13 mei_ ucapan tunku menerusi rtm _ helen ang

1/17/2015 13 Mei: Ucapan Tunku menerusi RTM | Helen Ang

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13meiucapantunkumenerusirtm/ 1/35

13 Mei: Ucapan Tunku menerusi RTM

February 22, 2013 at 12:01 pm (https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13‑mei‑ucapan‑tunku‑menerusi‑rtm/) 67 comments (https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13‑mei‑ucapan‑tunku‑menerusi‑rtm/#comments)

(https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/13mei.jpg)

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13-mei-ucapan-tunku-menerusi-rtm/

https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/13mei.jpg



Pada 13 Mei setibanya perdana menteri di stesen RTM kira‑kira pukul 10.30 malam, beliau terusberucap menerusi televisyen dengan mencelah di tengah‑tengah sebuah rancangan kegemaranramai.

Sila baca dengan teliti.

Teks ucapan Tunku Abdul Rahman (13 Mei 1969):

“Kejadian yang tidak diingini telah pun berlaku di Kuala Lumpur dan pasukan keselamatan telahpun mengawal dengan kuatnya di serata‑rata tempat dan penjuru‑penjuru jalan. Dengan keadaanyang demikian, saya terpaksa mengisytiharkan Darurat di Kuala Lumpur. Curfew pun telahdimulakan dan dijalankan. Dan saya telah memberikan kuasa mengisytiharkan darurat ataupunstate emergency di serata‑rata negeri lagi, sekiranya wajib berbuat demikian, kerana hendakmenjaga keamanan negara dan nyawa dan harta benda dan dengan ini adalah menjaditanggungjawab saya dan saya akan menjalankan dengan sekuat‑kuatnya kuasa saya itu.

“Saya minta pertolongan semua pihak yang bertanggungjawab supaya bekerjasama denganpegawai‑pegawai keamanan untuk menolong menjaga keamanan di negara kita ini danpenduduk‑penduduknya sekalian. Kejadian yang berlaku itu tidak ada sebab. Apa yangdiperbuat oleh parti pembangkang pada semalam, kita tidak ingini dan saya pegang dan tuduhmereka telah memulakan kejadian yang jahat itu, kejadian yang khianat itu. Tetapi balas‑membalas bukan boleh menimbulkan baiknya.

“Saya rasa sangat‑sangat susah hati di atas apa yang telah berlaku kerana dua bulan lamanyasaya berpusing di tempat‑tempat memberi syarahan dan mengingatkan kepada sekalianpenduduk‑penduduk segala dakyah anti itu bangsa, anti itu bangsa boleh menimbulkanpergaduhan yang besar di antara bangsa‑bangsa, penduduk‑penduduk di negara kita ini. Olehsebab negara ini ialah berbilang bangsa, saya rasa hal seumpama ini harus berlaku, halpergaduhan yang seumpama ini harus berlaku dan sekarang ini telah pun berlaku, sungguhpuncaranva sederhana.

“Semuanya yang bertanggungjawab kenalah menjalankan kepentingan mereka supava hal initidak merebak. Mahulah setiap tempat meletakkan jawatankuasa muhibah serata tempat‑tempatitu boleh menjaga keselamatan dan perasaan baik waspada antara satu kaum dengan lain kaurn.Negara ini bergantung kepada tuan‑tuan sekalian. Tolong masing‑masing yang jujur dan ikhlaskepada saya yang menjaga negara ini supaya tidak berbangkit hal‑hal yang berbahaya. Negarayang kita kasihi ini adalah kehendak pertolongan tuan‑tuan sekalian. Saya doakan kepada kehadrat Subhannahuwataallah. Selamatkanlah semua penduduk‑penduduk sekalian!”



(https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/may‑151.jpg)

Muka depan The Straits Times (15 Mei 1969)

Kenangan Tunku Abdul Rahman

“Saya tidak dapat tidur pada malam itu kerana mengenangkan kejadian yang telah menimpa ibukota dan negara kita yang aman ini. Saya telah berasa gelisah dan berjalan mundar‑mandir sertamenghabiskan masa saya di atas sejadah untuk berdoa kepada Allah SWT. Saya berdiri diberanda luar bilik tidur saya dan menghalakan pandangan saya ke bandar sambil memerhatikanapi yang menjulang tinggi di beberapa kawasan berhampiran Kampung Baru dan di sebelahutara.

“Kuala Lumpur telah menjadi satu bandar yang terang dengan api kebakaran di sana sini dandapat dilihat dengan jelas dari rumah saya yang terletak di atas bukit. Inilah satu pemandanganyang sangat menyedihkan dan saya tidak menyangka saya akan menyaksikan kejadian yangseperti itu semasa hayat saya. Api yang menjilat bangunan itu telah menghanguskan segalausaha‑usaha saya dalam beberapa tahun yang lepas untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebagai sebuahnegara yang bahagia dan aman, dan juga menghancurkan impian saya hendak menjadi perdanamenteri yang paling bahagia sekali di dunia ini.

“Ketika saya memerhatikan api yang menjulang tinggi, terbayang di mata saya kejadian dashyatyang sedang berlaku pada malam yang mengerikan itu, dan saya terkenang kepada peristiwa‑peristiwa lepas yang menyebabkan timbulnya malapetaka itu. Pada masa itu juga saya sedar daninsaf bahawa jika hendak difahami sebab‑sebab kenapa boleh tercetus peristiwa yang buruk itu,maka perlulah dikaji satu per satu kejadian‑kejadian yang telah lepas.

“Pada hari itu saya menerima laporan mengenai perarakan Gerakan yang telah diadakan

https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/may-151.jpg



“Pada hari itu saya menerima laporan mengenai perarakan Gerakan yang telah diadakansemalam. Mereka telah melemparkan kata‑kata nista terhadap orang Melayu dan menyuruhorang Melayu pulang ke kampung‑kampung dan desa kerana kapal layar (lambang Perikatan)telah ditenggelamkan. Kesemua hal ini terbayang dalam ingatan saya yang merupakansebahagian daripada sebab‑sebab berlakunya rusuhan itu.”

– Petikan buku ’13 Mei Sebelum dan Selepas’ (memoir Tunku Abdul Rahman, halaman 81)

(https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/perarakan9mei.jpg)Perarakan mayat Lim Soon Seng melalui perut ibukota

9 Mei 1969: Kata‑kata yang tertera pada sepanduk (gambar atas) berbunyi “死的光彩，生的伟大”

https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/perarakan9mei.jpg



9 Mei 1969: Kata‑kata yang tertera pada sepanduk (gambar atas) berbunyi “死的光彩，生的伟大”(kematian yang cerah ‘berwibawa’, kehidupan yang ‘gemilang’)

Lim Soon Seng, seorang sukarelawan pilihanraya yang mati dibunuh, telah mencetuskankontroversi yang sama hebatnya dengan kematian Teoh Beng Hock zaman kita.

10 Mei 1969: Hari membuang undi.

Dalam pilihanraya umum 1969, MCA telah kalah teruk kepada DAP yang pertama kalibertanding PRU – parti itu didaftar pada 1966 – serta MCA langsung tewas di Pulau Pinangkepada Gerakan yang ditubuhkan Dr Lim Chong Eu setahun awal pada 1968.

12 Mei 1969: Perarakan sambutan kemenangan oleh pembangkang

(https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/dapmei13.jpg)DAP menyambut kemenangan PRU di jalanan

Suasana kempen pilihanraya tegang

Tunku memperingatkan “jika hendak difahami sebab‑sebab kenapa boleh tercetus peristiwa yangburuk itu, maka perlulah dikaji satu per satu kejadian‑kejadian yang telah lepas”.

Peristiwa 血債血還 (hutang darah dibayar darah) tidak berlaku secara spontan dalam suatu ruangkosong (vacuum) ataupun tanpa apa‑apa kesinambungan. Ia sebenarnya menyusuli “kejadian‑kejadian yang telah lepas” — untuk meminjam cakap Tunku Abdul Rahman.

Contohnya, berlaku rusuhan kaum di Pulau Pinang pada bulan November 1967 di mana 4 orangterbunuh serta dikeluarkan perintah berkurung oleh pihak berkuasa.

Mengimbau suhu pilihanraya bersejarah itu, Tunku menyorot kembali keberlangsungan sebuah

https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/dapmei13.jpg



Mengimbau suhu pilihanraya bersejarah itu, Tunku menyorot kembali keberlangsungan sebuahkempen yang sengit. Katanya:

“dua bulan lamanya saya berpusing di tempat‑tempat memberi syarahan dan mengingatkankepada sekalian penduduk‑penduduk segala dakyah anti itu bangsa, anti itu bangsa bolehmenimbulkan pergaduhan yang besar …”.

Kempen PRU tahun 1969 berbekalkan “dakyah anti itu bangsa, anti itu bangsa”.

Dalam kempen PRU tahun ini, di samping politik perkauman juga sekarang dicampur‑adukkanunsur‑unsur benci agama.

(https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/kingkong.jpg)http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/buddhists‑want‑probe‑into‑chinese‑ustazs‑king‑kong‑remarks (http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/buddhists‑want‑probe‑into‑chinese‑ustazs‑

king‑kong‑remarks)

https://helenang.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/kingkong.jpg

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/buddhists-want-probe-into-chinese-ustazs-king-kong-remarks



Fanatik Kristian pun ada sekarang

Ridhuan Tee sudah berkali‑kali mencemuh kaum minoriti serta agama‑agama yang dianutimereka.

Orang India dan agama Hindu beserta perayaan‑perayaan untuk dewa‑dewi seperti Thaipusamdihina bukan hanya oleh seorang pelampau agama Islam seperti Ridhuan sahaja.

Pelampau agama juga berwajahkan fanatik Kristian yang benci patung disembah (idolatry).

Mungkin disebabkan sesetengah orang Kristian yang duduk di kawasan perumahan mewahbandar adalah orang yang berada serta memiliki segulung kertas ijazah, maka merekamemandang rendah penganut agama‑agama lain sebagai “low class”.

Cuba tanya kenapa si evangelis begitu beriya‑iya mahu memurtadkan orang yang miskin sertayang kurang bersekolah? Kenapa mereka bergerak di kalangan gelandangan Melayu? Kenapadisasarkan penganut Hindu golongan kelas pekerja?

Tingkahlaku evangelis yang ‘born again’ ke dalam agama Kristian membayangkan mereka tidakmenghormati asas‑asas peradaban dan kepercayaan tamadun lain.

Contohnya dalam soal mahu kebas kalimah Allah serta evangelis mendakwa hal mencuri itubukan menjadi isu (“non‑issue” (https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/kalimah‑allah‑bukan‑isu‑kata‑uskop‑paul‑tan/)).

Orang Islam diwajib menunaikan 5 solat dan dalam setiap sembahyang pula diulangi ucapansyahadah yang mana kalimah Allah disebut dua kali. Justeru kalimah Allah tidak lekang daribibir seseorang Muslim untuk sepanjang hari, sepanjang minggu dan sepanjang hayat.

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/kalimah-allah-bukan-isu-kata-uskop-paul-tan/



Maka pastilah orang Islam amat sayangkan kalimah Allah serta memandang berat seandainya iadisalahgunakan.

Pendekatan golongan Kristian yang meremehkan hakmilik kalimah Allah tidak kurang perbuatanseorang pendakwah mualaf Shah Kirit (http://www.facebook.com/pages/ANTI‑Shah‑Kirit‑Racist/419355361438876) yang pernah menghina amalan Hinduisme dan Ustaz Ann Wan Seng(PAS) yang menghina amalan Taoisme — screenshot atas, dia menggelar kepercayaan “KingKong” masyarakat Cina ibarat doa “kong kali kong”.

Bukan Ridhuan Tee seorang sahaja yang memperlekehkan Thaipusam. Malah kedengaran banyakrungutan dari golongan berusia kaum Cina dan kaum India bahawa evangelis Kristian tiadamempunyai rasa hormat bagi tradisi nenek‑moyang(https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/fakta‑fakta‑menarik‑tentang‑ridhuan‑tee/)keluargamereka.

Mula‑mulanya si evangelis ekstremis ini kurang ajar terhadap masyarakat Hindu dan Buddhayang lemah di negara.

Namun apabila mereka sudah berani tunjuk taring kepada masyarakat Islam yang kuat …

Entry filed under: Evangelis(https://helenang.wordpress.com/category/agama/kristian/evangelis/). Tags: fanatik Kristian(https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/fanatik‑kristian/), puak pelampau agama(https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/puak‑pelampau‑agama/), Ridhuan Tee(https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/ridhuan‑tee/), Tunku Abdul Rahman(https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/tunku‑abdul‑rahman/).

Gelaran ‘Lord Muruguan’ tapi Kristian The Star: Govt says Beng Hock’s “own negligence”caused his death

67 Comments Add your own

1. dral | February 22, 2013 at 12:19 pm

salam helen…what is ur prediction that “peristiwa 13mei”will happen again?..god forbid,,,

Reply2. Helen Ang | February 22, 2013 at 12:53 pm

About these ads(http://wordpress.com/about-these-ads/)

https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/puak-pelampau-agama/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13-mei-ucapan-tunku-menerusi-rtm/?replytocom=24578#respond

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/gelaran-lord-muruguan-tapi-kristian/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/ridhuan-tee/

http://www.facebook.com/pages/ANTI-Shah-Kirit-Racist/419355361438876

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/fakta-fakta-menarik-tentang-ridhuan-tee/

http://wordpress.com/about-these-ads/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/fanatik-kristian/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/category/agama/kristian/evangelis/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/the-star-govt-says-beng-hocks-own-negligence-caused-his-death/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/tag/tunku-abdul-rahman/



Dr M cautioned that tensions could lead to religious (overlapping race) riots.

He has his finger on the nation’s pulse. And he’s qualified to speak from experience. Underhis 22 years, we did not witness any significant Sino‑Malay clashes although there were theMalay‑Indian clashes of Kg Rawa and Kg Medan.

Ex‑IGP Musa Hassan also warned the same as did Shahrizat. She made a mention of it (thealarm bell) in the text of her speech prepared for last year’s Wanita Umno generalassembly. But she was accused of scaremongering for political mileage. I don’t think so.

Shahrizat is not campaigning for a seat anymore as she’s not a winnable candidate andwon’t be put up for nomination. Her political career has stalemated; she’s lost herSenatorship and consequently her Ministerial post. There’s no reason for her to raise theMay 13 sprectre just to score political points given that even she herself would haverealised she’s at a political dead end.

Therefore I’m inclined to think that she was merely expressing the mood of the wanita‑wanita Umno. And it’s a gender thing as well. The possibility of civil unrest preys more onthe mind and fears of women than it does men. And perhaps women are more sensitive tothese moods in the air.

Shahrizat is not the only Umno or BN politician to say so. But every time a Malay pollieraises this, he’s instantly accused of threatening (“wanting to soak the keris in blood”) theminorities. If a BN Chinese pollie brings it up, he’s accused of fear‑mongering so that theChinese won’t vote DAP and scorned that such old tricks won’t work anymore.

And the usual cacophony of “Racist!”, “politically bankrupt” and their Firster ideology“we’re all brothers and sisters”, “there’s no barrier between the races today”, yadda yaddarhetoric is trotted out.

If other countries are war‑torn and their people belong to the same race, having the sameculture and same language but only different religions, what more us in Malaysia?

We look different, we behave different, we talk different, we pray different but still theseDapsters are dispensing kool‑aid by the barrels like as if their narrative is the only gospeltruth. And they’re more than willing to fitnah everybody else.

When a huge segment of the electorate are indulging themselves in this dangerousdisconnect, and the perception gap between reality and their lalaland is a yawning chasm,then of course people’s patience will snap.

Isn’t the biadab behaviour of Dapsters today reminiscent of May 1969?

Reply3. RD. | February 22, 2013 at 5:46 pm

I totally agree with you, Helen.


http://gravatar.com/rahmatdaud



Reply4. Ahmad | February 22, 2013 at 6:31 pm

Fully agreed & request for reblog this post.


Please go ahead. Thanks for reading.

Reply6. shamshul anuar | February 22, 2013 at 8:19 pm

Helen,

I used to stay I Kg Baru while I was then a “bujang’. Kg Baru in the heart of Kualalumpur as all of us know was then the scene of bloody racial riot known as May 131969.

I used to mix around with older people then. These ‘haji” and “lebais’ were then hotblooded young men during that period(1969). They all told me that they saw Kit Siangon a lorry provoking the malay folk.

“Tapi itu cerita lama. Tak payah dok ingat lagi. nanti ada yang terasa hati’. That was themood of these simple minded folk.

But DAP goes on and on blaming Tun Razak by portraying him as trying to unseatTunku. also blamed was Dato Haron, then MB of Selangor. Are they saying UMNOsupplied “penyapu” to extremist within Chinese communiity to be used against Malayfolk , incident that triggered May 13.

I agree with your assesment. Sharizat was just remimding us the danger of anotherracial riot looming if we are not careful. Not to scare voters to vote BN. But to remindthat all will be affected if riot takes place.


If we try to look at it as objectively as possible:

Tun Razak had been deputy president of Umno since 1957. This means for 12 yearsuntil 1969, he had faithfully served under Tunku in the party and there was no talkof him trying to oust Tunku.

Tun Razak had been deputy prime minister since 1957 as well. So he was 12 yearsdeputy to Tunku and was never accused of trying to unseat the PM.

The NOC was formed in the aftermath of May 13 and Tun Razak appointed the







The NOC was formed in the aftermath of May 13 and Tun Razak appointed thechairman. Although Tunku remained PM, it was more in name only.

Since Parliament was suspended and the country under Emergency, the NOCchairman actually held more power in his hands than a PM would have had during‘peace’ time.

Tun Razak succeeded Tunku as PM in Sept 1970. Barely six months later, Tun Razakrestored Parliament or in other words, restored democracy. He could havecontinued an authoritarian rule (meaning minus the oversight of the Dewan) but hedid not.

The general election was called in August 1974 in keeping with the 5‑year cycle. TunRazak had absorbed PAS, PPP and Gerakan which were opposition parties into theBN just before the GE. The decision hints that he was an inclusive leader and aconsensus builder.

Tun Razak’s track record before and after 13 May 1969 does not indicate someonewho is power hungry.

The accusation by the opposition portrays him as trying to unseat Tunku. If he hadwanted to do so, why did he remain a loyal deputy for the preceding 12 years before1969?

Furthermore, Tunku was on record earlier saying that 1969 would be his lastelection and he would be handing over the reins.

After all, there were the Young Turks in Umno who were unhappy with Tunku.And it was Tun Razak who expelled Dr M Umno from Umno for penning thefamous (or infamous) letter against Tunku.

If Tun Razak was in cahoots with Dr M (meaning those unhappy with Tunku), he’dnot have sacked Dr M from Umno. It was only after Tunku resigned that Dr M wasbrought back in from the cold.

Tun Razak’s action in expelling Dr M showed that he jaga hati Tunku. Wouldsomeone who plotted to oust Tunku through bloodshed bother with the gesture ofjaga hati the Tunku?

Reply8. Conrad | February 22, 2013 at 10:30 pm

“Isn’t the biadab behaviour of Dapsters today reminiscent of May 1969?”

I disagree. I loathe the DAPsters but I also disagree with the narrative put forward hereabout the events leading up to May 1969.

Mahathir never had the pulse of the nation. He maintained a chokehold during his




Mahathir never had the pulse of the nation. He maintained a chokehold during hisreign. I understand that some revere him but he is a despicable character whounfortunately understood the selfish nature of the various communities here inMalaysia.

The reason why there were no tensions when he was in charge was that he kept an irongrip on the radicals within his own party and at the same time demonized PAS, whowere lacking in political savvy in their attempts to claim Putrajaya.

The rise of evangelical Christianity here in Malaysia was due to him and his cronies inthe MCA, who were more than willing to play the race card and subject themselves tohis tirades as long as they could fleece the majority Malay population.

If people’s patience snaps, it is because of the hidden hands and their lust for power.Although there is a leap of registered voters this year, the majority of the country stilldo not vote and this apathy is what ensures that there will be no violence unless theEstablishment wants chaos.

Moreover, if there is violence most probably it would be within the Malay communitybecause at the end of the day, this is the vote that UMNO, PKR and PAS are chasing. Iwould add the DAP but so far their attempts have been laughable.

I apologize if this is confrontational but I think your message of rationality andmoderation is lost when you choose to concentrate on the DAP, when UMNO has muchmore to answer for especially now when it fears losing power. Nobody in UMNO everthinks of violence when his or her position is secure.


re: “Mahathir maintained a chokehold during his reign.”

But he allowed KuLi who set up the rival S46 to return to Umno. He did not sackKuLi like how Wee Choo Keong got the sack and Kerk Kim Hock was pressed toretire.

Musa Hitam got a cushy ambassadorship and GLC directorship even after thefallout. Look at how LGE is treating his foes. He called for “zero opposition” inPenang. And Koh Tsu Koon has become a butt of jokes in Penang (okaylah, he mayhave deserved the criticisms but the fact is that it is the DAP people who leading thepack in vilifying KSK).

He allowed Pak Lah who sided with S46 to become Foreign Minister and later hisDeputy Prime Minister. And most tellingly, he allowed Anwar to become sopowerful, holding the DPM and Finance Minister posts at the same time.

If Mahathir had that chokehold, Anwar would not have been able to put his people




If Mahathir had that chokehold, Anwar would not have been able to put his peoplein positions of importance in the media (BH, TV3) and in the universities (Chandra’schair at one time, IIU)

re: “The reason why there were no tensions when he was in charge was that he keptan iron grip on the radicals within his own party and at the same time demonizedPAS, who were lacking in political savvy in their attempts to claim Putrajaya.”

Now nobody can control the Dapsters anymore.

re: “The rise of evangelical Christianity here in Malaysia was due to him and hiscronies in the MCA, who were more than willing to play the race card and subjectthemselves to his tirades as long as they could fleece the majority Malaypopulation.”

The rise of evangelical Christianity is the new factor which we did not have in 1969.Perhaps we can pin a date on the rise of the religious fervour but the rise of theevangelistas as a political player with power is definitely in tandem with the rise ofthe DAP.

re: “If people’s patience snaps, it is because of the hidden hands and their lust forpower. Although there is a leap of registered voters this year, the majority of thecountry still do not vote and this apathy is what ensures that there will be noviolence unless the Establishment wants chaos.”

Who are the hidden hands? I’m not dismissing what you say. It’s certainly possibleand I’m open to the idea.

re: “Moreover, if there is violence most probably it would be within the Malaycommunity because at the end of the day, this is the vote that UMNO, PKR and PASare chasing. I would add the DAP but so far their attempts have been laughable.”

Again what you say is possible and the same thought crossed my mind, in thatwhile the instigators may be the elites of Jerusubang but the people who are caughtin the street‑fighting would be the Ah Bengs.

The evangelistas will watch from the safety of their gated suburbs, barricaded andwell‑stocked with food. The working classes becoming the cannon fodder is hardly anew phenomenon.

re: “I apologize if this is confrontational but I think your message of rationality andmoderation is lost when you choose to concentrate on the DAP, when UMNO hasmuch more to answer for especially now when it fears losing power. Nobody inUMNO ever thinks of violence when his or her position is secure.”

One argument goes that Umno is willing to do anything to stay in power. But wecan also argue that DAP will not stop at anything to grab power.



BN is used to the taste of power. They have been in power since 1955 — 58 years.

DAP has never had power until 2008. Just look at what a little taste of power hasdone to them. In the last 5 years, they’ve not shown that they can wear powerwithout being despotic.

If we look at the early Umno people, there’s not any criticism that Tunku is corrupt(or hobnobbing with developers or Big Business) and Tun Dr Ismail isirreproachable. Onn Jaafar was of course the best. Hence in the early years, theAlliance wore its power well.

Can’t say the same for Pakatan. Not so much PAS as they’ve controlled K’tan andT’ganu before. But DAP in Penang is like kera dapat bunga.

Reply10. Conrad | February 22, 2013 at 11:43 pm

Re: Ku li, Musa Hitam, Badawi, Anwar ,chokehold.

Do not confuse political maneuverings within UMNO with chokehold of thepublic. The keyword in your response is “allowed”.

The fact is he was more than willing to allow these factions (individuals) time inhis sandbox if it was to his advantage or necesasary and rewarded them when itwas necessary or convenient.

My use of the term chokehold was concerning the public and the laws usedagainst them. As you say, nobody can control the Dapsters now because thecurrent potentate is weak within his own party and making attempts atliberalization.

The very laws that Mahathir used to maintain his chokehold is usedhalfheartedly and UMNO’s squabbling makes a united front impossible.

Re: The rise of evangelical Christianity

It really does not matter if the DAP is chasing the evangelical vote but rather therise of Evangelical movement and something Mahathir abhors now, happenedon his watch.

Re. Hidden hands and Jerusubang elites.

Again, I disagree. What you are essentially saying is that the Christian/Chineseevangelical wing of the DAP may instigate violence. I see no evidence of this.

What is more plausible seeing the way how the most harassment (by UMNO) isbeing felt by the Malay members in PKR and PAS on the election trail, is that ifPAS or elements within PKR may feel that they have been cheated in this




elections and may take it to the streets which could lead to chaos.

However if UMNO loses they may instigate violence using the evangelicalChristian element as a convenient launching point.

Re: DAP and taste of power

If you are going to argue that the DAP in its quest for power will do anything toget it, perhaps it is best to give me some examples beyond despotism, which isalso something UMNO especially under the current lot is not short off.

As I said looking at the harassment of Malays within the Opposition, it wouldnot be inconceivable for UMNO or PAS/PKR to start something. Looking at therhetoric of UMNO groupies who always warn of violence, it would not beinconceivable that they would have the guts to attempt something esp if theyhave the backing of the Establisment.

All the rhetoric coming from the DAP is their politics of love, themost they would do is barricade themselves in their homes and dine on tin food.So no, I do not think that the elites in Jerusubang would have the guts toinstigate anything.

Reply11. Helen Ang | February 23, 2013 at 12:36 am

Re: Do not confuse political maneuverings within UMNO with chokehold ofthe public. The keyword in your response is “allowed”.

Yup, “allowed”. The position of Umno prez is very powerful. TunDol is not apowerful personality but his incumbency enabled him to get the better of TunM who failed to get elected even as a Kubang Pasu delegate in 2006,http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=218859

re: “My use of the term chokehold was concerning the public and the lawsused against them. As you say, nobody can control the Dapsters now becausethe current potentate is weak within his own party and making attempts atliberalization. The very laws that Mahathir used to maintain his chokehold isused halfheartedly and UMNO’s squabbling makes a united frontimpossible.”

That’s why you hear the Umno‑ite rightists yearning for the restoration of theISA. I don’t agree with them as I’m for liberalization. But the Dapsters are notshowing that they can handle ‘freedom’ they’ve been given now.

Like I said, they’re behaving like some of the 1969‑ers, e.g. the Penang guywho showed his middle finger to the Permaisuri. Action was taken b’cos shehad police outriders at the scene. But the guy could show his middle finger to1,000 ordinary people and altho it’s technically punishable under the Penal

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=218859




Code but I don’t think the law would be enforced if the victim was anyoneother than the top tier royalty. Nonetheless if lots of people behaved like that,our social order will break down.

Re: “It really does not matter if the DAP is chasing the evangelical vote butrather the rise of Evangelical movement and something Mahathir abhorsnow, happened on his watch.”

If he abhors the evangelical movement and still it happened on his watch,then the public chokehold you claim he exercised had failed in this instance.

Re: “What you are essentially saying is that the Christian/Chinese evangelicalwing of the DAP may instigate violence. I see no evidence of this.”

I see the evangelistas as precipitating the violence as per the May 13 parallelthat I drew. I don’t reckon the 1969 Chinese had wished for or wanted theviolence which erupted (and caused them to die). So I don’t see the 1969Chinese as instigating violence or instigating the May 13 riots.

However Tunku in his memoir blamed the bad behaviour (menyebardakyah) during the long‑drawn campaign as a contributory factor to the riotsbreaking out, i.e. the kebiadaban incubated the hostile and volatile climate inwhich the riots occurred. If the temperature was cooler, the conditions maynot have been ripe for May 13 to take place.

Re: “What is more plausible seeing the way how the most harassment (byUMNO) is being felt by the Malay members in PKR and PAS on the electiontrail, is that if PAS or elements within PKR may feel that they have beencheated in this elections and may take it to the streets which could lead tochaos.”

It looks like Pakatan is signaling this and hence Najib et al invoking TahrirSquare.

re: “However if UMNO loses they may instigate violence using theevangelical Christian element as a convenient launching point.”

Umno’s bait will only be taken if the evangelistas are deemed to be enough ofa threat. If they were less offensive, then they wouldn’t lend themselves tobecoming the launch pad for bullseye. I don’t think the Sikhs, for example,can be similarly made a scapegoat for the purpose.

Re: “If you are going to argue that the DAP in its quest for power will doanything to get it, perhaps it is best to give me some examples beyonddespotism, which is also something UMNO especially under the current lot isnot short off.”

Only if you want to argue that Umno will resort to violence because it fears



Only if you want to argue that Umno will resort to violence because it fearslosing power.

I’m not afraid that DAP itself will instigate violence but I’m afraid that theDapster behaviour which they have nurtured (e.g. the anti‑Lynas Red Guardsand Wong Tack’s talk of torching Lynas) will provoke the Malays tomengamokA.

And once the tinder box is lit, then it’s pointless to pin the blame who startedit b’cause the violence will spiral in tit‑for‑tat. Like what happened during theshort interregnum after the Japanese surrender.

re: “All the rhetoric coming from the DAP is their politics of love…”

The politics‑of‑love‑Wormtongues irk me far more than Perkara’s threats. Iwonder if many other folks feel the same?

Reply12. AK47 | January 23, 2014 at 10:42 pm

Ms H. Your Dapsters of the 21st Century are middle income class whilst those in 1969were working class and may have come from the Republic of Singapore as well to givea boost in numbers. The present lot is in a dream in the head. The previous lot had anempty stomach. Both serve a purpose.

Only the future will foretell what is going to happen. A country Malaysia which treatsthe Chinese, Malaysian Chinese better than Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China andthe rest of the World, still does not satisfy them. Then we have to examine what is reallyhappening. What is this agitation all about ? Is all these real and not due to foreigninfluence ? ONLY THE BN GOVERNMENT AS LED BY THE UMNO WITH THE 13COMPONENT PARTIES CAN FIND OUT! Not you or me.

Reply13. Helen Ang | January 24, 2014 at 12:25 am

re: “Only the future will foretell what is going to happen.”

LKS appears afraid of a Malay backlash.

Reply14. AK47 | January 24, 2014 at 5:47 am

Ms H. On the Opposition moves, have you ever heard of the 36 steps in Strategyin Ancient China ? You will do well to extrapolate the actions of the Oppositionwith the 36 steps. The last step is to flee to Singapore !

Reply15. islam1st | January 24, 2014 at 9:07 am



http://islam1st.org/





Itu drama hungry ghost la Helen!

Reply16. Goondoo | January 23, 2014 at 11:56 pm

Helen;

I cant blame Dapsters. An opportunist will always capitalise any opportunities availableto them. Maybe they were sincere in fighting their case for their community from theirnarrow angle that they forget the rupercussions if things go awry..

According to the nature’s law, “For any action there will be always be a reaction”. Agood leader must be able to see this and balance his approach for the best of hiscommunities. He must recognised, whatever action he took, other communities willalso be affected. In the real world, no minority can dominate in all things except viabrutal force and even if they are succesful, their success will be a short one as themajority according to the law of nature will try to correct the imbalance, also by force.

In 1969, DAP and Gerakan sold the idea that the non Malays were third class citizensbecause of the special priveleges provided in the constitution and provoked the nonMalays masses. They were successful in creating the hostile atmosphere even though atthat time the economy was in control by the Non Malays and 70% senior Governmentofficers came from the non Malays communities..

What happened after Mei 1969? Did the non Malays get the power and abolished theconstitution that provide a special privelege for the Malays. No, Instead DEB wasintroduced and affirmative actions for the bumiputeras were enforced. Did the nonMalays fare better after their attempts failed in 1969.

Their control in economy were slightly affected and but their dominance in civilservices declined greatly. This is the price they paid for believing in DAP and Gerakanpromises then, I blame the non Malays masses for being too gullible and believing‘hook and sinkers in DAP lies.

Will history repeat itself. Yes, it will if we didn’t learnt from the past.

Ask the Jews, how many pogroms were against them throughout the centuries? Morethan 100 pogroms against them since Moses done by different race and in differenttime. Ask why?

How many pogroms against the Farsis of India even though they dominate theeconomies in India and they are in small minority? None. Why?

Reply17. azre | January 24, 2014 at 2:52 pm

Agreed n good pov. Makasih helen





Reply18. antihipokrit | January 24, 2014 at 11:45 pm

Only Najib blinds to see all these. Konon kebebasan bersuara.. Konon nak jaga hati dlmberpolitik. Tun M dulu pun berpolitik juga. Tapi kita rasa aman.

Reply19. Pakatan Puak Pembohong | February 22, 2013 at 12:28 pm

these people, particularly the born again types, they have this inherent inferiority complex thatis demonstrated through hatred of their own selves.

this is not surprising. in their quest to rid themselves of their perceived, imagined inferiority,their method, as inculcated by their white masters, is to emasculate their own heritage.

this is what I called a defeated people. only defeated people adopt the language and culture oftheir conquerors. this is particularly visible among the urban Chinese, even among thoseeducated at Chinese schools. they adopt white, English names.

the way they speak, the way they conduct themselves, they look more like, have more incommon with the white man than to a Chinese. looking at these urban Chinese, there’s not asign of Chinese culture that’s based on humanism, of ethics and piety.

they have a Chinese face, they have a Chinese name, and for those educated at Chineseschools, they are literate in Chinese script, but their mentality is that of a white man. in otherwords, they are bananas.

Reply20. Rabbit | February 22, 2013 at 12:52 pm

Larangan menghina agama dan kepercayaan lain sudah jelas disebut dalam Al Quran. Ustaz2Ann Wan Seng, Ridzuan Tee, Shah Kirit jangan lupa atau buat2 tak tau.

Reply21. RD. | February 22, 2013 at 5:49 pm

Jangan hina agama orang lain, jika kamu tak mahu agama kamu di hina orang………macam tu lah, lebih kurang

Reply22. JIWA HAMBA | February 22, 2013 at 1:40 pm

Reblogged this on .

Reply23. anakjamil | February 22, 2013 at 3:44 pm

pls don’t take it the wrong way, but coming from a chinese buddhist woman lamenting in her


http://gravatar.com/rahmatdaud



http://jiwahambakini.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/262/






pls don’t take it the wrong way, but coming from a chinese buddhist woman lamenting in herpersonal blog strikes a chord in my heart – you do realise that your choice of words exudesorrow in this particular article.

i admit all our politicians play the race card for this GE13 though some may not be aware ofit’s impact.. but, if Malaysia is destined for yet another May 13, there’s nothing that we can doto avoid it. Maybe that’s our wake up call in the event people forget how fragile & delicate ourinterwoven nation actually is.

Reply24. El‑barokas | January 23, 2014 at 11:38 pm

It’s unavoidable. Humans are still animalistic and having to adhere to the law of nature,sunnatUllah. And nature will take its course. This prolonged incitement from the slit‑eyedevangelists on the “low‑class” majority without much of an effort at containment that isexpected of a government that had taken on characteristics of the lowly kangkong can onlylead to one destiny, temporary disaster. And I say let it be.

There’d be a new equilibrium rising from the ashes. The only regret is that it would not bethe evangelists who’d be burnt. It would be the low‑class majority that would be badlywounded for, in Malaysia, generally race is identified with religion.

Reply25. pakard | February 22, 2013 at 5:30 pm

Ada yang tulis bahawa 13 Mei 69 adalah cetusan dari perebutan kuasa dalaman UMNO, ramaijuga yang percaya. Dari sudut itu bermakna orang Cina telah berjaya diperkuda olehpemimpin UMNO untuk melakukan huru‑hara demi kepentingan politik pemimpinUMNO/Melayu tersebut.

Sudah tentu pemimpin UMNO itu jugalah yang menyediakan penyapu besar kepada orangCina untuk diarakkan di KL sebagai tanda menghalau Melayu keluar dari KL (MALAYsia ?).

LKS tidak terlibat kerana tiada disitu waktu itu katanya, jadi dia seorang Cina yang bijak tidakterpedaya oleh pemimpin UMNO tersebut….

Tulisan itu tidak diendahkan, tiada bantahan, tiada bangkangan, ianya mungkin betul.

Tanda Putera ditentang habis‑habisan. Cina teraniaya angkara kerakusan politik Melayu,Melayu bersalah sebenarnya… Mereka perlu membayar dengan mengalah dan tidak lagimenuntut apa‑apa di negara MALAYsia ini.

Kita akan terima padah jika lupa sejarah apatah lagi mengubah sejarah…tapi Melayu selalutak kisah…

Reply26. i hate nʹsync | February 22, 2013 at 6:30 pm


http://gravatar.com/pakard





“Negara ini bergantung kepada tuan‑tuan sekalian. Tolong masing‑masing yang jujur danikhlas kepada saya yang menjaga negara ini supaya tidak berbangkit hal‑hal yang berbahaya.Negara yang kita kasihi ini adalah kehendak pertolongan tuan‑tuan sekalian. Saya doakankepada ke hadrat Subhannahuwataallah. Selamatkanlah semua penduduk‑penduduksekalian!”

– Tunku Abdul Rahman

I read this part so many times that my eyes are teary at this point. Yes, this is OUR country andher fate lies in OUR hands. The politics of hate is now so pervasive and overwhelming that allpretence of sanity, decorum and rationality have disappeared.

We cannot save the world, we can only save ourselves. As Elie Wiesel said, “Mankind mustremember that peace is not God’s gift to his creatures; peace is our gift to each other.”

Malaysians must have the fortitude to resist violence. Even in the darkest of days, truth andjustice will triumph. We just need to keep working on it.

Reply27. Ini Tanah Melayu. | January 24, 2014 at 12:00 am

Negara ini negara melayu, bukan negara berbilang kaum. Kaum cina adalah pegembaraekonomi. begitu juga orang India.

Kita perlu mengembalikan hak orang melayu seperti orang Yahudi berjuang mengambilbalek baitul maqdis dari orang Arab.

Sedangkan ini adalah negara Melayu dan Tanah Melayu kenapa orang Cina dan Indiayang jadi bilionari seperti yang didehkan oleh Forbes. Kenapa pelabuhan PPinang diberikepada Syed mohktar? kenapa airasia diberi kepada Tony Fernandes?

Reply28. AC‑DC | January 24, 2014 at 1:16 am

Sabah dan Sarawak bukannya Tanah Melayu.

Reply29. LOL | January 25, 2014 at 1:13 pm

AC‑DC,

Belajar kat mana tu?

Sabah dan Serawak terletak dalam Kepulauan Melayu.

Reply30. AC‑DC | January 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm

Dia kata ‘Tanah Melayu’ laa…








Betul, tapi Sabah dan Serawak begabung dengan Malaysia, mereka secaraautomatiknya jadi sebahagian dari Tahan Melayu, dan tambahan pula Borneoterletak dalam gugusan Kepulauan Melayu. penduduk pribuminya juga darisuku‑sakat Melayu yang berbilang.

Manakala orang cina dan India TIDAK dan BUKAN dari golongan suku‑sakat Melayu.

Jadi apa masaalah kamu?

Reply32. Helen Ang | January 25, 2014 at 2:47 pm

re: “Jadi apa masalah kamu?”

Dyslexia

Reply33. asus | January 24, 2014 at 6:15 pm

per: Kenapa pelabuhan PPinang diberi kepada Syed mohktar

Bukankah Syed Mokhtar orang Melayu?

Reply34. asus | January 24, 2014 at 7:03 pm

per: Sedangkan ini adalah negara Melayu dan Tanah Melayu kenapa orang Cina danIndia yang jadi bilionari seperti yang didehkan oleh Forbes.

Siapa yang beri lesen perniagaan kepada orang‑orang di bawah?

1. Ananda‑lesen Maxis, Astro;2. Teh Hong Piow dan Quek Leng Chan‑lesen bank;3. Robert Kuok‑lesen gula (dulu);4. Lim Goh Tong‑lesen kasino;5. dan banyak lagi contoh.


Re. Siapa yang beri lesen perniagaan kepada orang‑orang di bawah?

That was the old days. A simply look at the banking industry, will show that GLCcoomercial banks and Islamic Banking are dominating the scene now.








Plantation, Oil and Gas, Port, Land and Sea Transport, etc have been taken overthrough GLC or chosen and trusted Bumi Business.

Reply36. Antihipokrit | February 22, 2013 at 10:34 pm

DAP akan meneruskan agenda menghuru‑harakan negara ini, kali ini melalui Melayu dungusendiri yg berada di dalam PAS dan PKR. Jadi DAP boleh cuci tangan.

Reply37. Conrad | February 23, 2013 at 1:48 am

Re: Mahathir failing to get elected in Kubang Basu.

Yup, with loss of power comes loss of influence. In addition, you would notice that Mahathirlaments the fact that some of his policies were reversed by his successors and these successorsdo not have a grip on UMNO and the country like he did. He himself has acknowledged this.

Re: UMNO rightist yearnings

What the UMNO right yearn are laws like the ISA be used against anyone who threatenUMNO hegemony. Our social order breaks down when people do not support the idea thatfreedom includes those who do not handle it responsibly.

Stepping on a picture of the Prime minister, flipping the bird at the Queen, protesting with acow head, spitting out the Holy sacrament, all these are examples of people not handling theirfreedom responsibility but the question is (and this also relates to the breaking down of thesocial order), do the rules constraining freedom apply to everyone or is it selective ?

Re. Mahathir’s chokehold and rise of evangelism

His chokehold did not fail. As I said, Mahathir was more than willing to let his moneybagsChristian MCA coterie a free run of their religion. As usual, it was the sordid intersection ofGod and money.

Re: Tunku’s narrative of May 13

As I said, I do not agree with the narrative. However, as to your point about evangelicalsprecipitating violence, I do not see it. Reading that excerpt of Tunku you posted I see parallelsbetween the way how UMNO interacts with its Malay political adversaries than what theevangelicals are doing now.

Re. Najib evoking Tahrir Square

I do not see evidence of Pakatan signaling this. I think this is more of a preemptivepropaganda strike on UMNO’s part, which is part of the harassment of its Malay politicaladversaries.





Re. UMNO’s bait

Exactly. Because UMNO finds them offensive, they are viewed as a threat.

Re. Malay’s mengamoking

The only reason why I claimed UMNO would resort to violence if they lose power is that theyare the ones who claim they would be chaos if they lose, be it the Tahrir square narrative or thefact that “Malays” would lose their sovereignty.

The Opposition always claims that there will be a smooth transition of power.

Just as how UMNO has always said that street demonstrations lead to violence but theHimpunan Bangkit proved that with minimal police presence, the whole enterprise could beachieved without much tension

I do not see the Malays amocking unless as I said, it is a conflict within their own community.Opposition Malay supporters do not buy into the whole narrative that Islam and Malaydom isunder threat by the DAP or the evangelists.

If they did, they would have been trouble during the Allah controversy and the churchburnings. Some Malays believe that UMNO would use the evangelical of the DAP to causetrouble, which is why this type of propaganda is not as effective as before.

Others who support UMNO would believe that their religion and race is under threat.

Lynas and Wong Tuck actions are obviously against UMNO and only those who believe thatUMNO and the Malay are the same would feel a sense of hostility.

There are many Malays who do not support UMNO but who could care less about Lynasexcept that it makes UMNO look bad.


re: “[Mahathir’s] moneybags Christian MCA coterie”

:) Gimme us some names pls (aside from Jimmy Chua Jui Meng who has left the party). Ishould like to devote some blog space to the MCA Christian coterie.

Reply39. Conrad | February 23, 2013 at 11:00 am

Ayuh, Helen, if I were to name names I would be engaging in “fitnah” of my own sinceI have no tangible evidence linking the MCA Christian coterie and Mahathir, only whatI and a few other observed in the late 80’s.

You are spot on in your pieces about the evangelical movement and its link with theDAP. The DAP has evolved into a plutocracy or maybe it is theoplutocracy.





What I noticed was when it came to the MCA it was more of protecting a segment of itsbase, which comprised of a diverse range of interests. While with the DAP it is more ofa singular interest, if you get my drift.

Honestly, I feel bad for the MCA at times (Pakatan leaning voter that I am) since theydid play by the race rules but seem unable to get a grip on the propaganda war they arefacing.

I know this makes me sound like a bigot but the thing is, what fuels the evangelicals istheir obsession with money cloaked in piety.

From what I observed in those times, within the upper echelons of the MCA, it wasnever about spreading Christianity but merely another revenue stream. With the DAPon the other hand, religious fervor and pecuniary interest is embraced as some sortof direct relationship with God.

Again I apologize to readers if this is interpreted as some form of bigotry. Please keep inmind this is purely anecdotal and I could very well be wrong.


re: “the evangelicals … obsession with money cloaked in piety”

The Prosperity Gospel has been discussed in the S’pore public domain after the CityHarvest Church scandal blew up.

The Star has adamantly refused to give coverage and didn’t even mention once themoney laundering charges before the Singapore court which implicated the CHC ofSubang Jaya.

Reply41. Colin Wong | February 23, 2013 at 9:07 am

Let your words here not be divisive. Let not your intellectual urge spew out derogatoryremarks about each other’s religion. Let not your personal grudge against a particular groupmanifest in veiled attacks on others.

Reply42. Basicsimple | April 30, 2013 at 8:26 am

First of all let the history be history….

If really want to know whose fault then communist (Chinese extremist) and UMNOultra(malay extremist) that want power are at fault…

I read the book of 13 mei by TAR.






Chinese communist thinking no longer active in today malaysia Chinese mentality, but all theevil deeds that TAR mentioned being done by opposition during 1969 actually being done byBN In today politics…

Communist gone but the Malay ultra remained…it is clearly stated in TAR book that mahathiris an extremist. What is important is not past but present. War never about right or wrong, it isalways about power.

Why not learn from history so we never make the same mistake again.

Some blame Chinese, some blame UMNO ultra…I blame the sorroundings environmentduring 1969 that make it happened.

Communist influences in Chinese thinking during that time.The present of leaders who only think about Malay ( UMNO ultra )UMNO infighting and power grab from TAR.The people who approve the permit for demonstration.

Everything is a chain that link everything.

Today UMNO remained the same for 1969 because it still have the same leader. Mahathir andnajib( Razak son ) but the environment changed, 13 mei 2013 is not going to happen.

History never went backwards only forwards. This is the golden rules in history.

Reply43. Helen Ang | April 30, 2013 at 8:29 am

re: “all the evil deeds that TAR mentioned being done by opposition during 1969 actuallybeing done by BN In today politics…”

Oh really? And the opposition (Pakatan) is faultless today?

Reply44. Basicsimple | April 30, 2013 at 9:46 am

Hi Helen,

No one in this world is perfect. Opposition is never perfect, that is why I highlight thestatement by TAR. Opposition fault at that moment by using dirty trick, but why BNlearn all the bad thing that opposition do at that moment and use it now?

Opposition talk still have some logic and don’t treat their rakyat as brainless althoughnot all right.

Look at how BN talk. Sometimes I wonder whether they understand what theythemselves talk about or not. They treat the rakyat at stupid and cannot think.

People treat you a cup of water, the water is cold or hot impossible the rakyat don’t





People treat you a cup of water, the water is cold or hot impossible the rakyat don’tknow.

Reply45. poco | April 30, 2013 at 8:46 am

Real funny lah…considering we have Lim Kit Siang and also his son running now, Lim KitSiang is even in Johor wanting to kick UMNO out of their stronghold.

Just like last time won some seats already want to kick Malays out.

Reply46. Goondoo | January 23, 2014 at 10:41 pm

“Today UMNO remained the same for 1969 because it still have the same leader. Mahathirand najib( Razak son ) but the environment changed, 13 mei 2013 is not going to happen.”

Mahathir was not a leader in 1969. He was nobody not even an MP , Ketua Pemuda orKetua Bahagian UMNO. That was a fact.

Reply47. 69 inPJ | January 23, 2014 at 10:15 pm

Lately thare has been lots of provocations against the Malays and Muslims.

There must be an experienced Master who orchestrated such provocations, and may be theMaster is blood thirsty wanting bloodshed in the country.

The Malays until now can still exercise restrain and it is hoped that things will not get out ofhand.

The provocations must stop immediately and we should not underestimate the thinking of theother parties.

We all know the history of May 13 and the people responsible.

I wish “ISA” can be used against these trouble makers, and let other peace loving Malaysianlive happily together. These unwanted elements should be paralyzed behind bars.

We should all learn from this painful lessons of May 13.

The government must bring back ISA……..NO CHOICE !


re: “The government must bring back ISA……..NO CHOICE !”

Ada ISA ke, takde ISA ke, gomen masih lagi diterajui Najib. Jadi kena dinilai dulu







Ada ISA ke, takde ISA ke, gomen masih lagi diterajui Najib. Jadi kena dinilai dulukeperibadian pemimpin.

Najib ni bagi dia pistol ke, Kalashnikov ke, senjata apa pun dia takkan guna. Pernah sayatulis PM kita ni tiada killer instinct and he will not go for the jugular.

Dengan samseng jalanan macam Guan Eng, senjatanya ialah buku lima (knuckle duster),dan dengan Tian Chua, dia akan gigit telinga lawan.


Ms H. In the early 1980s, the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew with his 14 failed Policies forSingapore said that Johor Baru was full of crime and Singapore was crime‑free. Today,it is 2014, our beloved Malaysia has a rising crime rate and we have abolished the ISAwhich exposed the whole country to securtiy risk. Singapore is crime‑free andRETAINS THE ISA.

WHAT IS THE BN GOVERNMENT AS LED BY THE UMNO WITH THE 13COMPONENT PARTIES TRYING TO SHOW ? We are all bullet proof ? Bring back theISA, everyone makes mistakes. By recognising one’s mistakes only then we canprogrress.

SEE HOW QUICKLY IN 2013 THE SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT DISMANTLEDTHEIR MUCH VAUNTED AND FLAUNTED DYSFUNCTIONAL MERICTOCRATICPYRAMID OF YES MEN WITH THE SMARTEST FELLOW ON TOP AFTER LOSINGUS$108 BILLOINS IN 2008 Kudos to them for recognising a wrong since 1959. Theyclosed the whole meritocratic show and moved on. No need to be obstinate over amistake.

Reply50. AK47 | January 23, 2014 at 10:49 pm

Ms H. Lest we forget. The MCA under the leadership of Tun Tan Siew Sin pulled out of theAlliance at 2.30 pm on 13 May 1969. The riots began at 5 pm in Princes Road, Kuala Lumpurnear the Tamil Physical Culture Stadium. By 10 pm., the MCA re‑joined the Alliance.


Ms H. I would like to repeat how the Opposition with the Singaporean Trojan Horse DAPmissed Putrajaya in 3 EASY STEPS somewhat like their spiritual head the brilliant Lee KuanYew iwth his 14 Policies for Singapore which is their spiritual homeland.

1. In 1997, if the DPM had taken a holiday in Disneyland. He would have returned as theHonorable Prime Minister of Malaysia.

2. In 2008, if the Opposition had sorted out the 32 seats before the 12th General Elections, and






2. In 2008, if the Opposition had sorted out the 32 seats before the 12th General Elections, andnot after, Putrajaya would have been theirs.

3. In 2013, if the Opposition had gone on a 100 day hunger strike and boycotted the 13thGeneral Elections and allowed the BN to win 100% of the seats with 49% of the votes withWorld condemnation. They would be in Putrajaya swanking around by now.

The above examples are the main reasons why I always exhort people to vote BN and berealistic.IF THE BRILLIANT LEE KUAN YEW SCREWED UP BIG TIME IN A SMALL ONE STREETTOWN, WHAT DO YOU EXPECT HIS DIGITS AND COHORTS TO PERFORM IN THEULUS ? It can only be a poor farcical show like now. See how it is done in Bangkok and Kiev !The real difference between professionals and our Malaysian amateurs !

Reply52. berserk | January 24, 2014 at 7:15 am

Ada berpendapat DAP tidak mengunjurkan violance. Mungkin benar. Tetapi DAP dilihatmemainkan peranan sebagai agen provokasi.

Mungkin masih ada yang teringat peristiwa banglasia pilihanraya umum. Terdapat videodimana sebuah bas sarat dengan pekerja kilang bangladesh di tahan kemudian sekumpulanpemuda cina melakukan provokasi. Paling menyedihkan apa bila video tersebutmempamerkan betapa takutnya warga bangladesh digertak.

Kalau kumpulan pemuda pemuda cina tersebut boleh melakukan provokasi terhadap wargabangla mengapa mereka tidak kepada melayu?


re: “Kalau kumpulan pemuda pemuda cina tersebut boleh melakukan provokasi terhadapwarga bangla mengapa mereka tidak kepada melayu?”

Bangla tidak akan mengundi DAP. Sebaliknya dengan Melayu pula, kumpulan pemuda‑pemuda Cina tersebut masih mengharapkan golongan yang duduk atas pagar akanmenyokong pembangkang kelak. Maka mereka bermuka‑mukalah dengan orang Melayu.

Reply54. terimakasih | January 24, 2014 at 10:37 pm

selepas 13 mei orang melayu dan bumiputra dapat dasar ekonomi baru dgn matlamat 30%pegangan ekonomi negara

dan jika berlaku sekali lagi harap dasar ekonomi yang terbaru pula diujudkan dgn meletakanmatlamat pegangannya kepada lebih kurang 70% bersesuaian dengan peratus penduduknegara.






Reply55. asus | January 25, 2014 at 10:44 am

per: selepas 13 mei orang melayu dan bumiputra dapat dasar ekonomi baru dgn matlamat30% pegangan ekonomi negara

Setelah lebih 30 tahun, DEB masih gagal mencapai matlamat. Apatah lagi, kebanyakankekayaan (tanpa mengambil kira pegangan syaikat berkaitan kerajaan) berada dalamtangan individu terpilih seperti Syed Mokhtar, Mokhzani Mahathir dan jutawanCina/India Robert Kuok, Ananda dll. Rakyat biasa masih terperangkap dalam golonganpertengahan/miskin.


The GOMEN is smart now they won’t simply give big contract to untrusted Malaybusiness who tend to “Ali Babakan” the contracts. Thus the name that Malay namesthat you see nowadays are the chosen one.

While at lower level of the supply chain, more and more Malay youths have ventureinto business through various incentive from Mara and the GOMEN. This is just thebeginning.

Re. Rakyat biasa masih terperangkap dalam golongan pertengahan/miskin.

Keperitan hidup it lumrah hidup, semua negara mengalami termasuklah Singaporeyang dikatakan maju tu. Cuba baca apa kata rakyat Marhaen mereka. Belum adarasanya rakyat Malaysia yang mati tak makan, kalau ada pun selalunya akan disiarkandan bantuan mencurah datang dari pelbagai pihak.

Orang yang bersyukur saja yang sentiasa merasa tak cukup.

5 kuih RM1, teh O 30 sen

Kuala Terengganu: Ketika ramai peniaga makanan lain mengeluh dan menaikkanharga, Sinah Sulaiman, pengusaha kedai makan di Kampung Losong Atap Zin, di sini,masih menjual air minuman serendah 30 sen secawan.

Malah, lebih 50 jenis hidangan yang dijual di kedai Sinah, termasuk nasi minyak, nasilemak, nasi berlauk dijual pada harga serendah RM2, manakala pelbagai jenis kuihdijual serendah RM1 untuk lima biji.

Sinah, 64, berkata, sejak membuka kedai makan itu bersama arwah suaminya, YusofSalleh, 20 tahun lalu, dia tidak pernah menaikkan harga makanan seperti peniaga lain,walaupun berdepan isu kenaikan harga pelbagai barangan.

Biarpun harga makanan dan minuman di kedainya murah, aspek mutu tidak pernah





Biarpun harga makanan dan minuman di kedainya murah, aspek mutu tidak pernahdipinggirkan dan disebabkan itu, kedai Sinah tidak putus‑putus menerima pelangganwalaupun terletak di pinggir bandar.

“Alhamdulillah, walaupun tidak banyak untung, tetapi saya bersyukur kerana rezekiberniaga kedai makan ini cukup untuk membesarkan lima anak dan menampungkehidupan.

Kedai jadi tumpuan

“Walaupun kedai saya jauh dari bandar, ramai kakitangan awam dan swasta yangbekerja di bandar datang ke sini terutama ketika sarapan pagi. Bagi saya, tidakmengapa jika memperoleh untung sedikit, asalkan rezeki yang diterima berkat,” kataibu tunggal itu.Kedai makan Sinah yang dibuka setiap hari dari jam 6 pagi hingga 7 malam, hanyamenjual secawan teh O dengan harga 30 sen, manakala milo ais yang dianggap mahaldan boleh mencecah RM2, hanya dijual dengan harga RM1.

Selain itu, kuih pula dijual dengan harga rendah iaitu karipap empat biji (RM1), apamlima biji (RM1), nasi lemak RM1, nasi berlauk RM2 dan bihun goreng (70 sen).

http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/5kuihRM1_tehO30sen/Article


Error:

Orang yang tak bersyukur saja yang sentiasa merasa tak cukup.

Reply58. RINA | January 25, 2014 at 7:04 am

Sekarang tak perlu Mei 13 lagi, messy. Just amalkan ABC, ABCD this will bleed and kill themoff slowly but surely wan.

Jan 2014 the Apeks sombong2 lost from my families;… Back to school of necessities over RM15K (my kids, nephews, nieces and cousins)… Kedai cermin mata over RM20K (All tukar cermin mata/contacts and abandoned ourtraditional Apek shops)… My shop redo complete piping system – RM 6K now instead of Apek contractors changedMelayus, and to my delight – they did a splendid job, neat and with new gadgetsrecommended. You all nak contact sila hubungi saya.….Building already over 15yrs and am looking for Malay contractors to redo all my electricalfittings – usually handled by Apek sombongs contractors.…. Our monthly medication subscriptions we are all switching from Apek pharmacies. Haikawan2 sekolah saya pun 3 orang have their own pharmacies, so go to them. Ubat darahtinggi bole dapat 40% diskaun pulak tu!


http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/5kuihRM1_tehO30sen/Article




See, our huge family (siblings and uncles/aunts’s families included) have united to go all outfor the ABC, ABCD whatnot, so tak usah payah2 gaduh sampai tumpah darah.. Join in the funeveryone, satisfaction guaranteed!


My advice to all Apek sombong2 this CNY when you gather, kindly reflect whatevermisdeeds you people have been inflicting to the Bumiputras esp in your business dealings..

Even our kids and their friends (huge networking) are getting very detailed and meticuloustoday when they spend, ABC, ABCD on their minds. Plus belek2 segalanya, ade sajatulisan bahasa Kebangsaan Negara China mereka tak selesa owh! Salespersons Apek2sombong mereka taknak masuk kedai tu owh!

UBAH cara hidup kamu after this CNY, jgn tak UBAH ya, kalau takmau UBAH nantibanyak Apek2 sombong yang akan rugi.

Reply60. asus | January 25, 2014 at 10:40 am

Rina,

Just that small peanut amount of few thousands will not make any business suffer. This isonly at the retail level. Don’t forget the entire value chain. Example, school necessities. Theretail seller may be Malay. But the supplier may be non‑Malay. Your contractor could be aMalay. But the sub‑contractor and supplier maybe Chinese.


I have commented about this before i.e. to kill their small business first, the rest willfollow. As it is now, many have reported that Giants and in my case, 7‑11, have stoppedsupplied the Bumi products or they refused to refurnish it on purpose. I used to drinkH&L milk and back then the supply at Giant or 7‑11 was harder to get as it is verypopular, unlike Dutch Lady, now you can see the different you will see many of themon the diary products rack but Dutch Lady is hard to find. I think 7‑11 have stopsupplying it altogether.

Even simple products like Sardin now have various Bumi Brand and so do the rest ofthe other necessities e.g. sugar, flour, cooking oil, ketchup, kicap etc.

If you live around Cina DAP areas, you won’t see the effects as the Cina DAPcommunity will still support their own, but in Malay majority areas they are suffering, Ihope soon many will close shops.

Reply62. RINA | January 25, 2014 at 3:22 pm







Sikit2 lama2 jadi bukit… I am content with the support shown so far by family andfriends.. The young Melayu plumber I engaged sekarang dah kena “booking” as hishands are FULL.. Syukur.

Main contractors and suppliers? Tak kisah buat masa ini, at least dari bawah kita gerakand Bumiputras jgn lupa are the majority in this country. Ini baru keluarga dan rakan2saya, anda bila lagi? And Dato Najib, nak plumbing Sri Perdana pun I am confident thisyoung man can handle… jgn panggil foreign plumbers OKAY!

Apek2 nak marah – actually kita sekadar mengikut teladan mereka.

So Helen, forget all these Mei 13 issues, zaman sekarang minda Melayu dah berubah.No money no talk wan!

Reply63. Fazillah | January 25, 2014 at 11:08 am

Suka suka suka sangat. Let us build the biggest melayu islam supply base. We the Melayuscan do it.


MAHAS, Pasar Tani and even Pasar Malam are the starting point now. At Pasar Tani,the GOMEN have ensured 22 products under control.


CNY cuti panjang.. siapa nak servis kenderaan, nak ganti enjin baru, mencat, spare parts localke imported ke 2nd hand ke pun saya bole bagi 100% bumi workshops termasuk 100%(graduan2) pekerja bengkel..

Forget all these Mei 13 nonsense.. buang masa.. kasi sakit jiwa aje. Sekarang kita guna caraEKONOMI..

Siapa bole marah? Wang dari hasil titik peluh doa siang malam, kenapa nak bagi kat depa‑depa tu?

Properties? Mereka yg bermaharajalela? Pihak2 seperti UDA, MARA dll dipersilakan bantu.Duk tunggu ape lagi?


There are two Malay shops that sell IT products, Mobile phones and repair services in LowYat Plaza now, they are located at the back unit on the 2nd. and 3rd. floor I think, just walkaround to find it.








Re. Properties? Mereka yg bermaharajalela? Pihak2 seperti UDA, MARA dll dipersilakanbantu. Duk tunggu ape lagi?

It has been done, just google UDA, TH properties, Naza TTDI etc. This is only area that theCina DAP is currently dominating.

Reply

Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Recent Posts

2015: Will evil ʺracistsʺ finally stand up to the Yahudi Yeohs?2014 ‑ Tahun cengkaman Yahudi YeohFunding: National disaster management RM9.4 million, TalentCorp RM87.4 millionKit Siang & daughter to give aid to Kelantan flood victimsChristians claim theyʹre ʺselflessly helping the flood victimsʺCukup parah dah nihMayat putus pergelangan tangan ditemui berdekatan gerejaOpening the floodgates to hududHaramkan Isma ‑ Behind call by Papa Dapsterʹs sidekick to ban the NGO2015: Three wishes come true

Feeds

Entries (RSS)Comments (RSS)

Blog at WordPress.com. The Blix Theme.

Follow

https://wordpress.com/themes/blix/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/26/behind-call-by-papa-dapsters-sidekick-to-ban-isma/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13-mei-ucapan-tunku-menerusi-rtm/trackback/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/31/2015-will-evil-racists-finally-stand-up-to-the-yahudi-yeohs/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/christians-claim-theyre-selflessly-helping-the-flood-victims/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/26/opening-the-floodgates-to-hudud/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/25/2015-three-wishes-come-true/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/kit-siang-daughter-to-give-aid-to-kelantan-flood-victims/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/28/funding-national-disaster-management-rm9-4-million-talentcorp-rm87-4-million/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/26/mayat-putus-pergelangan-tangan-ditemui-berdekatan-gereja/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/feed/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/2014-tahun-cengkaman-yahudi-yeoh/


https://helenang.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/13-mei-ucapan-tunku-menerusi-rtm/feed/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/cukup-parah-dah-nih/

https://helenang.wordpress.com/comments/feed/

https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog




Follow “Helen Ang”

Build a website with WordPress.com

https://wordpress.com/?ref=lof

13 mei_ ucapan tunku menerusi rtm _ helen ang

Documents