balita bagus

33
Lampiran 1 KUESIONER FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZI ANAK BALITA DI DESA KOLAM KECAMATAN PERCUT SEI TUAN KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2010 Alamat Responden : I. Identitas Responden 1.  Nama : 2. Umur : 3. Pekerjaan : a. Pegawai Negeri Sipil  b. Pegawai Swasta c. Wiraswasta d. Ibu Rumah Tangga 4. Pendidikan : a. Tidak Sekolah/tidak tamat SD  b. Tamat SD c. Tamat SLTP d. Tamat SLTA e. Tamat Akademi f. Sarjana 5. Jumlah anak : II. Identitas Balita 1.  Nama : 2. Umur : 3. Berat Badan Lahir : 4. Berat Badan sekarang : 5. Jenis kelamin : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Upload: ranny

Post on 03-Jun-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 1/32

Page 2: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 2/32

III. Status Imunisasi

Apakah anak balita anda telah mendapatkan imunisasi di bawah ini:

a.  BCG 1. Ya 2. Tidak

 b.  Polio 1 1. Ya 2. Tidakc.  Polio 2 1. Ya 2. Tidakd.  Polio 3 1. Ya 2. Tidak

e.  Polio 4 1. Ya 2. Tidakf.  DPT 1 1. Ya 2. Tidak

g.  DPT 2 1. Ya 2. Tidakh.  DPT 3 1. Ya 2. Tidak

i.  Campak 1. Ya 2. Tidak j.  Hepatitis B1 1. Ya 2. Tidak

k.  Hepatitis B2 1. Ya 2. Tidakl.  Hepatitis B3 1. Ya 2. Tidak

IV. Status ASI Ekslusif

Apakah anak balita anda telah diberikan ASI Eksklusif (ASI saja sebagai

makanan hingga balita berumur 6 bulan)?

1.  Tidak

2.  Ya

V. Pada saat anak anda lahir apakah anda memberikan ASI yang pertama kali keluar

yang berwarna kuning (kolostrum)?

1. Tidak

2. Ya

VI. Pengetahuan Ibu

1.  Apakah makanan/minuman terbaik untuk bayi?

a.  Tidak tahu b. Susu botol c. ASI

2.  Kapan pertama kali sebaiknya anak ibu diberikan makanan tambahan?

a.  Tidak tahu b. <6 bulan c. >6 bulan

3.  Apakah yang dimaksud dengan makanan 4 sehat 5 sempurna?

a.  Tidak tahu

 b.  Makanan bergizi

c.  Makanan yang terdiri dari nasi, lauk, sayur, buah dan susu.

4.  Makanan apa saja yang mengandung zat tenaga (karbohidrat)

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 3: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 3/32

a.  Tidak tahu b. Kurang tahu (1 item) c. Tahu (lebih dari 1 item)

Item: nasi, jagung, kentang, ubi, roti

5.  Makanan apa saja yang mengandung zat pembangun (protein)

a.  Tidak tahu b. Kurang tahu (1 item) c. Tahu (lebih dari 1

item)

Item:telur,daging,ayam,ikan

6.  Apakah manfaat imunisasi?

a.  Tidak tahu

 b.  Menambah berat badan

c.  Memberi kekebalan terhadap penyakit

7.  Umur berapakah sebaiknya imunisasi dasar lengkap diberikan kepada bayi?

a.  Tidak tahu b. > 1 tahun c. < 1 tahun

8.  Apakah yang dimaksud dengan ASI Eksklusif?

a.  Tidak tahu

 b.  Memberikan ASI

c.  Memberikan ASI sampai umur anak 6 bulan.

VII. Riwayat Penyakit Infeksi

1.  Diare

Apakah dalam satu bulan terakhir anak balita anda pernah menderita diare?

a.  Ya

 b.  Tidak

2.  ISPA

Apakah dalam satu bulan terakhir anak balita anda pernah menderita penyakit

ISPA (batuk, pilek, diserta atau tanpa demam)?

a.  Ya

 b.  Tidak

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 4: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 4/32

VIII. Faktor Lingkungan

1.  Sumber air minum keluarga

a.  Sumur gali

 b.  PAM/Sumur bor

c.  Air kemasan

2.  Kebiasaan minum keluarga

a.  Tidak dimasak

 b.  Kadang-kadang dimasak

c.  Dimasak sampai mendidih

3.  Kondisi air minum

a.  Keruh, berasa dan berbau

 b.  Bening, tidak berasa dan berbau

c.  Bening, tidak berasa dan tidak berbau

4.  Tipe jamban

a.  Cemplung

 b.  Jamban leher angsa

c.  Closet

5.  Keadaan jamban

a.  Tidak terawat sama sekali

 b.  Jarang dibersihkan

c.  Terawat dan bersih

6.  Jenis tempat pembuangan sampah

a.  Tidak ada

 b.  Lubang tanah galian

c.  Tong sampah

7.  Cara pengolahan sampah

a.  Tidak diolah dan dibiarkan berserakan

 b.  Dibakar

c.  Diangkut petugas kebersihan

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 5: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 5/32

Lampiran 3

Frequency Table 

Status Gizi Anak 

Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent

Valid Gizi Baik 58 55.2 55.2 55.2

Gizi Kurang 36 34.3 34.3 89.5

Gizi Buruk 11 10.5 10.5 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Kategori Status Gizi Anak 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Gizi Kurang 47 44.8 44.8 44.8

Gizi Baik 58 55.2 55.2 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Jenis kelamin balita 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Laki-Laki 53 50.5 50.5 50.5

Perempuan 52 49.5 49.5 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Berat Badan Lahir  

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

BBLR 26 24.8 24.8 24.8

Normal 79 75.2 75.2 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Status Imunisasi 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak Lengkap 18 17.1 17.1 17.1

Lengkap 87 82.9 82.9 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 6: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 6/32

 

Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif  

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak 65 61.9 61.9 61.9

Ya 40 38.1 38.1 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Status pemberian kolostrum 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak 55 52.4 52.4 52.4

Ya 50 47.6 47.6 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan ibu 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Pendidikan Rendah 80 76.2 76.2 76.2

Pendidikan Tinggi 25 23.8 23.8 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu 

Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent

Valid

Kurang 71 67.6 67.6 67.6

Baik 34 32.4 32.4 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan ibu 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Bekerja 8 7.6 7.6 7.6

Tidak Bekerja 97 92.4 92.4 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 7: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 7/32

 

Jumlah anak dalam keluarga 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

1 25 23.8 23.8 23.8

2 48 45.7 45.7 69.5

3 19 18.1 18.1 87.6

4 8 7.6 7.6 95.2

5 4 3.8 3.8 99.0

6 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

ISPA 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid ISPA 69 65.7 65.7 65.7

Tidak ISPA 36 34.3 34.3 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Diare 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Diare 47 44.8 44.8 44.8

Tidak Diare 58 55.2 55.2 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Sumber air minum keluarga 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Sumur gali 72 68.6 68.6 68.6

PAM/SUmur bor 1 1.0 1.0 69.5

 Air kemasan 32 30.5 30.5 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Kebiasaan minum keluarga 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak dimasak 22 21.0 21.0 21.0

Dimasak sampai mendidih 83 79.0 79.0 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 8: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 8/32

 kondisi air minum 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

keruh, berasa dan berbau 41 39.0 39.0 39.0

bening, tidak berasa danberbau

5 4.8 4.8 43.8

bening, tidak berasa dantidak berbau

59 56.2 56.2 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

tipe jamban 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Cemplung 10 9.5 9.5 9.5

Jamban leher angsa 95 90.5 90.5 100.0Total 105 100.0 100.0

keadaan jamban 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak terwat sama sekali 8 7.6 7.6 7.6

Jarang dibersihkan 26 24.8 24.8 32.4

Terawat dan bersih 71 67.6 67.6 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

 jenis tempat pembuangan sampah 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

tidak ada 45 42.9 42.9 42.9

Lubang tanah galian 38 36.2 36.2 79.0

Tong sampah 22 21.0 21.0 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

cara pengolahan sampah 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak diolah dan dibiarkanberserakan

14 13.3 13.3 13.3

Dibakar 91 86.7 86.7 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 9: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 9/32

 Kesehatan lingkungan 

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid

Tidak baik 17 16.2 16.2 16.2

Baik 88 83.8 83.8 100.0

Total 105 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs 

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing TotalN Percent N Percent N Percent

Jenis kelamin balita * StatusGizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Berat Badan Lahir * StatusGizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Status Imunisasi * StatusGizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Status pemberian ASIEksklusif * Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Status pemberian kolostrum* Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Pendidikan ibu * Status Gizi Anak 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu *Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Pekerjaan ibu * Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Jumlah anak dalam keluarga* Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

ISPA * Status Gizi Anak 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Diare * Status Gizi Anak 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Kesehatan lingkungan *Status Gizi Anak

105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 10: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 10/32

Jenis kelamin balita * Status Gizi Anak Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Jenis kelamin balita Laki-Laki Count 23 30 53

Expected Count 23.7 29.3 53.0

% within Jenis kelamin balita 43.4% 56.6% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 48.9% 51.7% 50.5%

% of Total 21.9% 28.6% 50.5%

Perempuan Count 24 28 52

Expected Count 23.3 28.7 52.0

% within Jenis kelamin balita 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 51.1% 48.3% 49.5%

% of Total 22.9% 26.7% 49.5%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Jenis kelamin balita 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .081a  1 .776

Continuity Correction .008 1 .930

Likelihood Ratio .081 1 .776

Fisher's Exact Test .845 .465

Linear-by-Linear Association .080 1 .777

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.28.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 11: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 11/32

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .081a  1 .776

Continuity Correction

b

  .008 1 .930Likelihood Ratio .081 1 .776

Fisher's Exact Test .845 .465

Linear-by-Linear Association .080 1 .777

N of Valid Casesb  105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.28.

c. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 12: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 12/32

 

Berat Badan Lahir * Status Gizi Anak Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Berat Badan Lahir BBLR Count 23 3 26

Expected Count 11.6 14.4 26.0

% within Berat Badan Lahir 88.5% 11.5% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 48.9% 5.2% 24.8%

% of Total 21.9% 2.9% 24.8%

Normal Count 24 55 79

Expected Count 35.4 43.6 79.0

% within Berat Badan Lahir 30.4% 69.6% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 51.1% 94.8% 75.2%

% of Total 22.9% 52.4% 75.2%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Berat Badan Lahir 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Jenis kelaminbalita (Laki-Laki /Perempuan)

.894 .414 1.931

For cohort Status Gizi Anak

= Gizi Kurang .940 .615 1.438For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

1.051 .745 1.484

N of Valid Cases 105

Chi-Square Tests 

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 13: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 13/32

 Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Berat BadanLahir (BBLR / Normal)

17.569 4.812 64.156

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

2.912 2.028 4.180

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.166 .057 .485

N of Valid Cases 105

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 26.690a  1 .000

Continuity Correction 24.392 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 28.790 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 26.436 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.64.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 14: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 14/32

 Status Imunisasi * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi Anak

TotalGizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Status Imunisasi Tidak Lengkap Count 11 7 18

Expected Count 8.1 9.9 18.0

% within Status Imunisasi 61.1% 38.9% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 12.1% 17.1%

% of Total 10.5% 6.7% 17.1%

Lengkap Count 36 51 87

Expected Count 38.9 48.1 87.0

% within Status Imunisasi 41.4% 58.6% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 87.9% 82.9%

% of Total 34.3% 48.6% 82.9%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Status Imunisasi 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.348a

  1 .125Continuity Correction 1.618 1 .203

Likelihood Ratio 2.341 1 .126

Fisher's Exact Test .192 .102

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.326 1 .127

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.06.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 15: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 15/32

 

Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Status pemberian ASIEksklusif

Tidak Count 29 36 65

Expected Count 29.1 35.9 65.0

% within Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif

44.6% 55.4% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 61.7% 62.1% 61.9%

% of Total 27.6% 34.3% 61.9%

Ya Count 18 22 40

Expected Count 17.9 22.1 40.0

% within Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif

45.0% 55.0% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 38.3% 37.9% 38.1%

% of Total 17.1% 21.0% 38.1%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif

44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for StatusImunisasi (Tidak Lengkap /Lengkap)

2.226 .787 6.294

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang 1.477 .946 2.305

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.663 .362 1.215

N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 16: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 16/32

 Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square.001

a

  1 .969Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .001 1 .969

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .564

Linear-by-Linear Association .001 1 .969

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.90.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Statuspemberian ASI Eksklusif(Tidak / Ya)

.985 .446 2.174

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

.991 .641 1.534

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

1.007 .706 1.436

N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 17: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 17/32

Page 18: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 18/32

 Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Statuspemberian kolostrum (Tidak /Ya)

10.183 4.056 25.569

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

3.838 2.070 7.117

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.377 .249 .571

N of Valid Cases 105

Pendidikan ibu * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab Status Gizi Anak

TotalGizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Pendidikan ibu Pendidikan Rendah Count 39 41 80

Expected Count 35.8 44.2 80.0

% within Pendidikan ibu 48.8% 51.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 83.0% 70.7% 76.2%

% of Total 37.1% 39.0% 76.2%

Pendidikan Tinggi Count 8 17 25

Expected Count 11.2 13.8 25.0

% within Pendidikan ibu 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 17.0% 29.3% 23.8%

% of Total 7.6% 16.2% 23.8%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Pendidikan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 19: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 19/32

 Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square2.161

a

  1 .142Continuity Correction 1.537 1 .215

Likelihood Ratio 2.209 1 .137

Fisher's Exact Test .171 .107

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.141 1 .143

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.19.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pendidikanibu (Pendidikan Rendah /Pendidikan Tinggi)

2.021 .783 5.215

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.523 .824 2.815

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.754 .535 1.063

N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 20: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 20/32

Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu Kurang Count 33 38 71

Expected Count 31.8 39.2 71.0

% within TingkatPengetahuan ibu

46.5% 53.5% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 65.5% 67.6%

% of Total 31.4% 36.2% 67.6%

Baik Count 14 20 34

Expected Count 15.2 18.8 34.0

% within Tingkat

Pengetahuan ibu

41.2% 58.8% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 34.5% 32.4%

% of Total 13.3% 19.0% 32.4%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within TingkatPengetahuan ibu

44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df  Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .261a  1 .609

Continuity Correction .091 1 .763

Likelihood Ratio .262 1 .609

Fisher's Exact Test .678 .383

Linear-by-Linear Association .259 1 .611

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.22.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 21: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 21/32

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for TingkatPengetahuan ibu (Kurang /Baik)

1.241 .543 2.837

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.129 .703 1.811

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.910 .638 1.298

N of Valid Cases 105

Pekerjaan ibu * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab Status Gizi Anak

TotalGizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Pekerjaan ibu Bekerja Count 4 4 8

Expected Count 3.6 4.4 8.0

% within Pekerjaan ibu 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 8.5% 6.9% 7.6%

% of Total 3.8% 3.8% 7.6%

Tidak Bekerja Count 43 54 97

Expected Count 43.4 53.6 97.0

% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.3% 55.7% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 91.5% 93.1% 92.4%

% of Total 41.0% 51.4% 92.4%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 22: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 22/32

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .096a  1 .757

Continuity Correction

b

  .000 1 1.000Likelihood Ratio .096 1 .757

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .519

Linear-by-Linear Association .095 1 .758

N of Valid Casesb  105

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.58.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan ibu(Bekerja / Tidak Bekerja)

1.256 .297 5.314

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.128 .545 2.336

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.898 .439 1.837

N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 23: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 23/32

Jumlah anak dalam keluarga * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Jumlah anak dalam keluarga >=3 orang Count 14 18 32

Expected Count 14.3 17.7 32.0

% within Jumlah anak dalamkeluarga

43.8% 56.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 31.0% 30.5%

% of Total 13.3% 17.1% 30.5%

1-2 orang Count 33 40 73

Expected Count 32.7 40.3 73.0

% within Jumlah anak dalam

keluarga

45.2% 54.8% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 69.0% 69.5%

% of Total 31.4% 38.1% 69.5%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Jumlah anak dalamkeluarga

44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .019a  1 .890

Continuity Correctionb  .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .019 1 .890

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .531

Linear-by-Linear Association .019 1 .891

N of Valid Casesb  105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.32.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 24: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 24/32

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Jumlah anak

dalam keluarga (>=3 orang /1-2 orang)

.943 .408 2.177

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

.968 .607 1.544

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

1.027 .709 1.486

N of Valid Cases 105

ISPA * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

ISPA ISPA Count 36 33 69

Expected Count 30.9 38.1 69.0

% within ISPA 52.2% 47.8% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 56.9% 65.7%

% of Total 34.3% 31.4% 65.7%

Tidak ISPA Count 11 25 36

Expected Count 16.1 19.9 36.0

% within ISPA 30.6% 69.4% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 43.1% 34.3%

% of Total 10.5% 23.8% 34.3%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within ISPA 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 25: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 25/32

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.472a  1 .034

Continuity Correction

b

  3.640 1 .056Likelihood Ratio 4.567 1 .033

Fisher's Exact Test .040 .027

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.429 1 .035

N of Valid Casesb  105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.11.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate 

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for ISPA (ISPA /Tidak ISPA)

2.479 1.058 5.813

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.708 .993 2.935

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.689 .496 .956

N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 26: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 26/32

Diare * Status Gizi Anak Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Diare Diare Count 27 20 47

Expected Count 21.0 26.0 47.0

% within Diare 57.4% 42.6% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 57.4% 34.5% 44.8%

% of Total 25.7% 19.0% 44.8%

Tidak Diare Count 20 38 58

Expected Count 26.0 32.0 58.0

% within Diare 34.5% 65.5% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 42.6% 65.5% 55.2%

% of Total 19.0% 36.2% 55.2%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Diare 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.537a  1 .019

Continuity Correction 4.647 1 .031

Likelihood Ratio 5.571 1 .018

Fisher's Exact Test .029 .015

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.484 1 .019

N of Valid Cases 105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.04.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 27: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 27/32

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Diare (Diare /

Tidak Diare) 2.565 1.162 5.664

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.666 1.082 2.565

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.649 .444 .951

N of Valid Cases 105

Kesehatan lingkungan * Status Gizi Anak 

Crosstab 

Status Gizi AnakTotal

Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Kesehatan lingkungan Tidak baik Count 11 6 17

Expected Count 7.6 9.4 17.0

% within Kesehatanlingkungan

64.7% 35.3% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 10.3% 16.2%

% of Total 10.5% 5.7% 16.2%

Baik Count 36 52 88

Expected Count 39.4 48.6 88.0

% within Kesehatanlingkungan

40.9% 59.1% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 89.7% 83.8%

% of Total 34.3% 49.5% 83.8%

Total Count 47 58 105

Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0

% within Kesehatanlingkungan

44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 28: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 28/32

Chi-Square Tests 

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.263a  1 .071

Continuity Correction

b

  2.372 1 .124Likelihood Ratio 3.263 1 .071

Fisher's Exact Test .109 .062

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.232 1 .072

N of Valid Casesb  105

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.61.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate 

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kesehatanlingkungan (Tidak baik /Baik)

2.648 .898 7.811

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Kurang

1.582 1.027 2.435

For cohort Status Gizi Anak= Gizi Baik

.597 .307 1.163

N of Valid Cases 105

Logistic Regression 

Case Processing Summary 

Unweighted Casesa  N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 105 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 105 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 105 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number ofcases.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 29: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 29/32

Dependent Variable Encoding 

Original Value Internal Value

Gizi Kurang 0

Gizi Baik 1

Block 0: Beginning Block 

Classification Tablea,

 

Observed

Predicted

Status Gizi AnakPercentage

CorrectGizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Step 0 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 0 47 .0

Gizi Baik 0 58 100.0

Overall Percentage 55.2

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation 

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .210 .196 1.148 1 .284 1.234

Variables not in the Equation 

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables BBLk 26.690 1 .000

Imunlkap 2.348 1 .125

KoLs 27.649 1 .000

didikk 2.161 1 .142

ISPA 4.472 1 .034

Diare 5.537 1 .019

Lingk 3.263 1 .071Overall Statistics 47.617 7 .000

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio) 

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients 

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 30: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 30/32

  Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 57.855 7 .000

Block 57.855 7 .000

Model 57.855 7 .000

Step 6a  Step -2.013 1 .156

Block 52.250 3 .000

Model 52.250 2 .000

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary 

Step -2 Log likelihoodCox & Snell R

SquareNagelkerke R

Square

1 86.551a  .424 .567

6 92.157 .392 .525a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 becauseparameter estimates changed by less than .001.

b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 becauseparameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test 

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 6.362 8 .607

6 2.688 4 .611

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 31: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 31/32

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test 

Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Kurang Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Baik

TotalObserved Expected Observed Expected

Step 1 1 12 11.657 0 .343 12

2 11 9.955 0 1.045 11

3 7 8.077 4 2.923 11

4 7 5.699 3 4.301 10

5 3 4.920 8 6.080 11

6 2 3.195 9 7.805 11

7 3 1.719 8 9.281 11

8 1 .927 9 9.073 10

9 1 .614 10 10.386 11

10 0 .236 7 6.764 7

Step 6 1 4 3.926 0 .074 4

2 16 15.098 0 .902 16

3 8 8.528 4 3.472 12

4 13 14.424 16 14.576 29

5 1 1.680 6 5.320 7

6 5 3.344 32 33.656 37

Classification Tablea 

Observed

Predicted

Status Gizi Anak

PercentageCorrectGizi Kurang Gizi Baik

Step 1 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 36 11 76.6

Gizi Baik 7 51 87.9

Overall Percentage 82.9

Step 6 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 28 19 59.6

Gizi Baik 4 54 93.1

Overall Percentage 78.1

a. The cut value is .500

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Page 32: balita bagus

8/12/2019 balita bagus

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/balita-bagus 32/32

Variables in the Equation 

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a  BBLk 2.583 .778 11.013 1 .001 13.237 2.879 60.857

Imunlkap 1.097 .723 2.299 1 .129 2.995 .725 12.366

KoLs 2.342 .578 16.393 1 .000 10.402 3.348 32.319

didikk .787 .649 1.471 1 .225 2.196 .616 7.832

ISPA .347 .572 .367 1 .545 1.414 .461 4.344

Diare .779 .557 1.954 1 .162 2.179 .731 6.494

Lingk .852 .741 1.323 1 .250 2.345 .549 10.021

Constant -13.960 3.118 20.044 1 .000 .000

Step 6a  BBLk 2.828 .744 14.435 1 .000 16.905 3.931 72.697

Imunlkap 1.156 .699 2.737 1 .098 3.177 .808 12.496

KoLs 2.299 .552 17.319 1 .000 9.960 3.374 29.402

Constant -10.255 2.315 19.617 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: BBLk, Imunlkap, KoLs, didikk, ISPA, Diare, Lingk.

Variables not in the Equation 

Score df Sig.

Step 6a  Variables didikk 1.859 1 .173

ISPA .491 1 .483

Diare 1.680 1 .195

Lingk 1.991 1 .158

Overall Statistics 5.325 4 .256

a. Variable(s) removed on step 5: Lingk.

Step Summarya,

 

Step

Improvement ModelCorrect Class

% VariableChi-square df Sig. Chi-square df Sig.

2 -.369 1 .544 57.486 6 .000 81.9% OUT: ISPA

3 -1.526 1 .217 55.961 5 .000 81.9% OUT: didikk

4 -1.698 1 .192 54.262 4 .000 79.0% OUT: Diare

5 -2.013 1 .156 52.250 3 .000 78.1% OUT: Lingk

a. No more variables can be deleted from or added to the current model.

b. End block: 1