bacaan wajib

4
EDITORIAL COMMENT High-Density Lipoproteins From Function to Therapy* Chunyu Zheng, S CD, Masanori Aikawa, MD, PHD Boston, Massachusetts  The substantial residual cardiovascular events present in statin-treated patients provide a challenge to researchers in the cardiovascular eld to develop additional therapeutic approaches. In cardiovascular disease (CVD) epidemiology, few as sociations are as consistent an d enduri ng as the inverse association between high-density lipoprotein cho- lesterol (HDL-C) levels and risk for coronary artery disease (1). Obser vational studie s hav e shown tha t eac h 1- mg/ dl decrease in HDL-C concentration is associated with a 2% to 3% increased risk of CVD (2). This strong inverse relationship has stimulated interest in determining mechanisms and opti- mal management of low levels of HDL-C (3,4 ).  See page 2372 Clinical and pre-clinica l eviden ce has estab lished that lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lev els red uces vascular inammation and act iva tio n and pre ven ts the onset of acute thrombotic compli cat ion s of atherosclerosis (5,6). However, in contrast to observational studies that have consistently identied HDL-C as a potent cardioprotective factor, interventional CVD trials evaluating HDL have so far been discouraging. Phase III trials with torcetrapib and dalcetrapib, a class of drugs that elevate the concentration of large, mature HDL through cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition, were terminated prematurely due to excess adverse events (7) and futility (8).  Another study, AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Interven- tion in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Trig- lyceri des: Impact on Global Healt h Outco mes), which was conducted to validate the benet of raising HDL-C levels thr oug h ext end ed- rel eas e niacin in a gro up of hig h-r isk patients with managed low LDL-C levels, failed to show any incremental clinical benet, although the difference in HDL-C values between the niacin and placebo groups was unexpectedly small, only 5.0 mg/dl ( 9). In addition, recent Mendelian randomization studies in which functional ge- netic var iant s of apo lip opr ote in AI (apoAI), lec ithin- cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), and endothelial lipase apparently exhibited isolated effects on HDL-C level failed to sho w a cau sal rel ationship bet wee n gen etically dete r- mined HDL-C level and predicted CVD risk, even when HDL-C level and risk were strongly related in the back- ground population (10). Should we give up on HDL? Or should we establish a new rationale behind HDL-raising therapy?  The dichotomy of ndings from observational studies and randomized trials emphasizes the complexity of HDL in vascular disease. It is becoming increasin gly evident that the “quality” of HDL matters as much as its “quantity.” The HDL-C blood levels do not necessarily capture the diverse atheroprotective functions of the heterogeneous HDL pop- ulations and may not be a reliable surrogate for causative biological processes through which HDL protects against atherosclerotic plaque development. HDL may exert protective effects against CVD through multiple mechanisms. The most popular view is that HDL eli cit s chol est ero l ef ux fro m cholesterol est er–enric hed macrophage foam cells in atheromata and transfers the excess cholesterol ester to the liver for excretion ( 11), a process termed reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) ( Fig. 1). In addition to removing excess plaque lipids, HDL exhibits anti- inammatory, antithrombotic, and antioxidant effects and imp roves end otheli al fun ction ( 4,11), which could al so contr ibute to reduct ion in athero sclero sis. Accumu latin g evidence suggests that HDL may lose its atheroprotective functions in chronic and inammatory diseases and become dysfunctional (12). HDL may even gain atherogenic agents, as summarized in Figure 2.  For example, the concentration of HDL that contains apoCIII may directly (harmfully) associate with CVD (13). ApoCIII has proinammatory, proatherogenic effects on cells that participate in atheroscle- rosis (14). HDL can acquire apoCIII during secretion by the liver or intestine or by transfer from very low-density lipoprotein while in the circulation (15). Low HDL-C level represents a major lipid abnormality and CVD risk in patients with chronic renal disease ( 16).  This is particularly important because lowering LDL-C levels with statins has diminished benets in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (17). In this issue of the Journal , Yamamoto et al. (18)  reported that HDL from patients with ESRD exhibited hallmarks of impaired atheroprotective functions: marke dly reduce d cholest erol ef ux capac ity, atten uated antic hemota ctic abili ty, and increa sed proin amma tory ef- fects. HDL from patients undergoing statin therapy, al- though less proinammatory, did not show improved cho- lester ol ef ux functi on, sugges ting independence among different ath ero pro tect ive fun cti ons of HDL ( 18). This interesting clinical study is consistent with recent reports of HDL proteome and lipidome. HDL from ESRD carries a distinct protein cargo, evidenced by enrichment of acute- *Editorials published in the  Journal of the American College of Cardiology  reect the  views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of  JACC  or the  American College of Cardiology. From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Both authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.  Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 60, No. 23, 2012 © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.999

Upload: aditya-nuraminudin-aziz

Post on 02-Jun-2018

246 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: bacaan wajib

8/10/2019 bacaan wajib

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bacaan-wajib 1/4

EDITORIAL COMMENT

High-Density Lipoproteins

From Function to Therapy*

Chunyu Zheng, SCD, Masanori Aikawa, MD, PHD

Boston, Massachusetts 

 The substantial residual cardiovascular events present instatin-treated patients provide a challenge to researchers inthe cardiovascular field to develop additional therapeuticapproaches. In cardiovascular disease (CVD) epidemiology,

few associations are as consistent and enduring as theinverse association between high-density lipoprotein cho-lesterol (HDL-C) levels and risk for coronary artery disease(1). Observational studies have shown that each 1-mg/dldecrease in HDL-C concentration is associated with a 2% to3% increased risk of CVD (2). This strong inverse relationshiphas stimulated interest in determining mechanisms and opti-mal management of low levels of HDL-C (3,4).

 See page 2372

Clinical and pre-clinical evidence has established that

lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)levels reduces vascular inflammation and activation andprevents the onset of acute thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis (5,6). However, in contrast to observationalstudies that have consistently identified HDL-C as a potentcardioprotective factor, interventional CVD trials evaluatingHDL have so far been discouraging. Phase III trials withtorcetrapib and dalcetrapib, a class of drugs that elevate theconcentration of large, mature HDL through cholesterylester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition, were terminatedprematurely due to excess adverse events (7) and futility (8). Another study, AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Interven-

tion in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Trig-lycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes), which wasconducted to validate the benefit of raising HDL-C levelsthrough extended-release niacin in a group of high-risk patients with managed low LDL-C levels, failed to show any incremental clinical benefit, although the difference inHDL-C values between the niacin and placebo groups wasunexpectedly small, only 5.0 mg/dl (9). In addition, recent

Mendelian randomization studies in which functional ge-netic variants of apolipoprotein AI (apoAI), lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), and endothelial lipaseapparently exhibited isolated effects on HDL-C level failedto show a causal relationship between genetically deter-

mined HDL-C level and predicted CVD risk, even whenHDL-C level and risk were strongly related in the back-ground population (10). Should we give up on HDL? Orshould we establish a new rationale behind HDL-raisingtherapy?

 The dichotomy of findings from observational studiesand randomized trials emphasizes the complexity of HDLin vascular disease. It is becoming increasingly evident thatthe “quality” of HDL matters as much as its “quantity.” TheHDL-C blood levels do not necessarily capture the diverseatheroprotective functions of the heterogeneous HDL pop-ulations and may not be a reliable surrogate for causative

biological processes through which HDL protects againstatherosclerotic plaque development.

HDL may exert protective effects against CVD throughmultiple mechanisms. The most popular view is that HDLelicits cholesterol efflux from cholesterol ester–enrichedmacrophage foam cells in atheromata and transfers the excesscholesterol ester to the liver for excretion (11), a process termedreverse cholesterol transport (RCT) (Fig. 1). In addition toremoving excess plaque lipids, HDL exhibits anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and antioxidant effects andimproves endothelial function (4,11), which could alsocontribute to reduction in atherosclerosis. Accumulating

evidence suggests that HDL may lose its atheroprotectivefunctions in chronic and inflammatory diseases and becomedysfunctional (12). HDL may even gain atherogenic agents,as summarized in Figure 2. For example, the concentrationof HDL that contains apoCIII may directly (harmfully)associate with CVD (13). ApoCIII has proinflammatory,proatherogenic effects on cells that participate in atheroscle-rosis (14). HDL can acquire apoCIII during secretion by the liver or intestine or by transfer from very low-density lipoprotein while in the circulation (15).

Low HDL-C level represents a major lipid abnormality and CVD risk in patients with chronic renal disease (16).

 This is particularly important because lowering LDL-Clevels with statins has diminished benefits in end-stage renaldisease (ESRD) (17). In this issue of the Journal , Yamamotoet al. (18)   reported that HDL from patients with ESRDexhibited hallmarks of impaired atheroprotective functions:markedly reduced cholesterol efflux capacity, attenuatedantichemotactic ability, and increased proinflammatory ef-fects. HDL from patients undergoing statin therapy, al-though less proinflammatory, did not show improved cho-lesterol efflux function, suggesting independence amongdifferent atheroprotective functions of HDL (18). Thisinteresting clinical study is consistent with recent reports of 

HDL proteome and lipidome. HDL from ESRD carries adistinct protein cargo, evidenced by enrichment of acute-

*Editorials published in the  Journal of the American College of Cardiology   reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of   JACC   or the American College of Cardiology.

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Both authors have reported thatthey have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

 Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 60, No. 23, 2012© 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.999

Page 2: bacaan wajib

8/10/2019 bacaan wajib

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bacaan-wajib 2/4

phase protein serum amyloid A1, lipoprotein-associatedphospholipase A2, and apoCIII (19).

Functionality studies like these are crucial for developingeffective HDL therapeutics to prevent/treat CVD. It isapparent that not all HDL particles are created equal, andno doubt the “method” of raising HDL levels has everythingto do with any clinical benefit conferred. HDL functionality 

assessment, in addition to raising HDL particle concentra-tion (or HDL-C), would be a crucial part of any future drugdevelopment. Various functional aspects of HDL, includingthe following issues, deserve attention.

1. CETP inhibition remains a viable option to raiseHDL-C and lower LDL-C levels to reduce CVD risk.Studies to date have not supported an adverse effect of CETP inhibition on HDL function. The hypotheticalbenefit on atherosclerosis was offset by a molecule-specific off-target toxicity effect of torcetrapib (20), which was not shared by other CETP inhibitors, suchas anacetrapib and evacetrapib (21,22). On the other

hand, dalcetrapib, a partial CETP inhibitor, in con-trast to other CETP inhibitors, less effectively reduces

CETP activity and thus has a moderate effect onraising HDL-C levels and a negligible impact onlowering LDL-C levels. Therefore, outcome trials with anacetrapib and evacetrapib, with sound safety profiles and effective lipid modification, have thepotential to provide conclusive answers for the conceptof reducing the number of CVD events by CETP

inhibition (23). In the meantime, it is crucial to study the functionality of the raised HDL levels treated withCETP inhibitors.

2. ApoAI-based therapies. Infusion of reconstituted ordelipidated HDL dramatically raised plasma levels of pre-HDL, raised levels of lipid-poor cholesterol effluxacceptors and ligands for ATP-binding cassette trans-porter A1, and was shown to be able to cause a rapidreduction in atheroma burden (24). Additionally, infu-sion of lipid-poor HDL was also anti-inflammatory (25). Acute HDL therapy may be effective to prevent recur-rent events in high-risk patients. In addition to admin-

istration of HDL or apoAI mimetic peptides for short-term therapy, raising endogenous apoAI levels was

Figure 1   Overview of Reverse Cholesterol Transport and HDL Metabolism

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) is first secreted by the liver and small intestine as lipid-poor pre-HDL, which interacts with ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABC-A1)

at peripheral tissues, such as macrophage foam cells in the atherosclerotic plaque, to initiate the reverse cholesterol transport process. Plasma-free cholesterol effluxed

from cells and incorporated into pre-HDL is esterified by the enzyme lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) with the formation of spherical HDL. Cholesterol ester

in plasma HDL derived from atherosclerotic plaque and other peripheral tissues is transported to the liver by either direct delivery through scavenger receptor BI

(SR-BI)–mediated selective cholesterol ester offloading or cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)–mediated exchange of HDL cholesterol ester for apolipoprotein B

(apoB) lipoprotein-bound triglyceride (TG) and then low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDL-R)–mediated uptake of the apoB lipoproteins. Current drug developmentfocuses on CETP inhibition, which blocks the exchange of cholesterol esters for triglyceride between HDL and apoB lipoproteins. CETP raises HDL-cholesterol (C) levels

primarily through expanding the population of mature, large HDL. Other potential interventions under clinical evaluation include administration of HDL or apoAI mimetic

peptide, inducers of endogenous apoAI synthesis, LCAT inducers, ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 activators, and selective liver X receptor agonists.

2381JACC Vol. 60, No. 23, 2012   Zheng and Aikawa

December 11, 2012:2380–3   High-Density Lipoproteins

Page 3: bacaan wajib

8/10/2019 bacaan wajib

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bacaan-wajib 3/4

shown to increase pre-HDL levels and enhance RCTand may be suitable for chronic use (26).

3. Identification of HDL components that directly affect itsatheroprotective functions. In addition to apoAI andapoAII, HDL carries more than 30 other proteins (19),and some of them are involved in lipid metabolism and vascular inflammation, including apoCIII, apoLI, andparaoxonase 1. These HDL modulators may be potentialtargets for drug development. They may also be used asbiomarkers to gauge HDL functionality.

4. RCT quantification and metrics of HDL “quality.” There is an urgent need for effective investigational and

clinical tools that measure HDL quality as well asquantity to guide drug development and evaluationthrough pre-clinical and early clinical phases beforeembarking on expensive large-scale CVD outcome trials.It was recently reported that the cholesterol efflux capac-ity of HDL, calculated from ex vivo cultured macro-phages, has a strong inverse association with regressionof coronary artery disease independent of plasmaHDL-C levels in a CVD imaging trial (27). Severallaboratories are also developing methods for quantifyingRCT in humans using stable isotopes. In addition toRCT, similarly principled metrics (28), with their anti-

inflammatory, antithrombotic, and antioxidant functionsmeasured, together with parameters of HDL quantity 

(i.e., HDL particle number), will allow for global assess-ment of HDL’s atheroprotective functions.

In summary, low levels of HDL-C are associated withincreased cardiovascular risk, even among patients withaggressive statin regimens, which leads to the recommen-dation of raising HDL levels as a rational target. However,it is becoming increasingly apparent that not all HDLparticles are created equal and that the “quality” of HDLmatters as much as its “quantity.” Future research shouldexplore the most efficient methods of improving HDLquality, measuring functions of raised HDL levels by new therapies, as well as designing metrics of HDL multifaceted

atheroprotective functions.

Reprint requests and correspondence:  Dr. Masanori Aikawa,Center for Excellence in Vascular Biology, Brigham and Women’sHospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur,NRB7, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail:   [email protected].

REFERENCES

1. Boden WE. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as an independent

risk factor in cardiovascular disease: assessing the data from Framing-ham to the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:19L–22L.

Figure 2   Functional Versus Dysfunctional HDL

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) can become dysfunctional after exposure to an inflammatory environment and under certain chronic diseases. Colored circles in the illus-

tration represent markers of functional or dysfunctional HDL. The loss or modification of HDL-bound enzymes and proteins such as apolipoprotein AI (apoAI), apoE, para-

oxonase 1 (PON1), and acetylhydrolase (AH) reduces HDL cholesterol efflux capacity and attenuates its anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic functions. On the other

hand, addition of proinflammatory and prothrombotic proteins such as apoCIII, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) also

contributes to formation of dysfunctional HDL. Lifestyle and pharmaceutical intervention may restore or even enhance HDL function, with or without affecting total HDL

cholesterol or HDL particle count in the blood.

2382 Zheng and Aikawa   JACC Vol. 60, No. 23, 2012

High-Density Lipoproteins   December 11, 2012:2380–3

Page 4: bacaan wajib

8/10/2019 bacaan wajib

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bacaan-wajib 4/4

2. Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC, Kannel WB, Dawber TR.High density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heartdisease. The Framingham Study. Am J Med 1977;62:707–14.

3. Duffy D, Rader DJ. Emerging therapies targeting high-density lipo-protein metabolism and reverse cholesterol transport. Circulation2006;113:1140–50.

4. Brewer HB Jr. Clinical review: the evolving role of HDL in thetreatment of high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease. J Clin

Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:1246–57.5. Libby P, Aikawa M. Stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques: new 

mechanisms and clinical targets. Nat Med 2002;8:1257–62.6. Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, et al. The effects of lowering

LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vasculardisease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.Lancet 2012;380:581–90.

7. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib inpatients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2109–22.

8. Roche Provides Update on Phase   III Study of Dalcetrapib. RocheGlobal Website. Available at:   http://www.roche.com/media/media_releases/med-cor-2012-05-07.htm.  Accessed September 28, 2012.

9. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, et al. Niacin in patients withlow HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl

 J Med 2011;365:2255–67.

10. Voight BF, Peloso GM, Orho-Melander M, et al. Plasma HDLcholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a Mendelian randomi-sation study. Lancet 2012;380:572–80.

11. Tall AR, Yvan-Charvet L, Terasaka N, Pagler T, Wang N. HDL, ABC transporters, and cholesterol efflux: implications for the treat-ment of atherosclerosis. Cell Metab 2008;7:365–75.

12. Navab M, Reddy ST, Van Lenten BJ, Anantharamaiah GM, Fogel-man AM. The role of dysfunctional HDL in atherosclerosis. J LipidRes 2009;50 Suppl:S145–9.

13. Jensen MK, Rimm EB, Furtado JD, Sacks FM. Apolipoprotein C-IIIas a potential modulator of the association between HDL-cholesteroland incident coronary heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2012 April 24[Epub ahead of print].

14. Zheng C, Azcutia V, Aikawa E, et al. Statins suppress apolipoproteinCIII-induced vascular endothelial cell activation and monocyte adhe-sion. Eur Heart J 2012 Aug 26 [Epub ahead of print].

15. Sacks FM, Zheng C, Cohn JS. Complexities of plasma apolipoproteinC-III metabolism. J Lipid Res 2011;52:1067–70.

16. Attman PO, Samuelsson O, Alaupovic P. Lipoprotein metabolismand renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 1993;21:573–92.

17. Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, et al. The effects of lowering LDLcholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronickidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomisedplacebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:2181–92.

18. Yamamoto S, Yancey PG, Ikizler TA, et al. Dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am CollCardiol 2012;60:2372–9.

19. Holzer M, Birner-Gruenberger R, Stojakovic T, et al. Uremia altersHDL composition and function. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1631–41.

20. Hu X, Dietz JD, Xia C, et al. Torcetrapib induces aldosterone andcortisol production by an intracellular calcium-mediated mechanismindependently of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition. Endo-crinology 2009;150:2211–9.

21. Nicholls SJ, Brewer HB, Kastelein JJ, et al. Effects of the CETPinhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination

 with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlledtrial. JAMA 2011;306:2099–109.

22. Cannon CP, Shah S, Dansky HM, et al. Safety of anacetrapib inpatients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med2010;363:2406–15.

23. Hewing B, Fisher EA. Rationale for cholesteryl ester transfer proteininhibition. Curr Opin Lipidol 2012;23:372–6.

24. Nissen SE, Tsunoda T, Tuzcu EM, et al. Effect of recombinant

apoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acutecoronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:2292–300.

25. Dimayuga P, Zhu J, Oguchi S, et al. Reconstituted HDL containinghuman apolipoprotein A-1 reduces VCAM-1 expression and neoin-tima formation following periadventitial cuff-induced carotid injury inapoE null mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;264:465–8.

26. Bailey D, Jahagirdar R, Gordon A, et al. RVX-208: a small moleculethat increases apolipoprotein A-I and high-density lipoprotein cho-lesterol in vitro and in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2580–9.

27. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, et al. Cholesterol effluxcapacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis.N Engl J Med 2011;364:127–35.

28. Jang W, Shim J, Lee DY, Dutta P, Kim JR, Cho KH. Rapid detectionof dysfunctional high-density lipoproteins using isoelectric focusing-

based microfluidic device to diagnose senescence-related disease.Electrophoresis 2011;32:3415–23.

Key Words: atherosclerosis   y HDL   y kidney   y macrophage   y statin.

2383JACC Vol. 60, No. 23, 2012   Zheng and Aikawa

December 11, 2012:2380–3   High-Density Lipoproteins