7/27/2019 JKR-SHAH ALAM[1].ppt

1/42

SITE SAFETY ,ENVIRONMENTAND QUALITY IN

CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Ir.M.RAMUSERENSENIOR MANAGER CIDBB.Eng (Hons)., M.I.E.M., P.Eng ( M )., CCPM., CPESC.,

B.Jur ( Hons ) Malaya., CLP

Tel : 0162200200 / 03-26170360

E-mail : [email protected]

10thAugust 2009

Quality Hotel, Shah Alam


2/42

Topics That Will Be Covered

Today

Site SafetyHIRARC and

SHASSIC

EnvironmentWaste

Management and SEC

Workmanship Quality - QLASSIC


3/42

OSH Management System

There is no OSH Management System

without HIRARC

HIRARC is the key process for managingOSH Management System


4/42

HIRARC - WHAT IS THIS ?

HAZARD INDENTIFICATION ,

RISK ANALYSIS OR ASSESSMENT

RISK CONTROL MEASURES

- in short we call HIRARC


5/42

HAZARD INDENTIFICATION

EACH ACTIVITITY HAS ITS OWN HAZARD

FOR EXAMPLECONCRETING WORKS

WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE HAZARDS ? - NO PROPER WORKING PLATFORM

WHICH MAY CAUSE WORKER FALL

FROM HEIGHT

- HIT BY CONCRETE BUCKET

- CONCRETE DROPS FROM HEIGHTETC


6/42

RISK ANALYSIS- HIT BY CONCRETE BUCKET

( LIKELIHOOD VS SEVERITY )

LIKELIHOOD

SEVERITY

1VERY UNLIKELY

2UNLIKELY

3LIKELY

4VERY LIKELY

1ACCEPTABLE

1 2 3 4

2NOT SERIOUS

2 4 6 8

3SERIOUS

3 6 9 12

4VERY SERIOUS

4 8 12 16

6


7/42

RISK RANKING

SCORE( LIKELIHOOD VS SEVERITY)

LEVEL

7 - 16HIGH

3 - 6 MEDIUM

1 - 2 LOW


8/42

RISK CONTROLMEASURES

SCORE( LIKELIHOOD VS

SEVERITY)

LEVEL CONTROL

7 - 16 HIGH ENGINEERINGSOLUTION

3 - 6 MEDIUM TRAINING TO

WORKERS AND

CRANE

OPERATOR

1 - 2 LOW WARNING

SIGNAGE


9/42

I have finished on HIRARC

NOWI AM GOING TO COVER

SHASSIC


10/42

WHAT IS SHASSIC ?

SAFETY AND HEALTH

ASSESSMENT

SYSTEM INCONSTRUCTION


11/42

SHASSIC OBJECTIVES

To benchmarkthe level of safety and health

performance of construction industry in

Malaysia

To have a common standardon safety and

health assessment system for contractor (s)

in construction industry

To assess safety and health performanceof contractorbased on approved standard

by the industry stakeholders


12/42

SHASSIC OBJECTIVES

Continue.

To evaluate the performanceof

contractor(s) based on the safety and health

practices; and

To compile data for statistical analysison

contractors safety and health management

and performance at sites


13/42

SHASSIC OBJECTIVES ( con..)

To study on which area contractors has failed

or could not score higher points so that

appropriate trainingcan be organized

Part of preparation for OSH management

systemin long run


14/42

CRITERIA CONSIDERED FOR THE

DEVELOPMENT OF SHASSIC

Compliance to legal requirements

- OHSA 1994, FMA, BOWEC Reg,

Safety,Health & Welfare Reg,etc

Based on approved Standard & good practice

- OSH MS such as OHSAS 18001 AND MS

1722 etc


15/42

COMPONENT OF

ASSESSMENT & WEIGHTAGE

Divided into 3 categories:-

DOCUMENT CHECK - 40% WORKPLACE INSPECTION - 40%

EMPLOYEE INTERVIEW - 20%


16/42

SHASSIC REQUIREMENT

Work Progresshas to be within 25% to

75%

WHY ?

Construction at peak

Many activities

Workers at full Strength Potential accidents


17/42

DOCUMENT CHECK

Checking on documents and records - to

determine the compliance of establishment of

OSH program and activities

There are 63 questions/checklists

Weightage is 40% of the total marks of 100


18/42

WORKPLACE INSPECTION

This assessment shall provide visualcomparison of evidence on the OSH programthat being implementation, enforced and

practiced at site. There are 62 questions/checklists

5 (five) high risk areas shall be assessedwithin the site ( areas to be decided byAssessor)

It carries 40% of overall weightage


19/42

EMPLOYEES INTERVIEW

Employees shall be randomly selected forinterview purpose

Divided into 3 categories of Employees,

namely, management personal ( 1), safety &health personals (3) and finally workers(10)from various trades

The set of questions are different for eachcategories

There are 48 questions all together(12, 6, 30)

It carries weightage of 20%


20/42

METHOD TO CALCULATE

SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT

Document Check

Total compliance in the checklist / ( 63

minus Number of Not applicable items) X

40% = A ( score for document check )


21/42

METHOD TO CALCULATE


Workplace Inspect ion

Total compliance in the checklist / (

62X5=310 minus Number of Not applicable

items) X 40% = B ( score for Workplace

Inspection )


22/42

METHOD TO CALCULATE


Employees Interv iew

Total compliance in the checklist / ( 330

minus Number of Not applicable items) X

20% = C ( score for Employees

Interview )


23/42

TOTAL CHECKLISTS

Document Check 63

Workplace Inspection 310 ( 62 X 5 )

Employee Interviews 330 ( 12(x1) +6(x3)+ 30 (x10)

TOTAL = 63 + 310 + 330703 / site


24/42

SCORE STARS( RATING )

85 - 100

70 - 84

55 - 69


25/42

SCORE STARS

( RATING )

40 - 54

39 and

less


26/42

ASSESSOR

Who can be the SHASSIC Assessor (s) ?

A person who has attended one day training and

passed exam and must have 5 years woking

experience in construction industry Attended and passed Lead Auditor OHSAS

18001/MS 1722 course and with 3 years working

experience in Construction Industry

CSHO with 2 years working experience inconstruction industry


27/42

ENVIRONMENTAL


28/42

ENVIRONMENTAL

TWO IMPORTANT MATTERS TO

CONSIDER

1. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT

2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

3. GREEN BUIDING INDEX


29/42

CONSTRUCTION WASTE

MANAGEMENT

EXTRA ORDERS

CONVENTIONAL TYPE OF

CONSTRUCTION USING A LOT OF

TIMBER FORMWORKS ETC

BREAKAGE / POOR HANDLING

- ONE WAY TO CONTROL CONSTRUTION

WASTE IS BY ADOPTING IBS


30/42

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

SITE CLEARING CAN CAUSE IMMEDIATEAND HUGE SOIL LOST IF NOTPROTECTED IMMEDIATELY

PROPER PLANNING IS REQUIREDBEFORE THE EXECUTION OF SITECLEARING

VEGITATION REMOVED MUST BEIMMEDIATELY COVERED BY SUITABLEMATERIAL OR CONSTRUCTION MUSTTAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY


31/42

GREEN BUIDING INDEX

IT IS A RATING SYSTEM FOR GREEN

BUIDING

A CERTIFICATE WILL BE ISSUED FOR

BUIDING WHICH HAS COMPLIED THE

GREEN BUILDINGS REQUIREMENTS


32/42

GREEN BUILDING

ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

In USA it is known as LEED

AustraliaGreen Star

SingaporeGreen Mark UKBREEAM

MalaysiaGBI ( by PAM & ACEM )


33/42

GREEN BUILDING RATING

Developed by PAM & ACEM

CIDB having discussion with PAM & ACEM

to convert GBI to Construction Industry

Standard

Ratingwill take consideration of the

following:-


34/42

GREEN BUILDING

RATINGcontinue

Energy Efficiency

Indoor environmental Quality

Sustainable site & Management Material & Resources

Water Efficiency

Innovation


35/42

QLASSIC


36/42

QLASSIC

Quality Assessment System In Construction

Was developed in 2006 as Construction

Industry Standard ( CIS )

This is workmanship quality assessment

standard

CIDB is providing free assessment service for

contractors


37/42

How QLASSIC can help CIDB

to improve ConstructionsWorkmanship Quality ?

Base on score Contractor failed or score less in certain

areas could be identified

CIDB could arrange proper training program

for contractor


38/42

ASSESSMENT APPROACH

Assessor determines the samples to be

assessed prior to asssessment

Samples are selected from drawings and

plans

Samples shall be distributed uniformly

Scoring will be done on the works that are

inspected for the first time

Rectified works would not be assessed

COMPONENTS TO BE


39/42

COMPONENTS TO BE

ASSESSED

STRUCTURAL WORKS

ARCHITECTURAL WORKS

MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL WORKS EXTERNAL WORKS

All ti f W i ht F


40/42

Allocation of Weightage For

Components ( % )CATEGORIES

COMPONENTS

Landed

Housing

Stratified

Housing

PublicBuilding

SpecialPublic

Building

Structural 25 30 30 30

Architect 60 50 45 35

M & E 5 10 15 25

Ext.

works

10 10 10 10

T. Score 100 100 100 100


41/42

CONCLUSION

SAFETYLESS ACCIDENT AT SITE IFIBS ADOPTED AS WE WILL BE DEALINGWITH LESS WORKERS AND PROCESSES

ENVIROMENTVERY LITTLECONSTRUCTION WASTE IF IBS METHODADOPTED

QUALITY- WORKMANSHIPS QUALITYDEFINITELY IMPROVED IF IBS METHODOF CONSTRUCTION IS ADOPTED


42/42

THANK YOU

jkr-shah alam[1].ppt

Documents