Teddy Mantoro
No Jabatan Dosen
Dosen Tetap
2014
Dosen Tetap
2015
Dosen Tetap
2016
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 GURU BESAR 369 2 371 1,8 250 1,3
2LEKTOR
KEPALA1736 9,4 1783 8,5 1375 6,9
3 LEKTOR 4333 23,5 4452 21,2 4239 21,2
4 ASISTEN AHLI 4188 22,7 4413 21 4695 23,5
5TENAGA
PENGAJAR7819 42,3 9958 47,5 9408 47,1
Jumlah 18445 20977 19967
source: PDdikti, 25/10/2016
1. Jumlah Profesor Berkurang
2. Jumlah Lektor Kepala Berkurang
3. Jumlah Lektor Berkurang
4. Jumlah Asisten Ahli Bertambah
5. Jumlah Tenaga Pengajar Berkurang
Fakta Dalam Tiga Tahun Terakhir
• Asisten Ahli = 629 orang
• Lektor = 295 orang
• Lektor Kepala = 106 orang
• Profesor = 11 orang
Peningkatan JabatanDosen
1041
• Beasiswa PT Dalam Negeri = 127 orang
• Beasiswa PT Luar Negeri = 17 orang
Peningkatan kualifikasi
akademik dosen ke S3
144
• Mutasi dosen = 330 orang
• Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi = 5 orang
Pengembangan Karier
dan penghargaan
Dosen
335
Pengindeks bereputasi Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF)
h-index dan g-index
Penelitian Ilmiah Mencari bidang yang akan diteliti
AI Method in Brief
Jenis Publikasi karya ilmiah
Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)
Penulisan Proposal dan publikasi Ilmiah Judul
Abstract
Introduction, methodology, etc.
o Contoh penelitian dan hasilnya
Menjelaskan tentang pengindeks bereputasi
Membedakan Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF)
Dapat menghitung h-index dan g-index
Dapat menetapkan area yang akan diteliti
Dapat menetapkan Idea pada suatu penelitian(Problem dan Solusi yang diusulkan)
Mampu menulis papers yang memiliki strong references dan rendah similarity-score-nya.
Mampu menghasilkan paper yang berpotensi di publikasi di jurnal Internasional bereputasi(Scopus dan WoS).
Variables:
Author
Area – define by
author
Citations: All and the
last 5 years
h-Index
i10-index
Total papers
Peneliti A
+++ reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF
--- first author atau corresponding author
---- bahasa Indonesia
Disiplin ilmu: Biologi
Citations=660
h-index = 14
I10-index=18
Peneliti B
--- reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF
+++ first author atau corresponding author
+++ bahasa Indonesia
Disiplin ilmu: Ilmu komputer
Citations=1176
h-index = 17
I10-index=35
Peneliti A
h-index=12
Docs=26
Citations=390 from 322 docs
Peneliti B
h-index=0
Docs=1
Citations=0 from 0 docs
Variables:
Author Id
ORCID
# docs
# Citations
# docs yg mengutip
h-Index
# co-authors
Subject area
Graph visualization
Variables:
Jumlah Docs
Jumlah sitasi
Jumlah sitasi
tanpa self-citation
Citing-articles
tanpa self-citation
Rata-2 citation per
paper
h-index
Graph visualization
(ResearchID)
The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the
productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar.
Proposed by Jorge E. Hirsch (2005).
The index is a measure of the number of highly impactful papers a scientist has
published. The larger the number of important papers, the higher the h-index,
regardless of where the work was published.
To calculate it, only two pieces of information are required: the total number of
papers published (Np) and the number of citations (Nc) for each paper.
The h-index is defined by how many h of a researcher’s publications (Np) have at
least h citations each.
Source: http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/
‘The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation
number greater than or equal to h, is a useful index to characterise the scientific output of aresearcher.’ (JE Hirsch)
The h-index is a measure of the number of publications
published (productivity) as well as how often they are cited
(impact).
PRODUCTIVITY + IMPACT = INFLUENCE
If your h-index is 15, you have 15 papers cited 15 times or more.
If your h-index is 20, you have 20 papers cited 20 times or more.
Peneliti C Peneliti D
H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi
1 386 145
2 247 40
3 313 27
4 37 18
5 26 14
6 0 5
7 0 5
Total 1109 257
h-index’s weakness -- not consider:
• Type of author
• # papers
• # citations
• # span of time
The G-index was proposed by Leo Egghe in his paper "Theory and
Practice of the G-Index" in 2006 as an improvement on the H-Index.
G-Index is calculated this way: "[Given a set of articles] ranked in
decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the G-
Index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received
(together) at least g^2 citations." (from Harzig's Publish or Perish Manual)
Advantages of the G-Index:
Accounts for the performance of author's top articles
Helps to make more apparent the difference between authors'
respective impacts. The inflated values of the G-Index help to give
credit to lowly-cited or non-cited papers while giving credit for highly-
cited papers.
Disadvantages of the G-Index:
Introduced in 2006 and debate continues whether G-Index is superior to
H-Index. Might not be as widely accepted as H-Index.
g-index’s weakness -- not consider:
• Type of Author
• # papers
• # citations
• # span of time
Peneliti C Peneliti DN Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif
Kutipan/Sitasi
N x N N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif
Kutipan/Sitasi
N x N
1 386 386 1 1 145 145 1
2 247 633 4 2 40 185 4
3 313 946 9 3 27 212 9
4 37 983 16 4 18 230 16
5 26 1009 25 5 14 234 25
6 0 1009 36 6 5 239 36
7 0 1009 49 7 5 244 49
8 0 1009 64 8 1 245 64
9 0 1009 81 9 1 246 81
10 0 1009 100 10 1 247 100
11 0 1009 121 11 0 247 121
12 0 1009 144 12 0 247 144
13 0 1009 169 13 0 247 169
14 0 1009 196 14 0 247 196
15 0 1009 225 15 0 247 225
16 0 1009 256 16 0 247 256
17 0 1009 289 17 0 247 289
18 0 1009 324 18 0 247 324
19 0 1009 361 19 0 247 361
20 0 1009 400 20 0 247 400
21 0 1009 441 21 0 247 441
22 0 1009 484 22 0 247 484
23 0 1009 529 23 0 247 529
24 0 1009 576 24 0 247 576
25 0 1009 625 25 0 247 625
26 0 1009 676 26 0 247 676
27 0 1009 729 27 0 247 729
28 0 1009 784 28 0 247 784
29 0 1009 841 29 0 247 841
30 0 1009 900 30 0 247 900
31 0 1009 961 31 0 247 961
32 0 1009 1024 32 0 247 1024
33 0 1009 1089 33 0 247 1089
34 0 1009 1156 34 0 247 1156
h-index=5 g-index=31 h-index=5 g-index=15
Peneliti C Peneliti D
H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi
1 386 145
2 247 40
3 313 27
4 37 18
5 26 14
6 0 5
7 0 5
Total 1109 257
i10-index’s weakness -- not consider:
• Type of author
• # papers
• # citations
• # span of time