rm lecture 04

Upload: vuduyduc

Post on 02-Jun-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    1/61

    Basic price optimization - Part 2

    Brian Kallehauge

    42134 Advanced Topics in Operations Research

    a

    Revenue Management Session 04

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    2/61

    Outline

    Common price-response functions

    Price response with competition

    The basic price optimization problem

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 042 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    3/61

    Recap: the price-response function

    The price-response function, d(p), specifies demand, d, as a function ofthe price,p.

    Typical price-response curves demonstratesome degree of smooth price response.

    -

    Demand decreases withincreasing price.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 043 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    nonnegative,

    continuous,

    differentiable, and

    downward sloping.

    Demand reaches 0at a satiating

    price P.

    Slope: change in demand divided bychange in price,

    Price elasticity: percentage changein demand divided by percentagechange in price,

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    4/61

    Recap: willingness to pay

    Each potential customer is assumed to have a maximum willingness to pay(w.t.p.) for a given product.

    The number of customers whose w.t.p. is at leastp is denoted d(p).

    The w.t.p. distribution function, w(x), across the population has the following

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 044 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    For any values 0 p1 < p2, is the fraction of the populationwith w.t.p. .

    For all nonnegative values ofx, 0 w(x) 1.

    Recall, d(p) is the number of customers willing to pay at leastp for the product.

    The total demand D = d(0) corresponds to the number of customers willingto pay at least zero, i.e. willing to purchase at all.

    Then we can derive the price-response function d(p) from the w.t.pdistribution:

    ],[21

    ppp

    The partition into com-ponents for total demand and

    willingness to pay is convenientfor modeling the market.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    5/61

    The price-response function andthe willingness to pay distribution

    The derivative of the price-response function then is:

    which is nonpositive as required by the downward-sloping demand curveproperty.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 045 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Conversely, we can derive the w.t.p distribution from the price-responsefunction:

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    6/61

    Common price-response functions

    Linear

    Constant elasticity

    Logit

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 046 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    7/61

    Linear price-response function

    The general formula for the linear price-response function is:

    where D > 0 and m > 0. D = d(0) is the demand as zero price (totaldemand achievable).

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 047 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    The satiating price where the demand drops to zero is P = D/m.

    The slope is m for 0 < p < Pand 0 forp P.

    The elasticity, , of the linear price-response function is:

    The elasticity ranges from 0 atp = 0 and approaches infinity aspapproaches Pand drops to 0 again forp > P.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    8/61

    Linear price-response function

    The linear price-responsefunction is convenient butnot realistic in acompetitive market.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 048 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    A linear price-response function.

    Satiatingprice P.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    9/61

    Uniform willingness-to-pay distribution

    A linear price-response function corresponds to a uniform w.t.p.distribution, and vice versa.

    Recall how to derive thew.t.p. distribution from theprice-response function:

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 049 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    A uniform willingness-to-pay distribution.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    10/61

    The constant-elasticity price-responsefunction

    Constant-elasticity price-response functions have a point elasticity that isthe same at all prices, i.e.

    This results in the price-response function

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0410 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    where C > 0 is a parameter chosen such that d(1) = C.

    The slope of the constant-elasticity price-response function is

    However, such price-response functions do not meet the usual assumptions

    for price-response functions as the following examples show...

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    11/61

    Examples of constant-elasticity price-response functions

    Constant-elasticity price-response functions are neither

    finite nor satiating.

    Demand approaches infinity asthe price approaches zero, i.e.the total demand D = d 0 = .

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0411 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Constant-elasticity price-response functions with different elasticities.

    Demand does not drop to zero atany price, no matter how high,i.e. there is no satiating price P.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    12/61

    Properties of the constant-elasticity price-function

    The revenue, R, equals price times demand, i.e.

    The slope of the revenue function then is

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0412 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Since d(p) > 0, the direction of the slope is determined by (1 ):

    If < 1 (inelastic demand), then R(p) > 0, i.e. revenue increaseswith increasing prices.

    If > 1 (elastic demand), then R(p) < 0, i.e. revenue increaseswith decreasing prices.

    If = 1 (elastic demand), then R(p) = C for any price, i.e. revenueis constant and independent of price changes.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    13/61

    Revenue and price elasticity

    < 1: Revenue increases withincreasin rice

    > 1: Revenue increases withdecreasing price

    Clearly, the constant-elasticityprice-response function is

    unrealistic as a global price-response function

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0413 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Revenue as a function of price for the constant-elasticity price-response function.

    = 1: Constant revenue

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    14/61

    Limitations of the linear and constant-elasticity price-response functions

    Neither the linear nor the constant-elasticity price-response function isvery realistic as a global model.

    They can, however, be useful as local estimators of demand as afunction of the price.

    The limitation of these two models can be seen by considering theircorres ondin willin ness-to- a distributions.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0414 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    The w.t.p. distribution for a linear price-response function isuniformly distributed between 0 and some maximum value.

    The w.t.p. distribution for a constant-elasticity price-responsefunction is highly concentrated around 0 and drops steadily as priceincreases.

    Neither of these functions seem to represent customer behaviorrealistically.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    15/61

    Market price and changes in price elasticity

    So how would we expect customers to react to changing prices?

    In general, price elasticity is high around the market pricepm and

    low for smaller or larger values ofp.

    Small changes in demand when pricesare low, i.e. is low.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0415 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    S-shaped price-response function.

    Dramatic changes in demand whenprices are near the market price,i.e. is high.

    Small changes in demand when pricesare high, i.e. is low.

    g eman

    at low prices

    Low demandat high prices

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    16/61

    The logit price-response function

    The logit price-response function captures the property that small pricechanges around some market pricepm will lead to substantial shifts indemand whereas demand is less sensitive to price changes if they aremuch lower or higher than the competitors prices.

    Therefore, the logit price-response function is a more suitable way toestimate changes in demand as a function of price changes in a

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0416 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    competitive market. Such a price-response function can be defined as

    Broadly speaking, C > 0 indicates the size of the overall market and b >0 specifies price sensitivity. Usually we also have that a > 0.

    The price-sensitivity curve is steepest atpm = (a/b) which can beconsidered to be approximately the market price.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    17/61

    Examples of logit price-response functions

    As b grows larger, themarket approachesperfect competition.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0417 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Logit price-response functions with C = 20,000 and pm = 13,000.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    18/61

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    19/61

    Price response with competition

    Competition is a very important fact of life in any market of interest andmost managers consider competition as the primary influence on theirpricing.

    There are three different levels at which competition might be included inpricing and revenue optimization (PRO):

    1. Incor oratin com etition in the rice-res onse function.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0419 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    2. Explicitly modeling consumer choice.3. Trying to anticipate competitive reaction.

    The first action is easiest whereas the third is the most difficult and mostsophisticated attempt to incorporate competition.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    20/61

    Incorporating competition in the price-response function

    In many cases, competitors prices are not known at the time ofoptimizing the companys prices.

    Retailers generally have a good idea of what their major competitors arecharging but they usually lack time or resources to investigatecompetition daily or weekly.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0420 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    So how is it possible to include competition in the price optimization? Price-response functions are based on history so they already include

    typical competitive pricing.(It would actually be impossible to estimate price-response withoutcompetition.)

    If competitors behave similarly in the future, the price-responsefunction will be a fair representation of market response.

    If the market changes the company needs to adjust the price-response function and re-optimize the prices.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    21/61

    Consumer-choice modeling

    If we have access to current competitive prices, we are better able topredict customer response to our own prices.

    Such information is increasingly available, especially in onlinemarkets.

    Consumer-choice modeling is based on the situation in which a numberof com etitors rovide similar roducts to some o ulation of customers.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0421 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Each competitor sets a price for the product. Each customer has a willingness to pay for each product,

    correponding to the brand value associated with the product.

    The surplus for each customer and each product is defined as thedifference between the customers w.t.p. and the price.

    Each customer then purchases the product with the highest positivesurplus, corresponding to the best buy of the given brand.

    If none of the products have a positive surplus for a customer, he/shewill not purchase at all.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    22/61

    Example of customer-choice

    A customer can choose between five models of stereo amplifiers.

    The models are priced differently and the customer has different

    willingness to pay for each model. This results in a different surplus value for each of the models.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0422 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Ths customer will purchase the Koshiba amplifier since it provides thehighest surplus, i.e. difference between w.t.p. and price.

    Note that neither the cheapest model (Audio Two) nor the customersfavorite (Cacophonia) is purchased.

    Cheapest modelHighest surplus

    Favorite model

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    23/61

    Market share

    Assume that we have a fixed population of potential buyers, each with apositive surplus for at least one product. Then, the market share obtainedby a particular alternative i, , is

    = Fraction of buyers for whomw.t.p.(i) pi> w.t.p.(j) pj for all j.

    Is it realisticto know all

    prices?

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0423 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    .

    Then, a market-share function determines for all i.

    A market-share function has the following characteristics.

    1. The market share of each alternative is between 0 and 1:

    2. Every buyer chooses some alternative:

    3. Increasing pricepidecreases the market share for product i butincreases the market share for other products:

    Given the total demand D, the demand for product i is:

    Is assumption2 realistic?

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    24/61

    Anticipating competitive response

    Since we take competitive prices into account in setting our prices, weshould anticipate that our competitors will take our price into accountwhen setting theirs.

    If we drop a price, some competitors will probably match and therebyerase much of the demand we had predicted by the price decrease.

    Attem ts to redict com etitive res onse and incor orate it into current

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0424 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    pricing decisions falls within game theory.

    Such approaches apply to strategic (long-term) pricing but are lesssuitable for tactical (medium-term) pricing and revenue optimization.

    There does not appear to be a single pricing and revenue optimization

    (PRO) system that explicitly attempts to forecast competitive responseusing game theory.

    However, many of the (small) price adjustments in PRO are not likely totrigger any explicit response from the competition, so effort may be

    better used elsewhere, at least in many industries.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    25/61

    Incremental costs

    Calculating costs may seem much easier than estimating demand, price-response, and competitive reactions.

    However, retrieving the companys own costs is often not that simple!

    PRO decisions are based on the incremental costof a customercommitment:

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0425 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    26/61

    The basic price optimization problem

    The difference between the price of a product sold and its incrementalcost is called its margin.

    The sum of the margins of all products sold during a time period is calledthe total contribution.

    When a supplyer is selling a single product at pricep, the totalcontribution will be

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0426 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    where c is incremental cost for the product.

    The basic price optimization problem is to maximize total contribution:

    I.e. the goal is to find the optimal price for the products sold.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    27/61

    The total contribution function

    The total contribution function m(p) is hill-shaped with a single peak,corresponding to the optimal pricep*.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0427 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Pricing too low(below incremental cost)

    implies loosing money.

    Pricing high neverimplies loosing money,worst case just driving

    demand to zero.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    28/61

    Optimality conditions

    Finding the optimal price is an unconstrained optimization problem whichcan be solved by taking the derivative of m(p) and set it equal to zero:

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0428 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    .

    Rewriting this we get optimality: marginal revenue = marginal cost

    Marginal revenue (derivative of totalrevenue with respect to price): the additionalrevenue achievable by a small increase inprice. Usually positive for low prices andnegative for high prices.

    Marginal cost: the additional cost theseller would incur from a small increase inprice. Always negative as increase in priceleads to lower demand and thereby lowercosts.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    29/61

    Increasing total contribution

    If marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost, the supplier canincrease total contribution by increasing the price.

    If, on the other hand, marginal revenue is lower than marginal cost,decreasing the price will increase total contributions.

    *

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0429 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    A particular price can only be optimal if raising the priceby a penny or lowering the price by a penny results inreduced margin contribution.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    30/61

    Optimality and price elasticity

    Rewriting the optimality condition by including price elasticity we get

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0430 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    This means that if the point elasticity at our current price is less than 1,we can increase total contribution by increasing price.

    However, typically the price elasticity will increase when prices go up!

    d(p) is downward sloping.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    31/61

    Checking the optimal price

    If maximizing total revenue instead of total contribution, the optimizationproblem is

    Maximizing total revenue ignores incremental cost.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0431 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    industries such as movie theaters, video rentals, sporting events, etc. Also companies that have already purchased a fixed amount of

    perishable, nonreplenishable inventory have incremental costapproximately equal to zero.

    Optimality is achieved bywhich yields the optimal price satisfying

    The revenue-maximizingprice occurs where the price

    elasticity is equal to 1

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    32/61

    Revenue- and contribution maximization

    The optimal price when maximizing revenue is lower than the optimalprice when maximizing total contribution.

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0432 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    If combining the twooptimization criteria,the optimal price liesbetween p and p*.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    33/61

    Summary

    The core problem in pricing and revenue optimization is maximizing thetotal contribution subject to strategic and/or physical constraints

    A key input to any price optimization problem is the price-responsefunction that relates price to demand

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0433 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    elasticity of the price-response function

    Price-response functions are often a measure of the number of peoplewhose maximum willingness to pay is greater than a certain price

    Logit functions, a reverse S-shaped model, is often appropriate, whereaslinear and constant-elasticity functions tend to be unrealistic

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    34/61

    Summary continued

    Optimality conditions for the unconstrained price optimization problem:

    Marginal revenue equals marginal cost

    The derivative of total contribution with respect to price is zero The contribution margin ratio is equal to 1 over the price elasticity

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0434 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    35/61

    Customized pricing

    Brian Kallehauge

    42134 Advanced Topics in Operations Research

    a

    Revenue Management Session 04

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    36/61

    Characterization of list-pricing

    The seller offers a stock of goods to different customer segments throughdifferent channels

    Potential customers arrive, observe a price, and decide whether or not topurchase

    Seller needs to decide what price to offer for each product to each

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0436 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    customer group through each channel

    Seller monitors sales of his goods and periodically updates the pricesand/or availabilities

    The airline seat allocation problem is an example of the list-pricing model

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    37/61

    Characterization of customized pricing

    Potential customers approach the seller, one by one

    The seller quotes each one a price

    Often (but not always) each potential buyer wants something different,e.g. different variant or different quantity

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0437 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    The seller can quote a different price for each request

    Price can be based on knowledge of the individual buyer, productsrequested, general market conditions, and so on.

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    38/61

    Example of customized pricing: UnsecuredConsumer Loans

    Unsecured loans are monetary loans that are not secured against theborrower's assets

    Amounts for unsecured consumer loans in the UK ranges from 500 to20,000

    T ical terms are between one to seven ears

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0438 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    The market has many competitors with more than 20 nationwideproviders in the UK

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    39/61

    Example of annual percentage rates for a3000 unsecured consumer loan

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0439 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    40/61

    Sales and pricing process for an unsecuredconsumer loan

    Step 1 First quote. Customers are asked how much they want to borrow,term, name, age, and time at current address

    The bank quotes an APR and monthly payment. About 14% of thecustomers drop out (lost quotes)

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0440 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    . ,including employer, income, expenses, and other loans outstanding.

    The bank assigns a credit score to each applicant. About 50% of theapplications are declined by the bank as too risky.

    Step 3 Final quote. The bank can adjust the APR for the acceptedapplications. About 90% of customers go on to take a loan

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    41/61

    Overview of consumer loan sales and pricingprocess

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0441 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    42/61

    Decision problems of the bank

    What APR to offer in the initial quote?

    What adjusted APR to offer to customers whose application has beenaccepted?

    This is a customized-pricing problem because the bank can choose

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0442 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    , ,and market segment

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    43/61

    Overview of differences between list pricingand customized pricing

    The key issue in customized pricing is not ifthe customer will purchasebut who the customer will purchase from, as opposed to list pricing

    In customized pricing the seller can quote a different price to eachcustomer. The price should reflect the best information the seller has atthat time

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0443 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    In customized pricing the seller can track lost business whereas in listpricing the seller can only observe how many units he sold. The lost bidinformation is important for the estimation of the bid-response function

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    44/61

    Bids and price quotes

    The existence of a bid or price quote is common in customized pricing

    In business-to-business markets the quote is often a response to arequest for proposal (RFP) or request for quote (RFQ) issued by a buyer

    In business-to-consumer markets, such as unsecured consumer loans,

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0444 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    In both markets the price quote occurs after the seller knows somethingabout the buyer and what he wants

    This is in contrast to list pricing where customers find prices by accessing

    a price list or reading a price tag in a store. Here the prices need to beset before the seller knows anything about the individual potentialcustomer

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    45/61

    Coexistence of list pricing and custompricing

    Sellers often use list pricing to set a ceiling, while most customers arequoted a price at a discount from the list

    The manufacturers suggested retail price (MSRP) (in Danish vejledendeudsalgspris) is usually an upper limit on the price

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0445 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    ability to negotiate and the sellers willingness to sell at a lower price

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    46/61

    Calculating optimal customized prices

    Definition of the objective function of the customized-pricing problem(maximize):

    Expected contribution at pricep = (Deal contribution atp) (Probability of winning bid atp)

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0446 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Competitive uncertainty Preference uncertainty

    If there was no uncertainty the problem would be easy we wouldsubmit the most profitable bid that would win

    No preference uncertainty when buyer must choose lowest-cost bidder

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    47/61

    Single-competitor model

    Suppose you are an auto manufacturer bidding against a singlecompetitor to sell 50 pickup trucks to a county park district

    The park district will buy all 50 trucks from a single supplier and iscommitted by law to pick the lowest bidder

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0447 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Your production cost per truck is $10,000

    Based on your past experience your belief about what your competitorwill bid can be described by a uniform distribution between $9,000 and

    $14,000

    What should you bid to maximize expected profitability?

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    48/61

    Single-competitor model

    Call you bidp and the competing bid q

    You will win if your bid is less than the competing bid, i.e.p < q(for simplicity we ignore the possibility of a tie)

    Let (p) be the probability that you would win if you bid a pricep

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0448 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Let F(x) be the probability that the competing bid will be less thanx

    Then,

    (p) = 1 - F(p)

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    49/61

    Uniform probability distribution on acompetitor's bid

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0449 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    50/61

    Probability of winning the bid as a functionof price

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0450 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    51/61

    Bid-response function

    We call (p) the bid-response function of this deal

    For each deal, the bid-response function specifies the probability ofwinning the deal as a function of our bid

    The bid-response function is the customized-pricing analog of the price-

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0451 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Price-response curve: Total expected demand as a function of list price

    Bid-response curve: Probability of winning an individual bid as a functionof price bid

    For the example:

    (p) = 2.8 p/5000 for $9,000 p $14,000

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    52/61

    Results

    The price that maximizes expected profitability can be found by solving

    Maximize 50 (2.8 p/5000) (p 10,000)

    Solving forp givesp* = $12,000

    EXAMPLE

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0452 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    . , .

    The margin per unit if the deal is won is $12,000 - $10,000 = $2,000

    Expected total margin is 40% 50 $2,000 = $40,000

    EXAMPLE

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    53/61

    Expected profitability as a function of bidprice

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0453 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    54/61

    The customized pricing problem

    Maximize (p) = (p) m(p)

    where

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0454 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    p = expec e con r u on a pr cep

    (p) = bid-response function

    m(p) = deal contribution at pricep

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    55/61

    Bid response

    The most challenging part of optimizing customized prices is determiningan appropriate bid-response function

    If we already have a bid-response function, finding the price thatmaximizes expected contribution is relatively simple

    -

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0455 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Bottom-up modeling from our probability distributions on how webelieve our competitors will bid and the selection process of the buyer

    Expert judgment, i.e. gather people that have knowledge of the deal

    to derive the bid-response function

    Statistical estimation based on historic patterns of wins and losses

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    56/61

    Minimum information needed to estimate a

    bid-response function

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0456 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    57/61

    Wins = 1 and losses = 0

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0457 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    Linear fit

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    58/61

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0458 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    59/61

    Examples of logit response curves

    )(

    1

    1)(

    bpa

    e

    p+

    +

    =

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0459 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    60/61

    Logit bid-response curve fit by maximizing

    log likelihood

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0460 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 Rm Lecture 04

    61/61

    Conclusions

    Estimating the bid-response function is the challenging part ofcustomized pricing

    A variety of approaches can be used, but the logit function is quitepopular

    -

    29/10/2009Revenue Management Session 0461 DTU Management Engineering,Technical University of Denmark

    using the multivariate logit function

    There exists a range of sophisticated statistical estimation techniques forpractical applications belonging to the field of discrete choice methods