soalan isl & jawapan

MUHAMMAD FAIS BIN ISMAIL ISL SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS

Soalan ISL

1. Sediakan satu rubrik untuk menilai portfolio.

2. Buat refleksi tentang kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. Cari makna istilah yg

berikut: alfa cronbach, indeks kesukaran, indeks diskriminasi, indeks

kebolehpercayaan, indeks kesahan, kesahan konstruk, kesahan

kandungan, kesahan kriteria, & kesahan muka.

*Bagi rubrik penilaian portfolio, contoh yang diberikan adalah dalam Bahasa Inggeris

memandangkan kurang sumber rujukan di dalam bahasa Melayu.

Education Teaching Portfolio Evaluation Rubric

DIRECTIONS: For each category assign a score (0-4) for completeness, relevance, and

presentation. Calculate subtotals for each column and a total score.

Criteria

Cover

letter/resum

e

Teaching

philosophy

Lesson

plans/unit plan

Concept maps

or graphic

organizers

Work samples-

yours/your

students

Assessment

evaluation and

validity

assignment

related to

Evaluations/

reflections

207/307

microteachin

g evaluations

to show

growth

Resources

| SCE 3111 PENILAIAN DALAM PENGAJARAN SAINS 1


student

assessment

Completeness:

includes rich

variety of items

relevant to

teaching

Relevance: items

relate to current

& effective

materials,

methods &

content

Presentation:

justification of

items, creativity,

organization,

visual appeal,

grammar &

spelling

SUBTOTALS

TOTAL SCORE = /48

Score of greater than 36 to pass anything less is a revise and resubmit

Scoring key:

0 = Not present. There is limited or no evidence in this category.



1 = Below expectations; unacceptable. Evidence presented is of low quality. Items

are not completed in a thorough and professional manner (e.g., sloppy, not typed) or

are of variable quality. Further work is required to adequately document the candidate's

qualifications.

2 = Meets minimum expectations; fair Evidence presented indicates a minimally

acceptable level of competence. Demonstrates some strength, but reveals inconsistent

quality and/or clear weaknesses in the candidate's understandings, experiences, and/or

abilities as a teacher. Demonstrates that the candidate has the potential to become a

satisfactory teacher.

3 = Exceeds expectations; good. Evidence provided indicates that the candidate's

competence clearly exceeds minimum expectations for professional practice.

Documents work that is consistently of good quality. Documents some experience with,

and a good understanding of, issues and practices in education. The portfolio

demonstrates that this candidate has the potential to become a good teacher.

4 = Far exceeds expectation; exceptional. Evidence provided indicates that the

candidate has the potential to be an exceptionally well qualified teacher. The items are

neat, accurate, complete, and professionally presented. The portfolio indicates

substantial experience with, and excellent understanding of, issues in education, and a

desire and ability to blend theory and practice in one’s teaching. high quality.



CRITERIA POOR(1)

GOOD(2)

EXCELLENT(3)

TECHNICAL Hard to navigate; many links do not work; all text docs with few images; audio/or video not included; documents have many grammatical errors

Navigation is clear; some links do not work; content includes audio/video, digital images, slide show, and/or PDF docs; few grammar errors in documents

Clear navigation; links work; content includes audio/video, digital images, slide show, and/or PDF docs; documents are error-free; portfolio has been converted to CD or posted to a web site.

DESIGN Not organized or presented well; lacks personalization; not visual; poor use of design, audio, text elements

Organized; some evidence of personalization; isvisual; good use of design, audio, and text elements

Well organized; unique/imaginative approach to design; highly visual; excellent use of design, audio, and text elements

*REFLECTIONS

Reflections not related to artifacts; many reflections missing and/or need substantial improvement and revisions; reflections overall are of poor quality

Reflections are related to artifacts; some reflections missing/and or need of improvement and revisions; reflections overall are of good quality

Reflections are learly related to artifacts; reflections demonstrate growth over time; reflections are well written and reveal depth and breadth of experiences; reflections overall ar of excellent quality

ARTIFACTS Artifacts are not related to reflections; many artifacts missing; little variety of artifacts included; poor quality digital and/or video images and sound

Artifacts related to reflections; some artifacts missing; has a variety of artifacts included; good quality digital and/or video images & sound

Artifacts are related to reflections; no artifacts missing; categories are complete; good variety of artifacts included; excellent quality digital and/or video images and sound

Jawapan soalan kedua:



KEBOLEHPERCAYAAN DAN KESAHAN

Cara untuk mendapatkan kaedah yang terbaik ialah dengan cara kebolehpercayaan

dan kesahan.Kebolehpercayaan itu terbatas dan ia merupakan ujian atau prosuder dan

hasil keputusan yang sama di bawah keadaan yang tetap dalam semua keadaan.

Kesahan pula adalah lebih kompleks daripada kebolehpercayaan iaitu ia menjelaskan

kepada kita keadaan instrumen pengumpulan data yang sebenarnya mengumpul atau

mengukur maklumat yang telah dirancang.



Glossari:

Cari makna istilah yg berikut: alfa cronbach, indeks kesukaran, indeks

diskriminasi, indeks kebolehpercayaan, indeks kesahan, kesahan konstruk,

kesahan kandungan, kesahan kriteria, & kesahan muka.

Istilah Makna

Alfa Cronbach Indeks untuk mengukur ketakalan dalaman /

keseragaman item / soalan yang bukan

berjawapan dikotomi.

Indeks kesukaran Indeks untuk mengukur aras kesukaran

sesuatu item, iaitu nisbah calon yang

memberi jawapan betul kepada jumlah

calon, atau markah purata dibahagikan

dengan julat markah penuh.

Indeks Diskriminasi Indeks yang dihasilkan oleh sesuatu item

untuk mengukur perbezaan keupayaan

pelajar, iaitu nisbah pelajar pandai yang

menjawab dengan betul ditolak nisbah

pelajar lemah yang menjawab soalan

dengan betul.

Indeks Kebolehpercayaan Indeks untuk mengukur ketakalan ukuran-

ukuran yang dihasilkan oleh sesuatu alat

ukuran yang boleh dikira menggunakan

pekali Korelasi Pearson, Kuder-Richardson

atau Alfa- Cronbach.

Indeks Kesahan Indeks untuk mengukur sejauh mana

sesuatu alat dapat mengukur apa yang

sepatutnya diukur oleh alat tersebut yang

boleh dikira menggunakan pekali Korelasi



Pearson atau persamaan regresi.

Kesahan Konstruk Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu

ujian dapat mengukur sesuatu konstruk

tertentu.

Kesahan Kandungan Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu

ujian mewakili kandungan / sukatan

pelajaran yang telah diajar.

Kesahan Kriteria Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu

ujian mempunyai hubungan dengan ujian

lain, sama ada yang ditadbirkan secara

serentak atau kemudian.

Kesahan Muka Kesahan dari segi sejauh mana sesuatu

ujian dapat mengukur sesuatu konstruk

tertentu seperti yang dipersepsikan oleh

calon yang menduduki ujian.
