UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
COMPATIBILITY OF FOUR FORAGE LEGUMES WITH GUINEA GRASS (Panicum maximum Jacq.)
MOHAMMED BABA
FP 2013 38
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
i
COMPATIBILITY OF FOUR FORAGE LEGUMES WITH GUINEA GRASS
(Panicum maximum Jacq.)
By
MOHAMMED BABA
Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the
Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
December 2013
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
ii
COPYRIGHT
All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons,
photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of University Putra Malaysia
unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for
non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may
only be made with the express, prior, written permission of University Putra Malaysia.
Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
ii
DEDICATION
To my loving parents, wife and daughters
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
iii
Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfillment of
the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
COMPATIBILITY OF FOUR FORAGE LEGUMES WITH GUINEA GRASS
(Panicum maximum) JACQ
By
MOHAMMED BABA
December 2013
Chairman : Associate Professor Mohd Ridzwan Abd Halim, PhD
Faculty : Agriculture
Livestock production in the tropics is constrained by decline in quantity and quality of
the predominant tropical grasses during the growing season. Incorporation of forage
legumes into grassland agriculture has been used as a panacea to mitigate the problem.
However, in tropical regions, not much of success has been achieved due to strong
competitive ability of the grass which reduces the content of the companion legume. It is
with this background that four experiments were conducted to evaluate the compatibility
of grass-legume mixtures and their suitability for plantation livestock integration.
An investigation into the nature of competition between Panicum maximum (guinea
grass) and each of the following legumes of contrasting growth habits; Stylosanthes
guianensis (stylo), Centrosema pubescens (centro) Macroptilium bracteatum (burgundy)
and Arachis pintoi (arachis) showed that dry matter yield in guinea-centro mixtures (2:2
and 3:1) species combination tended to be higher than the corresponding grass
monoculture (differences were not significant). Mean relative yield total values were
higher in guinea-stylo (1.41) and guinea-centro (1.4) the values seemed to be higher at
2:2 species combination except in the case of guinea-burgundy. The climbing/trailing
legume (centro) appeared to be more compatible with guinea grass especially at 2:2
species combination compared to the erect (stylo), erect/climbing (burgundy) and
prostrate (arachis) legumes.
Compatibility of forage mixtures evaluated at 50:50 species combination in relation to
dry matter yield and chemical composition indicates that guinea-arachis produced
significantly greater (P<0.01) cumulative total dry matter yield compared to other
mixtures. However, the yield was not significantly different from that of guinea
monoculture. The erect legume (stylo) produced significantly higher (P<0.01)
cumulative total dry matter yield than arachis in mixture with guinea. Similarly, relative
yield of stylo tended to be higher than those of arachis and burgundy. Thus as a
compromise between dry matter yield and pasture quality, grass-stylo mixture was
recommended.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
iv
The productivity of four mixtures guinea-arachis, guinea-burgundy, guinea-centro and
guinea-stylo evaluated under 3 shade levels 0 (1701.9µmol m-2
s-1
), 50 (583.3 µmol m-2
s-1
) and 70% (520.2 µmol m-2
s-1
) indicates that guinea-centro tended to produce higher
yield among mixtures though differences were not significant. Centro in mixture with
guinea recorded significantly higher yield (P<0.05) than arachis and burgundy.
Interaction between legume species and shade levels on dry matter yield showed that the
dry matter yields of centro and stylo were significantly greater than those of arachis and
burgundy under 0% shade, however, centro recorded significantly higher yield than all
legumes at 50% shade, a similar trend was observed at 70% shade but the difference was
only significant when centro was compared with arachis. The dry matter yields of grass
and legumes decreased with increasing shade level. Guinea-centro mixture was
recommended based on higher dry matter yield of centro compared to other legumes
especially at 50% shade.
Allelopathy study conducted using laboratory bioassay and pot trial to test whether
guinea grass had allelopathic effect on companion legumes indicates that shoot length in
stylo was significantly (P<0.05) reduced at 1% leaf extract concentration. Dry matter
yield and root length in burgundy were significantly decreased by root powder while the
yields of centro and stylo were enhanced by leaf powder. In conclusion, the
climbing/trailing legume (centro) was observed to be the most compatible with guinea.
This is based on the facts that in study 1, guinea-centro mixture showed tendency
towards higher dry matter yield than the corresponding monoculture of grass (guinea). In
study 2, however, the guinea-centro mixture was not part of the treatments owing to lack
of germination of the centro seeds. In study 3, centro produced significantly higher dry
matter yield than arachis and burgundy and surpassed other legumes at 50 % shade.
Centro was also not negatively affected by the allelopathic effect of guinea grass as
observed in study 4.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
v
Abstrak tesis yang dikemukakan kepada Senate Universiti Putra Malaysia sebagai
memenuhi keperluan untuk ijazah Doktor Falsafah
KESERASIAN CAMPURAN EMPAT KEKACANG FORAJ DENGAN RUMPUT
GUINEA (Panicum maximum) JACQ
Oleh
MOHAMMED BABA
Disember 2013
Pengerusi : Profesor Madya Mohd Ridzwan Abd Halim, Ph.D
Fakulti : Pertanian
Pengeluaran ternakan di kawasan tropika dikekang oleh penurunan dalam kuantiti dan
kualiti rumput tropika utama semasa musim yang semakin meningkat. Penubuhan
kekacang makanan ternakan ke padang rumput pertanian telah digunakan sebagai
penawar untuk menyelesaikan masalah tersebut. Walau bagaimanapun, di kawasan-
kawasan tropika, tidak banyak kejayaan yang telah dicapai kerana kemampuannya
kompetitif kuat rumput yang mengurangkan kandungan kekacang teman. Ia adalah
dengan latar belakang ini bahawa empat percubaan telah dijalankan untuk menilai
keserasian campuran rumput kekacang dan kesesuaiannya untuk integrasi ternakan
perladangan.
Siasatan ke atas sifat persaingan antara Panicum maximum (rumput guinea) dengan
setiap satu daripada kekacang berikut yang berlainan tabiat pertumbuhan; Stylosanthes
guianensis (Stylo), Centrosema pubescens (centro) Macroptilium bracteatum (burgundy
bean) dan Arachis pintoi (arachis) menunjukkan bahawa hasil kering campuran guinea-
entro (2:2 dan 3:1) gabungan spesies cenderung untuk menjadi lebih tinggi daripada
monokultur rumput (perbezaan ini tidak ketara). Hasil relatif jumlah adalah lebih tinggi
dalam campuran guinea-stylo (1.41 ) dan guinea-centro (1.4) pada nisbah 2:2 kecuali
untuk guinea-burgundy. Kekacang yang memanjat (centro) kelihatan lebih serasi dengan
rumput guinea terutamanya pada kombinasi 2:2 berbanding yang tegak ( stylo),
tegak/memanjat (burgundy) dan yang melata (Arachis).
Keserasian campuran foraj dinilai pada nisbah 50:50 gabungan spesies dari segi hasil
kering dan komposisi kimia menunjukkan bahawa guinea-arachis lebih tinggi hasil
(P<0.01) terkumpul berbanding campuran lain. Walau bagaimanapun, hasil ini tidak
ketara berbeza dengan guinea monokultur. Kekacang menegak (stylo) mempunyai hasil
lebih tinggi (P< 0.01) daripada Arachis dalam campuran dengan guinea. Begitu juga,
hasil relatif stylo cenderung untuk menjadi lebih tinggi daripada arachis dan burgundy.
Oleh itu sebagai satu kompromi di antara hasil bahan kering dan kualiti, campuran
rumput Stylo disyorkan.
Produktiviti empat campuran guinea-Arachis, guinea-burgundy, guinea-centro dan
guinea-stylo dinilai di bawah 3 aras naungan 0 ( 1701.9 μmol m-2
s-1
), 50 ( 583.3 μmol
m-2
s-1
) dan 70 % ( 520.2 μmol m-2
s-1
) menunjukkan bahawa guinea-centro cenderung
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
vi
untuk mengeluarkan hasil yang lebih tinggi di kalangan campuran walaupun perbezaan
ini tidak ketara . Centro dalam campuran dengan guinea mencatatkan hasil lebih tinggi
(P< 0.05) daripada Arachis dan burgundy. Interaksi antara spesies kekacang dan aras
naungan pada pengeluaran bahan kering menunjukkan bahawa hasil bahan kering centro
dan stylo nyata lebih besar daripada arachis dan burgundy di bawah 0% teduh,
bagaimanapun, centro mencatatkan hasil lebih tinggi daripada semua kekacang pada
50% naungan, trend yang sama diperhatikan di naungan 70%, tetapi perbezaan itu hanya
ketara apabila centro telah dibandingkan dengan arachis. Hasil bahan kering rumput dan
kekacang menurun dengan peningkatan tahap teduh. Campuran guinea- centro disyorkan
berdasarkan hasil bahan kering tinggi centro berbanding kekacang lain terutama pada
50% teduh.
Kajian allelopathy dijalankan menggunakan bioesei makmal dan percubaan pasu untuk
menguji sama ada rumput guinea mempunyai kesan alelopati pada kekacang
menunjukkan bahawa panjang tumbuhan stylo menurun secara bererti (P<0.05) dengan
campuran 1% ekstrak daun. Hasil bahan kering dan panjang akar dalam burgundy telah
menurun dengan ketara oleh serbuk akar manakala hasil centro dan stylo telah
dipertingkatkan dengan serbuk daun. Kesimpulannya, kekacang menegak/memanjat
(centro) diperhatikan menjadi yang paling serasi dengan guinea. Ini adalah berdasarkan
kepada fakta bahawa dalam kajian 1, campuran guinea-centro menunjukkan
kecenderungan ke arah hasil bahan kering tinggi daripada monokultur rumput (guinea).
Dalam kajian 2, bagaimanapun, campuran guinea-centro tidak merupakan sebahagian
daripada rawatan kerana kekurangan percambahan benih centro. Dalam kajian 3, Centro
mempunyai hasil bahan kering yang tinggi sedikit dari Arachis dan burgundy dan
mengatasi kekacang lain pada 50% teduh. Centro juga tidak terjejas oleh kesan alelopati
rumput guinea sebagaimana yang berlaku dalam kajian 4.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All praise is due to Allah Subhanahu wataala for enabling me to accomplish this
monumental task in life. I would like to express my immense gratitude to Assoc. Prof.
Dr. Mohd Ridzwan Abd Halim. Chairman of the Supervisory Committee for his
consistent guidance, very useful suggestions and constructive criticisms throughout the
study period. Iam highly indebted to Prof. Dr. Abd. Razak Alimon, Abdul Shukor
Juraimi and Tuan Hj. Idris Abu Bakar, members of my Supervisory Committee for their
guidance comments and suggestions.
My sincere appreciation goes to Mr Suhaimi and Mr Mazlan Bangi both of Botany and
Physiology laboratory, Department of Crop Science respectively. Mr Mahdi Ebrahimi of
Physiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine who assisted with the in vitro
work. Mrs Nassrin Sultana and Miss Noor Anisa who have also made contributions
towards the success of this study. Words will not be adequate to express my gratitude to
Mr Fabian Tengoua, Mr shamsuddin Rufai and Mr Ibrahim Wasiu all of Institute for
Tropical Agriculture, they have been with me all through the field work.
I am highly indebted to Bayero University Kano, Nigeria, for granting me the
permission to carry out the study. Worthy of note also is the contribution of Universiti
Putra Malaysia in the areas of research facilities, enabling environment and funds.
I remain eternally grateful to my parents for their prayers and useful advices, my wife
and daughters for their patience, understanding and moral support while the programme
lasted, my two younger brothers, Kabir Muhammad and Nasir Muhammad for their
support and encouragement and my dear friend Musa Danlami Usman.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
viii
I certify that a Thesis Examination Committee has met on 16th December 2013 to
conduct the final examination of Mohammed Baba on his Doctor of Philosophy thesis
entitled “Compatibility of four forage legumes with guinea grass (Panicum maximum
Jacq.)” in accordance with the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 and the
Constitution of the Universiti Putra Malaysia [P.U. (A) 106] 15 March 1998. The
Committee recommends that the student be awarded the Doctor of Philosophy.
Members of the Thesis Examination Committee were as follows:
Siti Aisha Hassan, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Yahya Awang, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Hawa Jaafar, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Jim Bidlack, PhD
Professor
University of Central Oklahoma
United State of America
(External Examiner)
NORITAH OMAR, PhD
Associate Professor Deputy Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date: 17 February 2014
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
ix
This thesis was submitted to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia and has been
accepted as fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The
members of the Supervisory Committee are as follows:
Mohd Ridzwan Abd. Halim, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Abd. Razak Alimon, Ph.D.
Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
Abdul Shukor Juraimi, Ph.D.
Professor
Faculty of Agriculture
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
___________________________
BUJANG BIN KIM HUAT, PhD.
Professor and Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date:
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
x
DECLARATION
Declaration by Graduate Student
I hereby confirm that:
this thesis is my original work
quotations, illustrations and citations have been duly referenced
the thesis has not been submitted previously or concurrently for any other degree at
any institutions
intellectual property from the thesis and copyright of thesis are fully-owned by
Universiti Putra Malaysia as according to the Universiti Putra Malaysia (Research)
Rules 2012;
written permission must be owned from supervisor and deputy vice –chancellor
(Research and innovation) before thesis is published in book form
there is no plagiarism or data falsification/fabrication in the thesis and scholarly
integrity was upheld as according to Rule 59 in Rules 2003 (Revision 2012-2013).
The thesis has undergone plagiarism detection software
Signature: ------------------------------- Date: 16 December, 2013
Name and Matric No: MOHAMMED BABA (GS26109)
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xi
Declaration by Members of Supervisory Committee
This is to confirm that:
the research conducted and the writing of this thesis was under our supervision,
Supervision responsibilities as stated in Rule 41 in Rules 2003 (Revision 2012-
2013) were adhered to.
Signature ------------------------------- Signature -------------------------------
MOHD RIDZWAN ABD HALIM, PhD ABD RAZAK ALIMON, PhD
(Chairman) (Member)
Signature -------------------------------
ABDUL SHUKOR JURAIMI, PhD
(Member)
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
ABSTRACT iii
ABSTRAK vi
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix
APPROVAL x
DECLARATION xii
LIST OF TABLES xviii
LIST OF FIGURES xxi
LIST OF PLATES xxiii
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2.1.Plant Competition 3
2.1.1. Physiological Factors Affecting Plant competition 3
2.1.2. Morphological Factors Affecting Plant competition 5
2.2. Competition Model of DeWit 1960 6
2.3. Influence of Grass-Legume Mixtures on Nutritive Value 8
2.4. Influence of Grass-Legume Mixtures on Dry Matter Yield 8
2.5. Allelopathic Interactions in Grass-Legume Mixtures. 9
2.6. Nitrogen Fixation by Legumes 10
2.6.1. Factors Affecting Nitrogen Fixation 10
2.7. Influence of Fertilizer on Grass-Legume mixture 13
2.7.1. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer 13
2.7.2. Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer 13
2.8. Sustainable Grass-Legume Pasture 14
2.8.1. Selection of Appropriate Forage Legume 14
2.8.2. Use of Fertilizer 14
2.8.3. Grazing Pressure 14
2.8.4. Acceptability of forage legumes by farmers 15
2.9. Contributions of Grass-legume mixtures to Animal Production 15
2.10. Silvopasture 15
2.11. Benefits of Silvopastures 15
2.12. Habitats of Plantation Crops 16
2.13. Forages under Plantation 16
2.14. Effect of Shade 17
2.14.1. Water Availability in Pastures 17
2.14.2. Photosynthesis 18
2.14.3. Growth and Morphology of Forage 18
2.14.4. Nutritive Value 20
2.14.5. Nodulation 21
2.15. Botanical and Agronomic Characteristics of Four Tropical 21
Legumes and Grass
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xiii
2.15.1. Arachis pintoi 21
2.15.2. Centrosema pubescens 23
2.15.3. Stylosanthes guianensis 24
2.15.4. Macroptilium bracteatum 25
2.15.5. Panicum maximum 27
3. NATURE OF COMPETITION BETWEEN GUINEA GRASS AND
FOUR LEGUME FORAGES 3.1. Introduction 29
3.2. Materials and Methods 30
3.2.1. Location of the Experiment 30
3.2.2. Experimental Design 30
3.2.3. Field Culture and Experimental Materials 30
3.2.4. Environmental Condition 31
3.2.5. Harvesting and Plant Measurements 32
3.2.6. Competition Indices Computed 33
3.2.7. Data Analysis 33
3.3. Results 34
3.3.1. Dry Matter Yield 34
3.3.2. Relative Yield 37
3.3.3. Relative Crowding Coefficient 41
3.3.4. Aggresivity Index 43
3.4. Discussion 44
3.4.1. Dry Matter Yield 44
3.4.2. Relative Yield 45
3.4.3. Relative Crowding Coefficient 46
3.4.4. Aggresivity Index 46
3.5. Conclusion 46
4. EVALUATION OF GUINEA-LEGUME MIXTURES FOR
COMPATIBILTYIN RELATION TO DRY MATTER YIELD
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONAND IN VITRO DRY MATTER
DIGESTIBILITY
4.1. Introduction 48
4.2. Materials and Methods 49
4.2.1. Location of the Experiment 49
4.2.2. Experimental Designs 49
4.2.3. Experimental Materials and Field Culture 49
4.2.4. Environmental Condition 49
4.2.5. Harvesting and Plant Measurements 50
4.2.6. Analysis of Chemical Composition 50
4.2.7. Analysis of Mineral Concentrations 51
4.2.8. Cumulative Gas Production and In vitro Dry Matter 52
Digestibility
4.2.9. Determination of Volatile Fatty Acids in Rumen Liquor 52
4.2.10. Data Analysis 53
4.3. Results 53
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xiv
4.3.1. Dry Matter Yield 53
4.3.2. Percentage Relative Yield of Legumes in Mixtures 58
4.3.3. Percentage Grass and Legumes in Mixtures 59
and Leaf to Stem Ratio
4.3.4. Chemical Composition 60
4.3.5. Mineral Composition. 61
4.3.6. Cumulative Gas Production and In vitro Dry Matter 63
Digestibility
4.3.7. Volatile Fatty Acids Production 64
4.3.8. Correlation Coefficient 65
4.4. Discussion 65
4.4.1. Dry Matter Yield 65
4.4.2. Chemical Composition 66
4.4.3. Mineral Concentration. 68
4.4.4. Gas Production and In vitro Dry Matter Digestibility 69
4.4.5. Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) Production 70
4.5. Conclusion 71
5. PRODUCTIVITY OF GUINEA-LEGUME MIXTURES UNDER
DIFFERENT SHADE LEVELS
5.1. Introduction 72
5.2. Materials and Methods 73
5.2.1. Location of the Experiment 73
5.2.2. Experimental Designs 73
5.2.3. Experimental Materials and Field Culture 73
5.2.4. Environmental Condition 74
5.2.5. Measurements of Physiological parameters 74
5.2.6. Harvesting and other Measurements 75
5.2.7. Analysis of Chemical Composition 75
5.2.8. Data Analysis 75
5.3. Results 76
5.3.1. Light Intensity Measurement 76
5.3.2. Cumulative Dry Matter Yield 76
5.3.3. Mean Percentage Grass and Legumes in mixtures 76
5.3.4. Morphological Characteristics of Mixtures 78
5.3.5. Effect of light Intensity on LAI and Light Extinction 81
Coefficient.
5.3.6. Physiological Characteristics of Mixtures 82
5.3.7. Chemical composition 85
5.3.8. Correlation Coefficient 86
5.4. Discussion 87
5.4.1. Cumulative Dry Matter Yield 87
5.4.2. Mean Percentage Grass and Legumes in Mixtures 88
5.4.3. Morphological Characteristics of Mixtures 88
5.4.4. LAI and Light Extinction Coefficient. 89
5.4.5. Physiological Characteristics of Mixtures 89
5.4.6. Chemical Composition of Mixtures. 91
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xv
5.5. Conclusion 92
6. ALLELOPATHIC POTENTIAL OF PANICUM MAXIMUM
6.1. Introduction 93
6.2. Materials and Methods 93
6.2.1. Location of the experiment 93
6.2.2. Experimental Designs 94
6.2.3. Environmental Condition 94
6.2.4. Experimental Procedure 94
6.2.5. Data analysis 95
6.3. Results 95
6.3.1. Effect of Leaf Extract 96
6.3.2. Effect of Root Extract 98
6.3.3. Effect of Leaf and Root Powder 99
6.4. Discussion 102
6.4.1. Effects of Leaf and Root Extract 102
6.4.2. Effects of Leaf and Root Powder 103
6.5. Conclusion 104
7. GENERAL DISCUSSION 105
BIBILIOGRAPHY 109
APPENDICES 133
BIODATA OF STUDENT 141
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 142