pengurusan tesis dan desertasi … file03/06/2017 · • kajian telah disediakan oleh seksyen...
TRANSCRIPT
PENGURUSAN TESIS DAN DESERTASI DIKALANGAN UNIVERSITI AWAM MALAYSIA: ISU DAN CABARAN UNTUK MENWUJUDKAN REPOSITORI
TEKS PENUH KEBANGSAAN
Oleh:
Amir Hussain Md Ishak
Salmah Salleh
Zubaidah Iberahim
1
PENGENALAN
• Kajian polisi repositori tesis dan disertasi elektronik di Universiti Awam Malaysia
dijalankan seperti yang dikehendaki dalam Mesyuarat Majlis Ketua Pustakawan
Bil. 4/2016.
• Kajian telah disediakan oleh Seksyen Perkhidmatan Penyelidikan, Bahagian
Perkhidmatan Penyelidikan dan Maklumat, Perpustakaan Sultan Abdul Samad,
Universiti Putra Malaysia.
• Kajian telah dihantar melalui e-mel kepada 20 Ketua Pustakawan Universiti
Awam Malaysia pada 1 Mac 2017 di https://goo.gl/forms/UK0IToechDzsxeM82
2
SOROTAN KAJIAN
Author/ Year
Place conducted/ Participants
Objective Methodology Findings
Ghosh
(2009)
9 ETD digital libraries
in India /; ETD
project coordinators;
content analysis of
ETD websites
To perform a
preliminary
study and
explore the
possibilities for
creating a
national
repository for
the deposit,
discovery, use
and long-term
care of research
theses in an
open access
environment.
Triangulation of
three different
methods:
(1) e-mail
questionnaire
(2) face to face
interviews/
telephonic
conversation and
(3) content
analysis of ETD
websites.
Selection of
digital libraries
for the
evaluation are:
➢ An increasing number of universities
are accepting and encouraging the
submission of theses and dissertations
in electronic format.
➢ Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Indian
Institute of Science, National Institute
of Oceanography, Goa institutions have
adopted open access policies.
➢ IIT kanpur, IIT Bambay, IIT Delhi have
restricted access, i.e Full text are
available online within the campus;
even authors do not have access to
their ETDs when they are outside of
their campus.
➢ The submission of soft copy of the
approved theses/ dissertations is
mandatory for IIT Kanpur, IIT Bombay,
Indian Institute of Astrophysics,
National Chemical Laboratory, Pune.
3
SOROTAN KAJIAN
Author/ Year
Place conducted/ Participants
Objective Methodology Findings
Joint (2009) Place conducted: UK library
To give an overview of electronic thesis and dissertation collection development trends to date
A brief historical narrative combined with commentary fromthe point of view of the library practitioner.
➢ 2 legal issues had been discussed (a) Legal issues- copyright (b) Legal issues- publication status
➢ Legal issues- Copyright of a thesis remains firmly in the hand of the thesis writer before and after the act of submission.
➢ Legal issues- publication statusIntellectual property of the author
➢ However, as long as the requirement for digital submission and dissertation is made clear to the research student at the point of entry onto a course then the student cannot have any objections about losing publication opportunities
4
SOROTAN KAJIAN
Author/ Year
Place conducted/ Participants
Objective Methodology Findings
Aquil Ahmed,
Sulaiman
Alreyaee,
Azizur
Rahman,
(2014)
Asian countries /
247 e-theses
repositories
To discover the
composition of ETD
repositories in Asia
based on the seven
key parameters, i.e.
(1) country-wise
contributions; (2)
types of ETD
repositories; (3)
language interfaces
used; (4) subjects
covered; (5)
software used; (6)
core content types;
and (7) recorded
repository policies
ETD
repositories
developed by
Asian countries
were identified
by selecting the
database of
OpenDOAR
(Directory of
Open Access
Repositories)
and the
retrieved data
were
thoroughly
analyzed for
the necessary
information
➢ Theses and dissertations are
considered an important part of
information resources in any
institution. They are often the only
source of research work, which are
not generally made available
elsewhere. Unfortunately, access to
these valuable unpublished
resources is often restricted to
parent institution only
5
SOROTAN KAJIAN
Author/ Year
Place conducted/ Participants
Objective Methodology Findings
Shalini
Ramdas
Lihitkar,
Lihitkar,
(2014)
Institutional
repositories in
India
(1) Determine which
institutions are
developing EDTs in
India.
(2) To compare EDTs
in India based on
predetermined
parameters such as:
. software; . format;
. number of EDTs; .
search; and . access.
(3) Offer suggestions
for developing
EDT repositories in
India.
The methodology
used for this
research paper
was a descriptive
method. The
institutional web
sites
were browsed and
searched to collect
the data
➢ Out of 41 institutional
repositories, 23 provide access
to EDTs:
➢ Dspace open source software
isused by 31 out of 41
institutions. EPrint software was
used by eight institutions.
➢ PDF format is used by more
repositories for EDTs. The
probable reason is that others
cannot change the content of
these items. Only one
institutions using is using MPEG
and one is using Microsoft Word.
➢ University of Mysore has access
to 5,482 EDTs, the most of any
institution in this study.
6
SOROTAN KAJIAN
Author/ Year
Place conducted/ Participants
Objective Methodology Findings
➢ All 23 institutions allowed
searching by researchers, subject,
and title.Only eight institutions
allowed searching by the name of
the thesis guide. Advanced search
capabilities are provided by all 23
institutions.
➢ Full text accesses to EDTs are
provided by 16 institutional
repositories and seven only provide
access to the abstract.
Riddle (2015)
Place conducted: University of San Diego, California
to explore questions and concepts encountered when developing policies for an institutional repository with a library publishing component.
➢ The author discussed three area in the majority of available IR policy documents:
a. Content policiesb. Access policiesc. Preservation policies
7
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Demografi
Responden
8
Bil Singkatan Universiti1 UM Universiti Malaya2 USM Universiti Sains Malaysia3 UKM Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia4 UPM Universiti Putra Malaysia5 UTM Universiti Teknologi Malaysia6 UIAM Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia7 UUM Universiti Utara Malaysia8 UNIMAS Universiti Malaysia Sarawak9 UMS Universiti Malaysia Sabah
10 UPSI Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
11 USIM Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
12 UITM Universiti Teknologi MARA13 UMT Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
14 UTHM Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
15 UTeM Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka16 UMP Universiti Malaysia Pahang17 UniMAP Universiti Malaysia Perlis18 UniSZA Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin19 UMK Universiti Malaysia Kelantan20 UPNM Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
1. Format penyerahanmanuskrip
tesis/disertasi pelajarMaster/PhD kepada
perpustakaan
9
Bil Singkatan Bercetak Bil Tidak bercetak (CD, DVD, dll) Bil
1 UM √ 1 √ 1
2 USM √ 1 √ 1
3 UKM √ 1 √ 1
4 UPM √ 1 √ 1
5 UTM √ 1 √ 1
6 UIAM √ 1 √ 1
7 UUM √ 2 √ 1
8 UNIMAS √ 1 √ 1
9 UMS √ 1 √ 1
10 UPSI √ 1 √ 1
11 USIM √ 1 √ 1
12 UITM √ 1 √ 1
13 UMT √ 1 √ 1
14 UTHM √ 1 √ 1
15 UTeM √ 1 √ 1
16 UMP √ 1 √ 1
17 UniMAP √ ≥ 5 √ ≥ 5
18 UniSZA √ 1 √ 1
19 UMK √ ≥ 5 √ ≥ 5
20 UPNM √ 1 √ 1
2. Manuskrip tesis/disertasi bolehdicapai secara atas talian
10
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan Ya Tidak
1 UM √
2 USM √
3 UKM √
4 UPM √
5 UTM √
6 UIAM √
7 UUM √
8 UNIMAS √
9 UMS √
10 UPSI √
11 USIM √
12 UITM √
13 UMT √
14 UTHM √
15 UTeM √
16 UMP √
17 UniMAP √
18 UniSZA √
19 UMK √
20 UPNM √
3. Bahagianyang
menguruskan(input/indeks,
imbas, dll) capaian secara
atas talianmengikutuniversiti
11
PENEMUAN KAJIANBil Singkatan Nama Bahagian
1 UM UM Archives (Perpustakaan)
2 USM Bahagian Pendigitalan dan Repositori (Perpustakaan)
3 UKM Unit Pengindeksan (Perpustakaan)
4 UPM Bahagian Pengurusan Sumber Digital (BPSD) (Perpustakaan)
5 UTM Bahagian Repositori Metadata (Perpustakaan)
6 UIAM Digital Library Unit (Perpustakaan)
7 UUM Bahagian ePerpustakaan (Perpustakaan)
8 UNIMAS Unit Pengurusan Digital (Perpustakaan)
9 UMS Seksyen Pengindeksan dan repositori (Bahagian Sumber Ilmu) (Perpustakaan)
10 UPSI Unit Perpustakaan Digital (Perpustakaan)
11 USIM Unit Pengurusan Repositori Pepustakaan (Perpustakaan)
12 UITM 1. Jabatan Pembangunan Repositori Institusi Universiti2. Jabatan Pembangunan Bahan Perpustakaan (Perpustakaan)
13 UMT Bahagian Repositori Data (Perpustakaan)
14 UTHM Bahagian Pembangunan Koleksi Digital (Perpustakaan)
15 UTeM Pembangunan Sumber (Perpustakaan)
16 UMPUnit Digital Perpustakaan dan Unit Knowledge Management (Perpustakaan)
17 UniMAP Hub Digital (Repositori Digital & Media) (Perpustakaan)
18 UniSZAUnit Pengurusan Koleksi dan Unit Teknologi Maklumat dan Multimedia (Perpustakaan)
19 UMK Tidak berkaitan
20 UPNM Tidak berkaitan
4.1 Kaedah capaian
(Open Access)
maklumat manuskrip
tesis/disertasi
mengikut universiti
12
PENEMUAN KAJIANOpen Access
Bil Singkatan Maklumat bibliografi
k
Maklumat bibliografik +
abstrak
Maklumat bibliografisehingga beberapa muka
surat tertentu
Teks penuh
1 UM √
2 USM √
3 UKM √
4 UPM √
5 UTM √
6 UIAM √
7 UUM √
8 UNIMAS √
9 UMS √
10 UPSI √
11 USIM √
12 UITM √
13 UMT √
14 UTHM √
15 UTeM √
16 UMP √
17 UniMAP √
18 UniSZA √
19 UMK Tidak berkaitan
20 UPNM Tidak berkaitan
4.2 Kaedah capaian
(Intranet) maklumat
manuskrip
tesis/disertasi
mengikut universiti
13
PENEMUAN KAJIANIntranet
Bil Singkatan Maklumat bibliografi
k
Maklumat bibliografik +
abstrak
Maklumat bibliografisehingga beberapa muka
surat tertentu
Teks penuh
1 UM √
2 USM √
3 UKM √
4 UPM √
5 UTM √
6 UIAM √
7 UUM √
8 UNIMAS √
9 UMS √
10 UPSI √
11 USIM √
12 UITM √
13 UMT √
14 UTHM √
15 UTeM √
16 UMP √
17 UniMAP √
18 UniSZA √
19 UMK Tidak berkaitan
20 UPNM Tidak berkaitan
4.3 Kaedah capaian
(Ez-Proxy) maklumat
manuskrip
tesis/disertasi
mengikut universiti
14
PENEMUAN KAJIANEz-Proxy
Bil Singkatan Maklumat bibliografi
k
Maklumat bibliografik +
abstrak
Maklumat bibliografi sehingga beberapa muka
surat tertentu
Teks penuh
1 UM √
2 USM √
3 UKM √
4 UPM √
5 UTM √
6 UIAM √
7 UUM √
8 UNIMAS √
9 UMS √
10 UPSI √
11 USIM √
12 UITM √
13 UMT √
14 UTHM √
15 UTeM √
16 UMP √
17 UniMAP √
18 UniSZA √
19 UMK
20 UPNM
5. Tempoh embargo
manuskrip
tesis/disertasi
mengikut universiti
15
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil SingkatanAda Embargo?
Tempoh EmbargoYa Tidak
1 UM √
Sehingga selesai perkara berikut;
-Pemfailan harta intelek-Sulit (mengandungi maklumat sulit dibawah Akta Rasmi 1972)-Dokumen terkawal/ ‘restricted’ (mengandungi maklumat terhad//terkawal oleh organisasi dimana penyelidikan dibuat)
2 USM √
3 UKM √
4 UPM √ Bergantung kepada permohonan pengarang
5 UTM √
6 UIAM √
7 UUM √
8 UNIMAS √ Bergantung kepada permohonan pengarang
9 UMS √
10 UPSI √
11 USIM √
12 UITM √
13 UMT √
14 UTHM √
15 UTeM √ Berdasarkan surat lampiran yang disertakan pada bahan
16 UMP √
17 UniMAP √
18 UniSZA √
19 UMK
20 UPNM
6. Sebab-sebab
embargo mengikut
universiti
16
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan
Pemfailan
harta
intelek
Sulit(mengandungi
maklumatsulit dibawah
Akta Rasmi1972)
Dokumen terkawal/ ‘restricted’
(mengandungimaklumat
terhad//terkawaloleh organisasi
dimana penyelidikandibuat)
Lain-lain
1 UM √ √ √
Penerbitan
artikel dan
kertas
persidangan
2 UPM √ √ √
3 UNIMAS √ √
4 UTeM √ √
7. Status polisi
(hak milik
intelek dan
hakcipta
tesis/disertasi)
serta nama
dokumen
mengikut
universiti
17
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan
Polisi hak milik
intelek dan hakcipta Nama Dokumen
Ya Tidak
1 UM √Nama Dokumen: Tempat: Institut Pengajian Siswazah UM
2 USM √
Nama Dokumen: Rekod minit mesyuarat ahli senat & dasar penerbitan tesis
Tempat: Pejabat Canselor
Nama Dokumen: Melalui panduan akademik
Tempat: Institut Pengajian Siswazah
Nama Dokumen: Melalui peraturan/panduan akademik untuk siswazah
Tempat: Pusat-pusat Pengajian
3 UKM √
4 UPM √Nama Dokumen: University Putra Malaysia (Research) Rules 2012
Tempat: Research Management Center
5 UTM √Nama Dokumen: LIB Mgt Sys, Doc Mgt Syst n UTMIRTempat: Perpustakaan
6 UIAM √ Dimuka surat "Copyright Statement" thesis
7 UUM √
Nama Dokumen: Pusat Inovasi UUM (ICC UUM) , Intellectual Property and Commercialisation PolicyTempat:
8 UNIMAS √Nama Dokumen: Polisi Penyerahan TesisTempat:
9 UMS √ Di dalam tesis tersebut (Borang Pengesahan Status Tesis)
10 UPSI √Nama Dokumen: Thesis/ Dissertations Guideline Tempat: Institut Pengajian Siswazah
7. Status polisi
(hak milik intelek
dan hakcipta
tesis/disertasi)
serta nama
dokumen
mengikut
universiti (Cont.)
18
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan
Polisi hak milik intelek
dan hakcipta Nama Dokumen
Ya Tidak
11 USIM √Nama Dokumen: Tempat: Online system “eimetiaz”
12 UITM √
Nama Dokumen: Dasar Harta Intelek Universiti Teknologi MARA; Dasar Pengkomersilan Harta Intelek Universiti Teknologi MARA; Dasar Penyerahan Bahan Harta Intelek UiTM Ke Repositori Institusi UniversitiTempat: Institut Pengurusan Penyelidikan UiTM
13 UMT √Nama Dokumen: Lokasi: Bahagian Koleksi Kahs Perpustakaan Sultanah Nur Zahirah
14 UTHM √
Nama Dokumen: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Intellectual Property Policy 2011 and Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Student Intellectual Property Policy (Supplementary 2014).Tempat: Bahagian Pembanguan Sumber Ilmu.
15 UTeM √Nama Dokumen:Tempat:Pusat Pengajian Siswazah (PPS)
16 UMP √Nama Dokumen: Tempat: Bilik Khas tesis (hard copy) Perpustakaan
17 UniMAP √
Nama Dokumen: Polisi Harta Intelek Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Tempat: Pusat Pembangunan Pengkomersilan dan Pengurusan
Harta Intelek
18 UniSZA √Nama Dokumen:
Tempat: Pusat Pengajian Siswazah
19 UMK
20 UPNM
8. Pemilik mutlak hak
milik intelek daripada
tesis/disertasi dan
hakcipta manuskrip
mengikut universiti
19
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan
Pemilik mutlak HAK MILIK intelek
daripada tesis/disertasi
Pemilik mutlak HAKCIPTA manuskrip
tesis/disertasi
Universiti Penaja Pelajar Universiti Penaja Pelajar
1 UM √ √
2 USM √ √
3 UKM √ √
4 UPM √ √
5 UTM √ √
6 UIAM √ √
7 UUM √ √
8 UNIMAS √ √
9 UMS √ √
10 UPSI √ √
11 USIM √ √
12 UITM √ √
13 UMT √ √
14 UTHM √ √
15 UTeM √ √
16 UMP √ √
17 UniMAP √ √
18 UniSZA √ √
19 UMK √ √
20 UPNM √ √
9. Status pindahmilik
(dibenarkan/tidak
dibenarkan) bagi hak milik
intelek daripada tesis/disertasi
dan hakcipta manuskrip
tesis/disertasi universiti kepada
pihak ketiga seperti pihak
industri mengikut universiti
20
PENEMUAN KAJIAN
Bil Singkatan Hakmilik Hak Cipta
1 UM x x
2 USM √ x
3 UKM x x
4 UPM x x
5 UTM x x
6 UIAM x x
7 UUM √ x
8 UNIMAS x x
9 UMS x x
10 UPSI x x
11 USIM √ √
12 UITM x x
13 UMT x x
14 UTHM x x
15 UTeM √ √
16 UMP x x
17 UniMAP x x
18 UniSZA x x
19 UMK x √
20 UPNM x x
KESIMPULAN
Hasil kajian mendapati;
➢ 17 daripada 20 universiti awam mempunyai polisi hak milik intelek dan hakcipta
tesis/disertasi mengikut universiti, manakala 3 daripadanya tiada.
➢ 18 daripada 20 universiti awam mempunyai akses manuskrip tesis/disertasi
secara atas talian
➢ 19 universiti awam menghadkan kaedah capaian maklumat teks penuh
manuskrip tesis/disertasi kepada pengguna dalaman. Hanya UM
membenarkan akses kepada teks penuh secara open access, intranet dan ez-
proxy.
➢ 16 universiti awam tidak mempunyai tempoh embargo bagi manuskrip
tesis/disertasi, manakala 4 daripadanya mempunyai tempoh embargo atas
sebab-sebab antaranya pemfailan harta intelek, Sulit (mengandungi maklumat
sulit dibawah Akta Rasmi 1972), dokumen terkawal/ ‘restricted’ (mengandungi
maklumat terhad//terkawal oleh organisasi dimana penyelidikan dibuat)
21
RTDK : KEBAIKKAN
1. Meningkat keterlihatan (Visibility)
➢ Universiti
➢ Penyelia
➢ Kepakaran
➢ Penulis
23
RTDK : KEBAIKKAN
2. Memudahkan akses
3. Memudahkan pencarian ilmu intelektual /
penyelidikan yang telah diterokai
4. Daftar ilmiah / penyelidikan negara
24
25
“… a document that can be read over the course of several years
by many people is preferable to a document available for a million years
and read only by a few people… “
Moxley, Joseph M., "American Universities Should Require Electronic Theses and Dissertations" (2001). English Faculty Publications. Paper 113. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/eng_facpub/113
RTD : SITUASI SEMASA
26
MyTo
- Usahasama ahli
PERPUN
- 20 UA & 5 GLC
- Metadata biblio,
abstrak, 24 mukasurat
pertama / Bab 1
Perlu ada:
• polisi kebangsaan mengenai hakmilik dan
hakcipta tesis dan desertasi untuk UA / US
• Pekeliling/warta dari pihak berkuasa berkaitan
28
REPOSITORI TESIS DAN
DESERTASI KEBANGSAAN
(RTDK)
Garuda
29
• Creation of Garuda was by the
Ministry of National Education
Act No. 17 / 2010, which
mandates the use of Garuda or
other forms of IRs to “upload
electronically all scholarly works
by students, lecturers,
researchers, staff of any higher
education institution
• 2011 -Circular 2050/E/T/2011,
“Kebijakan Unggah Karya Ilmiah
dan Jurnal” (“Policies on the
Uploading of Scholarly Works
and Journals”). The Circular re-
emphasized the critical role that
Garuda and other forms of IR
play in the Indonesian HE sector
INDONESIA ONESEARCH
30
“Indonesia One Search adalah target kolektif di masa depan agar
setiap masyarakat bisa mudah mengakses seluruh koleksi
perpustakaan melalui satu pintu,”
Titiek Kismiyati
Kepala Pusat Jasa dan Informasi Perpusnas,
RTDK : Kaedah
Akses Terbuka
• Percuma
• Abstrak / Teks penuh
Akses Terhad
• Langganan (penjanapendapatan)
• Teks penuh
Kekangan
• Nilai komersial
• Keboleh pasaran
• Logistik pembayaran royalti
31
Cadangan
Majlis Ketua Pustakawan
1. Meminta KPT menetapkan polisi kebangsaan
mengenai hakmilik dan hakcipta tesis dan desertasi
untuk UA & US
2. Memohon KPT menwujudkan repositori tesis dan
desertasi kebangsaan dengan mengunapakai
platform MyTo yang sedia ada dan meningkatkan
kapsiti pelayan (server) MyTo
3. Memohon RTDK diletak bawah seliaan Pusat Sitasi
Malaysia
32
RUJUKANAquil Ahmed, Sulaiman Alreyaee, Azizur Rahman (2014). Theses and dissertations in institutional
repositories: an Asian perspective, New Library World, 115 (9/10), 438-451.
Ghosh, M. (2009). ETDs in India: Towards a national repository with value added e-theses service.
Paper presented at 10th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations, ETD
2007: Added value to e-theses Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, 13-16 June, 2007. Retrieved at
http://epc.ub.uu.se/etd2007/files/papers/paper-20.pdf
Joint, N. (2009). Online digital thesis collections and national information policy: ANTAEUS, Library
Review, 58 (8), 561-568. doi: 10.1108/00242530910987055
Riddle, K. (2015). Creating policies for library publishing in an institutional repository: Exploring
purpose, scope, and the library’s role. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library
perspectives, 31(2), 59-68. doi: 10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0007
Shalini Ramdas Lihitkar, R.S. Lihitkar, (2014). Electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) in India: A
comparative study, Library Hi Tech News, 31 (2), 9-14. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-10-2013-0061
Liauw, T., & Genoni, P. (2017). A Different Shade of Green: A Survey of Indonesian Higher EducationInstitutional Repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 4(General Issue), eP2136.http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2136
33