estebat principal 1 ipcrf

8/19/2019 Estebat Principal 1 Ipcrf

1/15

Name of Employee: SERAPINO E. ESTEBAT, JR.

Position: School Principal-I

Review Period: January 2015-December 2015

Division/District/School: Dipolog City Division

Name of Rater: MAJARANI M. JACINTO, Ed.D.

Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINEWeightper KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timelines)

ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

1. Improvingquality oflearning andinstructionaldelivery

1.1 InstructionalLeadership

• Increase NATresults by 2% from86.64 to 88.37 byMarch, 2016 ofMinaogElementarySchool.

• Conduct ten(10)

formal

observations/walk

through

observations in all

subject areas in allgrade levels per

month with a total

of 100 in a year

June,2015 toMarch2016

June,2015 toMarch,2016

(20%)

9%

6%

(5)

• NAT performance and GSA is 98-100% and above

(4)

• NAT performance and GSA is 86-97%

(3)

• NAT performance and GSA is 75-85%

(2)•

NAT performance and GSA is 74-50%(1)

• NAT performance and GSA is49% and below

5- Performed the followingwith evidences:Collected, analyzed andutilized data to identifyand plan neededinterventions

- Recommended localized

curriculum (mother tongue

DEPED RPMS form – For Senior Officers (from SG18 up

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

86.65 from

74.51%4 0.36

January 4, 2016


2/15







Date of Review:


MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weightper KRA


ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

based) for instruction

- Developed standards foroutstanding teacher andpupil performance

- Organized appropriateclass programs, ADM,flexible learning optionsas stop-gap measures

- Consolidated reports onlearning difficulties,home visitations andpeculiar incidents usedfor planning andimplementingappropriateinterventions

- Prepared a monthlysupervisory planapproved by the ASDS

- Submitted 100 formalobservation notes and100 walk throughobservations in alllearning areas in thedifferent grade levels



January 4, 2016


3/15



Review Period: January 2015-December, 2015




Date of Review:




ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

• To plan/prepare/

implement

AIP/SIP/APP with

internal/ external

stakeholders

June 2015-March 2016

4- 6 requirements satisfied(with evidences)

3- 4-5 requirementssatisfied (withevidences)

2- 2-3 requirementssatisfied (withoutevidences)

1- 2 requirements andreports largely missing

5- Performed the followingsupported bydocuments:

- Prepared a schoolstrategic plan/SIP and AIP through thestrategic planningprocess

-Conduct of school

situational analysis,SWOT, determiningstrategies throughprioritizing strategicoptions, resource andfacilities planning and



5%

only 5 3 0.18

satisfiedrequirements

January 4, 2016


4/15







Date of Review:




ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

2. Improvingaccess andefficiency

formulation of PAP'sbased on analysis

4- Strategic Plan was basedon DepEd vision,contextualized in schoolvision and mission

3- All school stakeholderswere engaged in thestrategic planningprocess

2- M&E for process andoutcomes checkpointswere developed andutilized

1- Above accomplishmentof school targets withevidence contained inschool report card.



2.1 Learning

Environment

• To increase

school enrolmentby 2% from 456

to 465 by June,

2015

June,

2015

5- Enrolment Rate is130% and abovetarget.

4- Enrolment Rate is 115-129%

(20%)

10%

January 4, 2016


5/15







Date of Review:


MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINEWeight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timelines)

ACTUAL

RESULTSRATING SCORE*

• To supply safe/

fun classroomactivities and

school programs

June,

2015to

March,2016

5- Adhered to Child-Friendly

environment standardsand programs

4- All mechanisms arepresent except for someminimal requirements

3- All mechanisms arepresent but withoutevidences

2- Incomplete mechanisms

and absence of reports

1- Mechanisms and reportsare missing





1- Enrolment Rate is 50%

5%

500 from 3 0.30

456 based

on LIS/

actual

Enrolment

Some mini- 4 0.20

mal require-

ments not

satisfied

January 4, 2016


6/15


Position:



Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIO


per KRA



ACTUAL

RESULTSRATING SCOR



• To evaluate/

furnish/ provide

plant/ physical

facilities fitness

and safety to the

learners

June,

2015

to

March

2015

5- Evaluated /provided allschool plants, physicalfacilities which are fittedand safety.

4- All school plants aresafe except for one

3- All school plants andphysical facilities aresafe but some with nodocuments.

2- All school plants andphysical facilities aresafe but withoutdocuments

1- Not all school plantsare safe.

3. Strengthening

internal systemof governance

3.1. School

Leadership,Managementand Operations

• To decrease

drop out from0.006 to 0.004

by SY 2015-

2016

5- Drop-out rate is 130%and above target.

4- Drop-out rate is 115-129%

3- Drop-out rate is 100-114%

2- Drop-out rate is 51-99%1- Drop-out rate is 50% and

below

June,

2015to

March,

2016

MAJARANI M. JACINTO, Ed.D.

Assistant Schools DivisionSchool Principal-I

5%

(10%)

4%

4 4 0.16

0% drop-Out 5 0.20

rate

January 4, 2016


7/15




Division/District/School:Dipolog City Division

Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:




ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

• To allocate funds

prioritized as

needed/ indicated

in the school

annual

procurement plan

• To prepare/

implement AIP/

SIP/ APP with

80% for SY 2015-

2016

All YearRound

June,2015 to August,

2015

5- Allocated/Prioritizedfunds for programs andschool facilitiesimprovement andmaintenance

4- Monitored, accountedand reported utilization ofschool fund

3- Reported sources anduses of funds

2--Ensured qualitystandards for facilitiesgiven to the school

1- requirement are absent

5- Prepared/ implemented AIP/SIP/ APP with 90% to 100%


3- Prepared/ implemented AIP/

SIP/ APP with 70% to 79%2-- Prepared/ implemented AIP/

SIP/ APP with 60% to 69%


PED RPMS form – For Senior Officers (from SG18 up)



Assistant Schools Division

3%

3%

5 5 0.15

89% of the 4 0.12

AIP targets

achieved

January 4, 2016


8/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL


3.2. HumanResourceManagementandDevelopment

• To prepare/ submit

classroom and

Master Program/

Teachers

Assignment two (2)

weeks before the

opening of classes

April-May,2016

(10%)

4%

5- Prepared the followingsupported bydocuments:

-Prepared school masterplan(teachers teachingload and class programsestablished)

-All teachers have portfoliocontaining observationreports, TSNA resultsperformed all RPMSprocesses among schoolpersonnel with thefollowing as evidences;performance contractsand performanceevaluation results inprescribed toolsprepared proposeddevelopment plans

4- 4 requirements met3- 3 requirements met2- requirements are largely

missing1- requirements are absent

PED RPMS form – For Senior Officers (from SG18 up




All 5 0.20

requirements

are met


9/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL

RESULTSRATING SCORE

• To conduct LAC

Session at least

twice a month/20

in one school year

• To mentor

potentials

advancement of

career of teachers

at least 5 byMarch, 2015

June,2015

toMarch,2016

June,2015to

March,2016

5- Conducted at least 25-28LAC Sessions in aschool year





5- Mentored at least 8-9teachers4- Mentored at least 6-7teachers3- Mentored at least 4-5

teachers2- Mentored at least 3-4teachers1- Mentored at least 1-2

teachersPED RPMS form – For Senior Officers (from SG18 u




3%

3%

20 sessions 4 0.12

since

June, 2015

only 3

teachers

mentored

2 0.06


10/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL


4. Parents'Involvementand CommunityPartnership

• To establish

school and family,

community

partnership for

improved school

performance

Octoberof theSchoolYear or

as needsarise

5- Has stakeholderspartnership/ mobilizationplan

-Organized programs withstakeholders, esp. parentsfor academic and otherpurposes.

-Coordinate with stakeholderson resource mobilization

-Maintained an updated schoolEMIS and regularly submitMIS reports to the DivisionOffice

4- With clear financial andresource managementsystem but tworequirements weremissing

3- With clear financial andresource managementsystem but threerequirements and/orreports were lacking

2- Financial ManagementSystem and reportingwere in its initial stages

1- No FinancialManagement Systemand/or reports observed




(20%)

10%

missing 2 4 0.40

requirements


11/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL


• To involveinternal/

external

stakeholders in

implementation of

the AIP/SIP

June,2015to

March,2016

5- Involved 30% ofinternal/externalstakeholders inimplementation

4- Involved 15-29%internal/externalstakeholders in

implementation3- Involved 10-14%

internal/externalstakeholders inimplementation

2- Involved 5-9%internal/externalstakeholders inimplementation

1- Involved 4%internal/externalstakeholders in

implementation




5%

25% stake- 4 0.20

holders are

involve


12/15


Position: School Principal-



Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:




ACTUALRESULTS

RATING SCORE*

• To promote strongpartnership withstakeholders toattend BrigadaEskwela .

January,2015

toMay,2016

5- Promoted 90-99%partnership ofstakeholders to attend/participate in the BrigadaEskwela

4- Promoted 80-89%partnership ofstakeholders to attend/participate in theBrigada Eskwela

3- Promoted 70-79%partnership ofstakeholders to attend/participate in the BrigadaEskwela

2- Promoted 60-69%partnership ofstakeholders to attend/participate in the BrigadaEskwela1- Promoted 50-59%

partnership of stakeholdersto attend / participate in the

Brigada Eskwela




5%

85% 4 0.20


13/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL


5.Timeliness inProgramImplementation,School andOther ReportPreparation

• To submit allmonthly requiredreports before theset deadline

All YearRound

5- Prepared and submittedall required reports 3days ahead of the targetschedule of the setdeadline.

4- Prepared and Preparedand submitted allrequired reports 2 daysahead of the target

schedule of the setdeadline.

3- Prepared and submittedall required reports 1 dayahead of the targetschedule of the setdeadline.

2- Prepared and submittedrequired reports in theset deadline

.1- Prepared and submittedincomplete reports

beyond the targetschedule




(20%)

8%

usually

1 day

before

3 0.24


14/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:



per KRA



ACTUAL

RESULTSRATING SCOR

• To implement/liquidate School-Based FeedingProgram funds/MOOE one (1)week before theset schedule by

SY 2015-2016

June,2015

toMarch,2016

5- Implemented/liquidatedSBFP funds /MOOE 90-99% before the setschedule

4- Implemented/liquidatedSBFP funds /MOOE 80-89% before the set

schedule3- Implemented/liquidatedSBFP funds /MOOE 70-79% before the setschedule

2- Implemented/liquidatedSBFP funds /MOOE 60-99% before the setschedule

1- Implemented/liquidatedSBFP funds /MOOE 50-59% before the set

schedule

PED RPMS form – For Senior Officers (from SG18



6%

89% 4 0.24


15/15





Name of Rater:

Position:

Date of Review:


MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA



ACTUAL

RESULTS RATING SCOR

• To monitor CheckMy School/ otherschool programswith 85%accuracy.

June,2015 toMarch2016

5- Monitored Check MySchool/ other schoolprograms with 90%-100% accuracy.

4- Monitored Check MySchool/ other schoolprograms with 80%-89%accuracy.




*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL

RATING FOR

ACCOMPLI-

SHMENTS

DEPED RPMS form – For Senior Officers from SG18

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

MAJARANI M. JACINTO, Ed. D. SERAPINO E. ESTEBAT, JR. VICTORINA G. PEREZ, CEO VIAsst. Schools. Div. Supt. School principal-I Schools Division Superintendent



6%

87% 4 0.24

3.57VS

January 4, 2016

estebat principal 1 ipcrf

Documents