LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIAKEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA

FORMAT PELAPORAN ULBSBAHASA INGGERIS SPM

2012

LAPORAN KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

NAMA SEKOLAH: SMK SERI GUNONG

KOD SEKOLAH: KEE 2160

NOMBOR PUSAT: KC 201

NO TELEFON SEKOLAH : 04-7209922

BILANGAN CALON : 115

NAMA KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH: FAUZIAH BT SAAD

1. STUDENTS PERFORMANCE REPORT BASED ON CONSTRUCT(STRENGTH, WEEKNESSESS AND ERRORS)

1.1. Give appropriate responses/Converse on a topic effectively:

a) Strengths. Adequate understanding of topic but with limited ability to

sustain a conversation. Ability to catch and maintain audience-interest throughout

presentation.

b) Weaknesses. Inability to interact/hold a discussion/hold a conversation Inability to arouse interest of the audience.

c) Errors. Wrong topic Wrong discussion

1.2 Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation:

d) Strength. Fairly fluent and clear speech with frequent and long pause.

e) Weaknesses. Fluency is interrupted by consistent halting and long pauses. Minimal or no utterance

f) Errors. Wrong pronunciation

1.3 Speak coherently:

g) Strength. Flow of ideas is interrupted by use of inappropriate discourse

markers and linkers. Some relevant and appropriate responses.

h) Weaknesses Minimal or no flow of ideas Very few relevant and appropriate responses.

i) Errors Wrong information and ideas on the topic.

1.4 Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context:

j) Strength. Good range of vocabulary with some interesting expressions. Accurate and clear language used most of the time with some

slips that do not disrupt meaning.

k) Weaknesses. Limited range of vocabulary Frequent use of inappropriate vocabulary which distort

meaning Minimal use of language Able to perform only limited language functions in context.

l) Errors. Wrong vocabulary A few words mistake

1.5 Speak using correct grammar:

m) Strengths: Proficient candidates had no problem with these two aspects. Most of

them we able to speak and converse using grammatically correct sentences.

n) Weaknesses Weak candidates mainly resorted simple or compound sentences to

play safe as they have no confidence in using more complex structures. They made a lot of grammar errors which affect the flow of the ideas.

o) Errors. Pronoun errors Subject verb agreement errors Tense errors

2. OVERALL STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE BASED ON SCORE

LEVEL SCORE NO OF CANDIDATESEXCELLENT 26-30 0GOOD 21-25 0SATISFACTORY 16-20 7WEAK 11-15 18VERY WEAK 5-10 90TOTAL MARKS 115

3. COMMENT ON INSTRUMENT/MODEL

3.1 Model been used for students: The students used Narrating and Giving description for Model 1 & 2 in

their form 4 assessment while Role-Playing as their activity for Model 3 in their form 5 assessment.

3.2 Suitability of model to students. Most of the models suited with the level of students’ proficiency in

this school. Most of the students were able to complete the task.

4 ADVISE TO CANDIDATES Candidates should be more creative in carrying out their task. English teachers always stress on the importance of English, especially

in this global era and for science subjects. Students were also encouraged to interact among themselves in the language.

5 ADVISE TO TEACHER Comprehensive evaluation, which consists of teacher evaluation

especially in speaking. Teacher role as advisor, reader and resource person for the students. As for the students, when they evaluate the others’ work, it provide every speaker with real speaker, enable students to learn different speaking and listening strategies from one another and focus more on speaking and listening aspects.

Reported by :

……………………..(FAUZIAH BT SAAD)

DATE: 15 MAY 2012