hoh foo kong lllecwlber 19% (c)hohfookmg. l!m,aurights~. · 2020. 1. 19. · entrepreneurship and...

21
b HOH FOO KONG lllecwlber 19% (c)HohFooKmg. l!M,AURights~.

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • b

    HOH FOO KONG

    lllecwlber 19%

    (c)HohFooKmg. l!M,AURights~.

  • Sekolah Siswazah(Graduate School )

    Universiti Utara Malaysia

    PERAKUAN KERJA TENS(Certification Of Thesis Work)

    Kami, yang bertandatangan, memperakukan bahawa(We, the undersigned, certify that)

    HcxilxnmG

    calon untuk ijazah(candidate for the degree ofi Master of Science (Management)

    telah mengemukakan tesisnya yang bertajuk(has presented his/her thesis of the following title)

    ENTREPRENEURIAL INCLINATION AM(=IJGSECXNDARY-LTEA-OF

    KUALAt4UMYAN

    seperti yang tercatat di muka surat tajuk dan kulit tesis(as it appears on the title page and front cover of thesis)

    bahawa tesis tersebut boleh diterima dari segi bentuk serta kandungan, dan meliputibidang ilmu dengan memuaskan.(that the thesis is acceptable in form and content, and that a satisfactory knowledge of thefield is coverd by the thesis).

    AJK Tesis(Thesis Committee)

    Nama ASSOC. Prof. Dr. Add YaSeen(Name)

    (Penyelia Utama/Principal Superviiwr)

    Nama(Name) Lim chee thee

    Nama Tandatangan(Name) (Signature)

    Tarikh(Date) /o - 1 2 a rQq6

  • P - I O N T O U S E

    Rcqmts fix pelYh&mtocQpyortomakcothcruBeof~inthis~in

    wholeorinpartehouldbeaddmsedto:

    Dean of Gfaduah School

    u-UtaraMalarysia

    06010 shtok

    ii

  • Akat ukw y a n g d@nakun ten&i daripak &a bah@an; Bahagian A clanBahagian B. Bahagkan A burtqjnan mengumpd makkmd &mqgr& manakdkBahagian B i#igw&n nntnk meqydxr kcedrungan keusahcwman ?wpon&n.Bdqgi’Bakatukwtni cMdwai&~skJaOrie~i~htusahawanan yang dihasfh olkh Robinson et al (1991), Sh& kkcedwganAm Keusa ytq &h&&an c&h D&am Uniwst@ Business Mud(1988) dh dat ukwr Bard&a (1992).

    Data yang dkwnpui t&h c&andtsti &qan menggudwn kaedkah t-test i&nANOVA sadu arah nntuk menentkan kwan &i-&i &mqgrq# k e a&askc%~rongankeus~Panns 0.05 t&h dit%taphanssbogai tahapswuntuk membuat keptwan msngenai ht*is.

    Ber&sarh &pa&an hqjian, cadangawadangan unti kqkan farzlfutcm tekd

    yang mmzncangprogrom iteswakawanan ’

    . . .m

  • The present SW& investigated the rntLipprrrmrial inckaticm ofsec;andarv SCMhaders in KwakrMnt&z Y&L Spec$cal& it aimed to investigate the rekvtkmsh@sbetween entrep-’al tnclination andthepersonal charac&$sti~~, fmi&-ekztedf-Pe?#vimment~,andti~ qfseconhy school teacher8 qfKiiaklM.Yan.

    In or&r to carry out this research, a &wr@ive qawnti~ stu& was carried out.The units cfan+is are the SW schad teachers cfKitaka Muda Yon. Threehundred and thiwtwo teachers wers inch&d in the stn& through a mbinationqf strat$ed randiwn sampiing cind cfommi- smgdiing. Questionnatres weredistribnti to target res~~pers~ or through the school Ainistrators.Therespcmeratewars90.6%.

    The instrwnent used -&ted oftw parts; part A and part B. Part A was usedfwa hmographic survey and Part B wav used to me-e the entiprenewialinclination sfthe respon&n& The iat& part dthe insirument was &ted&mthe Entrepreneurial Attiti Orienkatkm 5%x& dsvslopod by Robinsm (1991), theGeneral Enbvpreneuriai Tend&y &eloped by the Durham Universi@ BusinessSchool (I 988), and Barcelona ‘s (I 992) swvey.

    Data were analysed using the t-test and one way ANOVA to &ermine thedkreremxs in demographic char&ristics and their fleets on the entrepreneuriaiinclination qf~~hers. The 0.05 keel ofsi&n+ance was wed as the critical kvetfm dkcisions regarding the lppc&esa.

    This s&u& fd that sign&ant werences in entrepreneurial inckztion amongteachers could be seen au&v three fm tested They are monthly income of theibacher, k4y pa& held by the teacher and business experience out&ii& school. Theother factors fsstsd cd0 not appear to have sign$cant dects on the en~preneuria~inclination qfthe teachers.

    Based on iire findings, suggestions forjkrther research and recommendations fop&ision makers in poiicy fmation or enbwpreneurship akvebpment programmeshave been fmardkd.

    iv

  • ACIUWWLEDGEMENT

    Thew&efwi&eflto aclwwk+and$raalrthosewholnade~theeiapoesibte.

    1. To Assock& Rofessor Dr. Adei Yawn, theais twpehor, Miss Lim Cbeethee, second at#gmkr, ad - Dr. Mibndre wini” B Rw434RwwchM~Iecturer,fatheirguidanct,,andandfforthecompk&mof~tficsis.

    4. TotheFxbatkmPhy&ngandRcaamhDeparlment,Iblin&yofEducation,theKedahStatc~depsrtmcnt,acuitheIrc$oolswhichparticipatedinthetlamey, fmthcirpxmiwbn tocamyoutthe~,andtolheteach~whohadl-eqm&dtothtqlu#dioanabrt,for~coloperatian.

    5. TothcPkipalofS.MSg.Layar, theS&arAseietwtsofS.M. S.Pasir, SM.Batu Lima, SM. Gum, and S.M. Gum &mped& MdmMayKbor,Mr.Balasundram,Mr.RaqjitShgh,andMrPrasadfath&as&tanwindisbibutiagancua conec~thequcstiomrainaintheirschode.

    4. TomycoumemateaChanKearKeow,T~~S~ AUisonLeeGlmW4YunWengKon&CburgFuiCbin,MobdOtkmrnYuaoff,Atlrt~~dLlmBeeLeewhohadhc@dinmanyway6toficibtcthecompletionoftfristhesis.

    V

  • vi

  • PIWMiWONTQusE

    ABSTRAK

    AEWIRACT

    AKNOW

    UST OF TABLES

    LIsToFFK3uREs

    I INTRODUCTION

    1.1 -aftishrdy

    1.2 St&IlXWOfproManr

    1.3 DChlithOfTCffnS

    1.4 RolWKChobjactiv#,

    1.5 ResarrchpuesbEaaa

    1.6 - -

    1.7 RtxwanhModel

    1.8 S~oftheSbudy

    1.9 . . .-0fthcshrdy

    WP

    ii. . .m

    iv

    V

    X

    xii

    1

    1

    3

    3

    5

    7

    9 :

    11 ‘:

    1 2

    1 3

    vii

  • 2.23

    2.2.6

    2.2.7

    228

    IlI RESEARC!HDESIt3NANDMETHODOLDGY

    3 . 1 Soummof-

    3.1.1 unitof-

    3.1.2 Pqlation

    3.1.3 Sample&m Tccdmkpc

    p4F

    1 4

    1 4

    25

    26

    29

    3 1

    33

    34

    3 5

    49

    52

    5 6

    5 6

    5 6

    5 6

    5 7

  • -

    3.2 TbcRaqmnb&

    3.3 Da$iB~,T~.

    3.3.1 TheIlwmmm&

    33.2 P&t Study

    3.3.3 Data(lTdhth

    3.4 Data Andy&ii Tedmiquc

    3.4.1 clitdau6cd~Dbcieioa~

    Iv PRESENTATION AND DISCWHON OF FINDIIWS

    4.1 l?h&tpand~

    4.1.1 pcmonal-

    4.1.2 Family Related Factom

    4.1.3 Emriromnar&1FIctors

    4.1.4 work-

    v f$IMWWY, CONCUJSION, ANDRECOIbfMENDA~ONS

    5.1 SInmnary

    5 .2 Con&&n

    pass606464686972

    73

    74

    74

    75

    8 7

    100

    106

    1 1 3

    1 1 3

    1 1 7

    1 2 5

    131

    1 3 7

    1 3 8

    1 5 3

    ix

  • 1 5 3

    Table No. Tii p4F

    3 . 3 DidbuthofT~~toschoofe

    3.4 D of QQlahmh Items (IadbpaadwrtVM)

    Eaclhnahon of Male and FemaleTCMChU#

    4 . 3.OfEthtlidtywith~

    4.4 .ofI3duamd Lewdwith

    4.5 AMlynisofvorinaEefor~~with- -

    5 8

    5 9

    62

    66

    67

    7 1

    76

    7 8

    8 0

    8 2

    84

    86

    8 8

  • Table No. LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED)

    Title

    4.8 Meat& standard Deviation scores, and t-vahles forEntrepreneurial Incm of Teachers with MothersWho are Housewks and Teachers W& WorkingMothem

    4.9

    4.10

    4.11

    4.12

    4.13

    4.14

    4.15

    4.16

    4.17

    4.18

    Analyb of Variance of Father’s Education withEntrepreneuriallnclination

    Analyh of Vaknce of Mother’s Education withEnlreprmeurialInclination

    Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values forEntrepreneurial Inclination of Awilabibty of Capitalfrom Family Members and Non-f- Memlxm

    Analyis of Variance of Birth order with EntrepreneurialInclination

    Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values fixEntrepreneurial In&nation of Teach- Who Reside inthe Rural Area and Teachers Who Reside in the UrbanAreaDuringtheirYouth

    Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values forEntrepreneuriaI Jnclination of Teachem Who Reside inthe Rural Area and Teachers Who Reside in the UrbanArtabllilkgtheil-AdUlthood

    Analyis o f Vaknce of Subjec ts Taught wi thEntrepreneurial Inclination

    Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values forEntrepreneurial Inclination of Teachers Who Hold KeyPosts and Teachers Who Do Not Hold Key Posts inSchool

    Analyfs of valiance of Len&& of service withEntrepreneurialInc%nation

    Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values forEntrepreneurial Inclination of Teachers With BusinessExgxxience and Teachem Without T&hem Experienceoutside School

    page

    90

    92

    94

    %

    9 8

    1 0 0

    1 0 3

    1 0 5

    1 0 7

    1 0 9

    111

    x i

  • LIST I 6r VIGURES

    FigureNo.

    .

    1.1

    Title

    Schematic Diagram Showing the Relationship BetweenPersonal Characteristics, Famiiy-related Factors,Environmental Factors, and Work Experience andEntrepreneurial Inclination Among Secondary SchollTeachers of Kuala Muda Yan

    2.1 The Operations Involved in Constructing the Questionnaire(Appendix II) in Order to Help IdenQ a Possible Measureof @ntrepreneurial Inclination

    3.1 Distribution of Respondents According to Rack and Sex

    3.2 Distribution of Respondents According to Age Group

    3.3 Distribution of Respondents According to Monthly Income

    3.4 Di&ibution of Respondents According to Educational Level

    Pag&

    11

    51

    61

    61

    6 3

    64

    xii

  • CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Background of the 8tuciy

    This study atbpted to ident@ the factors that are associated with

    entrepreneurial inclination. It would attempt to investigate the entrepreneuzial

    inclination among teachers in the Kuala Muda Yan district. An entrepreneur

    is&finedas%omeonewhoper&vesanoppntu@ andcrea tesan

    organization to pmue it” @ygrakqlWl). Enlrepreneufial potential is a

    latent ability of individuals, regardless of their c-t job, to become an

    entfepmeur.

    InFe~1991,DrMahathirMohamadoutlinedthcviaionofMalaysiato

    be a w developed and klustklized nation by the year 2020. One of the

    challcngtsMalaysia~tofactinhereff~to~~~thievisionisto

    develop an economy that is competitive, dynamic, robust and Hent. One

    of the strategies to meet this challenge by the govenunentisto~de

    entrepreneurial development and skills traiuiq (Abdul41993).

    Entreprenekal development will result in the setting up of more small and

    medium enterpkzs. These economic entities will not only complement

    1

  • The contents of

    the thesis is for

    internal user

    only

  • .AbdullahAbdulRahman.“MslsrysliaIn~-publicSector- n. InA4akaysia’s Vision 2020 (ip. 361-382). Wited by Abmad Sarji AbdulHamid. Petding Jaya: Pehmduk Publications. 1995.

    Baharu Kemat. (1994, May). Orientasi Sikqg Keusahawanan Di KalanganPoZiteknik Di Makzysia. Univekti Utara Malay& M. SC. thesis.

    Bakar,A. and Ellis, W.H. (1990). Entrepreneurship and Small BusinessManagement, Second Edition. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/ Hti Publi&@co..

    Barcelona&C., and Valida,A.C. (1992). Inturelationahipa Between the PersonalVariablea and Ewepreneuial Pokntials of Senior Studenta of UniveraitiUtara Malay&. Malaysian Mawgement Review, 29(4), 15-28.

    Begley, TM., & Boyd, D.P.. 1985. Coqany and Chief Executive OfiicerCharacti Related to Financial Perfmce of Smalhx Businews. InHorn&y, J., Shils, E., Timmons, J., & Vesper, K. @ids.). Frontiers ofEntrepreneurship Research, 1985. Weksley, MA: Babwn College.

    Belly RR. (1992 ). Task Role Motivation and Attributional Style as Predictors ofEntrepreneuxial Perfwce: Female Sample Findings. Entrepreneurshipand Regional Development, 4, 331-344.

    Bird, B.J. (1994). “Demographic Approaches to Entrepreneurship: The Role ofExpexience and Background”. In KatqJ.A. and Bro&haw, R.H.Sr, (Eds.)Adbances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth @p. 1 l-48)..Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai m Inc.

    Boocock, G. (1996, July). Venture Capital in Malaysia. L.~ughborough UniwzGtyBanking Centre. (Unpublished manuscript).

    Brenner, O.C., I%ngle, C.D., & Gree&w, J.H. ( 1991, July). Pewived Fulfihnentof Orpkational Employment Vexsus Enkprenewship: Work Values andCareer Intentions of Busiuesa College Graduates. Journal of SmallBusiness iUanagement,29(3), 62-74.

    Brockhaus, RH. Sr. (1993). “Series Introduction”. In Katz,J.A. and Brockhaus,RH.Sr., Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth.Greenwich (pp. l-5), Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.

    Bro&haus, RH.Sr. (1982). “The Psychology of the Entqreneur”. In Kent,C.k,Sexton, D-L., & Veper, K-H. (Ms.), Encyclspasdia of Entrepreneurship(@p. 39-71). En&wood Cliff& N.J.: Prentice IGIL

    131

  • Bygwe, W.D. & Hofer, C.W. (1991, Winter). Theo&~ about Enmprenm.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (Z), 13-22.

    C&d, Sdy. (1990). The Enterprbing Tendency of Occupational GroupsIntionalSmaflBusiness Journal) 9(4), 75-81.

    carland, J.W. Jr. (1992) Entrepreneurship in a Small Business Setting: Anhkpkvwtory Study. Univmpity of Georgia. PhD. thesis.

    .cassrud, AL., & Gaglio, C.M. (1993). “Demographics in mResearch: Guidelines for the Use of Demopphic Data”. Jn Katz,J.A. andBrockhaw, R.H.Sr., Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, andGrowth. Greenwich (pp. 49-81). Conneclicut: Jai Press Inc.

    Chandler, Gayien N & Hanks, Steven H. (1994,Spring ). Founder C!mqeknce, theEmkmment and Venture competence. Entrepreneurship Tiseory andPractice, 18 ( 3 X77-89.

    Chong, K. S.. (1993). Chinese Entrepreneurship in Malaysia. Univmity ofsouthenl California PhD. Thesis.

    Cole, Arthur H. (1995).‘%ntrepreneumhip and Entxqmneuial History” YnEntrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms. edited by Lkaay, Harold C.Brookiield,US: An Elgar Reference Cok&on.

    Dolinsky, Arthur L. (1993, Fall). The Efkts of Education on Business Own-:A Lq@udid Study of Women. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice, 17(1),43-53.

    DuCelk, J. (1986). Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development: FurtherAnalysis ofPhase I Data. Ncwbury, St. Boston: McBu & Co..

    Faitiie,R. W. (1994). Three Essays on Ethnic and Racial Selfemployment(&trepreneurship). Northwe&rn Unkmity. F%D. Thesis.

    Fillion, L. J. (1994). Ten Steps to Entrepsnemial Teaching. Journal of SmallBusiness and Entrepreneurship. 1 l(lO), 68-78.

    Fraboni, M., & Sabtone,R. (1991). Meamanent and Evatuation of Work Strewand Values in Male and Female Entrepreneurs. Journal OfSmall BuisnessManagement.

    Gamer, W.B. & Shaver, K.G. Gatewood, E. & Katz, J.A. (1994). Finding IheEntrepreneur in Enbqxene~. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,18(3), 5-9.

    1 3 2

  • Gamer, W.B. (1989, Summer).“Who is an Entnqreneur? Is the Wrong Questio$.Ent?q.weneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47-68.

    Game, Y. (1990). An Experience in Training in the Area of En-p andStartingaBuainesa inQuebec:theProject’BecomeanEntrepreneur’.InDonckela, R., and Mettinen, A.m.), New Readings and Perspectives inEntrepreneurship @p. 99-114). Brookfield: AvebuIy.

    Gnyawali, D.R. and Fogcl. (1994, Summer). “Environmenta fix En&preneumhipDevelopment: Key Dimensions and Research Implications”.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 4362.

    Gray, D.A. (1989). The Entrepreneurs Complete Self-Assessment Gui&: How toDetermine Your Potential for Business. London: Kogan Page.

    Hatbn, T.S. (1994). Stint Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship as A&&d byParticipation in a Small Business Institute Prqgramme. Univefsity ofMisaouxi-cohlmbia. PhD. thesis.

    Hian, C.K. (1995). “Factora Associated with Entrepreneuial Inclination: AnEmpixical Study of Business Unw in Hong Kong”. Journal ofSmall Business & Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 29-41.

    Wch, R.D., & Bruah,C. (1986, October). Characte&ics of the MinorityEntrepreneur. Journal ofSmall Business Management, 24(4), 1-8.

    Horn&y, J.A. and Ticks,N.B. (1983). “Capturing 21 Heff&mpa”. In Hornadq,J.A., Timmons, J .A. , and Vesper, K.H.., (Eds.). F r o n t i e r s o fEntipreneurship Research 1984. Wellesley, MAzBabson College.

    Hull, D.L., Bosley, J.J., & Udell, G.G. (1980). “Renewing the Hunt for theHefI&mp: Ident@& Potential En-em by their Characteri&cs”.Journal of Small Business Management, 18(l), 11-18.

    Jennings, D. F. (1994). Multiple Perspectives ofEntrepreneurship, Text, Readings,and Cases. Cinch Ohio: South Western Publi&ing Co.

    Johnson, B.R (1990, Spring). “Toward a Multidimensional Model ofEntzqxeneumhip: The Case of Achievement Model Motivation and theEntmpreneur”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3) 39-54.

    Johnson, David and Ma, Rosa. (1994, July). “Rewg&ing Entnpmeurial Potentialin Graduate Business Start-up: The Development of a Behaviourally BaaedAssessment Tool”. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2( 2F57-682.

    1 3 3

  • Kantor, J. (1988, Fall). “Job Choke and Locus of Control as Predictors ofEn- Potential: A Study of Entqr Level and Exit-level of Businessa n d l3b@mhg SndcnpB”. J o u r n a l o f small Business a n dEntrepreneurship, ii(l), 40-48.

    Kao, R.W.Y. (1995). Entrepreneurship, A Wealih-creation and Value AddingPrcxess. Singapore: Prenb Hall.

    Kaufimq P. J., Welsh, D. H., and Bushma& N. V. (Fall, 1995). Locus of Controland En&epreneumhip in the Russian Republic. Entrepreneurship Theovand Practice, 20 (1 X 43-56.

    Kiby, P. (1971). Hunting the Heffkhunp. Entrepreneurship and EconomicDevelopment. New Yoric: Free Press.

    Kilby, P. (1971). Hunting the He&dump. In Kilby, P (Ed.). Entrepreneurship andEconomic Development, pp. l-40. New Yo&: Fret Preee

    I&n&, H. J. (1989). Entrepreneurship in Business Development. New YakAvebury.

    lbueger, N.F. and Brazeal, D.(1994, Spring). Entrepmeurial Potential and PotentialEntrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory a&Practice, 19(3), 91-104.

    Kuratko, D.F., 8c Hodgetis, R.M. (1995). Entrepreneurship, A ContemporaryApproach, 3 rd Edition. New York: The Dryden Press.

    L~I, thee Chee. (1995). Demographic Characteristics, Need for Achievement andEntrepreneurial Attitude among Woman Entrepreneurs and WbpnanManagers inMalaysia. Univer&i Utara Malaysia. M. SC. Thesis.

    T~~ain, J.. 1991. Young and Older Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study ofDifference. Journal ofsmall Business Management, 8(4), 50-61.

    Mahathk, Mohamad. 1991. Malaysia: The Way Forward. In Ahmad Saqji (Ed.),Malaysia’s Vision 2020, (pp. 401-420). Kuala Lumpur, PelandukPublicaiiw.

    M&mood Naztr Mohamed. (1990, February). An Ekploration of the Pemmalityhfile of Small Businesa Bumiputm and Non-bumiputra Enlmpreneum.iUalaysian Management Review, 18-27.

    Mathews, C.H., and Moser, S.B. (1996, April). A Lmg&kd Investigation of theImpact of Family Background and Gender on Interest in SmalI Firmownership. Journal ofSmart Business Management, 34(2), 29-43.

    McClelland, D.C. (l%l). The Achieving Society. New York: D. Van Nostrand.

    1 3 4

  • McCord, MA. (1995). Training Nee& of Pre-ventire Female Entrepreneurs. Bailstateunivlcreity. PhD. Thesis.

    Md Zabid, Abdul Rashid. (1992, June-Dee.). Management Ra&es, Motivationsand Problems of Male and Female winMalaysia.TheMalaysian Journal ofSmall andMedium Enterprises, 3,35-46.

    Miller, J. C. D. (1994). Familyoforigin and Financially Successful MaleEntrepreneurs. Texas Woman’s Univmity. PhD. Thesis.

    Nafbiger, D. W. and Ho&y, J.S., and Kuratko, D.F. (1994, Spring). A PmposedRtscarch Model of Enbrtprtnturia Motiwtion. Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice, 18(3),29-42.

    Norcio, Ralph J. (1995). A Stzu& of a Non-traditional Entrepreneurial Popuiationas they Participated in an Entrepreneurzal Sk& Prqgramme. F%D. Thesis.

    Provoa4 KP. (1993). American Indian Entrepreneurs: A Case Study (SouthDakota). South Dakota State University. PhD. Thesis.

    Ray, D.M.. (1993) Understanding the Entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial Attributes,Experience and Skills. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, S(4),345-357.

    Robbins, S.P. (1993). Organisation Behavior: Concepts, Controversies andApplications. Jbglewood Clifflk, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

    Robinson, P.B., 8c Hunt, H.K. (1992, July-Sept). Entrepreneurship and Birth Order:Fact or Folklore. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4(3), 289-296.

    Robinson, P.B., Stimpm, D.V. , Huefim, J., & Hunt, H. K. (1991, Sumner). AnAttitude Approach to the Prc&ion of Entrcprcnewship. EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice, 15 (4), 19-29.

    Ronstadt,R. (1984) . “Ex-a&qrenm and the Decision to Start en Entmpremeurcareer ((. In Homaday, J. Taapley, F. , Tinunons, J. & Vesper, K.@&)Frontiers qf Entrepreneurship Research, I984 . We&&y, MA:Babson Colbge.

    Scherer, R.F. & James (1991). %xamin& the Relatimahip Between Perso&@and Entrepreneurial Career Prefmce.” Entrepreneurship & RegionalDevelopment,3(4), 195-206.

    1 3 5

  • Scherex, RF., Bmbimki, D.B., & Wiebe, F.A. (1990,Apil). Entrepreneur CareerSelech and Gendec A So&lbation Approach. Journal ofSmall BusinessManagement, 28 (2),37-44.

    Scholtq C.P.T. (1994, April). Attitruks andPr@rences asMethodv to Di@rentiateAmong Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and MaMgsrs; Successjid and LessSuccess$d Entrepreneurs j&n Di#erent Economic Sectors. U&e&y ofPretoria ( south A&a)). PhD. Thesis.

    Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Meth& for Business, Second Edition. New York:John Wiley & sons, Inc.

    Shanthakumar, D.K. (1993) AttitudinaZ Characteristics of Male and FemaleEntrepreneurs in India and a Comparison with American Entrepreneurs.BrighamYoungUnimsity. PhD. Thusis.

    Shapero, A., and Sokol, L. (1982) “The Social Dimensions of Entmpreneumhip”. InKent,C.A., Sexton , D-L., 8c Vesper K.H. @Is.), Encycbaedia o fEntrepreneurship (pp. 72-89), Englewood CKfIk, N. J. : Prentice HalI.

    Shanna, S.V.S. (1979). Small Entrepreneurial Development in Some AsianCountries: A Comparative Stu&. New Delhi: Light and Lift Publisher.

    Shaver, K.G. & Scott, L.R. (1991, Winter). Pemon, Process, Choice: ThePsychology of New Venture Creation. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice, 16 (21, 23-45.

    Swierczek, F. W. (1994, July). Eworing Entrepreneurship Cuhures in South-EatAsia. Journal OfEnterprising Culture, 2(Z), 687-707.

    The Concise Oxjbrd Dictionary. (1990). Ed, H. W. Fowler & R.E. Allen. New York:oxfbrduniversity Press.

    Uneke, O.A. (1995). Inter-group Di$rences in Se&employment: Blacks andChinese in Toronto (Canada). Unbemity of Toronto. PhD thesis.

    Wang Gunpvu, (1990, March). The Culture of Chinese Merchants. Universi@ ofHongKong, Working Paper Series No. 57, Joint Centre for Asia Pa@cStudies

    Wee, C.H., L&n, W.S. & Lee, R. (1994, July-Sept.). Entreprenemhip: A Reviewwith Further Implicatiom for Further Research. C e n t r e forEntrepreneurship, Fact& of Management, University of Toronto,11(4X25-49.

    Zainal Abdubh, G&y, F.T., and Planisek, S.L. (1995). Who are the NextEntrepreneum?. A4akysian Management JoarrnaZ, l(Z), 31-40.

    1 3 6