A recent Kuala Lumpur Construction Court decision decided in favour of a contractor’s claim forloss & expense pursuant to a construction contract based on the PWD/JKR 203/203A Form, wherethe learned Judge had offered a novel interpretation of Clause 44.1 in respect of the need for anotice to claim loss & expense, as well as the use of “recurring preliminaries” as the basis toestimate the value of the loss & expense suffered by the contractor. The speaker will address thehistorical context of how loss & expense clauses are typically interpreted by the courts, andpropose possible alternative strategies for a claim for loss & expense in light of this recent HighCourt decision.

Sunissa Sdn Bhd vKerajaan MalaysiaA controversial interpretation of thePWD/JKR Loss & Expense Claim Provisions?

Lynnda Lim, Senior Partner

25 March 2021, Thursday5pm - 7pm @ Microsoft Teams

You may contact Ms Esther Ooi at 603 6206 2000 or email your registration form toseminars@contractsolutions-i.my with proof of payment. Account No: Contract Solutions I PLT, 1401-0163-99 (OCBC Bank)

Contract Solutions-I PLT Marketing by Events & Secretariat Solutions PLT

B-07-01 Gateway Kiaramas, No 1 Jalan Desa Kiara, 50480 Kuala LumpurTel: 03 6206 2000 Fax: 03 2719 3126 www.contractsolutions-i.com

RM200.00 per person

Company:

Tel / Mobile No:

Name: Designation:

Email: