kilang kelapa sawit changkat chermin · this month oer & ker dicreased by 0.40% & 0.30%...

34
Date 20/7/2012 KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN ………………………………………. (MOHD HADZRI BIN ARSAD) Manager KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN Progress Report For the month of JUNE 2012 KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BERHAD (No. Syarikat: 15043-V)

Upload: dinhthien

Post on 02-Mar-2019

260 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Date 20/7/2012

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

.(MOHD HADZRI BIN ARSAD)

Manager

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

Progress Report

For the month ofJUNE 2012

KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BERHAD(No. Syarikat: 15043-V)

PAGE 1

HIGHLIGHTSEstimated percentage of FFB pushed by shovelPercentage FFB pushed due to grading

PRODUCTION

RAINFALL RECORD (mm) Year 2012

Fin Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug SepLast FY 20.00 119.00 163.00 185.00 71.00 699.50 574.00 262.00 359.00 329.00 457.00 766.00This FY 314.75 431.00 431.00 61.25 197.75 242.25 203.25 79.50 20.50

OTHER HIGHLIGHTS

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS / ACHIEVEMENTS

Comments :This month OER & KER dicreased by 0.40% & 0.30% respectively as compared to last month figure.The todate OER was increased by 0.85% to 22.04% as compared to last year same period.

This Month

21.19

4.724.35

22.04

4.61

22.12 22.52

Same Period Last Year

100.0%0.0%

Last Month TodateThis Month

PROGRESS REPORT ON

(9TH MONTH OF FINANCIAL YEAR)FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

Todate Current Financial Year

ITEM

4.65

O.E.R %

K.E.R %

20.40

4.04

PAGE 2

1 PRODUCTION REPORT

1.1. FFB STATEMENT

1.1.1. FFB CONTRIBUTION

Estimate for Estimate +/- Estimate +/- EstimateThis Month Todate This Month Todate This Month Todate

KLK Estates MT MT MT MT MT MT- -

5,373.920 45,917.460 7,160.000 56,681.000 -24.95% -18.99%3,272.920 30,039.770 3,498.000 31,415.000 -6.43% -4.38%2,281.750 33,051.610 4,056.000 34,124.000 -43.74% -3.14%1,276.240 10,206.200 1,649.000 12,387.000 -22.61% -17.61%

929.060 7,782.530 1,161.000 8,616.000 -19.98% -9.67%416.610 3,264.440 568.000 4,810.000 -26.65% -32.13%

1,024.270 10,748.040 1,506.000 19,598.000 -31.99% -45.16%415.520 1,970.800 - - - -

- 312.210 - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Sub Total 14,990.290 143,293.060 19,598.000 167,631.000 -23.51% -14.52%

Non-KLK Estates- -

- 1,591.280 0.000 0.000 - -971.320 7,145.610 1180.000 4660.000 -17.68% 53.34%

LDG BATU DUA 159.600 1,351.030 210.000 890.000 -24.00% 51.80%LDG. MENGLEMBU 115.400 868.960 130.000 495.000 -11.23% 75.55%LDG BUKIT KATHO - 630.110 0.000 0.000 - -LDG TRONOH MALAY 248.930 535.820 0.000 0.000 - -

- -- -

- #VALUE!- -

Sub Total 1,495.250 12,122.810 1,520.000 6,045.000 -1.63% 100.54%

Outsiders- -

- 299.420 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Sub Total - 299.420 - - - -

Grand Total 16,485.540 155,715.290 21,118.000 173,676.000 -21.94% -10.34%

Comment :

Total FFB received for the month lowered by 21.94% or 4,632.46 mt as compared to the estimated.

LDG PINJI

LADG. NARBOROUGH

LDG. SENGGANG

LDG. SUBUR

LDG. KAMPAR

LDG. ALLAGARLDG. KUALA KANGSAR

LADANG LEKIRLDG. CHANGKAT CHERMINLDG. RAJA HITAMLDG. SERAPOHLDG. GLENEALY

( No include from Ladang Batu Dua, Ladang Kuala Kangsar, Ladang Subur, non-KLK estates and outsiders ).

PAGE 31.1.2. FFB COMPOSITION

Composition of crop from various years of planting are :-

MT % MT %1977 43.87 0.27 81.15 0.05 1980 18.08 0.11 77.23 0.05

1981 - - - - 1982 92.02 0.56 163.93 0.11 1983 - - 277.30 0.18 1984 120.67 0.73 925.32 0.61 1985 68.01 0.41 616.79 0.41 1986 46.06 0.28 614.21 0.41 1987 97.84 0.59 1,223.20 0.81 1988 - - 1,433.85 0.95 1989 701.56 4.26 5,709.10 3.77 1990 318.31 1.93 2,814.54 1.86 1991 439.06 2.66 3,763.65 2.49 1992 763.87 4.63 5,881.96 3.89 1993 18.82 0.11 159.83 0.11 1994 60.58 0.37 691.19 0.46 1995 44.75 0.27 658.11 0.43 1996 127.89 0.78 1,111.00 0.73 1997 94.59 0.57 817.88 0.54 1998 529.91 3.21 4,471.33 2.95 1999 584.67 3.55 4,924.43 3.25 2000 454.52 2.76 4,147.17 2.74 2001 1,446.19 8.77 13,153.78 8.69 2002 2,580.19 15.65 24,827.53 16.40 2003 1,224.37 7.43 10,905.21 7.20 2004 1,698.61 10.30 16,030.14 10.59 2005 1,060.99 6.44 12,072.16 7.97 2006 1,528.09 9.27 16,288.99 10.76 2007 1,699.66 10.31 15,338.93 10.13 2008 64.98 0.39 561.75 0.37 2009 557.38 3.38 1,637.34 1.08 2010 - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total 16,485.54 100.00 151,379.00 100.00

Append below the classification of Palms According to Age :-

Category Palm Age (years) %Immature 1st - 3rd 3%Young 4th - 9th 44%Prime 10th - 18th 36%Old 19th and above 17%

Comments :

This Month TodateYear of Planting

Remarks

FFB composition vary from the years 1977 to 2009 with most of the crop come from 2001 till 2007.

1.1.3. FFB QUALITY

CONTRIBUTING This Last This Last This Last This Last This Last This Last This Last This LastESTATES Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month

Total/Average 0 0

1.1.4. % FFB ON FLOOR AND IN LOADING RAMP FOR GRADING

FFB INTAKE (MT) % %

Comments :No grading was conducted by mill.

WEIGHT (MT)LOADING RAMP

WEIGHT (MT)FFB GRADING

PAGE 4

No. of Grading % Black % Underripe % Long Stalk % Pest Damaged % Empty Bunch% Overnight % Rotten

1.1.5. LOOSE FRUIT & TRASH CONTENT

This Last This Last This Last This LastNO ESTATES Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month

1 Lekir 15.50 14.00 2 C.Chermin 10.38 11.00 3 Raja Hitam 10.00 9.67 4 Glenealy 13.00 13.00 5 Serapoh - 12.50 6 Allagar 15.65 17.00 7 Kuala Kangsar 15.00 14.50 8 Tronoh Malay 11.00 12.50 9

101112

Average 0 0

NO Outsider Estate123

Average 0 0

1.1.6. LOOSE FRUITS TO FFB RATIO

NO ESTATES12345678

1.1.7. STONES & TRASH IN FFB

NO ESTATES1 All Estates2345678

Comments :

manage to reduced the trash content from 17% to 15.65%.Trash contents from Ladang Lekir and Ladang Kuala Kangsar rose to 15%. Ladang Allagar

TrashTonnage (mt) % to FFBStones (kgs) per 100 tn FFB

3.86

This Month Last MonthTotal Tonnage

This Month Last Month% to FFB

Fruit in Load Loose Fruit (%) FFB %

PAGE 4.1

No. of Grading % Loose Trash Content in Trash Content in

PAGE 5

1.2. PRODUCTION QUALITY

1.2.1. PRODUCTION OIL / DESPATCH OIL

X S.D. X S.D. X S.D. X S.D.

FFA %

Moisture (VM) %

Dirt %

Peroxide Value %

DOBI

ANALYSIS RESULT BY (KDC/TQCC)

TaikoSAMPLE Average StandardFFA 3.85 3.0 MaxVM 0.12 0.13 MaxDIRT 0.04 0.03 MaxPEROXIDE VALUE 0.68 0.60 MaxIODINE VALUE 52.15 50 - 54DOBI VALUE 2.51 3.0 MinCAROTENE 582.25 600 MinE233 (1% CORR.) 0.96 1.20 MaxE269 (1% CORR.) 0.24 0.20 MaxIRON 5.0 - 3.0PHOSPHORUS 8.0 - 5.0D.F. (Delta Y) 20.43 20.0 MinQUALITY RATING NIL

Comments :

2.782.79 0.072.88

0.21

The CPO Quality for the month was fair.

3.92 0.18

0.02

9.655

0.100.0420.70

52.20

3.78

0.034

0.12

--

21.97

1.240.28

--

18.16

2.83620.00

0.100.0380.60

52.001.21

547.00

0.21

0.140.0440.60

52.203.00

585.001.170.23

-

0.130.0410.80

2.99577.00

52.20

1.210.23

--

20.86-

20.73

3.53 3.97 3.76 4.14

0.09

0.038

2.81

0.03

9.396 0.037

0.12

1st Week 2nd Week 3rd Week 4th Week

0.07

Last Month This Month Last Month

< 0.25

> 2.31

0.033

0.14

Marketing

< 5.0

Specification

3.84 0.22 3.57

DESPATCH PRODUCTIONThis Month

PAGE 61.2.2. PRODUCTION / DESPATCH KERNEL

MARKETINGX S.D. X S.D. X S.D. X S.D. SPECIFICATION

5.65 0.38 5.57 5.80 0.43 5.92 6%3.95 0.44 4.12 4.37 0.22 4.48 7%1.12 0.06 1.07 1.14 0.06 1.10

26.54 1.18 25.400.00 1.18

1.2.3. CPO DESPATCHBUYER MILL BUYER'S + / -

NET NET ON MILLWEIGHT WEIGHT NET WEIGHT

tn tn tn1- 1497.090 1500.750 3.660

2- 198.490 198.630 0.140

3- 100.880 101.190 0.310

4- 1494.130 1498.720 4.590

5- 99.160 99.250 0.090

6- 98.650 98.980 0.330

7- 0.000 3488.400 3497.520 9.120

1.2.4. PK DESPATCHBUYER MILL

NETWEIGHT

tn1- 344.1202- 200.960 3- 120.500 4-5-6-7-

Total : 665.580

1.2.5. CXC REPORT

Comments :

DESPATCHTHIS MONTH LAST MONTH

MOISTURE %

THIS MONTH

RAUB OIL MILL (DELIVED TO ISF)LEE OIL MILLCARGILL PALM PRODUCTSOUTHERN EO

HUP LEE OIL MILLSINN HWAT HENG

PGEO LUMUT

ISF

No. of Loads with high differences +/- 80kg)

PRODUCTIONLAST MONTH

DIRT %FFA %TOTAL BROKEN KERNEL %STONE CONTENT %

95

PANGKOR OIL MILL

The buyer net weight have surplus 9.12 mt than mill net weight.

THIS MONTH LAST MONTH

The Kernel quality was fair.

9932

Total number of CPO tankers

PAGE 6.1

LOADS FROM MONTH: June 2012

Ticket No Driver Vehicle Date Mill Buyer G / Loss BuyerA083782 Hairul Nizam b. Hashim BJJ 5684 7.6.2012 40.810 40.700 0.110 Raub Oil Mill (Recovered 90 kg)A084257 Lokman bin Ahmad BLG 775 14.6.2012 40.770 40.690 0.080 Cargill ( Recovered 90 kg)

Total 0.190Comments

EXTRACTED FROM CXC REPORT

Mill already done load test and calibration on weighbridge end of this month.

Weight Details (MT)

CPO Despatch Loads With High Differences

PAGE 6.2

No. Tanker No. *Total

UsageMill Weight

+/-Other Mill Weight +/-

Total Weight +/-

No Go Zone

Excessive Idling

Power Disconnect

Zone Grid Exit Action Taken / Remarks

Total 0 0 0 0

* Represent (TMS) Outside Tankers

GPS PROGRESS REPORT FOR KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN ON June 2012

Violation Report

PAGE 71.3. COST OF PRODUCTION

(Basis : Cost per tonne CPO)

ThisMonth Todate Year ' s

June 2012 9 mths EstimateRM / tn RM / tn RM / tn

Indirect Cost 50.67 49.29 56.30

Depreciation 29.10 28.64 26.11

Manufacturing Cost 142.38 138.77 139.62

Ex-Mill Cost 222.15 216.70 222.03

Cooking Oil Cess - - 0.00

Palm Oil Stabilisation Cess 2.00 2.00 2.00

CPO (Sabah) Sales Tax - - 0.00

Despatch & Selling 22.16 6.80 27.1

TOTAL EXPENDITURE 246.31 225.50 251.13

A/c This Month Estimate

Code RM/ton CPO RM/ton CPO Diff. (%)

IC 08 7.89 6.46 18.1%

IC 12 2.92 0.70 76.0%

IC 20 14.11 12.03 14.7%

PK 44 56.39 38.66 31.4%

PK 46 3.50 1.75 50.0%

PK 47 8.25 5.95 27.9%

PK 51 4.62 1.84 60.2%

PK 57 14.16 9.16 35.3%

PK 58 8.10 6.00 25.9%

Comments :

High cost due to desilting of effluent pond.

Reimbursement claim for auditor stay in hotel.

Relocate office septic tank and install 3 unit flag pole.

Comments

Overhaul one unit of Westfalia separator.

High Diesel usage for diesel Generator due to no TNB supply.

Remove the side zinc of steriliser building to improve ventilation.

High cost due to beautification work in front of the office.

Remove the portion of roof to improve tne ventilation.

Install one unit C.M Conv. At the claybath.

PAGE 82 PROCESS PERFORMANCE

2.1. STERILIZATION

Summary of sterilisation cycle for the month is tabulated as follows :-

Function X (min) S.D.Deaeration 21st. Peak (1.41 Bar / 20 psi) 161st. Peak exhaust 12nd. Peak (1.7 Bar / 25 psi) 122nd. Peak exhaust3rd. Peak (1.7 Bar / 25 psi)3rd. Peak exhaust4th. Peak (1.7 Bar / 25 psi)Holding Time 31Final exhaust 4Steaming cycle 66 0Door Open to Door Shut Time 30

X S.D. X S.D.USB after 1st Threshing (%) 1.21 0.18 -USB after 2nd Threshing (%) 0.64 0.17 0.71Threshing Efficiency (%)

STERILIZER CONDENSATE

This Month Last MonthX S.D. X S.D.

4.86 1.01 5.37

Condensate / FFB Ratio - -

Absolute oil loss (kg/tn FFB) - -

Comments :

The OLWB of Sterilizer Condensate for the month was recorded at 4.86%.The Automatic Condensate Dispenser trial is carried out on Sterilizer No. 4.

Last MonthThis Month

Steriliser condensate (Oil Content in Wet Basis)

PAGE 9.02.2. DIGESTING & PRESSING STATION

2.2.1. DIGESTER TEMPERATURE OC

This Month Last Month DIGESTER X S.D. X S.D. Digester No. 1 98.00 0.80 98.00 0.75 Digester No. 2 97.00 0.79 98.00 0.85 Digester No. 3 97.00 0.54 98.00 0.89 Digester No. 4 99.00 0.59 98.00 1.00 Digester No. 5 Digester No. 6 Digester No. 7 Digester No. 8 Digester No. 9

2.2.2. PRESSING

Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press AverageNo. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9

X 4.55 4.60 4.60 4.70 4.61S.D. 0.16 0.12 0.19 1.20 0.42

X 4.61 4.62 4.61 4.57 4.60S.D. 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.10

X 7.55 7.61 7.61 7.53 7.58S.D. 0.34 0.19 0.28 0.34 0.29

X 7.65 7.67 7.65 7.58 7.64S.D. 0.18 0.14 0.18 0.16 0.16

X 14.37 12.98 13.41 13.46 13.56S.D. 2.82 1.93 1.33 1.55 1.91

X 14.33 13.41 13.39 14.28 13.85S.D. 2.43 1.88 2.24 2.17 2.18

X 233.59 235.27 189.47 208.30 216.66S.D.

X 233.07 222.68 191.44 203.72 212.73S.D.

Comments :

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

The digester temperature are maintained above 950C.

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

OIL LOSS ON WET BASIS (OLWB)

98

OIL LOSS ON DRY BASIS (OLDB)

NUT BREAKAGE (%)

PRESS RUNNING HOURS

The OLDB of press fibre controlled below 7.8%.

98

PAGE 9.12.2.3.

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

This Month

Last Month

XS.D.N

True Nut TrashTrue Mesocarp (ripe) True Mesocarp (unripe)

Oil in Mesocarp OLWB Normal Parthenocarp

Abnormal Partnenocarp

PAGE 9.2

2.2.4. EFB PRESSING

Press Press Press PressNo. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4

PRESS RUNNING This Month 169.57 171.77 211.24 HOURS Last Month 240.16 90.27 282.61 DOWN TIME This Month 2.00

Last Month 0.50

2.2.5. OIL RECOVERED

This Month F F A (%) DOBI

VM (%)OLWB (%)

Press Fibre (OLDB) Ratio EFB Liquor to FFB (%)

2.2.6. SPLITTER

RUNNING HOURSThis Month Last Month

No. 1 No. 2

Comments :

Last Month4.931.7187.777.26

4.761.73

87.767.31

PAGE 10

2.3. CLARIFICATION STATION

2.3.1. CLARIFICATION TANK

This Month Last MonthTank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3

X 96.00 98.00S.D

% Oil in underflow X 5.02 4.93 6.03 6.07 (% OLWB) S.D 0.57 0.11

2.3.2. SLUDGE SEPARATOR (S) / CENTRIFUGE (C)

S1 S2 DA 45 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7X 0.97 0.98 0.96 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.82

S.D 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.10X 0.98 0.96 0.78 0.79 0.77 0.79 0.77 0.78

S.D.T Mth X 162.18 22.41 247.24 118.41 20.25 118.06 139.19 84.81 131.73L Mth X 207.95 276.13 160.60 40.50 271.61 195.35 81.98 103.70T Mth X 1.40 1.40 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70L Mth X 1.40 1.40 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70T Mth XL Mth XT Mth XL Mth X

Comments :

Separate Waste Basculator (mt)

Oil losses on Absolute Terms (Kg/tn FFB)

The temperature of clarification tank maintained above 95oCThe % of underflow of clarification tank 1 & 2 was recorded at 5.02% and 4.93% respectively in OLWB.The OLWB of heavy phase for separator & centrifuge stork was below 1%.

Nozzle size (mm)

Temperature OC

This MonthLast

Month

% Oil loss on wet basis (x)

Operating Hours (hrs)

PAGE 11

2.3.2. DECANTER (D)

Inlet98.0098.00 D1 D2 D1 D2 D1 D2

X 6.88 3.38 0.87S.D 2.47 0.11X 7.55 3.65 0.93

S.D.X 87.80 77.83 95.03

S.DX 86.45 77.92 95.19

S.D.X 5.32 18.79 4.10

S.DX 6.00 18.43 3.88

S.D.T Mth XL Mth X

Comments :

Light Phase

This MonthLast

Month

This Month

This Month

This MonthLast

Month

Last Month

Decanter performance satisfactory.

Temperature (oC)

Oil % (x) Last Month

Solid Phase

VM % (x)

Operating Hours

NOS % (x)

Heavy Phase

PAGE 12

2.3.3. DILUTION RATE & ABSOLUTE OIL LOSS

X S.D. X S.DDILUTION RATE % 24.00 2.77 22.16Separator Waste to FFB ratioDecanter cake to FFB ratioAbsolute Oil loss in Separator/Centrifuge kg/mt FFBAbsolute Oil loss in Decanter Cake kg/mt FFBTotal Oil loss kg/MT FFB 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.3.4. OIL LOSSES AFTER DEOILING TANK TO EFFLUENT

DescriptionAfter Deoiling tank (OLWB)After Cooling pond

Comments :

This Month Last Month

This Month Last Month

Oil loss after cooling pond below 1%.

0.99 1.00

PAGE 13

2.3.5. PURIFIER & VACUUM DRYER

No: 1 No: 2 No: 1 No: 2 No: 3 No: 4 No: 5X 0.35

S.D 0.05X 0.56

S.D. 0.11X 0.04

S.D 6.93X 0.04

S.D. 7.33X

S.DX

S.D.X

S.DX

S.D.

2.3.6. VACUUM DRYER

X S.D X S.D X S.DThis Month 0.35 0.05 0.09 0.03 47.29Last Month 0.56 0.11 0.12 0.03 78.57This MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast Month

Comments :

% Dirt

This MonthLast

Month

PURIFIER After PurifierBefore Purifier

% VM

This MonthLast

Month

VM Rem. Eff

This MonthLast

Month

Dirt Rem. Eff

This MonthLast

Month

Production oil quality was satisfactory without using purifiers.Performance of Vacuum dryer was satisfactory.

VACUUM DRYER Vacuum (-cm Hg) VM % After DryerVM % Before DryerVM.

Removal Eff.

No: 1

No: 2

No: 3

2.4. NUT & KERNEL STATION PAGE 13.1

2.4.1. NUT SILO & KERNEL SILOS

DESCRIPTION No: 1 No: 2 No: 3 No: 4X

S.DX

S.D.X

S.DX

S.D.X

S.DX

S.D.

2.4.2. KERNEL SILO

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5Top 30.40 27.60 27.60 24.80 24.00 30.60 32.40 31.40 24.80 24.50

Middle 33.60 31.60 32.80 28.60 28.80 34.00 39.80 26.80 28.80 26.80Bottom 60.80 56.60 62.80 45.00 42.60 56.00 60.60 64.00 64.80 64.40

% VM Fresh Kernel X 21.30 21.00S.D 12.60X 5.65 5.57

S.D 0.38% Drying Efficiency 73.13 73.48

Comments :

This MonthLast

Month

This Month Last Month

% Drying Efficiency

% Dried Kernel

Temperature oC

The quality of kernel was satisfactory.

% VM Fresh Nut

This MonthLast

Month

% Dried Nut

This MonthLast

Month

2.4.3. NUT CRACKING EFFICIENCY PAGE 13.2

X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SDWhole Nut (%) 90.54 3.48 90.91 3.80Broken Nut (%) 4.90 2.06 4.93 2.42Whole Kernel (%) 2.50 1.20 2.45 1.37Brokern Kernel (%) 1.38 0.55 1.71 0.11

X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SDWhole Kernel (%) 26.05 4.78 24.92 3.44Broken Kernel (%) 18.07 4.24 17.32 2.73Uncracked Nut (%)Half cracked Nut (%) 2.10 1.06 2.40 0.41

X SD X SDRipple Mill No: 1 97.80 1.10 96.26 1.12Ripple Mill No: 2 97.50 0.81 96.13 1.08Ripple Mill No: 3Ripple Mill No: 4Ripple Mill No: 5Ripple Mill No: 6Ripple Mill No: 7Ripple Mill No: 8Ripple Mill No: 9

Comments :

No: 6 No: 7 No: 8 No: 9Mixture Composition after Cracker

No: 1 No: 2

R I P P L E M I L L

R I P P L E M I L L

No: 1 No: 2 No: 3 No: 9

No: 3 No: 4 No: 5

Nut Cracking Eff.

Kernel Recovery Eff.

Nut cracking efficiency and kernel recovery for all ripple mills were satisfactory.

Nut Composition before Cracker (INPUT)

No: 4 No: 5 No: 6 No: 7 No: 8

PAGE 142.4.4. KERNEL LOSSES / COST

X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD X SD

0.69 0.69

1st Stage2nd

Stage 1st Stage2nd

Stage 1st Stage2nd

Stage 1st Stage2nd

Stage 1st Stage2nd

Stage 1st Stage2nd

Stage

0.60 0.55 0.58 0.54

Claybath 0.94 0.92

2.4.5. RUNNING COST

Comments :

This Month

Line 3Line 1 Line 2 Line 3

Last Month Todate

Kernel Produced (mt)Total Kaolin or Calcium Carbonate Cost (RM)

Last MonthThis Month

Cyclone Fibre

LTDS

Hydrocyclone (PK in wet shell)

Line 1 Line 2

716.530 794.060 6265.640

3149.250 22026.250

4.610 3.970 3.520

3300.000

Cost / MT of FFB (RM)

Other Cost e.g Sodium Silicate (RM)

Cost / MT of PK (RM)

0.200 0.180 0.160

All the losses was maintained below 1%.

PAGE 152.5. BOILER / POWER HOUSE

2.5.1. BOILER HOUSE

Description This Month Last Month TodateBoiler Chemical Cost (RM) 2390.12 24482.66 Cost / MT FFB (RM) 0.14 0.18

2.5.2. POWER HOUSE

DescriptionThis Month Last Month This Month Last Month This Month Last Month This Month Last Month This Month Last Month

Turbines > NadrowskiNo. 1 (504 KW) 173.0 21.5 26650.0No. 2 (1200 KW) 295.0 317.4 221640.0 57070.0Diesel Gen Set > CaterpillarNo. 1 (280 KW) 20.4 670.0 214.0No. 2 (150 KW) 291.0 441.0 19844.0 33013.0 12303.0 10574.0 1.61 3.06No. 3 (360 KW) 482.0 509.0 19880.0 62780.0 12347.0 20108.0 1.61 3.12KwHr / mt FFB (Turbine + Genset)

2.5.3. TNB POWER SUPPLY

KwHr RM KwHr RM KwHr RMPalm Oil MillRubber FactoryEcomat PlantTotal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Comments :

Diesel consumption of 3 unit Genset was recorded at 24,650 liter reduced 20%..Cost of boiler chemical was recorded at RM 0.14/MT FFB.

179.8

This Month Last Month Todate

Steam Consumption per KwHr (Turbine)9.0

Operating Hours Total KwH Generated Kw KwHr / LitDiesel Consumption

(Litres)

PAGE 16

2.6. WATER TREATMENT PLANT

2.6.1. WATER CONSUMPTION

Description This Month Last Month This Month Last Month m3/mt FFBOwn 1030.27 859.99Estate

Mill 23060.00 21230.00 1.40 FCTOTAL 24090.27 22089.99 0.00 0.00 1.40

2.6.2. WATER TREATMENT COST

This Month Last Month TodateChemical Cost (RM) 1081.04 884.70 11391.51Cost /m3 water (cts / m3) 0.04 0.04Cost /mt FFB (cts / mt FFB) 0.07 0.05 0.08Water Consumption (m3 / mt FFB) 1.40 1.24

2.6.3. MONTHLY LICENCE COSTPUMPING RAW WATER FROM RIVER

This Month Last Month TodateTotal Volume of water (m3) consumedTotal Cost (RM)

Comments :

Raw water is pumping from tube well.

Domestic

Water consumed%

Water Consumption was recorded at 1.40 M3 /MT FFB.

PAGE 17

2.7. General (Visitors / Security / Training Programme / Details of Breakdown, etc)

2.7.1. Visitation

Date

2.7.2. Training

Date13.6.2012

2.7.3. Security

Date28.6.2012

2.7.4. OSH Matter

Date20.6.2012

2.7.5. RSPO Matter

Date

2.7.6. Amenities

Date

2.7.7. Water Supply

Date

2.7.8. EFB DISPOSAL

2.7.9. DECANTER CAKE DISPOSAL

- 389.00 302.23 86.77

Remarks

Production (mt) Collected (mt)

Remarks

Balance b/f (mt) Production (mt) Collected (mt) Balance c/f (mt)

2,573.16 47.84 Balance b/f (mt) Balance c/f (mt)

- 2,621.00

Remarks

Mohd Ismadi bin Ismail from OSH Dept. ( Safety Visit).

RemarksPerson

RemarksFirst Aid Traning from HA .

RemarksAP meeting.

Remarks

PAGE 17.1

2.8.0. Effluent Treatment

Date2.6.2012

2.8.1 Mill Downtime

Date Hours Date Hours15.6.2012 2

Total 2 0

2.8.2 Housekeeping / Beautification / Linesite / Compound

Date26.6.2012

15.6.2012

2.8.3. Others

Date

Comments

RemarksDisludging Effluent Pond in progress.

Details DetailsLine 1 Line 2

Diesel genset breakbown.

RemarksOffice removation in progress.

Internal tar road and Concrete road

Remarks

PAGE 17.2

2.8.4. Effluent Result For June 2012

abcdefgh

2.8.5 Trailing Report

Total Solids (mg / l)

DOE LimitpH NABOD (mg / l)

NA

5000 Max

NAAmmonical Nitrogen (mg / l) NA

61

COD (mg / l) NATotal Nitrogen (mg / l)

Oil & Grease (mg / l) NA

7601NA

TQCC Result7.4308

-248186

834Suspended Solids (mg / l)

PAGE 183.0 MANPOWER

3.1. EMPLOYEES

MALAYS CHINESE INDIANS OTHERS TOTAL Executives 2 2 4 Subordinate Staff 14 1 3 18 TOTAL 16 3 3 0 22

3.2. SUBORDINATE STAFF LEAVE STATUS

Leave Leave Leave B/F From Entitlement Taken Leave Year '10 for Year '11 This Taken

No. Position (Days) (Days) Total Month Todate Bal1 ELECTRICAL CH 7 21 28 4 19 92 LAB.SUPERVISO 10 24 34 2 15 193 W/BRIDGE CLERK 24 24 4 14 104 CLERK 24 24 2 8 165 BOILER CHARGEMAN 21 21 3 9 126 SUPERVISOR 24 24 - 7 177 CLERK 18 18 - 3 158 SUPERVISOR 24 24 - 5 199 CHIEF CLERK 24 24 2 9 15

10 CLERK 1 24 25 - 13 1211 STORE CLERK 4 24 28 6 6 2212 BOILERMAN 24 24 1 7 1713 FOREMAN 24 24 - 4 2014 BOILERMAN 24 24 1 7 1715 W/BRIDGE CLERK 18 18 1 8 1016 BOILERMAN 21 21 - 9 1217 ASST. FOREMAN 18 18 1 6 1218 BOILERMAN 18 18 - 5 1319202122232425262728

Comments :

FARIDAH BT TALIBHAJI BURHANUDDIN BIN MRAZALI BIN MAT

AYUB BIN BASRIFAUZIAH BT HAJI MANSUJOHARI BIN ALIZULINA BT MAT JUNOSABDUL RASHID BIN SARMLAI AH FONG

NORHAYATI BT MAT ISAJAMALUDDIN BIN AHMAD ABU HASSAN SHAARI BIN MOHD SAAD BIN BAKARABDUL RAHIM BIN HJ ARS

KUN MARIYATI BT RADIN

DEVADAS A/L MARIAPPANARUMUGAM A/L MUNIYANVELAN A/L SUBRAMANIAM

NAME

PAGE 18.13.3 EMPLOYEE (MILL WORKERS)

(A) CHECKROLL

(1) MALAYSIAN Male Female Sub Total Male Female Sub Total Bumiputera 28 3 31 - 31 Chinese - - - Indian 16 1 17 - 17 Grand Total 44 4 48 - - - 48

(2) NON-MALAYSIAN Sri Lanka - - - India 14 14 - 14 Indonesia 24 24 - 24 Bangladeshi 7 7 - 7 Thai - - - Filipino - - - Grand Total 45 - 45 - - - 45 Total Checkroll 89 4 93 - - - 93

(B) CONTRACT / TEMPORARY

(1) MALAYSIAN Male Female Sub Total Male Female Sub Total Bumiputera - - - Chinese 1 1 - 1 Indian 1 1 - 1 Grand Total 2 - 2 - - - 2

Employees Dependants (Resident)Total

Employees Dependants (Resident)Total

PAGE 19Appendix 1

Unit This Month Last Month Todate1.0 FFB

1.1.1 Weight of FFB processed MT 16,485.540 17,072.250 151,379.000 1.1.2 Estimate MT 19,598.000 17,486.000 160,762.000 1.1.3 Shift Hours Hrs -

2.0 OIL MANUFACTURE2.1.1 Weight of Oil Produced MT 3,647.370 3,844.370 33,361.390 2.1.2 Estimate MT 4,272.000 3,812.000 34,675.000 2.1.3 Oil Extraction Rate % 22.12 22.52 22.04 2.1.4 Estimate % 21.80 21.80 21.57 2.1.5 Press Running Hours Hrs. 866.63 850.91 7,905.68 2.1.6 Production Hours Hrs. 272.25 288.25 2,622.25 2.1.7 Downtime (Line 1) Hrs. 2.00 0.50 36.25 2.1.8 Downtime (Line 2) Hrs. - 2.1.9 Press Capacity per unit MT / hr 19.02 20.06 19.15 2.2.0 F.F.B. Manufactured / Hours MT / hr 60.55 59.23 57.73 2.2.1 Oil Recovered / Hours MT / hr 13.40 13.34 26.74

3.0 KERNEL MANUFACTURE3.1.1 Weight of kernel Produced MT 716.530 794.060 6,982.170 3.1.2 Estimate MT 1,019.000 909.000 8,359.000 3.1.3 Kernel Extraction Rate % 4.35 4.65 4.61

;3.1.4 Estimate % 5.20 5.20 5.20 3.1.5 Production Hours Hrs. 272.25 288.25 2,611.75 3.1.6 Kernel Recovered / Hr MT / hr 2.63 2.75 2.67

4.0 DESPATCH AND STOCK4.1.1 Oil Despatched MT 3,497.520 3,749.080 34,358.570 4.1.2 Oil in Stock MT 957.370 807.520 1,764.890 4.1.3 Kernels Despatched MT 665.580 791.400 6,901.710 4.1.4 Kernels in stock MT 231.610 180.660 412.270

- Packed / Bulk Silo MT 231.610 180.660 412.270 - Kernel in Bag MT -

Remarks :

PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE MONTHOF JUNE 2012

PAGE 20

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(1) RECEPTION STATION / (2) LOADING PUMP / (3) STERILISER STATION(4) HOISTING / TIPPER AND THRESHING STATION

PAGE 21

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(5) PRESS AND DIGESTER STATION / (6) EFB PRESSING STATION / (7) KERNEL PLANT STATION(8) CLARIFICATION STATION

PAGE 22

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(9) RAW WATER HOUSE AND WATER TREATMENT PLANT STATION / (10) POWER STATION / (11) BOILER STATION(12) EFFLUENT STATION

PAGE 23

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(13) MILL BUILDING UPKEEP / (14) VEHICLE / (15) WORKSHOP / (16) GENERAL

CoverPageHighlightsProductionReportFFBCompositionFFBQualityLF_TrashContentProductionQualityProdDesKernelCPODesGPSRepCOPProcPerfDigPressStationDigPressStation2EFBPressingClarificationStationDecanterDilutionPurifierNutKernelStationNutCrackingEffKernelLossesBoilerPowerHouseWaterTreatmentGeneralGeneral2General3ManPowerEmployeeAppendix1MajorMaintRep1MajorMaintRep2MajorMaintRep3MajorMaintRep4

Main

KKS Progress Report version 1.3 for June 2012

Please select your desire section by a mouse click

Section ASection B

Print

3

Save

Information for the Progress Report

Co NameKUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BERHAD

Co Reg No.15043-VSetup

OC Code157

OC NameKILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

Co Start of Fin Mth10

Current Year2012Reset

Current Month6June

Current Month, YrJune 2012

Current Fin Mth #9th

Current Fin Mth9th

Current Fin Yr2012

Current Period2011/12

Asst/Manager NameMOHD HADZRI BIN ARSADTitleManager

By: Chan Kok LeongInstalled to:C:\eProgressRep\version 1.3

Sys last updated:30-Mar-2012Set:12-Jun-2012

Title ListYearMonthYesNo

Assistant20111No

Senior Assistant20122Yes

Acting Manager20133

Manager20144

Senior Manager20155

20166

20177

20188

20199

202010

202111

202212

Brief Instructions1. Change the Current Year / Month2. Click to get to desire Worksheet Page3. Enter the necessary data - Use Tab key to move to different fields4. Click Save icon to save your work5. Click Print to preview print out

Notes:1. Click Setup to change system defaults2. Click Reset for default zoom or A4 size

++ means click tab for more pages

11. Process Performance

1. Highlights

2. Production Report

4. FFB Quality

5. LF and Trash Content

6. Production Quality

7. Production and Despatch Kernel

8. High Differences CPO Despatch Loads

9. GPS Progress Report

10. Cost of Production

12. Digesting & Pressing Station ++

13. EFB Pressing

1. Clarification Station

2. Decanter

3. Dilution Rate & Absolute Oil Loss

4. Purifier & Vacuum Dryer

5. Nut & Kernel Station

6. Nut Cracking Efficiency

7. Kernel Losses / Cost

8. Boiler / Power House

9. Water Treatment Plant

10. General (Visitors/Security/Breakdown, etc.) ++

11. Man Power

12. Appendix 1

3. FFB Composition

13. Major Maintenance Report ++

CoverPage

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

Progress Report

For the month of

JUNE 2012

Date7/20/12KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BERHAD

(No. Syarikat: 15043-V)

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

.

(MOHD HADZRI BIN ARSAD)

Manager

Highlights

PROGRESS REPORT ONPAGE 1

KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN

FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(9TH MONTH OF FINANCIAL YEAR)

HIGHLIGHTS

Estimated percentage of FFB pushed by shovel100.0%

Percentage FFB pushed due to grading0.0%

PRODUCTION

Current Financial YearSame Period Last Year

This MonthLast MonthTodateThis MonthTodate

O.E.R %22.1222.5222.0420.4021.19

K.E.R %4.354.654.614.044.72

RAINFALL RECORD (mm)Year2012

Fin YearOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep

Last FY20.00119.00163.00185.0071.00699.50574.00262.00359.00329.00457.00766.00

This FY314.75431.00431.0061.25197.75242.25203.2579.5020.50

OTHER HIGHLIGHTS

ITEMDESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS / ACHIEVEMENTS

Comments :

This month OER & KER dicreased by 0.40% & 0.30% respectively as compared to last month figure.

The todate OER was increased by 0.85% to 22.04% as compared to last year same period.

Main Menu

ProductionReport

PAGE 2

1PRODUCTION REPORT

1.1.FFB STATEMENT

1.1.1.FFB CONTRIBUTION

Estimate forEstimate+/- Estimate+/- Estimate

This MonthTodateThis MonthTodateThis MonthTodate

KLK EstatesMTMTMTMTMTMT

--

LADANG LEKIR5,373.92045,917.4607,160.00056,681.000-24.95%-18.99%

LDG. CHANGKAT CHERMIN3,272.92030,039.7703,498.00031,415.000-6.43%-4.38%

LDG. RAJA HITAM2,281.75033,051.6104,056.00034,124.000-43.74%-3.14%

LDG. SERAPOH1,276.24010,206.2001,649.00012,387.000-22.61%-17.61%

LDG. GLENEALY929.0607,782.5301,161.0008,616.000-19.98%-9.67%

LDG. SENGGANG416.6103,264.440568.0004,810.000-26.65%-32.13%

LDG. ALLAGAR1,024.27010,748.0401,506.00019,598.000-31.99%-45.16%

LDG. KUALA KANGSAR415.5201,970.800- 0- 0--

LDG. SUBUR- 0312.210- 0- 0--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Sub Total14,990.290143,293.06019,598.000167,631.000-23.51%-14.52%

Non-KLK Estates

--

LDG. KAMPAR- 01,591.2800.0000.000--

LDG PINJI971.3207,145.6101180.0004660.000-17.68%53.34%

LDG BATU DUA159.6001,351.030210.000890.000-24.00%51.80%

LDG. MENGLEMBU115.400868.960130.000495.000-11.23%75.55%

LDG BUKIT KATHO- 0630.1100.0000.000--

LDG TRONOH MALAY248.930535.8200.0000.000--

--

--

-0.00%

--

Sub Total1,495.25012,122.8101,520.0006,045.000-1.63%100.54%

Outsiders

--

LADG. NARBOROUGH- 0299.420--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Sub Total- 0299.420- 0- 0--

Grand Total16,485.540155,715.29021,118.000173,676.000-21.94%-10.34%

Comment :

Total FFB received for the month lowered by 21.94% or 4,632.46 mt as compared to the estimated.

( No include from Ladang Batu Dua, Ladang Kuala Kangsar, Ladang Subur, non-KLK estates and outsiders ).

Main Menu

FFBComposition

PAGE 3

1.1.2.FFB COMPOSITION

Composition of crop from various years of planting are :-

Year of PlantingThis MonthTodate

MT%MT%Palm Age1st-3rd4th-9th10th-18th19th&above

197743.870.2781.150.0535557.387276.75923.292728.17

198018.080.1177.230.0532

1981- 0- 0- 0- 00

198292.020.56163.930.1130

1983- 0- 0277.300.1829

1984120.670.73925.320.6128

198568.010.41616.790.4127

198646.060.28614.210.4126

198797.840.591,223.200.8125

1988- 0- 01,433.850.9524

1989701.564.265,709.103.7723

1990318.311.932,814.541.8622

1991439.062.663,763.652.4921

1992763.874.635,881.963.8920

199318.820.11159.830.1119

199460.580.37691.190.4618

199544.750.27658.110.4317

1996127.890.781,111.000.7316

199794.590.57817.880.5415

1998529.913.214,471.332.9514

1999584.673.554,924.433.2513

2000454.522.764,147.172.7412

20011,446.198.7713,153.788.6911

20022,580.1915.6524,827.5316.4010

20031,224.377.4310,905.217.209

20041,698.6110.3016,030.1410.598

20051,060.996.4412,072.167.977

20061,528.099.2716,288.9910.766

20071,699.6610.3115,338.9310.135

200864.980.39561.750.374

2009557.383.381,637.341.083

2010- 0- 02

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

- 0- 00

Total16,485.54100.00151,379.00100.00

Append below the classification of Palms According to Age :-

CategoryPalm Age (years)%Remarks

Immature1st - 3rd3%

Young4th - 9th44%

Prime10th - 18th36%

Old19th and above17%

Comments :

FFB composition vary from the years 1977 to 2009 with most of the crop

come from 2001 till 2007.

Main Menu

FFBQuality

PAGE 4

1.1.3.FFB QUALITY

No. of Grading% Black% Underripe% Overnight% Rotten% Long Stalk% Pest Damaged% Empty Bunch

CONTRIBUTINGThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLast

ESTATESMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonth

Total/Average00- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0

1.1.4.% FFB ON FLOOR AND IN LOADING RAMP FOR GRADING

LOADING RAMPFFB GRADING

FFB INTAKE (MT)WEIGHT (MT)%WEIGHT (MT)%

Comments :

No grading was conducted by mill.

Main Menu

LF_TrashContent

PAGE 4.1

1.1.5.LOOSE FRUIT & TRASH CONTENT

No. of Grading% LooseTrash Content inTrash Content in

Fruit in LoadLoose Fruit (%)FFB %

ThisLastThisLastThisLastThisLast

NOESTATESMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonthMonth

1Lekir15.5014.00

2C.Chermin10.3811.00

3Raja Hitam10.009.67

4Glenealy13.0013.00

5Serapoh-12.50

6Allagar15.6517.00

7Kuala Kangsar15.0014.50

8Tronoh Malay11.0012.50

9

10

11

12

Average00- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0

NOOutsider Estate

1

2

3

Average00- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0

1.1.6.LOOSE FRUITS TO FFB RATIO

Total Tonnage% to FFB

NOESTATESThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast Month

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1.1.7.STONES & TRASH IN FFB

Trash

NOESTATESStones (kgs) per 100 tn FFBTonnage (mt)% to FFB

1All Estates3.86

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Comments :

Trash contents from Ladang Lekir and Ladang Kuala Kangsar rose to 15%. Ladang Allagar

manage to reduced the trash content from 17% to 15.65%.

Main Menu

ProductionQuality

PAGE 5

1.2.PRODUCTION QUALITY

1.2.1.PRODUCTION OIL / DESPATCH OIL

PRODUCTIONDESPATCHMarketing

This MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthSpecification

XS.D.XS.D.XS.D.XS.D.

3.840.223.573.920.183.78

FFA %< 5.0

0.090.030.120.120.020.14< 0.25

Moisture (VM) %

0.0389.3960.0370.0349.6550.033

Dirt %

Peroxide Value %

2.810.072.882.790.072.78

DOBI> 2.31

ANALYSIS RESULT BY (KDC/TQCC)

1st Week2nd Week3rd Week4th WeekTaiko

SAMPLEAverageStandard

FFA3.533.973.764.143.853.0 Max

VM0.140.130.100.100.120.13 Max

DIRT0.0440.0410.0420.0380.040.03 Max

PEROXIDE VALUE0.600.800.700.600.680.60 Max

IODINE VALUE52.2052.2052.2052.0052.1550 - 54

DOBI VALUE3.002.992.831.212.513.0 Min

CAROTENE585.00577.00620.00547.00582.25600 Min

E233 (1% CORR.)1.171.211.240.210.961.20 Max

E269 (1% CORR.)0.230.230.280.210.240.20 Max

IRON----0.005.0 - 3.0

PHOSPHORUS----0.008.0 - 5.0

D.F. (Delta Y)20.8620.7318.1621.9720.4320.0 Min

QUALITY RATING0.00NIL

Comments :

The CPO Quality for the month was fair.

Main Menu

ProdDesKernel

PAGE 6

1.2.2.PRODUCTION / DESPATCH KERNEL

PRODUCTIONDESPATCH

THIS MONTHLAST MONTHTHIS MONTHLAST MONTHMARKETING

XS.D.XS.D.XS.D.XS.D.SPECIFICATION

MOISTURE %5.650.385.575.800.435.926%

DIRT %3.950.444.124.370.224.487%

FFA %1.120.061.071.140.061.10

TOTAL BROKEN KERNEL %26.541.1825.40

STONE CONTENT %0.001.18

1.2.3.CPO DESPATCH

BUYERMILLBUYER'S+ / -

NETNETON MILL

WEIGHTWEIGHTNET WEIGHT

tntntn

1-PGEO LUMUT1497.0901500.7503.660

2-RAUB OIL MILL (DELIVED TO ISF)198.490198.6300.140

3-LEE OIL MILL100.880101.1900.310

4-CARGILL PALM PRODUCT1494.1301498.7204.590

5-SOUTHERN EO99.16099.2500.090

6-ISF98.65098.9800.330

7-0.000

3488.4003497.5209.120

1.2.4.PK DESPATCH

BUYERMILL

NET

WEIGHT

tn

1-PANGKOR OIL MILL344.120

2-HUP LEE OIL MILL200.960

3-SINN HWAT HENG120.500

4-

5-

6-

7-

Total :665.580

1.2.5.CXC REPORT

THIS MONTHLAST MONTH

Total number of CPO tankers9599

No. of Loads with high differences +/- 80kg)23

Comments :

The Kernel quality was fair.

The buyer net weight have surplus 9.12 mt than mill net weight.

Main Menu

CPODes

PAGE 6.1

EXTRACTED FROM CXC REPORT

CPO Despatch Loads With High Differences

LOADS FROM MONTH: June 2012

Weight Details (MT)

Ticket NoDriverVehicleDateMillBuyerG / LossBuyer

A083782Hairul Nizam b. HashimBJJ 56847.6.201240.81040.7000.110Raub Oil Mill (Recovered 90 kg)

A084257Lokman bin AhmadBLG 77514.6.201240.77040.6900.080Cargill ( Recovered 90 kg)

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

Total0.190

Comments

Mill already done load test and calibration on weighbridge end of this month.

Main Menu

GPSRep

PAGE 6.2

GPS PROGRESS REPORT FOR KILANG KELAPA SAWIT CHANGKAT CHERMIN ON June 2012

Violation Report

No.Tanker No.*Total UsageMill Weight +/-Other Mill Weight +/-Total Weight +/-No Go ZoneExcessive IdlingPower DisconnectZone Grid ExitAction Taken / Remarks

Total0000

* Represent (TMS) Outside Tankers

Main Menu

COP

PAGE 7

1.3.COST OF PRODUCTION

(Basis : Cost per tonne CPO)

This

MonthTodateYear ' s

June 20129 mthsEstimate

RM / tnRM / tnRM / tn

Indirect Cost50.6749.2956.30

Depreciation29.1028.6426.11

Manufacturing Cost142.38138.77139.62

Ex-Mill Cost222.15216.70222.03

Cooking Oil Cess--0.00

Palm Oil Stabilisation Cess2.002.002.00

CPO (Sabah) Sales Tax--0.00

Despatch & Selling22.166.8027.1

TOTAL EXPENDITURE246.31225.50251.13

A/cThis MonthEstimateComments

CodeRM/ton CPORM/ton CPODiff. (%)

0.0%

IC 087.896.4618.1%Relocate office septic tank and install 3 unit flag pole.

0.0%

IC 122.920.7076.0%High cost due to beautification work in front of the office.

0.0%

IC 2014.1112.0314.7%Reimbursement claim for auditor stay in hotel.

0.0%

PK 4456.3938.6631.4%High Diesel usage for diesel Generator due to no TNB supply.

0.0%

PK 463.501.7550.0%Remove the side zinc of steriliser building to improve ventilation.

0.0%

PK 478.255.9527.9%High cost due to desilting of effluent pond.

0.0%

PK 514.621.8460.2%Remove the portion of roof to improve tne ventilation.

0.0%

PK 5714.169.1635.3%Overhaul one unit of Westfalia separator.

0.0%

PK 588.106.0025.9%Install one unit C.M Conv. At the claybath.

Comments :

Main Menu

ProcPerf

PAGE 8

2PROCESS PERFORMANCE

2.1.STERILIZATION

Summary of sterilisation cycle for the month is tabulated as follows :-

FunctionX (min)S.D.

Deaeration2BarPsi

1st. Peak(1.41 Bar / 20 psi)161.4120

1st. Peak exhaust1

2nd. Peak(1.7 Bar / 25 psi)121.725

2nd. Peak exhaust

3rd. Peak(1.7 Bar / 25 psi)1.725

3rd. Peak exhaust

4th. Peak(1.7 Bar / 25 psi)1.725

Holding Time31

Final exhaust4

Steaming cycle660

Door Open to Door Shut Time30

This MonthLast Month

XS.D.XS.D.

USB after 1st Threshing (%)1.210.18-

USB after 2nd Threshing (%)0.640.170.71

Threshing Efficiency (%)

STERILIZER CONDENSATE

This MonthLast Month

XS.D.XS.D.

Steriliser condensate (Oil Content in Wet Basis)4.861.015.37

Condensate / FFB Ratio--

Absolute oil loss (kg/tn FFB)--

Comments :

The Automatic Condensate Dispenser trial is carried out on Sterilizer No. 4.

The OLWB of Sterilizer Condensate for the month was recorded at 4.86%.

Main Menu

DigPressStation

PAGE 9.0

2.2.DIGESTING & PRESSING STATION

2.2.1.DIGESTER TEMPERATURE OC

ThisMonthLastMonth

DIGESTERXS.D.XS.D.

Digester No. 198.000.8098.000.75

Digester No. 297.000.7998.000.85

Digester No. 397.000.5498.000.89

Digester No. 499.000.5998.001.00

Digester No. 5

Digester No. 6

Digester No. 7

Digester No. 8

Digester No. 9

2.2.2.PRESSING

PressPressPressPressPressPressPressPressPressAverage

No. 1No. 2No. 3No. 4No. 5No. 6No. 7No. 8No. 9

OIL LOSS ON WET BASIS (OLWB)This MonthX4.554.604.604.704.61

S.D.0.160.120.191.200.42

Last MonthX4.614.624.614.574.60

S.D.0.100.090.100.110.10

OIL LOSS ON DRY BASIS (OLDB)This MonthX7.557.617.617.537.58

S.D.0.340.190.280.340.29

Last MonthX7.657.677.657.587.64

S.D.0.180.140.180.160.16

NUT BREAKAGE (%)This MonthX14.3712.9813.4113.4613.56

S.D.2.821.931.331.551.91

Last MonthX14.3313.4113.3914.2813.85

S.D.2.431.882.242.172.18

PRESS RUNNING HOURSThis MonthX233.59235.27189.47208.30216.66

S.D.0.00

Last MonthX233.07222.68191.44203.72212.73

S.D.0.00

Comments :

The digester temperature are maintained above 950C.

The OLDB of press fibre controlled below 7.8%.

98

98

Main Menu

DigPressStation2

PAGE 9.1

2.2.3.

True Mesocarp (ripe)True Mesocarp (unripe)Oil in MesocarpOLWBNormal ParthenocarpAbnormal PartnenocarpTrue NutTrash

This MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast Month

X

S.D.

N

Main Menu

EFBPressing

PAGE 9.2

2.2.4.EFB PRESSING

PressPressPressPress

No. 1No. 2No. 3No. 4

PRESS RUNNINGThis Month169.57171.77211.24

HOURSLast Month240.1690.27282.61

DOWN TIMEThis Month2.00

Last Month0.50

2.2.5.

OIL RECOVERED

This MonthLast Month

F F A(%)4.764.93

DOBI1.731.71

VM(%)87.7687.77

OLWB(%)7.317.26

Press Fibre (OLDB)

Ratio EFB Liquor to FFB (%)

2.2.6.SPLITTER

Running HoursRUNNING HOURS

This MonthLast Month

No. 1

No. 2

Comments :

Main Menu

ClarificationStation

PAGE 10

2.3.CLARIFICATION STATION

2.3.1.CLARIFICATION TANK

This MonthLast Month

Tank 1Tank 2Tank 3Tank 1Tank 2Tank 3

Temperature OCX96.0098.00

S.D

% Oil in underflowX5.024.936.036.07

(% OLWB)S.D0.570.11

2.3.2.SLUDGE SEPARATOR (S) / CENTRIFUGE (C)

S1S2DA 45C1C2C3C4C5C6C7

% Oil loss on wet basis (x)This MonthX0.970.980.960.770.780.780.780.760.82

S.D0.030.070.070.030.070.060.060.030.10

Last MonthX0.980.960.780.790.770.790.770.78

S.D.

Operating Hours (hrs)T MthX162.1822.41247.24118.4120.25118.06139.1984.81131.73

L MthX207.95276.13160.6040.50271.61195.3581.98103.70

Nozzle size (mm)T MthX1.401.401.701.701.701.701.701.701.70

L MthX1.401.401.701.701.701.701.701.701.70

Separate Waste Basculator (mt)T MthX

L MthX

Oil losses on Absolute Terms (Kg/tn FFB)T MthX

L MthX

Comments :

The temperature of clarification tank maintained above 95oC

The % of underflow of clarification tank 1 & 2 was recorded at 5.02% and 4.93% respectively in OLWB.

The OLWB of heavy phase for separator & centrifuge stork was below 1%.

Main Menu

Decanter

PAGE 11

2.3.2.DECANTER (D)

InletSolid PhaseLight PhaseHeavy Phase

Temperature (oC)This Month98.00

Last Month98.00D1D2D1D2D1D2

Oil % (x)This MonthX6.883.380.87

S.D2.470.11

Last MonthX7.553.650.93

S.D.

VM % (x)This MonthX87.8077.8395.03

S.D

Last MonthX86.4577.9295.19

S.D.

NOS % (x)This MonthX5.3218.794.10

S.D

Last MonthX6.0018.433.88

S.D.

Operating HoursT MthX

L MthX

Comments :

Decanter performance satisfactory.

Main Menu

Dilution

PAGE 12

2.3.3.DILUTION RATE & ABSOLUTE OIL LOSS

This MonthLast Month

XS.D.XS.D

DILUTION RATE %24.002.7722.16

Separator Waste to FFB ratio

Decanter cake to FFB ratio

Absolute Oil loss in Separator/Centrifuge kg/mt FFB

Absolute Oil loss in Decanter Cake kg/mt FFB

Total Oil loss kg/MT FFB0.000.000.000.00

2.3.4.OIL LOSSES AFTER DEOILING TANK TO EFFLUENT

DescriptionThis MonthLast Month

After Deoiling tank (OLWB)

After Cooling pond0.991.00

Comments :

Oil loss after cooling pond below 1%.

Main Menu

Purifier

PAGE 13

2.3.5.PURIFIER & VACUUM DRYER

PURIFIERBefore PurifierAfter Purifier

No: 1No: 2No: 1No: 2No: 3No: 4No: 5

% VMThis MonthX0.35

S.D0.05

Last MonthX0.56

S.D.0.11

% DirtThis MonthX0.04

S.D6.93

Last MonthX0.04

S.D.7.33

VM Rem. EffThis MonthX

S.D

Last MonthX

S.D.

Dirt Rem. EffThis MonthX

S.D

Last MonthX

S.D.

2.3.6.VACUUM DRYER

VACUUM DRYERVacuum (-cm Hg)VM % Before DryerVM % After DryerVM. Removal Eff.

XS.DXS.DXS.D

No: 1This Month0.350.050.090.0347.29

Last Month0.560.110.120.0378.57

No: 2This Month

Last Month

No: 3This Month

Last Month

Comments :

Production oil quality was satisfactory without using purifiers.

Performance of Vacuum dryer was satisfactory.

Main Menu

NutKernelStation

2.4.NUT & KERNEL STATIONPAGE 13.1

2.4.1.NUT SILO & KERNEL SILOS

DESCRIPTIONNo: 1No: 2No: 3No: 4

% VM Fresh NutThis MonthX

S.D

Last MonthX

S.D.

% Dried NutThis MonthX

S.D

Last MonthX

S.D.

% Drying EfficiencyThis MonthX

S.D

Last MonthX

S.D.

2.4.2.KERNEL SILO

This MonthLast Month

1234512345

Temperature oCTop30.4027.6027.6024.8024.0030.6032.4031.4024.8024.50

Middle33.6031.6032.8028.6028.8034.0039.8026.8028.8026.80

Bottom60.8056.6062.8045.0042.6056.0060.6064.0064.8064.40

% VM Fresh KernelX21.3021.00

S.D12.60

% Dried KernelX5.655.57

S.D0.38

% Drying Efficiency73.1373.48

Comments :

The quality of kernel was satisfactory.

Main Menu

NutCrackingEff

2.4.3.NUT CRACKING EFFICIENCYPAGE 13.2

R I P P L E M I L L

Nut Composition before Cracker (INPUT)No: 1No: 2No: 3No: 4No: 5No: 6No: 7No: 8No: 9

XSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSD

Whole Nut (%)90.543.4890.913.80

Broken Nut (%)4.902.064.932.42

Whole Kernel (%)2.501.202.451.37

Brokern Kernel (%)1.380.551.710.11

R I P P L E M I L L

Mixture Composition after CrackerNo: 1No: 2No: 3No: 4No: 5No: 6No: 7No: 8No: 9

XSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSD

Whole Kernel (%)26.054.7824.923.44

Broken Kernel (%)18.074.2417.322.73

Uncracked Nut (%)

Half cracked Nut (%)2.101.062.400.41

Nut Cracking Eff.Kernel Recovery Eff.

XSDXSD

Ripple Mill No: 197.801.1096.261.12

Ripple Mill No: 297.500.8196.131.08

Ripple Mill No: 3

Ripple Mill No: 4

Ripple Mill No: 5

Ripple Mill No: 6

Ripple Mill No: 7

Ripple Mill No: 8

Ripple Mill No: 9

Comments :

Nut cracking efficiency and kernel recovery for all ripple mills were satisfactory.

Main Menu

KernelLosses

PAGE 14

2.4.4.KERNEL LOSSES / COST

This MonthLast Month

Line 1Line 2Line 3Line 1Line 2Line 3

XSDXSDXSDXSDXSDXSD

Cyclone Fibre0.690.69

LTDS1st Stage2nd Stage1st Stage2nd Stage1st Stage2nd Stage1st Stage2nd Stage1st Stage2nd Stage1st Stage2nd Stage

0.600.550.580.54

Hydrocyclone (PK in wet shell)

Claybath0.940.92

2.4.5.RUNNING COST

This MonthLast MonthTodate

Kernel Produced (mt)716.530794.0606265.640

Total Kaolin or Calcium Carbonate Cost (RM)3300.0003149.25022026.250

Other Cost e.g Sodium Silicate (RM)

Cost / MT of PK (RM)4.6103.9703.520

Cost / MT of FFB (RM)0.2000.1800.160

Comments :

All the losses was maintained below 1%.

Main Menu

BoilerPowerHouse

PAGE 15

2.5.BOILER / POWER HOUSE

2.5.1.BOILER HOUSE

DescriptionThis MonthLast MonthTodate

Boiler Chemical Cost (RM)2390.1224482.66

Cost / MT FFB (RM)0.140.18

2.5.2.POWER HOUSE

DescriptionOperating HoursTotal KwH GeneratedDiesel Consumption (Litres)KwKwHr / LitTurbine / Dieset Gen Set Kw

This MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast Month

Turbines>NadrowskiAllan KKKDresser RandElliotShinkoTurbodyneNadrowskiOthers

No. 1 (504 KW)173.021.526650.0504

No. 2 (1200 KW)295.0317.4221640.057070.01200

Diesel Gen Set >CaterpillarCaterpillarCumminsListerOthers

No. 1 (280 KW)20.4670.0214.0280

No. 2 (150 KW)291.0441.019844.033013.012303.010574.01.613.06150

No. 3 (360 KW)482.0509.019880.062780.012347.020108.01.613.12360

KwHr / mt FFB (Turbine + Genset)9.0Steam Consumption per KwHr (Turbine)179.8

2.5.3.TNB POWER SUPPLY

This MonthLast MonthTodate

KwHrRMKwHrRMKwHrRM

Palm Oil Mill

Rubber Factory

Ecomat Plant

Total0.000.000.000.000.000.00

Comments :

Cost of boiler chemical was recorded at RM 0.14/MT FFB.

Diesel consumption of 3 unit Genset was recorded at 24,650 liter reduced 20%..

Main Menu

WaterTreatment

PAGE 16

2.6.WATER TREATMENT PLANT

2.6.1.WATER CONSUMPTION

Water consumed

%

DescriptionThis MonthLast MonthThis MonthLast Monthm3/mt FFB

DomesticOwn1030.27859.99

Estate

Mill23060.0021230.001.40

FC

TOTAL24090.2722089.990.000.001.40

2.6.2.WATER TREATMENT COST

This MonthLast MonthTodate

Chemical Cost (RM)1081.04884.7011391.51

Cost /m3 water (cts / m3)0.040.04

Cost /mt FFB (cts / mt FFB)0.070.050.08

Water Consumption (m3 / mt FFB)1.401.24

2.6.3.MONTHLY LICENCE COST

PUMPING RAW WATER FROM RIVER

This MonthLast MonthTodate

Total Volume of water (m3) consumed

Total Cost (RM)

Comments :

Water Consumption was recorded at 1.40 M3 /MT FFB.

Raw water is pumping from tube well.

Main Menu

General

PAGE 17

2.7.General (Visitors / Security / Training Programme / Details of Breakdown, etc)

2.7.1.Visitation

DatePersonRemarks

2.7.2.Training

DateRemarks

13.6.2012First Aid Traning from HA .

2.7.3.Security

DateRemarks

28.6.2012AP meeting.

2.7.4.OSH Matter

DateRemarks

20.6.2012Mohd Ismadi bin Ismail from OSH Dept. ( Safety Visit).

2.7.5.RSPO Matter

DateRemarks

2.7.6.Amenities

DateRemarks

2.7.7.Water Supply

DateRemarks

2.7.8.EFB DISPOSAL

Balance b/f (mt)Production (mt)Collected (mt)Balance c/f (mt)

-2,621.002,573.1647.84

2.7.9.DECANTER CAKE DISPOSAL

Balance b/f (mt)Production (mt)Collected (mt)Balance c/f (mt)

-389.00302.2386.77

Main Menu

General2

PAGE 17.1

2.8.0.Effluent Treatment

DateRemarks

2.6.2012Disludging Effluent Pond in progress.

2.8.1Mill Downtime

Line 1Line 2

DateHoursDetailsDateHoursDetails

15.6.20122Diesel genset breakbown.

Total20

2.8.2Housekeeping / Beautification / Linesite / Compound

DateRemarks

26.6.2012Office removation in progress.

15.6.2012Internal tar road and Concrete road

2.8.3.Others

DateRemarks

Comments

Main Menu

General3

PAGE 17.2

2.8.4.Effluent Result For June 2012

DOE LimitTQCC Result

apHNA7.4

bBOD (mg / l)5000 Max308

cCOD (mg / l)NA-

dTotal Nitrogen (mg / l)NA248

eAmmonical Nitrogen (mg / l)NA186

fTotal Solids (mg / l)NA7601

gSuspended Solids (mg / l)NA834

hOil & Grease (mg / l)NA61

2.8.5Trailing Report

Main Menu

ManPower

PAGE 18

3.0MANPOWER

3.1.EMPLOYEES

MALAYSCHINESEINDIANSOTHERSTOTAL

Executives224

Subordinate Staff141318

TOTAL1633022

3.2.SUBORDINATE STAFF LEAVE STATUS

LeaveLeaveLeave

B/F FromEntitlementTakenLeave

Year '10for Year '11ThisTaken

No.NAMEPosition(Days)(Days)TotalMonthTodateBal

1RAZALI BIN MATELECTRICAL CHARGEMAN721284199

2HAJI BURHANUDDIN BIN MOHDLAB.SUPERVISOR10243421519

3FARIDAH BT TALIBW/BRIDGE CLERK242441410

4KUN MARIYATI BT RADINCLERK24242816

5LAI AH FONGBOILER CHARGEMAN21213912

6ABDUL RASHID BIN SARMONSUPERVISOR2424-717

7ZULINA BT MAT JUNOSCLERK1818-315

8JOHARI BIN ALISUPERVISOR2424-519

9FAUZIAH BT HAJI MANSURCHIEF CLERK24242915

10AYUB BIN BASRICLERK12425-1312

11ABDUL RAHIM BIN HJ ARSHADSTORE CLERK424286622

12MOHD SAAD BIN BAKARBOILERMAN24241717

13ABU HASSAN SHAARI BIN MOHD RAMLIFOREMAN2424-420

14JAMALUDDIN BIN AHMAD MANSURBOILERMAN24241717

15NORHAYATI BT MAT ISAW/BRIDGE CLERK18181810

16VELAN A/L SUBRAMANIAMBOILERMAN2121-912

17ARUMUGAM A/L MUNIYANDIASST. FOREMAN18181612

18DEVADAS A/L MARIAPPANBOILERMAN1818-513

1900

2000

2100

2200

2300

2400

2500

2600

2700

2800

Comments :

Main Menu

Employee

PAGE 18.1

3.3EMPLOYEE (MILL WORKERS)

(A)CHECKROLL

EmployeesDependants (Resident)Total

(1) MALAYSIANMaleFemaleSub TotalMaleFemaleSub Total

Bumiputera28331- 031

Chinese- 0- 0- 0

Indian16117- 017

Grand Total44448- 0- 0- 048

(2) NON-MALAYSIAN

Sri Lanka- 0- 0- 0

India1414- 014

Indonesia2424- 024

Bangladeshi77- 07

Thai- 0- 0- 0

Filipino- 0- 0- 0

Grand Total45- 045- 0- 0- 045

Total Checkroll89493- 0- 0- 093

(B)CONTRACT / TEMPORARY

EmployeesDependants (Resident)Total

(1) MALAYSIANMaleFemaleSub TotalMaleFemaleSub Total

Bumiputera- 0- 0- 0

Chinese11- 01

Indian11- 01

Grand Total2- 02- 0- 0- 02

Main Menu

Appendix1

PAGE 19

Appendix 1

PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE MONTH

OF JUNE 2012

UnitThis MonthLast MonthTodatePrevious Todate

1.0FFB

1.1.1Weight of FFB processedMT16,485.54017,072.250151,379.000134,893.460

1.1.2EstimateMT19,598.00017,486.000160,762.000141,164.000

1.1.3Shift HoursHrs- 0- 0

2.0OIL MANUFACTURE

2.1.1Weight of Oil ProducedMT3,647.3703,844.37033,361.39029,714.020

2.1.2EstimateMT4,272.0003,812.00034,675.00030,403.000

2.1.3Oil Extraction Rate%22.1222.5222.04

2.1.4Estimate%21.8021.8021.57

2.1.5Press Running HoursHrs.866.63850.917,905.687,039.05

2.1.6Production HoursHrs.272.25288.252,622.252,350.00

2.1.7Downtime (Line 1)Hrs.2.000.5036.2534.25

2.1.8Downtime (Line 2)Hrs.- 0- 0

2.1.9Press Capacity per unitMT / hr19.0220.0619.15

2.2.0F.F.B. Manufactured / HoursMT / hr60.5559.2357.73

2.2.1Oil Recovered / HoursMT / hr13.4013.3426.7413.34

3.0KERNEL MANUFACTURE

3.1.1Weight of kernel ProducedMT716.530794.0606,982.1706,265.640

3.1.2EstimateMT1,019.000909.0008,359.0007,340.000

3.1.3Kernel Extraction Rate%4.354.654.61

;3.1.4Estimate%5.205.205.20

3.1.5Production HoursHrs.272.25288.252,611.752,339.50

3.1.6Kernel Recovered / HrMT / hr2.632.752.67

4.0DESPATCH AND STOCK

4.1.1Oil DespatchedMT3,497.5203,749.08034,358.57030,861.050

4.1.2Oil in StockMT957.370807.5201,764.890807.520

4.1.3Kernels DespatchedMT665.580791.4006,901.7106,236.130

4.1.4Kernels in stockMT231.610180.660412.270180.660

- Packed / Bulk SiloMT231.610180.660412.270180.660

- Kernel in BagMT- 0- 0

Remarks :

Main Menu

MajorMaintRep1

PAGE 20

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(1) RECEPTION STATION / (2) LOADING PUMP / (3) STERILISER STATION

(4) HOISTING / TIPPER AND THRESHING STATION

Main Menu

MajorMaintRep2

PAGE 21

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(5) PRESS AND DIGESTER STATION / (6) EFB PRESSING STATION / (7) KERNEL PLANT STATION

(8) CLARIFICATION STATION

Main Menu

MajorMaintRep3

PAGE 22

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(9) RAW WATER HOUSE AND WATER TREATMENT PLANT STATION / (10) POWER STATION / (11) BOILER STATION

(12) EFFLUENT STATION

Main Menu

MajorMaintRep4

PAGE 23

MAJOR MAINTENANCE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2012

(13) MILL BUILDING UPKEEP / (14) VEHICLE / (15) WORKSHOP / (16) GENERAL

Main Menu

Sheet1